Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
How am I wrong ?another distinction without a differenceThe most notable examples of McCarthyism include the speeches, investigations, and hearings of Senator McCarthy himself; the Hollywood blacklist, associated with hearings conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC); and the various anti-communist activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under Director J. Edgar Hoover. McCarthyism was a widespread social and cultural phenomenon that affected all levels of society and was the source of a great deal of debate and conflict in the United States.
There we go, again. Associating Senator Joe McCarthy with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
There were more Democrats on the HUAC than Republicans.
This is why American socialists are so dangerous. Even when they're blatanly wrong, the demand that the erroneous information be believed.
How am I wrong ?another distinction without a differenceThe most notable examples of McCarthyism include the speeches, investigations, and hearings of Senator McCarthy himself; the Hollywood blacklist, associated with hearings conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC); and the various anti-communist activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under Director J. Edgar Hoover. McCarthyism was a widespread social and cultural phenomenon that affected all levels of society and was the source of a great deal of debate and conflict in the United States.
There we go, again. Associating Senator Joe McCarthy with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
There were more Democrats on the HUAC than Republicans.
This is why American socialists are so dangerous. Even when they're blatanly wrong, the demand that the erroneous information be believed.
McCarthy'sand HUAC's witch hunting epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA.
Even though I know the difference between McCarthy's and HUAC's "investigations" .
It changes nothing .
that does not make me wrong but thanks for playing. they were both investigation the spread of communism in the us.How am I wrong ?another distinction without a differenceThe most notable examples of McCarthyism include the speeches, investigations, and hearings of Senator McCarthy himself; the Hollywood blacklist, associated with hearings conducted by the House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC); and the various anti-communist activities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) under Director J. Edgar Hoover. McCarthyism was a widespread social and cultural phenomenon that affected all levels of society and was the source of a great deal of debate and conflict in the United States.
There we go, again. Associating Senator Joe McCarthy with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
There were more Democrats on the HUAC than Republicans.
This is why American socialists are so dangerous. Even when they're blatanly wrong, the demand that the erroneous information be believed.
McCarthy'sand HUAC's witch hunting epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA.
Even though I know the difference between McCarthy's and HUAC's "investigations" .
It changes nothing .
You're wrong, because you keep trying to associate McCarthy with the HUAC.
Name one person wdho was actually investigated by McCarthy's committee.
that does not make me wrong but thanks for playing. they were both investigation the spread of communism in the us.How am I wrong ?another distinction without a differenceThere we go, again. Associating Senator Joe McCarthy with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
There were more Democrats on the HUAC than Republicans.
This is why American socialists are so dangerous. Even when they're blatanly wrong, the demand that the erroneous information be believed.
McCarthy'sand HUAC's witch hunting epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA.
Even though I know the difference between McCarthy's and HUAC's "investigations" .
It changes nothing .
You're wrong, because you keep trying to associate McCarthy with the HUAC.
Name one person wdho was actually investigated by McCarthy's committee.
as I've said before both "
epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA."
how bout these.
Tydings Committee[edit]
McCarthy himself was taken aback by the massive media response to the Wheeling speech, and he was accused of continually revising both his charges and figures. In Salt Lake City, Utah, a few days later, he cited a figure of 57, and in the Senate on February 20, he claimed 81.[citation needed] During a five-hour speech,[41] McCarthy presented a case-by-case analysis of his 81 "loyalty risks" employed at the State Department. It is widely accepted that most of McCarthy's cases were selected from the so-called "Lee list", a report that had been compiled three years earlier for the House Appropriations Committee. Led by a former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent named Robert E. Lee, the House investigators had reviewed security clearance documents on State Department employees, and had determined that there were "incidents of inefficiencies"[42] in the security reviews of 108 employees. McCarthy hid the source of his list, stating that he had penetrated the "iron curtain" of State Department secrecy with the aid of "some good, loyal Americans in the State Department".[43] In reciting the information from the Lee list cases, McCarthy consistently exaggerated, representing the hearsay of witnesses as facts and converting phrases such as "inclined towards Communism" to "a Communist".[44]
Senator Millard Tydings
In response to McCarthy's charges, the Senate voted unanimously to investigate, and the Tydings Committee hearings were called.[45] This was a subcommittee of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations set up in February 1950 to conduct "a full and complete study and investigation as to whether persons who are disloyal to the United States are, or have been, employed by the Department of State".[46] Many Democrats were incensed at McCarthy's attack on the State Department of a Democratic administration, and had hoped to use the hearings to discredit him. The Democratic chairman of the subcommittee, Senator Millard Tydings, was reported to have said, "Let me have him [McCarthy] for three days in public hearings, and he'll never show his face in the Senate again."[47]
During the hearings, McCarthy moved on from his original unnamed Lee list cases and used the hearings to make charges against nine specific people: Dorothy Kenyon, Esther Brunauer, Haldore Hanson, Gustavo Durán, Owen Lattimore, Harlow Shapley, Frederick Schuman, John S. Service, and Philip Jessup. Some of them no longer worked for the State Department, or never had; all had previously been the subject of charges of varying worth and validity. Owen Lattimore became a particular focus of McCarthy's, who at one point described him as a "top Russian spy". Throughout the hearings, McCarthy employed colorful rhetoric, but produced no substantial evidence, to support his accusations.[citation
that does not make me wrong but thanks for playing. they were both investigation the spread of communism in the us.How am I wrong ?another distinction without a differenceThere we go, again. Associating Senator Joe McCarthy with the House UnAmerican Activities Committee.
