Judge Jeanine Is Back and Fox Is Full Of It

[toobfreak]

This is not religion, this is not Middle East. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.

Recently Fox News suspended Jeanine Pirro for try to start a debate on the subject and forced her to say that being Muslim doesn’t mean a person doesn’t support the Constitution. Well, I'm sorry Fox, have you gone out and done a survey? You are not much of a Muslim if you don't believe in and support Sharia Law. A study of nations that support Sharia Law in full or part, it shows that where Sharia Law is partially supported, the OVERWHELMING number of Muslims want it in toto.

For instance, 91% of muslims in Iraq want Sharia law to handle everything.

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro back on-air after remarks on Muslim politician

The interviewees were striking in their honesty. There was no playing of the bigotry card, with many of them readily acknowledging that being Muslim in the United States was “easy” and that persecution and prejudice weren’t problems. But they also proudly proclaimed their own biases: Sharia should be preeminent, criticizing Mohammed is a crime, and using violence against those who slander him is legitimate.

One interviewee was an outlier. Appearing to be a middle-aged businessman smartly decked out in a sport jacket and tie, he said, “This is a free country; that’s the beaut[y] of it. We love America; I mean, it’s a great country — freedom of speech, freedom of choice, of religion, so we don’t have any issues.” Yet others certainly did have issues. As WND.com related:

One young man with dark sunglasses and a big smile, followed by another in a plaid dress shirt, and another with long hair stuffed under a Brooklyn Nets baseball [basketball] cap, all said they would prefer to live under Islamic law rather than American law.

“I’m a Muslim. I prefer Shariah law,” the man in the dress shirt said.

“Shariah law, yes,” said another.

“Of course, yeah,” said the one in the Nets ... cap.

Asked if most of his friends felt the same way, he responded, “Of course if you’re a Muslim, yeah.”

 

[Billy_Bob]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason they did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

 

[toobfreak]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason the did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

Disney is now Leftist scum and it is reflected in their movies as well. They suck. Walt would be spinning in his grave. Another once hallowed institution ruined by radical socialist agendas.

 

[theHawk]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason the did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

Disney does not own Fox News. They bought all Fox assets except the News.

 

[Billy_Bob]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason the did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

Disney does not own Fox News. They bought all Fox assets except the News.

It was my understanding it all went in the final deal. Do you have a source for this?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

This is not religion, this is not Middle East. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.

Recently Fox News suspended Jeanine Pirro for try to start a debate on the subject and forced her to say that being Muslim doesn’t mean a person doesn’t support the Constitution. Well, I'm sorry Fox, have you gone out and done a survey? You are not much of a Muslim if you don't believe in and support Sharia Law. A study of nations that support Sharia Law in full or part, it shows that where Sharia Law is partially supported, the OVERWHELMING number of Muslims want it in toto.

View attachment 253288

For instance, 91% of muslims in Iraq want Sharia law to handle everything.

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro back on-air after remarks on Muslim politician

The interviewees were striking in their honesty. There was no playing of the bigotry card, with many of them readily acknowledging that being Muslim in the United States was “easy” and that persecution and prejudice weren’t problems. But they also proudly proclaimed their own biases: Sharia should be preeminent, criticizing Mohammed is a crime, and using violence against those who slander him is legitimate.

One interviewee was an outlier. Appearing to be a middle-aged businessman smartly decked out in a sport jacket and tie, he said, “This is a free country; that’s the beaut[y] of it. We love America; I mean, it’s a great country — freedom of speech, freedom of choice, of religion, so we don’t have any issues.” Yet others certainly did have issues. As WND.com related:

One young man with dark sunglasses and a big smile, followed by another in a plaid dress shirt, and another with long hair stuffed under a Brooklyn Nets baseball [basketball] cap, all said they would prefer to live under Islamic law rather than American law.

“I’m a Muslim. I prefer Shariah law,” the man in the dress shirt said.

“Shariah law, yes,” said another.

“Of course, yeah,” said the one in the Nets ... cap.

Asked if most of his friends felt the same way, he responded, “Of course if you’re a Muslim, yeah.”

“Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.”

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

Period.

‘… sharia isn’t even “law” in the sense that we in the West understand it. And most devout Muslims who embrace sharia conceptually don’t think of it as a substitute for civil law. Sharia is not a book of statutes or judicial precedent imposed by a government, and it’s not a set of regulations adjudicated in court.’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e88f9a58bcb3

 

[toobfreak]

This is not religion, this is not Middle East. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.

