NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Well at least this shows she has a basic grasp of the constitution as marriage isn't part of it at all...whether hetrosexual or homosexual marriage isn't in there.
Why not? Because the constitution isn't there to give us, the people, rights....we get those from our creator and they are unalienable.....the constitution is there to limit the federal governments power.
+1 for the new nominee for understanding this basic aspect.
Why wouldn't marriage be an inalienable right? Being the most basic and fundamental relationship that human beings have.
Maybe....life, liberty, and THE PERSUIT OF HAPPINESS....but like I just told dogbert that was the declaration of indepenance not the constitution.
Since you all feel you are so smart why dont you show where the constitution guarantees MARRIAGE AS A RIGHT TO ANYONE!!!
Go ahead and try.....if you can't find it then you are all wrong.
The document actually says
AMONG THESE, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.
'among these' means that life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness are merely examples of a larger group.
Last edited: