Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist

They will all die. The Book of Acts describes 2 people dropping dead instantaneously for lying that they didn't pocket some of the communal money for themselves personally like a socialist leader.

Also Jesus and his apostles lived off of rich women because they gave up fishing and their families. The first Christian church was set up like a commune.

What is interesting, is that when you put a physical piece of yourself into something that you believe in, then your belief becomes physical reality. By the way, This is true not only for the faith in Jesus, but also every stupid faith too. For doing this for Jesus, the only non stupid faith, those rich women were most beneficial to God Himself, and as explained in the New Testament, they will receive their rewards in heaven.

The opposite of this happened too, when a moron called Luther invented at the late medieval ages, that the Church selling tickets for getting friends out of purgatory was unethical and useless. Taking away people's salvation in this way gets him his reward in hell along with all the other heretics.

So in essence you are saying they were panhandlers and gladly took in redistribution of wealth from the wealthy. Like today TV preachers. Thanks for the clarification.
TV preachers provide a service to people, willingly giving up their money. If a person pan handles on the street for money, freely given, that is the same thing, both charitable. But when dickless politicians steal my money from me, then give it to liberal bitches like you, then that isnt charity, but theft... again you never thank US for providing your welfare, just bitch and moan that it isnt enough.
You're kidding right?

TV preachers lie, cheat, and steal from the most vulnerable segments of our population. They are criminals and con men, nothing more.

A few do, they run afoul of the police or the IRS sooner or later and disappear. Most are legit, and most do indeed provide all the services they claim to provide. Whether or not you assorted deviants and dopers like them or not isn't 'proof' they're 'all crooks', which in the case of left wingers like yourself like the pot calling the kettle black, anyway.

Very few of the are 'TV preachers, either; most have real churches and congregations, and it's their services that are televised. Just because they're on TV doesn't make them all 'mega-churches', either. I post this for the FYI of the Peanut Gallery, not because I think you will admit to facts or anything and bother with real discussions; you're just here to post fake news as usual, and you have no character or morals worth mentioning anyway.
 
What is interesting, is that when you put a physical piece of yourself into something that you believe in, then your belief becomes physical reality. By the way, This is true not only for the faith in Jesus, but also every stupid faith too. For doing this for Jesus, the only non stupid faith, those rich women were most beneficial to God Himself, and as explained in the New Testament, they will receive their rewards in heaven.

The opposite of this happened too, when a moron called Luther invented at the late medieval ages, that the Church selling tickets for getting friends out of purgatory was unethical and useless. Taking away people's salvation in this way gets him his reward in hell along with all the other heretics.

So in essence you are saying they were panhandlers and gladly took in redistribution of wealth from the wealthy. Like today TV preachers. Thanks for the clarification.

No, socialists are not panhandlers, they mug you. Jesus doesn't mug you.

Socialist do not mug either, they tax.

Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
Really? So what is so expensive about the asphalt and the policeman's salary, that you urge everyone to dive up like 90 % of their income for?
 
So in essence you are saying they were panhandlers and gladly took in redistribution of wealth from the wealthy. Like today TV preachers. Thanks for the clarification.

No, socialists are not panhandlers, they mug you. Jesus doesn't mug you.

Socialist do not mug either, they tax.

Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
Really? So what is so expensive about the asphalt and the policeman's salary, that you urge everyone to dive up like 90 % of their income for?

I prefer 70% tax on the those who make over a million a year. A policeman would not pay it.
 
Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
The Military provide a service that keeps your sorry ass free, welfare bitches dont, they just shit, moan and groan.

Well the military sure gets most of our tax dollars, and no the military protects the oil industry.
Again, why dont you look at my signature. Then pull your head out of that big ass. You are so wrong again.

the War on Poverty has been incredibly expensive. Robert Rector, senior research fellow in domestic policy studies at the Heritage Foundation, writes that “taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on Johnson’s war. Adjusted for inflation, that’s three times the cost of all military wars since the American Revolution.”

You are a very sad person. Reagan started the war on the wealthy then.
Wrong again, but keep on voting for the very people who want to keep you poor and miserable, that is your dumbass choice.
 
The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
The Military provide a service that keeps your sorry ass free, welfare bitches dont, they just shit, moan and groan.

Well the military sure gets most of our tax dollars, and no the military protects the oil industry.
Again, why dont you look at my signature. Then pull your head out of that big ass. You are so wrong again.

the War on Poverty has been incredibly expensive. Robert Rector, senior research fellow in domestic policy studies at the Heritage Foundation, writes that “taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on Johnson’s war. Adjusted for inflation, that’s three times the cost of all military wars since the American Revolution.”