Recently Fox News suspended Jeanine Pirro for try to start a debate on the subject and forced her to say that being Muslim doesn’t mean a person doesn’t support the Constitution. Well, I'm sorry Fox, have you gone out and done a survey? You are not much of a Muslim if you don't believe in and support Sharia Law. A study of nations that support Sharia Law in full or part, it shows that where Sharia Law is partially supported, the OVERWHELMING number of Muslims want it in toto.

View attachment 253288

For instance, 91% of muslims in Iraq want Sharia law to handle everything.

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro back on-air after remarks on Muslim politician

The interviewees were striking in their honesty. There was no playing of the bigotry card, with many of them readily acknowledging that being Muslim in the United States was “easy” and that persecution and prejudice weren’t problems. But they also proudly proclaimed their own biases: Sharia should be preeminent, criticizing Mohammed is a crime, and using violence against those who slander him is legitimate.

One interviewee was an outlier. Appearing to be a middle-aged businessman smartly decked out in a sport jacket and tie, he said, “This is a free country; that’s the beaut[y] of it. We love America; I mean, it’s a great country — freedom of speech, freedom of choice, of religion, so we don’t have any issues.” Yet others certainly did have issues. As WND.com related:

One young man with dark sunglasses and a big smile, followed by another in a plaid dress shirt, and another with long hair stuffed under a Brooklyn Nets baseball [basketball] cap, all said they would prefer to live under Islamic law rather than American law.

“I’m a Muslim. I prefer Shariah law,” the man in the dress shirt said.

“Shariah law, yes,” said another.

“Of course, yeah,” said the one in the Nets ... cap.

Asked if most of his friends felt the same way, he responded, “Of course if you’re a Muslim, yeah.”

“Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.”

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

Period.

‘… sharia isn’t even “law” in the sense that we in the West understand it. And most devout Muslims who embrace sharia conceptually don’t think of it as a substitute for civil law. Sharia is not a book of statutes or judicial precedent imposed by a government, and it’s not a set of regulations adjudicated in court.’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e88f9a58bcb3

Is that why it is expressly banned by a number of states not to be used in their courts? Suck on this, fat boy:

SHARIA LAW — LIST OF KEY RULES — What Is Sharia Law?

Sharia - Wikipedia

What is Sharia?

Ban on sharia law - Wikipedia

 

[Slyhunter]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason the did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

Disney does not own Fox News. They bought all Fox assets except the News.

One of the old CEO's sons gets the news station.

 

[MarathonMike]

This is not religion, this is not Middle East. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.

Recently Fox News suspended Jeanine Pirro for try to start a debate on the subject and forced her to say that being Muslim doesn’t mean a person doesn’t support the Constitution. Well, I'm sorry Fox, have you gone out and done a survey? You are not much of a Muslim if you don't believe in and support Sharia Law. A study of nations that support Sharia Law in full or part, it shows that where Sharia Law is partially supported, the OVERWHELMING number of Muslims want it in toto.

View attachment 253288

For instance, 91% of muslims in Iraq want Sharia law to handle everything.

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro back on-air after remarks on Muslim politician

The interviewees were striking in their honesty. There was no playing of the bigotry card, with many of them readily acknowledging that being Muslim in the United States was “easy” and that persecution and prejudice weren’t problems. But they also proudly proclaimed their own biases: Sharia should be preeminent, criticizing Mohammed is a crime, and using violence against those who slander him is legitimate.

One interviewee was an outlier. Appearing to be a middle-aged businessman smartly decked out in a sport jacket and tie, he said, “This is a free country; that’s the beaut[y] of it. We love America; I mean, it’s a great country — freedom of speech, freedom of choice, of religion, so we don’t have any issues.” Yet others certainly did have issues. As WND.com related:

One young man with dark sunglasses and a big smile, followed by another in a plaid dress shirt, and another with long hair stuffed under a Brooklyn Nets baseball [basketball] cap, all said they would prefer to live under Islamic law rather than American law.

“I’m a Muslim. I prefer Shariah law,” the man in the dress shirt said.

“Shariah law, yes,” said another.

“Of course, yeah,” said the one in the Nets ... cap.

Asked if most of his friends felt the same way, he responded, “Of course if you’re a Muslim, yeah.”

“Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.”

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

Period.

‘… sharia isn’t even “law” in the sense that we in the West understand it. And most devout Muslims who embrace sharia conceptually don’t think of it as a substitute for civil law. Sharia is not a book of statutes or judicial precedent imposed by a government, and it’s not a set of regulations adjudicated in court.’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e88f9a58bcb3

Yeah right Clayton, that's why EVERY SINGLE TIME Muslims gain a foot hold in a new country, their first order of business is setting up a Sharia Court in their NO GO Muslim zone. You are full of crap.

 

[The Republicans]

Disney is disgusting and, frankly I think that Fox News is doom. You know Every outlets besides newsmax which is a starter so not very much News out of it n


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[bodecea]

This is not religion, this is not Middle East. Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.

