It's The Beginning Of The End!!!

[dudmuck]

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is from Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intelligence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

Good discussion so far, keeping the facts rolling along:
1. I'm always mystified by Comey's actions in 2016, why give Hillary a pass on her obvious crimes for lack of "intent", just to fuck that up with the announcement that they may have found "classified" emails on Uma Abedin's laptop?! WTF?? (of which there were none, supposedly)

2. Wray may have been told by the deep staters still in the FBI that there was no illegal spying on the Trump campaign, but we all know that McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant. Barr, Durham, Huber, and Horowitz will get to the bottom of any wrongdoing by the FBI and DOJ. Stay tuned, indictments coming for the coup plotters.

3. Trump did not ask Zelensky "to help him win". Trump asked for Zelensky to look into what the Ukraine did in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Trump's candidacy. He also asked Z to look into the Biden request to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden was getting $50,000 a month. Was that a legitimate request? Giuliani has a sworn affidavit from that prosecutor saying that the firing was illegal. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but Biden's video confession is damning. I can't find proof that Joe was acting honorably at the behest of the EU or WTO or Obama, etc.

There is a lot of old 2016 stuff to look into, as well as new 2020 stuff. The House may even vote on impeachment?! Should be an interesting year or two.

1) you weren't discussing hillary emails, you were on the dossier. The dossier is raw intelligence, it was used only to justify further investigation.

2) why are you bringing up McCabe? This is Wray saying the intellegence investigation wasnt spying. The FISA warrant was used to keep tabs on Carter Page, and these FISA warrants on Page existed long before Page joined the Trump campaign. The FBI has the job of investigating foreign influence in our election, that is the justification.

3) Giuliani affidavit? Affidavits dont exist.

Trump's Ukraine envoy 'warned Giuliani that Biden corruption claims were not credible'
Yet pushed for investigation without any credible evidence.

Show me the evidence.

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Shiff was caught lying his azzz off

If congress don’t throw him
In prison they themselves will be thrown into
Prison. By Donald T rump the next Andrew Jackson

 

[GreenAndBlue]

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is from Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intelligence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

Good discussion so far, keeping the facts rolling along:
1. I'm always mystified by Comey's actions in 2016, why give Hillary a pass on her obvious crimes for lack of "intent", just to fuck that up with the announcement that they may have found "classified" emails on Uma Abedin's laptop?! WTF?? (of which there were none, supposedly)

2. Wray may have been told by the deep staters still in the FBI that there was no illegal spying on the Trump campaign, but we all know that McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant. Barr, Durham, Huber, and Horowitz will get to the bottom of any wrongdoing by the FBI and DOJ. Stay tuned, indictments coming for the coup plotters.

3. Trump did not ask Zelensky "to help him win". Trump asked for Zelensky to look into what the Ukraine did in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Trump's candidacy. He also asked Z to look into the Biden request to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden was getting $50,000 a month. Was that a legitimate request? Giuliani has a sworn affidavit from that prosecutor saying that the firing was illegal. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but Biden's video confession is damning. I can't find proof that Joe was acting honorably at the behest of the EU or WTO or Obama, etc.

There is a lot of old 2016 stuff to look into, as well as new 2020 stuff. The House may even vote on impeachment?! Should be an interesting year or two.

1) you weren't discussing hillary emails, you were on the dossier. The dossier is raw intelligence, it was used only to justify further investigation.

2) why are you bringing up McCabe? This is Wray saying the intellegence investigation wasnt spying. The FISA warrant was used to keep tabs on Carter Page, and these FISA warrants on Page existed long before Page joined the Trump campaign. The FBI has the job of investigating foreign influence in our election, that is the justification.

3) Giuliani affidavit? Affidavits dont exist.

Trump's Ukraine envoy 'warned Giuliani that Biden corruption claims were not credible'
Yet pushed for investigation without any credible evidence.

Show me the evidence.

The American men has judged the democrats as guilty of high treason

Let that sink In !!

