Judge Rules High School Girls MUST Shower With Boys, says Girls Have No Right To Privacy

[theHawk]

So what happens when that transgender student uses the boys shower?

It gets wet.

 

[Polishprince]

. There is no science behind it

Depends on whether you consider perversion to be a "science". If you call it "sexology" instead of "perversion" or "alternative sex practices", does that make a diff?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

. There is no science behind it

Depends on whether you consider perversion to be a "science". If you call it "sexology" instead of "perversion" or "alternative sex practices", does that make a diff?

Leftists love word play, now they want to call an unborn baby's heartbeat embryontic pulsating.

Effin loons

 

[Stormy Daniels]

This is not current events, as the lawsuit was dropped two months ago.

Parents abruptly drop lawsuit over transgender student locker room access at suburban school district

 

[Polishprince]

This is not current events, as the lawsuit was dropped two months ago.

Parents abruptly drop lawsuit over transgender student locker room access at suburban school district

The whole topic of She-Males prancing around in the nation's Ladies' Rooms is a current event however. A topic of critical importance that will be considered in next year's election. America was conceived and dedicated with the idea of separate locker rooms for the sexes.

Now we are engaged in a great national debate, testing whether that nation or any nation so conceived and dedicated, can long endure.

 

[Likkmee]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcmustdie.com ...

I think it's a grand idea. Maybe add some techniques too. the whacks off wont be an issue in a shower !

 

[Polishprince]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcmustdie.com ...

Does this case have any relevance in our nation's prisons? Do male convicts have the constitutional right to shower with females prisoners? What was the intent of the founding fathers on this issue?

 

[Picaro]

This is not current events, as the lawsuit was dropped two months ago.

Parents abruptly drop lawsuit over transgender student locker room access at suburban school district

Mostly due to money issues. Faggots get a lot of financial support from assorted Democrats and deviant gangs.

 

[Polishprince]

This is not current events, as the lawsuit was dropped two months ago.

Parents abruptly drop lawsuit over transgender student locker room access at suburban school district

Mostly due to money issues. Faggots get a lot of financial support from assorted Democrats and deviant gangs.

I think you pinpointed it right there.

Its about the money.

Back in the day, homosexuality was not glorified to anywhere near the degree it is today. After gay activists started really paying off the leftist politicians, the politicians are obligated to honor the LGBTQQAAI+ community's ever whim.

 

[22lcidw]

So what happens when that transgender student uses the boys shower?

The kid will be beat up.

You don’t think that will happen in the girls shower?

Sure but when your fellows sisters do it it's not so bad.

This should be a lesson to Hetero males thinking about getting married and having children. Fellas you are at the bottom of the totem pole. Think long and hard before you make that decision. Eventually either we will come to our senses and increase Hetero marriages by free choice or become a totalitarian state with a dictator promoting Hetero marriages. Being cruel to gays and empowered gays promoting massive expansion of different ways of living are two different things. Kids can be nasty to each other as it is.

 

[Flash]

So do the girls shower separately when it is just females? Or do they demand privacy from other vaginas in the room?

You libtards are causing your own demise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Liberals can't help themselves from going bat shit crazy.

 

[Billy_Bob]

This is what 'diversity' gets you. Remember that.

When I first heard about a local school district having a big dispute about the bathroom facilities for She-Male students, my initial reaction was they should deal with that when the problem presents itself. The huge high school only has 1200 students, the chances seemed pretty slim that any of the boys would choose to be a chick-with-dick at such a young age. Adolescence is supposed to be about fitting in.

Now its all the rage, high schools have all sorts of lezzie clubs, she-male brotherhoods, boys who proudly call themselves "homos". This country has really gone downhill.

This is all aimed at killing organized religion, a key premise of the socialist destruction of our civilization. Once you have dehumanized humans you can kill them for the good of the group, at will. This is aimed at making the religious do what the government tells them, effectively killing the first amendment prohibiting such laws. The Roman Empire was destroyed by this same creep of acceptance of destructive and immoral behaviors. It tore them apart from within. Sad that we know history and choose to repeat it because some idiots think they can try it again and gain a different result.

 

[Billy_Bob]

So what happens when that transgender student uses the boys shower?

The kid will be beat up.

You don’t think that will happen in the girls shower?

Sure but when your fellows sisters do it it's not so bad.

This should be a lesson to Hetero males thinking about getting married and having children. Fellas you are at the bottom of the totem pole. Think long and hard before you make that decision. Eventually either we will come to our senses and increase Hetero marriages by free choice or become a totalitarian state with a dictator promoting Hetero marriages. Being cruel to gays and empowered gays promoting massive expansion of different ways of living are two different things. Kids can be nasty to each other as it is.

The immoral and bigoted stance of the Democrats... And you say your the party of acceptance yet you force your sick views on others... LIARS..

 

[Moonglow]

So do the girls shower separately when it is just females? Or do they demand privacy from other vaginas in the room?

You libtards are causing your own demise


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Liberals can't help themselves from going bat shit crazy.

No one can...That is why it is called a disease.

 

[Billy_Bob]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcmustdie.com ...

Democrat males exploit women at will.........and the democrat women keep supporting this predatory behavior.....

I find it rather interesting that the party who says they are for women are the ones actively destroying them and making them second class citizens..

 

[Billy_Bob]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcmustdie.com ...

Does this case have any relevance in our nation's prisons? Do male convicts have the constitutional right to shower with females prisoners? What was the intent of the founding fathers on this issue?

Actually they are separated to to stop rapes and other crimes.... But hey lets do it in schools... Fucking idiots...

 

[Third Party]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more at pcmustdie.com ...

What a great time to be alive!

 

[Magnificat]

Can't go much further than that in high school....except some judge might say if both parties agree they can have full blown sex in the showers and have all their friends join in!.....Proving once again that the inmates run the asylum!..
Waiting to see the UPROAR with some Muslim girls!!!

------------
A federal court permitted a lawsuit to proceed against an Illinois school district that allows high school boys to use girls’ locker rooms, restrooms and showers in order to accommodate transgender students.

But girls who don’t want to be seen naked by boys got bad news, College Fix reports. The judge ruled that they have no right to “visual bodily privacy” if the government says so.

Dozens of families sued the Chicago-area Township High School District 211 three years ago due to its policy letting students as young as 14 choose to use the locker rooms of the opposite sex.

“All the students must use the restroom with the knowledge that someone of the opposite sex is present or could walk in at any time,” their lawyers at the Alliance Defending Freedom wrote in a background document on the case.

It makes the stakes clear: “If our government is powerful enough to command innocent school children to disrobe in the presence of opposite-sex classmates, then there will be little it will not be powerful enough to do.”

The plaintiffs, organized as Students and Parents for Privacy, are composed of 52 families made up of 136 parents and current and future students who are “being forced to use the restroom, or change clothes, with someone of the opposite sex in the room.”

U.S. District Judge Jorge Alonso is letting Title IX and religious freedom claims go forward while throwing out other claims.

(Excerpt) Read more ..

It would be interesting to see the reaction if all of the students arrived at school naked. I mean, what could they do about it? Naked in the shower. Naked in class. Is there any difference?

 

[Magnificat]

We really need to start hanging some judges.

 

[WEATHER53]

Idiotic idea should be the trump here