Recently Fox News suspended Jeanine Pirro for try to start a debate on the subject and forced her to say that being Muslim doesn’t mean a person doesn’t support the Constitution. Well, I'm sorry Fox, have you gone out and done a survey? You are not much of a Muslim if you don't believe in and support Sharia Law. A study of nations that support Sharia Law in full or part, it shows that where Sharia Law is partially supported, the OVERWHELMING number of Muslims want it in toto.

View attachment 253288

For instance, 91% of muslims in Iraq want Sharia law to handle everything.

Fox’s Jeanine Pirro back on-air after remarks on Muslim politician

The interviewees were striking in their honesty. There was no playing of the bigotry card, with many of them readily acknowledging that being Muslim in the United States was “easy” and that persecution and prejudice weren’t problems. But they also proudly proclaimed their own biases: Sharia should be preeminent, criticizing Mohammed is a crime, and using violence against those who slander him is legitimate.

One interviewee was an outlier. Appearing to be a middle-aged businessman smartly decked out in a sport jacket and tie, he said, “This is a free country; that’s the beaut[y] of it. We love America; I mean, it’s a great country — freedom of speech, freedom of choice, of religion, so we don’t have any issues.” Yet others certainly did have issues. As WND.com related:

One young man with dark sunglasses and a big smile, followed by another in a plaid dress shirt, and another with long hair stuffed under a Brooklyn Nets baseball [basketball] cap, all said they would prefer to live under Islamic law rather than American law.

“I’m a Muslim. I prefer Shariah law,” the man in the dress shirt said.

“Shariah law, yes,” said another.

“Of course, yeah,” said the one in the Nets ... cap.

Asked if most of his friends felt the same way, he responded, “Of course if you’re a Muslim, yeah.”

“Sharia Law is fundamentally incompatible with US Law period. There is no arguing that point, if you operate under Sharia Law you are making US Law null and void.”

This is as ignorant as it is ridiculous and wrong.

Period.

‘… sharia isn’t even “law” in the sense that we in the West understand it. And most devout Muslims who embrace sharia conceptually don’t think of it as a substitute for civil law. Sharia is not a book of statutes or judicial precedent imposed by a government, and it’s not a set of regulations adjudicated in court.’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.e88f9a58bcb3

Sharia Law is a lot like Blue Laws.....those silly laws they have in the Bible Belt. And remember when there used to be mandatory prayer in schools....like sharia law. That stupid county clerk in Kentucky refusing to follow the law about marriage licenses? Sharia law.

 

[theHawk]

FOX, since being bought out by Disney Corp has gone on a left wing slide... Not sure how much longer conservatives will be able to stomach the crap they are trying to force down our throats..

The only reason the did not can the judge is due to her following and her friendship with the President. They are forcing us to accept anti-Christian bias and then force us to shut up when we call it out as unacceptable. FOX needs new owners that are not far left wing bigots.

Disney does not own Fox News. They bought all Fox assets except the News.

It was my understanding it all went in the final deal. Do you have a source for this?

Disney never intended to buy the News and broadcast channels, and the courts would not allow them to acquire the sports channels due to them already owning ESPN.

Those remaining Fox entities were spun off into “Fox Corporation”.

Disney just wanted their movie studio and all the IPs that come with it for their streaming service.

Fox Corporation - Wikipedia

 

[mamooth]

She also appeared on SNL.

 

[ABikerSailor]

Hate to tell you guys, but there are only 3 Muslims in Congress at this time.

There aren't enough Muslims in Congress to switch our form of government to Sharia law. That is something that both the Senate and the House would have to pass, as well as be signed by the president.

So, in short, Sharia law will never become the rule of law for the US. Our form of representative government stops the possibility of that happening.

And yeah, Pirro was just trying to stir shit up, she wasn't asking for a discussion.

 

[Ridgerunner]

And remember when there used to be mandatory prayer in schools

Hey bodecea are you insinuating that there was ever mandatory prayer in schools in the United States? If so please provide valid links for the class... Or are you just blowing smoke out your ass like normal?

 

[ABikerSailor]

And remember when there used to be mandatory prayer in schools

Hey bodecea are you insinuating that there was ever mandatory prayer in schools in the United States? If so please provide valid links for the class... Or are you just blowing smoke out your ass like normal?

Actually, prior to 1962, school prayer was kinda mandatory. It was a couple of decisions made by the supreme court back then that banned the prayer in public schools.

School prayer in the United States - Wikipedia

 

[Ridgerunner]

Actually, prior to 1962, school prayer was kinda mandatory.

