Junk Science Week: Climate models fail reality test

Discussion in 'Environment' started by IanC, Jun 14, 2012.

  1. IanC
    Offline

    IanC Gold Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2009
    Messages:
    9,365
    Thanks Received:
    1,089
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,550
    Junk Science Week: Climate models fail reality test | FP Comment | Financial Post

    I have read about random walks before but I did not realize that the HadCRU data is a near perfect random walk with a Hurst Exponent only slightly showing a small regression to the mean. (0.475 compared to a perfect 0500)
     
  2. westwall
    Offline

    westwall USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    43,180
    Thanks Received:
    8,538
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    Nevada
    Ratings:
    +22,972
    I posted the same story before i found yours! Very interesting and yet another nail in the coffin of AGW science which is almost wholly based on these things.
     
  3. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    Tis what happens when you rely on straight line projections and predetermined desired outcomes.
     
  4. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    32,334
    Thanks Received:
    5,052
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +15,235
    But but but --- these tests were done against REGIONAL DATA!!! That's not fair.. THat single "Global Mean Surface Temperature" number is supposed to simplify policy making.. Not project the temperature in Buffalo, NY or Vladisvostok...

    U need to find a region on earth that has AVERAGE temperatures.. Then the models are incredibly accurate I bet...

    You guys are always stretching the truth...
     
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2012
  5. flacaltenn
    Offline

    flacaltenn USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    32,334
    Thanks Received:
    5,052
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Location:
    Hillbilly Hollywood, Tenn
    Ratings:
    +15,235
    It was sarcasm guys.. Really it was.. Didn't mean to kill the joy...

    Here have a smiley-face... :razz:
     
  6. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    I smirked.
     
  7. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    29,149
    Thanks Received:
    4,658
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +12,537
    We know for a fact that real life computer models cannot determine the track of an imminent Atlantic hurricane or storm. The Weather Channel gives us three or four or ten possible tracks depending on minute data that is fed into the computer. How many times do we have to see evidence of bad data fed into computers to achieve a desired result? The theory of Man-Made-Global-Warming is fiction designed for several purposes including left wing political agendas, lavish federal funding for bogus "research", and international extortion schemes aimed at the US.
     
  8. rdean
    Online

    rdean Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Why don't we see any "Republican" computer models or Republican "science"?


    Just kidding.​

    :alcoholic:
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,219
    Thanks Received:
    6,101
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,769
    Retard alert. the board retard has infected this thread, ignore him as best you can, just remember in Rdean's case he is mentally unstable when it comes to facts and reality.
     
  10. Big Fitz
    Offline

    Big Fitz User Quit *****

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2009
    Messages:
    16,917
    Thanks Received:
    2,473
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,475
    The idea that the scientific method has a political position went out with Soviet Biology. Now we just use this silly thing called objective fact. You know, the stuff that is repeatable and disregards political party?
     

Share This Page