Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
are we ready to practice Tolerance?Is America ready for it's first Fag President? First Whore president?
women are female.Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
Eh? What about transgender?women are female.Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
only men are expected to abstain and just say no?Eh? What about transgender?women are female.Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
Are you saying modern women must be skanks as a way of mitigating Kamala's skankyness? Weirdonly men are expected to abstain and just say no?Eh? What about transgender?women are female.Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
She would blow Che Guevara’s rotten corpse the Trotskyite whore!you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
Or Joe Hill's. He's been ten years dead.She would blow Che Guevara’s rotten corpse the Trotskyite whore!you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
in modern times, i usually don't take women seriously if they are not doing me or haven't done me.Are you saying modern women must be skanks as a way of mitigating Kamala's skankyness? Weirdonly men are expected to abstain and just say no?Eh? What about transgender?women are female.Eh?How do you not "sleep around" if you are a woman, in modern times?
So?come on slick, you get off on orangemanbad tactics daily in here. how are you any fking different? fk, dude you slammed the man's entire fking family. you have no rights to be offended by anything.Bullshit is all you have. Trump is fascist pig, married thrice and his first wife accused him of raping here and pulling out her hair during the marriage.
I don't see what that has to do with Kamala Harris being a communist slut though. Wasn't that what the thread was about? How she sucked her way to US Senate?
You're a piece of shit.
I haven't called Trump's daughter a slut, a whore or used any vulgar and deplorable language like assholes above have done. You are a liar and despicable.
So?come on slick, you get off on orangemanbad tactics daily in here. how are you any fking different? fk, dude you slammed the man's entire fking family. you have no rights to be offended by anything.Bullshit is all you have. Trump is fascist pig, married thrice and his first wife accused him of raping here and pulling out her hair during the marriage.
I don't see what that has to do with Kamala Harris being a communist slut though. Wasn't that what the thread was about? How she sucked her way to US Senate?
You're a piece of shit.
I haven't called Trump's daughter a slut, a whore or used any vulgar and deplorable language like assholes above have done. You are a liar and despicable.
you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.maybe i am. i'm open to talking about that and seeing if there's a different way i can see or do things. but how i got to be the judge when i don't name call at the drop of a hat is a bit perplexing.
have a great day, man.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
Oh dayum! jc456 got a USMB beotch slap!So?come on slick, you get off on orangemanbad tactics daily in here. how are you any fking different? fk, dude you slammed the man's entire fking family. you have no rights to be offended by anything.I don't see what that has to do with Kamala Harris being a communist slut though. Wasn't that what the thread was about? How she sucked her way to US Senate?
You're a piece of shit.
I haven't called Trump's daughter a slut, a whore or used any vulgar and deplorable language like assholes above have done. You are a liar and despicable.
So you acknowledge being an asshole, a liar and despicable. Good, that's the first step - eleven more to go.
so when do you acknowledge the same?So?come on slick, you get off on orangemanbad tactics daily in here. how are you any fking different? fk, dude you slammed the man's entire fking family. you have no rights to be offended by anything.I don't see what that has to do with Kamala Harris being a communist slut though. Wasn't that what the thread was about? How she sucked her way to US Senate?
You're a piece of shit.
I haven't called Trump's daughter a slut, a whore or used any vulgar and deplorable language like assholes above have done. You are a liar and despicable.
So you acknowledge being an asshole, a liar and despicable. Good, that's the first step - eleven more to go.
unfortunately this is the world we live in. i don't think people care in as much as this is an opportunity for PAYBACK, so they dive in and do to her all the things they get panty-wadded about when done to women on the right. they'll get pissed the left talks smack about sarah sanders then they turn around and talk shit about harris.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?you got to be called judge is based on your constant belligerent technique in here.
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
Unfortunately, the USMB trolls will only half read your comment or won't bother to research just a little about the history of Harris. They'll just post vile lies and negative Hannity and Kellyanne Conway talking points of the week.
But thank you for your comment.
unfortunately this is the world we live in. i don't think people care in as much as this is an opportunity for PAYBACK, so they dive in and do to her all the things they get panty-wadded about when done to women on the right. they'll get pissed the left talks smack about sarah sanders then they turn around and talk shit about harris.you do that.dude, enjoy your belligerent discussions all you want. I will merely continue to point it out to you.should i use your belligerent technique in here?
hell, i'd at least like to have my own.
and i won't bother to say STOP JUDGING ME.
deal?
Harris didn't "sleep with a married man in return for opportunities". She had an ongoing relationship with an a much older man who had been separated from his wife for more than 10 years when that affair started. Harris was already an Assistant District Attorney and already a rising star in the Democratic Party. She was ELECTED District Attorney, and she was ELECTED Attorney General, and she had a remarkable record in both positions.
Neither Brown nor Harris hid the relationship at the time it was ongoing, and there was no sneaking around which is implied with your post, when you say Brown was a "married man". While technically correct, since neither of the Brown's had filed for divorce, you could hardly call him a "married man", since he hadn't co-habited with his wife in more than a decade.
Brown himself had said that he was smitten with her - not just her youth and good looks. Everyone could see she was a person who was dedicated to public life, and for whom the sky was the limit. If Brown had chosen to mentor a rising young male ADA with the same qualifications, we wouldn't be having this discussion. You'd be lauding Brown's choice of such a talented individual instead of castigating her for having had a relationship with him. This wasn't a quid pro quo relationship in that it has done her career more harm than good.
The "favours" he showed her were no different that any smart manager who is mentoring an up and coming individual. If they hadn't been having a personal relationship, his mentoring of her politically is no different than it would be for any mentor relationship. It's not like she wasn't qualified for the positions to which she was appointed, or that she did a bad job. On the contrary, her work was lauded and some of her programs were adopted nation wide.
This issue has come up at every step of the political ladder for Harris, and people have voted for her, and more importantly, re-elected her at every step of the political ladder. Whatever advantages her past relationship with Willie Brown may or may not have given Kamala Harris, she's long surpassed the point where it matters.
Unfortunately, the USMB trolls will only half read your comment or won't bother to research just a little about the history of Harris. They'll just post vile lies and negative Hannity and Kellyanne Conway talking points of the week.
But thank you for your comment.
political payback is driving this and it's so fucking jr high it's pathetic.
if it's wrong when done to "your side' then DO NOT DO IT TO THEIRS.
end of story.
you're not?So?come on slick, you get off on orangemanbad tactics daily in here. how are you any fking different? fk, dude you slammed the man's entire fking family. you have no rights to be offended by anything.I don't see what that has to do with Kamala Harris being a communist slut though. Wasn't that what the thread was about? How she sucked her way to US Senate?
You're a piece of shit.
I haven't called Trump's daughter a slut, a whore or used any vulgar and deplorable language like assholes above have done. You are a liar and despicable.
So you acknowledge being an asshole, a liar and despicable. Good, that's the first step - eleven more to go.