There were more Democrats on the HUAC than Republicans.
This is why American socialists are so dangerous. Even when they're blatanly wrong, the demand that the erroneous information be believed.
McCarthy'sand HUAC's witch hunting epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA.
Even though I know the difference between McCarthy's and HUAC's "investigations" .
It changes nothing .
You're wrong, because you keep trying to associate McCarthy with the HUAC.
Name one person wdho was actually investigated by McCarthy's committee.
as I've said before both "
epically failed at its intended purpose.
There was no large scale elimination of communism in the good old USA."
how bout these.
Tydings Committee[edit]
McCarthy himself was taken aback by the massive media response to the Wheeling speech, and he was accused of continually revising both his charges and figures. In Salt Lake City, Utah, a few days later, he cited a figure of 57, and in the Senate on February 20, he claimed 81.[citation needed] During a five-hour speech,[41] McCarthy presented a case-by-case analysis of his 81 "loyalty risks" employed at the State Department. It is widely accepted that most of McCarthy's cases were selected from the so-called "Lee list", a report that had been compiled three years earlier for the House Appropriations Committee. Led by a former Federal Bureau of Investigation agent named Robert E. Lee, the House investigators had reviewed security clearance documents on State Department employees, and had determined that there were "incidents of inefficiencies"[42] in the security reviews of 108 employees. McCarthy hid the source of his list, stating that he had penetrated the "iron curtain" of State Department secrecy with the aid of "some good, loyal Americans in the State Department".[43] In reciting the information from the Lee list cases, McCarthy consistently exaggerated, representing the hearsay of witnesses as facts and converting phrases such as "inclined towards Communism" to "a Communist".[44]
Senator Millard Tydings
In response to McCarthy's charges, the Senate voted unanimously to investigate, and the Tydings Committee hearings were called.[45] This was a subcommittee of the United States Senate Committee on Foreign Relations set up in February 1950 to conduct "a full and complete study and investigation as to whether persons who are disloyal to the United States are, or have been, employed by the Department of State".[46] Many Democrats were incensed at McCarthy's attack on the State Department of a Democratic administration, and had hoped to use the hearings to discredit him. The Democratic chairman of the subcommittee, Senator Millard Tydings, was reported to have said, "Let me have him [McCarthy] for three days in public hearings, and he'll never show his face in the Senate again."[47]
During the hearings, McCarthy moved on from his original unnamed Lee list cases and used the hearings to make charges against nine specific people: Dorothy Kenyon, Esther Brunauer, Haldore Hanson, Gustavo Durán, Owen Lattimore, Harlow Shapley, Frederick Schuman, John S. Service, and Philip Jessup. Some of them no longer worked for the State Department, or never had; all had previously been the subject of charges of varying worth and validity. Owen Lattimore became a particular focus of McCarthy's, who at one point described him as a "top Russian spy". Throughout the hearings, McCarthy employed colorful rhetoric, but produced no substantial evidence, to support his accusations.[citation
Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
Damn funny Franky!Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
the pumpkin papers +Project Verona would appear to be failures also .nice trivia though .Damn funny Franky!Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
The Kulaks! the Jews! The Capitalists! The 1% The Republican Governor! Capitalism!!
the pumpkin papers +Project Verona would appear to be failures also .nice trivia though .Damn funny Franky!Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
The Kulaks! the Jews! The Capitalists! The 1% The Republican Governor! Capitalism!!
classic false accusation ...they did nothing to stop or even slow down communism in the USthe pumpkin papers +Project Verona would appear to be failures also .nice trivia though .Damn funny Franky!Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
The Kulaks! the Jews! The Capitalists! The 1% The Republican Governor! Capitalism!!
Since you never read either, I'm not surprised you "think" that
What"right" track would that be?McCarthy was on the right track but he was wasting his time with the communist party.
McCarthy was trying to define The Community.English not your first language?What"right" track would that be?McCarthy was on the right track but he was wasting his time with the communist party.
Huh?
classic false accusation ...they did nothing to stop or even slow down communism in the USthe pumpkin papers +Project Verona would appear to be failures also .nice trivia though .Damn funny Franky!LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
The Kulaks! the Jews! The Capitalists! The 1% The Republican Governor! Capitalism!!
Since you never read either, I'm not surprised you "think" that
here's proof
Communist Party USA
Political Party
The Communist Party USA is a communist political party in the United States. It is the largest communist party in the country. Established in 1919, it has a long, complex history that is closely related to the histories of similar communist p…
en.wikipedia.org · Text under CC-BY-SA license
the pumpkin papers +Project Verona would appear to be failures also .nice trivia though .Damn funny Franky!Liberals need to learn about the Pumpkin Papers and Project Verona.
LOL @ using Liberals and learn in the same sentence. They have a 100% Fail rate BECAUSE they are incapable of learning. They blame others for their failing
The Kulaks! the Jews! The Capitalists! The 1% The Republican Governor! Capitalism!!