 

[dudmuck]

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is from Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intelligence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

Good discussion so far, keeping the facts rolling along:
1. I'm always mystified by Comey's actions in 2016, why give Hillary a pass on her obvious crimes for lack of "intent", just to fuck that up with the announcement that they may have found "classified" emails on Uma Abedin's laptop?! WTF?? (of which there were none, supposedly)

2. Wray may have been told by the deep staters still in the FBI that there was no illegal spying on the Trump campaign, but we all know that McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant. Barr, Durham, Huber, and Horowitz will get to the bottom of any wrongdoing by the FBI and DOJ. Stay tuned, indictments coming for the coup plotters.

3. Trump did not ask Zelensky "to help him win". Trump asked for Zelensky to look into what the Ukraine did in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Trump's candidacy. He also asked Z to look into the Biden request to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden was getting $50,000 a month. Was that a legitimate request? Giuliani has a sworn affidavit from that prosecutor saying that the firing was illegal. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but Biden's video confession is damning. I can't find proof that Joe was acting honorably at the behest of the EU or WTO or Obama, etc.

There is a lot of old 2016 stuff to look into, as well as new 2020 stuff. The House may even vote on impeachment?! Should be an interesting year or two.

1) you weren't discussing hillary emails, you were on the dossier. The dossier is raw intelligence, it was used only to justify further investigation.

2) why are you bringing up McCabe? This is Wray saying the intellegence investigation wasnt spying. The FISA warrant was used to keep tabs on Carter Page, and these FISA warrants on Page existed long before Page joined the Trump campaign. The FBI has the job of investigating foreign influence in our election, that is the justification.

3) Giuliani affidavit? Affidavits dont exist.

Trump's Ukraine envoy 'warned Giuliani that Biden corruption claims were not credible'
Yet pushed for investigation without any credible evidence.

Show me the evidence.

The American men has judged the democrats as guilty of high treason

Let that sink In !!

 

[SAYIT]

Not one of these leftist talking heads has admitted they were, are, and will always be FOS but while their hysterical silliness contains no information, it does have comedic value.

"Trump warrants impeachment on many counts from violations of the emoluments clause to obstruction of justice, and it's highly likely money laundering will be added to the case after his financial documents are examined...

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Pelosi has both a House majority and the authority to impeach but evidently lacks the case to get 'er done. Perhaps you should share your "knowledge" with her.

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Republicans controlled the House and Senate for two of those three years so, naturally, nothing was done about a POTUS who is too stupid, greedy, and united with Russia to serve.

Majority of Republicans Support Putin Coming to Washington

You now obfuscate. You posted what you claim to proof of Trump high crimes & misdemeanors but the Hysterical House Dems probably know everything you do yet haven't impeached. Perhaps you should send your "facts" to Pelosi so she can get the ball rolling. We are almost at the point - just 13 months from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to Trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

You're acting surprised Republicans raise more money than Democrats?

"Apparently stunned by the Republican National Committee’s surprise July fundraising haul of $21 million, the chief of the Democratic National Committee is on a panic drive to catch up and said in an email to supporters that the eventual nominee could be in trouble without more money.

"'I won't lie to you,' wrote Tom Perez, referring to the GOP’s announcement that it has $46 million in the bank and no debt."

Did you also use that @CivicAction (whoever they are) doughnut chart 3 years ago to explain Shrillary's 3:1 campaign cash advantage or is it only applicable when Trump is rolling in it?

And the point remains that the chairman of the DNC is so panicked that his "nominee won't stand a chance against Trump" that he held 3 fundraisers in MEXICO Freakin' CITY last weekend.

Perhaps Rep Al Green (D-Tx) is also correct … maybe impeachment is the only way the Dems can overthrow the Trump presidency.

What does that tell you about the Democrat Socialist Party's candidates & policies which the 2020 hopefuls have been open and honest about: gun-confiscation, abortion, open borders, socialism, and impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories.

All widely-held American values, eh Comrade?

 

[georgephillip]

"Trump warrants impeachment on many counts from violations of the emoluments clause to obstruction of justice, and it's highly likely money laundering will be added to the case after his financial documents are examined...

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Pelosi has both a House majority and the authority to impeach but evidently lacks the case to get 'er done. Perhaps you should share your "knowledge" with her.

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Republicans controlled the House and Senate for two of those three years so, naturally, nothing was done about a POTUS who is too stupid, greedy, and united with Russia to serve.