You are a very sad person. Reagan started the war on the wealthy then.
Wrong again, but keep on voting for the very people who want to keep you poor and miserable, that is your dumbass choice.

I am not poor and miserable.
 
No, socialists are not panhandlers, they mug you. Jesus doesn't mug you.

Socialist do not mug either, they tax.

Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
Really? So what is so expensive about the asphalt and the policeman's salary, that you urge everyone to dive up like 90 % of their income for?

I prefer 70% tax on the those who make over a million a year. A policeman would not pay it.
Oh I see, so you dont believe in Fairness? That when there arent anymore millionaires around then you have to go after the middle class, right? Just because you are too stupid to not know how to make a million, doesnt mean to punish every millionaire that is smart enough.

https://nypost.com/2019/03/30/even-new-yorks-millionaires-are-fleeing-to-less-expensive-cities/
 
The Military provide a service that keeps your sorry ass free, welfare bitches dont, they just shit, moan and groan.

Well the military sure gets most of our tax dollars, and no the military protects the oil industry.
Again, why dont you look at my signature. Then pull your head out of that big ass. You are so wrong again.

the War on Poverty has been incredibly expensive. Robert Rector, senior research fellow in domestic policy studies at the Heritage Foundation, writes that “taxpayers have spent $22 trillion on Johnson’s war. Adjusted for inflation, that’s three times the cost of all military wars since the American Revolution.”

You are a very sad person. Reagan started the war on the wealthy then.
Wrong again, but keep on voting for the very people who want to keep you poor and miserable, that is your dumbass choice.

I am not poor and miserable.
your right...You are poor, miserable, and petulant.
 
No, socialists are not panhandlers, they mug you. Jesus doesn't mug you.

Socialist do not mug either, they tax.

Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
Really? So what is so expensive about the asphalt and the policeman's salary, that you urge everyone to dive up like 90 % of their income for?

I prefer 70% tax on the those who make over a million a year. A policeman would not pay it.

The usual liberal sinister evil nonsense. Study US tax history! For example the story of the alternative minimum tax should teach you that it will e you who will pay that 70 %. Global law of laws is, that whatever punitive or manipulative you force into other people's obligations, you will ultimately pay those. Look at all the retards in any European country, they have learnt this the hard way, but still so confused and stunned, that can't do anything to protect themselves from it.
 
Socialist do not mug either, they tax.

Same thing.

The leader who sits in the Oval office doesn't like to pay taxes either . Lets get rid of the military. Are you pro that. Lets get rid of him , are you pro that.
Really? So what is so expensive about the asphalt and the policeman's salary, that you urge everyone to dive up like 90 % of their income for?

I prefer 70% tax on the those who make over a million a year. A policeman would not pay it.
Oh I see, so you dont believe in Fairness? That when there arent anymore millionaires around then you have to go after the middle class, right? Just because you are too stupid to not know how to make a million, doesnt mean to punish every millionaire that is smart enough.

https://nypost.com/2019/03/30/even-new-yorks-millionaires-are-fleeing-to-less-expensive-cities/
If only those liberals could think in terms of tithe instead of taxes. God's money versus satans money. But liberals reject God, so this remains a problem for everybody.
 
<<So, was Jesus really a socialist and is the gospel a message of socialism? The answer is “NO!”>>

Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist | Reclaiming America for Christ
And there ya go, taking the Christ outta Christianity again.

I know this has already been posted, maybe you missed it?


Everyone gets it.
Christians are not welcomed in the Democratic Party.
But, thanks for another reminder.

Lol, evangelicals are no longer christians. Didn't you hear?
 
<<So, was Jesus really a socialist and is the gospel a message of socialism? The answer is “NO!”>>

Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist | Reclaiming America for Christ
And there ya go, taking the Christ outta Christianity again.

I know this has already been posted, maybe you missed it?


Everyone gets it.
Christians are not welcomed in the Democratic Party.
But, thanks for another reminder.

Lol, evangelicals are no longer christians. Didn't you hear?

<<So, was Jesus really a socialist and is the gospel a message of socialism? The answer is “NO!”>>

Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist | Reclaiming America for Christ
And there ya go, taking the Christ outta Christianity again.

I know this has already been posted, maybe you missed it?


Everyone gets it.
Christians are not welcomed in the Democratic Party.
But, thanks for another reminder.

