Judge Napolitano on ‘Fast and Furious’ Documents: Executive Privilege Only Applies If

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Lovebears65, Jun 20, 2012.

  1. Lovebears65
    Offline

    Lovebears65 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    6,295
    Thanks Received:
    1,479
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +2,111
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    152,901
    Thanks Received:
    13,755
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +42,206
    Napolitano has an opinion, and it is in error.
     
  3. peach174
    Offline

    peach174 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    22,886
    Thanks Received:
    4,830
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    S.E. AZ
    Ratings:
    +9,845
    The Judge doesn't know that law?
    Yes he does, that is why he was a Judge.
    He read the law and that is not an opinion.
    You can only do what the President did this morning only if he was personally involved.
    Holder stated to congress that the President was not involved.
     
  4. asaratis
    Offline

    asaratis Uppity Senior Citizen Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,626
    Thanks Received:
    2,744
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Stockbridge
    Ratings:
    +5,033
    Therefore Eric Holder has lied to Congress and should be indicted for perjury...and kicked out of his cushy job as the highest lawyer in the land.

    No it is not. Executive privilege applies to communications with the White House (the cool Prez we have)
     
  5. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good!

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Thanks Received:
    5,259
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,148
    executive privilege legal definition of executive privilege. executive privilege synonyms by the Free Online Law Dictionary.
    Napolitano appears to be correct.
     
  6. eflatminor
    Offline

    eflatminor Classical Liberal

    Joined:
    May 24, 2011
    Messages:
    10,213
    Thanks Received:
    1,579
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,111
    Exactly.

    This whole thing stinks. Whatever happens, I'm sure happy about our most transparent administration ever...:eek:

    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fJNOHnFZnWQ]Obama..."Mr Transparency" - YouTube[/ame]
     
  7. Sokar
    Offline

    Sokar Yippiekiyay, mother****er

    Joined:
    May 24, 2012
    Messages:
    171
    Thanks Received:
    77
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Hell
    Ratings:
    +77
    I'm trying to understand why Obama is suddenly sticking his neck out to protect Holder after all these years of tossing people under the bus.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  8. DiamondDave
    Offline

    DiamondDave Army Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    18,169
    Thanks Received:
    2,810
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Ratings:
    +2,818
    We knew that she was probably correct right at the moment JakeyFakey disagreed
     
  9. Truthmatters
    Offline

    Truthmatters BANNED

    Joined:
    May 10, 2007
    Messages:
    80,182
    Thanks Received:
    2,224
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +2,239
    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fOaCemmsnNk]Judge Napolitano.How to get fired in under 5 mins - YouTube[/ame]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. Darkwind
    Offline

    Darkwind Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Messages:
    17,292
    Thanks Received:
    3,212
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +7,274
    Actually, EP can be invoked for a white house aid or adviser. It is possible that the President isn't involved. However, it does mean that the White House has been involved.

    The stakes just went up big time.
     

Share This Page