Judge tosses out trump suit against NY Times

[JimH52]

Judge Tosses Trump’s Lawsuit Against NY Times, Orders Him to Pay Legal Fees

Trump sued the paper, along with his niece Mary, alleging an “insidious plot” to grab his tax records and publish them in a Pulitzer-winning report.

www.thedailybeast.com

And he must pay all attorney fees and expenses. I think trump is setting some record for Losing?

 

[MarathonMike]

Funny how that works when the Democrats are in control of the entire DOJ. You keep pretending that we have a true justice system in America. Wake up Jim, we don't.

 

[toobfreak]

The twice-impeached former president’s claims against the defendants “fail as a matter of constitutional law,” New York Supreme Court Justice Robert R. Reed wrote in his ruling filed on Wednesday afternoon

More lies by another incredible unhinged leftwing rag, claiming that the judge actually referred to President Trump as "The twice-impeached former president."

Sure.

 

[Magnus]

Funny how that works when the Democrats are in control of the entire DOJ. You keep pretending that we have a true justice system in America. Wake up Jim, we don't.

A NY Judge is under the DOJ, now? LOL.

 

[JimH52]

A NY Judge is under the DOJ, now? LOL.

MAGA ain't so smart...

 

[Harry Dresden]

Funny how that works when the Democrats are in control of the entire DOJ. You keep pretending that we have a true justice system in America. Wake up Jim, we don't.

you are asking jimmy to wake up?.....you would have to pull his head out of the democrats collective asses first.....and then take away his trumpy doll...

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

More lies by another incredible unhinged leftwing rag, claiming that the judge actually referred to President Trump as "The twice-impeached former president."

Sure.

Article does not claim such a thing at all. Describes Trump, correctly, as "The twice-impeached former president." then gives the quote from the ruling..in quotation marks..so we all can know that it is directly attributed.
Read much?

The twice-impeached former president’s claims against the defendants “fail as a matter of constitutional law,” New York Supreme Court Justice Robert R. Reed wrote in his ruling filed on Wednesday afternoon, deeming the paper’s newsgathering as being at “the very core of protected First Amendment activity.”

 

[toobfreak]

Article does not claim such a thing at all. Describes Trump, correctly, as "The twice-impeached former president."

WRONG, Floogle, it implies that the JUDGE called Trump twice impeached when Trump was twice charged with impeachment and both times it was struck down and laughed out of the building.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

WRONG, Floogle, it implies that the JUDGE called Trump twice impeached when Trump was twice charged with impeachment and both times it was struck down and laughed out of the building.

It implies nothing of the sort..it is a descriptive lead..however, maybe in that cavernous hole you call a brain you perceive implication..but not to any sane person~

 

[toobfreak]

It implies nothing of the sort..it is a descriptive lead..however, maybe in that cavernous hole you call a brain you perceive implication..but not to any sane person~

The article is wrong and dishonest, misleading and bullshit, just like you.