Lol, evangelicals are no longer christians. Didn't you hear?

yea, we all get it, Democrats hate Christians, thanks for another reminder
 
<<So, was Jesus really a socialist and is the gospel a message of socialism? The answer is “NO!”>>

Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist | Reclaiming America for Christ
And there ya go, taking the Christ outta Christianity again.

I know this has already been posted, maybe you missed it?


Everyone gets it.
Christians are not welcomed in the Democratic Party.
But, thanks for another reminder.

Lol, evangelicals are no longer christians. Didn't you hear?

<<So, was Jesus really a socialist and is the gospel a message of socialism? The answer is “NO!”>>

Jesus was a capitalist – not a socialist | Reclaiming America for Christ
And there ya go, taking the Christ outta Christianity again.

I know this has already been posted, maybe you missed it?


Everyone gets it.
Christians are not welcomed in the Democratic Party.
But, thanks for another reminder.

Lol, evangelicals are no longer christians. Didn't you hear?

yea, we all get it, Democrats hate Christians, thanks for another reminder

Lol, listen I would have thought you knew this already but here we go:

You are supposed to read what I typed and respond to that, not whatever the voices in your head are saying.

If you do that successfully you may be able to actually communicate, instead of just this rambling in the dark routine you usually pull.
 
Thank you, so they were socialist.

No, Jesus and his apostles were not socialists.

What on Earth make these crazy libs think Jesus was a socialist?
Because a group of primitive Christians in Jerusalem shared their possessions in common and sold some and gave the proceeds to the poor.

Apparently when they volunteered to enter into this communal contract, they were forced to.
 
Thank you, so they were socialist.

No, Jesus and his apostles were not socialists.

What on Earth make these crazy libs think Jesus was a socialist?
Because a group of primitive Christians in Jerusalem shared their possessions in common and sold some and gave the proceeds to the poor.

Apparently when they volunteered to enter into this communal contract, they were forced to.

Actually those verses represent a time of festivals and partying, with people going around to others houses in celebrations, and it wasn't just Christians partying. They were all Jewish at that point in time; their 'communal contracts' were the norm, not something they dreamed up that was different from the cultural norms. Again, they couldn't meet 'communal obligations' if they all became beggars and hippies. that's just some inane interpretation dreamed up by Xian bashers who don't know what they're talking about., and want to to prove it.
 
Thank you, so they were socialist.

No, Jesus and his apostles were not socialists.

What on Earth make these crazy libs think Jesus was a socialist?
Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. 33 With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. 34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. 35 They laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.
Bible Gateway passage: Acts 4:32-35 - New Revised Standard Version
 
2331830273_5513c60598_o.png
 
Thank you, so they were socialist.

No, Jesus and his apostles were not socialists.

What on Earth make these crazy libs think Jesus was a socialist?
Now the whole group of those who believed were of one heart and soul, and no one claimed private ownership of any possessions, but everything they owned was held in common. 33 With great power the apostles gave their testimony to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was upon them all. 34 There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. 35 They laid it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need.
Bible Gateway passage: Acts 4:32-35 - New Revised Standard Version

that was a specific situation, and doesn't require all Christians to give everything they own away; as it says, there was not a needy person among them. They were giving the proceeds to the Apostles, not a poor relief fund; they were helping finance the ministries of the apostles and the church in preparation for the coming purges and persecutions , which is why Acts 4:32-37 are referred to as 'The Provision", the previous set of verses were known as 'The Prayer", the next sections deal with the 'Purging Within" and and so on.

Also, 4:36 and :37:" Now Joseph, a Levite of Cyprian birth, who was also called 'Barnabas by the apostles (which translated means Son of Encouragement), :)37) and who owned a tract of land, sold it and brought the money and laid it at the apostles' feet."

So, those verses don't mean what you want them to mean.

For the Peanut Gallery, the last two also seems to present a dispute among scholars, since the Levites were not given any land in Israel, and some think they weren't allowed to own any land on their own there, so the land Barnabas sold must have been in Cyprus. I personally don't know if they were allowed to buy their own property in Israel or not, nor do I care a lot about that, just a mention. In any case, it's clear that this donating took place over time and not at some spontaneous gathering, since it would be pretty hard to sell in land in just a few minutes, much less land overseas, in a street meeting. this is an allegorical story, so face value means nothing.

These verses are related to many others; I'm not going to type them all out, so get yourself a decent study bible and concordance if you want to run around citing verses without looking like an ignorant troll; it's one of the most printed books in world history, after all, a major influence on western history, so why not just read it, if only in outline form, and be a real scholar for once.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top