Justice Dept.: Missouri governor can't void federal gun laws

That is an OPINION by the justice department. The constitution specifies NO RESTRICTIONS specifically on gun ownership so wtf are you referring to in the constitution and implying that the right doesn't understand it?
The current administration can not impose restrictions that overrule specifically outlined constitutional rights. I mean they obviously can but that does not make them right or law binding until a court arbitrates the legality of the issue.
Constitution states that States must abide by Federal Law...

Article 6 Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

So Federal Laws trump State laws...

Thanks for playing...
 
Interesting but irrelevant. The federal government relies on local law enforcement to refer immigration violations to them and detain immigration violators until federal LE can respond. Your fellow DemoKKKrats in the "sanctuary cities" derelicted those duties and instructed their officers to ignore the laws.
Interesting but are Officers fined if they report someone to ICE like Missouri is doing?
 
They aren't voiding federal laws, they won't enforce them. There is a difference. And how are the feds gonna force Missouri to enforce federal law?

As if the feds don't ignore sanctuary cities and sanctuary states.
From the OP:
Missouri’s law would subject law enforcement agencies with officers who knowingly enforce any federal laws to a fine of about $50,000 per violating officer.
 
Constitution states that States must abide by Federal Law...

Article 6 Clause 2:
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

So Federal Laws trump State laws...

Thanks for playing...
Biden decrees aren't federal law
 
Sarcasm I assume, hope, etc.?

Obviously, have you ever red my posts before?

It's odd that Mustang isn't the one who you asked that question since he is the one I was mocking because he actually thinks that the bill of rights specifies powers of government
 
The really sad part is this is exactly how the left sees the second, as a power granted to the federal government.

It takes extreme mental gymnastics to get there.

Oh it's not just the second, it's all of them. Who gets free speech, freedom of religion, due process. Republicans get none of those or any other Constitutional right, according to Democrats
 

Forum List

Back
Top