Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course it's illegal (IRCA). But "illegal" doesn't prosecute a case. EVIDENCE DOES. This is why the courts don't prosecute the cases. They don't have the "knowingly" evidence.It's illegal. This is like "show me how we can prosecute theft". You aren't hiring hundreds of illegals for years and not know it.
If you think you do, let's hear it. So far, all you've done here is DODGE this challenge.
Of course it's illegal (IRCA). But "illegal" doesn't prosecute a case. EVIDENCE DOES. This is why the courts don't prosecute the cases. They don't have the "knowingly" evidence.It's illegal. This is like "show me how we can prosecute theft". You aren't hiring hundreds of illegals for years and not know it.
If you think you do, let's hear it. So far, all you've done here is DODGE this challenge.
The reason the courts don't prosecute the cases is because business doesn't want them prosecuted.
Courts don't bring charges. Charges were brought against Wal Mart and it wasn't even their employees.
Of course it's illegal (IRCA). But "illegal" doesn't prosecute a case. EVIDENCE DOES. This is why the courts don't prosecute the cases. They don't have the "knowingly" evidence.It's illegal. This is like "show me how we can prosecute theft". You aren't hiring hundreds of illegals for years and not know it.
If you think you do, let's hear it. So far, all you've done here is DODGE this challenge.
The reason the courts don't prosecute the cases is because business doesn't want them prosecuted.
Courts don't bring charges. Charges were brought against Wal Mart and it wasn't even their employees.
Charges were once brought against Walmart for knowingly hiring subcontractors who used undocumented laborers. Walmart lost. The American people continued to shop at Walmart, signalling that they are comfortable with the practice.
I tried to organize a boycott of Walmart to begin a week before Thanksgiving and extending to the day after Christmas. Half of Walmart's profits are made in that time span for the year. My idea went over like a fart in a whirlwind.
So, not only are current laws patently unconstitutional, the American people don't want to take responsibility for their own destiny OR, in the alternative, they do not believe in enforcing the unconstitutional laws most of you are fretting over on this thread.
Of course it's illegal (IRCA). But "illegal" doesn't prosecute a case. EVIDENCE DOES. This is why the courts don't prosecute the cases. They don't have the "knowingly" evidence.It's illegal. This is like "show me how we can prosecute theft". You aren't hiring hundreds of illegals for years and not know it.
If you think you do, let's hear it. So far, all you've done here is DODGE this challenge.
The reason the courts don't prosecute the cases is because business doesn't want them prosecuted.
Courts don't bring charges. Charges were brought against Wal Mart and it wasn't even their employees.
Charges were once brought against Walmart for knowingly hiring subcontractors who used undocumented laborers. Walmart lost. The American people continued to shop at Walmart, signalling that they are comfortable with the practice.
Fine, so the people should stop the bitching and pretending anything's is going to be done.
I tried to organize a boycott of Walmart to begin a week before Thanksgiving and extending to the day after Christmas. Half of Walmart's profits are made in that time span for the year. My idea went over like a fart in a whirlwind.
So, not only are current laws patently unconstitutional, the American people don't want to take responsibility for their own destiny OR, in the alternative, they do not believe in enforcing the unconstitutional laws most of you are fretting over on this thread.
Why would you protest over "unconstitutional" actions?
You're wrong. Courts have not prosecuted employers because they simply have no evidence (of KNOWINGLY hiring illegal aliens)The reason the courts don't prosecute the cases is because business doesn't want them prosecuted.
Courts don't bring charges. Charges were brought against Wal Mart and it wasn't even their employees.
They just like WalMart's low prices. That's all. They never heard of any charges against Walmart, or anything about illegal aliens.Charges were once brought against Walmart for knowingly hiring subcontractors who used undocumented laborers. Walmart lost. The American people continued to shop at Walmart, signalling that they are comfortable with the practice.
I tried to organize a boycott of Walmart to begin a week before Thanksgiving and extending to the day after Christmas. Half of Walmart's profits are made in that time span for the year. My idea went over like a fart in a whirlwind.
So, not only are current laws patently unconstitutional, the American people don't want to take responsibility for their own destiny OR, in the alternative, they do not believe in enforcing the unconstitutional laws most of you are fretting over on this thread.
aYou're wrong. Courts have not prosecuted employers because they simply have no evidence (of KNOWINGLY hiring illegal aliens)The reason the courts don't prosecute the cases is because business doesn't want them prosecuted.
Courts don't bring charges. Charges were brought against Wal Mart and it wasn't even their employees.
Typical liberal DODGE. Just pretend that what's happening isn't and make up some other reason. This is why you guys aren't getting presidents elected anymore. The people aren't fooled by your BS.
You still are dodging my challenge.
I am having flashback to 1993. I visited an INS office back in the day... I thought our government would want to know and interact... about illegals But hell no, that's the last thing they want to hear about..Now they want to give them Sanctuary without our piddly consent, Which is why we voted for Trump...
Fine, but this in no way changes anything I've said. Like I said, for years (and decades) courts haven't bothered going after illegal employers because of the difficulty of proving the illegal alien hires were done "KNOWINGLY".
Got any facts to indicate this ?They will be back doing whatever they were doing yesterday in a few days.
Fine, but this in no way changes anything I've said. Like I said, for years (and decades) courts haven't bothered going after illegal employers because of the difficulty of proving the illegal alien hires were done "KNOWINGLY".
That's who/what courts are > Prosecutors. Where did you think they practice their trade ? In massage parlors ?Courts never go after anyone. Prosecutors, justice departments, etc do.
That's who/what courts are > Prosecutors. Where did you think they practice their trade ? In massage parlors ?Courts never go after anyone. Prosecutors, justice departments, etc do.
Actually, your link showed just the opposite of that. You showed a good example of how easily illegal aliens can keep employers from knowingly hiring them.I showed where they can bring charges. They do not want to bring charges. Those who provide the money for their campaigns do not want them to bring charges.
Actually, your link showed just the opposite of that. You showed a good example of how easily illegal aliens can keep employers from knowingly hiring them.I showed where they can bring charges. They do not want to bring charges. Those who provide the money for their campaigns do not want them to bring charges.
Asplundt's guilty plea was based on image retention, not the ease or difficulty of prosecution.
