Jack Smith could face indictment

Sorry. There won't be a repeat of the miracle back-in to the presidency this time.
Again, he hasn't made any inroads into the swing states he lost last time. Which means
he's headed for the same fate. :)
Oh yeah. For sure. Every time he gets indicted his polling numbers rise. Keep it up.
 
A lot of things aren’t in the Constitution, Simp. An entire body of thought, debate, argument and compromise. That’s why we have a lot of other documents, papers, letters etc. through which to understand them.
So you admit it is found nowhere in our governing document.

Got it.
 
Oh yeah. For sure. Every time he gets indicted his polling numbers rise. Keep it up.
The only poll that counts is the one in November 2024. Before that, the polls mean nothing.
Otherwise, Dewey would have beat Truman and Hillary would have beat Trump.
 
The only poll that counts is the one in November 2024. Before that, the polls mean nothing.
Otherwise, Dewey would have beat Truman and Hillary would have beat Trump.

That's a nice stereotype but doesn't really address reality.

The fact is Trump won in 2016, after having been behind Hillary in virtually every single poll. Not infrequently by double digits.

He is now well ahead of his standing in the polls in both 2016 and 2020.

Factor in the element that the polls virtually always underestimate him, and well...

Are you beginning to get the picture?
 
The only poll that counts is the one in November 2024. Before that, the polls mean nothing.
Otherwise, Dewey would have beat Truman and Hillary would have beat Trump.
Hillary did beat Trump. The EC put him in office.
 
A lot of things aren’t in the Constitution, Simp. An entire body of thought, debate, argument and compromise. That’s why we have a lot of other documents, papers, letters etc. through which to understand them.
Many things are so self evident, that they didn't see a need to write them down.
Such as the right to vote in a democracy. It's not in the constitution.
Nor is the right to buy or sell property, goods, or services (except for slaves), in the Constitution.
 
The Constitution isn't a document telling us what we are permitted to do. It's a document telling the federal government what their powers are and aren't.
 
The Constitution isn't a document telling us what we are permitted to do. It's a document telling the federal government what their powers are and aren't.
What about the 6th amendment. That doesn't enumerate a power the government has, or a power the government is denied.
 
It puts restrictions on the government.
Such as?
What restriction is put on the government by enumerating a right of the people, to be represented by counsel, and have the power to compel witnesses on their behalf.
 
That's a nice stereotype but doesn't really address reality.

The fact is Trump won in 2016, after having been behind Hillary in virtually every single poll. Not infrequently by double digits.

He is now well ahead of his standing in the polls in both 2016 and 2020.

Factor in the element that the polls virtually always underestimate him, and well...

Are you beginning to get the picture?

Also factor in polls this far out from an election are utterly meaningless. At this point, we don't even know if it will be Biden v. Trump.
 
Such as?
What restriction is put on the government by enumerating a right of the people, to be represented by counsel, and have the power to compel witnesses on their behalf.
Those are natural rights. Like self defense. If you're attacked it's natural to defend yourself. The government didn't give you that right.
 
Those are natural rights. Like self defense. If you're attacked it's natural to defend yourself. The government didn't give you that right.
Which goes to the very heart of inalienable rights the people have, that aren't in the constitution, nor need to be enumerated by the government.

Remember how the argument started

Quote “separation of church and government” in the Constitution, Simp.
 

Forum List

Back
Top