Biker we don't always agree on things but I have seen you use logic more than not... "kinda is not a word that goes with mandatory... In the public school system there was never compulsory prayer forced on students... No laws... No rules... forced anyone to pray in the public schools...

 

[ABikerSailor]

Actually, prior to 1962, school prayer was kinda mandatory.

Biker we don't always agree on things but I have seen you use logic more than not... "kinda is not a word that goes with mandatory... In the public school system there was never compulsory prayer forced on students... No laws... No rules... forced anyone to pray in the public schools...

Apparently, you didn't click on the link provided....................

Since 1962, the Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that prayers in public schools are unconstitutional. Social conservatives have been unable to pass a constitutional amendment through Congress that would change that. It is a matter of the government promoting An establishment of religion. The Supreme Court is also ruled that so-called "voluntary" school prayers are also unconstitutional, because they force some students to be outsiders to the main group, and because they subject dissenters to intense peer group pressure. In Lee v. Weisman The Supreme Court held in 1992:


And........................you also missed this.........................

School prayer prior to 1962
In the 18th, 19th and early 20th centuries, it was common practice for public schools to open with an oral prayer or Bible reading. The 19th century debates over public funding for religious schools, and reading the King James Protestant Bible in the public schools was most heated in 1863 and 1876.[4] Partisan activists on the public-school issue believed that exposing the Catholic school children to the King James Bible would loosen their affiliation to the Catholic Church. In response the Catholics repeatedly objected to the distinct Protestant observations performed in the local schools. For instance, in the Edgerton Bible Case (Weiss v. District Board (1890)), the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled in favor of Catholics who objected to the use of the Protestant Bible in public schools. This ruling was based on the state constitution and only applied in Wisconsin. Eventually the Catholics took a large voice and even control in the politics of the major cities. Irish Catholic women – who married late or not at all – began to specialize as teachers in the public schools.[5] The Catholics and some high church groups including German Lutherans, Episcopalians and Jews, set up their own school systems, called parochial schools. Southern Baptists and fundamentalists In the late 20th century began aggressively setting up their own schools, where religion was practiced but no government aid was used. Likewise homeschooling in the late 20th century represented a reaction against compulsory school.[6]

In 1949 Bible reading was a part of routine in the public schools of at least thirty-seven states. In twelve of these states, Bible reading was legally required by state laws; 11 states passed these laws after 1913. In 1960, 42 per cent of school districts nationwide tolerated or required Bible reading, and 50 per cent reported some form of homeroom daily devotional exercise. [7]


A Turning Point: The "Regents' Prayer" and Engel v. Vitale
The media and popular culture often erroneously credit atheist Madalyn Murray O'Hair with removing school prayer from US public schools, when the case against recitation of the Lord's Prayer in Baltimore schools was decided by the Supreme Court in 1963. A more significant case had reached the Supreme Court one year prior, suddenly changing the legal climate for school prayer. In 1955, the New York Board of Regents developed a prayer recommended (but not required) for the school districts under its purview. The prayer was relatively short: "Almighty God, we acknowledge our dependence on Thee, and we beg Thy blessings upon us, our parents, our teachers, and our country."[1][8] The board stated that the prayer would "combat juvenile delinquency and counter the spread of Communism."[8]

Seven years later, Steven I. Engel, a Jew, was upset to see his son’s hands clasped and his head bent in prayer. He told his son that this was “not the way we say prayers.” Engel, a founding member of the New York Civil Liberties Union, brought action along with Daniel Lichtenstein, Monroe Lerner, Lenore Lyons, and Lawrence Roth, all parents of children in the Long Island, New York public school system, against Union Free School District No. 9 for its adoption and subsequent prescription of the so-called "Regent's prayer", arguing that it constituted the state-sponsored establishment of religion in violation of citizens’ First Amendment rights via the Fourteenth Amendment.[9]

Use of the Regent's prayer was initially upheld in both New York State Court and in the New York Court of Appeals, prompting Engels to petition the US Supreme Court in the Engel v. Vitale case in 1962. With its 8–1 vote to make public recitation of the Regents' Prayer in public schools unlawful, the U.S. Supreme Court made its first-ever decision on prayer in public schools. It made its second in 1963—the Abington School District v. Schempp ruling, which made the corporate reading of the Bible and recitation of the Lord's Prayer unlawful in public schools.[10]

Yes, there were times in this country that public school prayer was mandatory.

 

[Ridgerunner]

I stand corrected... I don't like it, but I have to accept it...

 

[ABikerSailor]

I stand corrected... I don't like it, but I have to accept it...

Generally, when someone asks a question like you did, and I know the answer, my post will have a link to answer said question.

Unlike some posters on here, I like to use links so that they can see the information for themselves.