Majority of Republicans Support Putin Coming to Washington

You now obfuscate. You posted what you claim to proof of Trump high crimes & misdemeanors but the Hysterical House Dems probably know everything you do yet haven't impeached. Perhaps you should send your "facts" to Pelosi so she can get the ball rolling. We are almost at the point - just 13 months from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to Trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

You're acting surprised Republicans raise more money than Democrats?

"Apparently stunned by the Republican National Committee’s surprise July fundraising haul of $21 million, the chief of the Democratic National Committee is on a panic drive to catch up and said in an email to supporters that the eventual nominee could be in trouble without more money.

"'I won't lie to you,' wrote Tom Perez, referring to the GOP’s announcement that it has $46 million in the bank and no debt."

Did you also use that @CivicAction (whoever they are) doughnut chart 3 years ago to explain Shrillary's 3:1 campaign cash advantage or is it only applicable when Trump is rolling in it?

And the point remains that the chairman of the DNC is so panicked that his "nominee won't stand a chance against Trump" that he held 3 fundraisers in MEXICO Freakin' CITY last weekend.

Perhaps Rep Al Green (D-Tx) is also correct … maybe impeachment is the only way the Dems can overthrow the Trump presidency.

What does that tell you about the Democrat Socialist Party's candidates & policies which the 2020 hopefuls have been open and honest about: gun-confiscation, abortion, open borders, socialism, and impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories.

All widely-held American values, eh Comrade?

What does that tell you about the Democrat Socialist Party's candidates & policies which the 2020 hopefuls have been open and honest about: gun-confiscation, abortion, open borders, socialism, and impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories.

All widely-held American values, eh Comrade?

You're frightened by equality, liberty, and schools without active shooter drills? Maybe Trump's impeachment will help you find reality before your party goes the way of the Whigs?

 

[SAYIT]

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Pelosi has both a House majority and the authority to impeach but evidently lacks the case to get 'er done. Perhaps you should share your "knowledge" with her.

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Republicans controlled the House and Senate for two of those three years so, naturally, nothing was done about a POTUS who is too stupid, greedy, and united with Russia to serve.

Majority of Republicans Support Putin Coming to Washington

You now obfuscate. You posted what you claim to proof of Trump high crimes & misdemeanors but the Hysterical House Dems probably know everything you do yet haven't impeached. Perhaps you should send your "facts" to Pelosi so she can get the ball rolling. We are almost at the point - just 13 months from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to Trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

from the election - where impeachment makes no sense unless you are afraid the Dems will lose to trump again. DNC Chair Tom Perez certainly is:

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

You're acting surprised Republicans raise more money than Democrats?

"Apparently stunned by the Republican National Committee’s surprise July fundraising haul of $21 million, the chief of the Democratic National Committee is on a panic drive to catch up and said in an email to supporters that the eventual nominee could be in trouble without more money.

"'I won't lie to you,' wrote Tom Perez, referring to the GOP’s announcement that it has $46 million in the bank and no debt."

Did you also use that @CivicAction (whoever they are) doughnut chart 3 years ago to explain Shrillary's 3:1 campaign cash advantage or is it only applicable when Trump is rolling in it?

And the point remains that the chairman of the DNC is so panicked that his "nominee won't stand a chance against Trump" that he held 3 fundraisers in MEXICO Freakin' CITY last weekend.

Perhaps Rep Al Green (D-Tx) is also correct … maybe impeachment is the only way the Dems can overthrow the Trump presidency.

What does that tell you about the Democrat Socialist Party's candidates & policies which the 2020 hopefuls have been open and honest about: gun-confiscation, abortion, open borders, socialism, and impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories.

All widely-held American values, eh Comrade?

What does that tell you about the Democrat Socialist Party's candidates & policies which the 2020 hopefuls have been open and honest about: gun-confiscation, abortion, open borders, socialism, and impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories.

All widely-held American values, eh Comrade?

You're frightened by equality, liberty, and schools without active shooter drills? Maybe Trump's impeachment will help you find reality before your party goes the way of the Whigs?

Wait … so you believe Democrat Socialist Party policies are constitutional, good for America, and will stop crazy people from killing others?

OK, you've convinced me you're either STUPID or BAT-SHIT nuts … or both.

No Comrade GP … neither you nor Bonkers Beto can have our guns.

“Hell yes, we're going to take your AR-15, your AK-47,” - Beto O'Rourke

 

[GreenAndBlue]

Unemployment rate drops to 3.5 %. Record low number

These screwery polls does show the Hispanics rising fast for trump .. that means they know they were helped by trump

But But their numbers don’t add up from that


It seems they are in a PANIC to hide the men’s vote .. to hide the white mens vote and to hide the military vote

They are in a panic afraid trump will now do like Andrew Jackson did with that real power

Fake lying media

Fake lying educators


Fake lying everybody that is getting their money from the crooked system which could bring us to world war 111

Really stoopid corrupt deep state

 

[SAYIT]

Speaking of the beginning of the end, that clearly is the case for Slo-Joe's candidacy but just for good measure it seems Pelosi and her son have also been dipping into The Ukraine for personal gain:

https://www.oann.com/son-of-house-speaker-pelosi-made-money-in-ukraine-used-her-in-ads/
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi may soon be facing similar allegations to Joe Biden. A recent report suggested Pelosi’s son Paul may have used her position to benefit financially...

The video shows Nancy Pelosi speaking about her efforts in office to push for clean energy. Her message is followed by a promotional statement from her son Paul, who was a board member of Viscoil and an executive at its related company NRGLab.

 

[kyzr]

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is from Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intelligence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

Good discussion so far, keeping the facts rolling along:
1. I'm always mystified by Comey's actions in 2016, why give Hillary a pass on her obvious crimes for lack of "intent", just to fuck that up with the announcement that they may have found "classified" emails on Uma Abedin's laptop?! WTF?? (of which there were none, supposedly)

2. Wray may have been told by the deep staters still in the FBI that there was no illegal spying on the Trump campaign, but we all know that McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant. Barr, Durham, Huber, and Horowitz will get to the bottom of any wrongdoing by the FBI and DOJ. Stay tuned, indictments coming for the coup plotters.

3. Trump did not ask Zelensky "to help him win". Trump asked for Zelensky to look into what the Ukraine did in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Trump's candidacy. He also asked Z to look into the Biden request to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden was getting $50,000 a month. Was that a legitimate request? Giuliani has a sworn affidavit from that prosecutor saying that the firing was illegal. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but Biden's video confession is damning. I can't find proof that Joe was acting honorably at the behest of the EU or WTO or Obama, etc.

There is a lot of old 2016 stuff to look into, as well as new 2020 stuff. The House may even vote on impeachment?! Should be an interesting year or two.

1) you weren't discussing hillary emails, you were on the dossier. The dossier is raw intelligence, it was used only to justify further investigation.

2) why are you bringing up McCabe? This is Wray saying the intelligence investigation wasn't spying. The FISA warrant was used to keep tabs on Carter Page, and these FISA warrants on Page existed long before Page joined the Trump campaign. The FBI has the job of investigating foreign influence in our election, that is the justification.

3) Giuliani affidavit? Affidavits dont exist.

Trump's Ukraine envoy 'warned Giuliani that Biden corruption claims were not credible'
Yet pushed for investigation without any credible evidence.

Show me the evidence.

1. The Steele Dossier isn't raw intelligence, its Russian fairy tales paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign.

2. Wray can say that the "FISA court approved surveillance" wasn't spying, he wasn't there when it happened, he has no clue.
When Barr finds evidence that the "surveillance" was illegal Wray isn't in trouble, Comey is. McCabe said under oath that "without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant". That's why I'm bringing up McCabe, he, Comey, and Strzok were in the coup plot up to their necks. The Carter Page surveillance was bullshit, he works for Merrill-Lynch, he never did anything to suggest that he should be spied on, the FISA warrants were illegal and used only to spy on Trump. .

3. Rudy says he has the affidavits, we'll see.

 

[skews13]

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

 

[SAYIT]

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

 

[dudmuck]

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

 

[lennypartiv]

 

[SAYIT]

As the talking heads say, the walls are definitely closing in though not on Trump but rather those who violated his civil rights and used their gov't offices and positions to steal a presidential election.

Did James Clapper Just Admit President Obama Directed Him to Go After the Trump Campaign?
"I don't know. I don’t think there was any wrongdoing," Clapper said. ..,what the then commander-in-chief, President Obama, told us to do..."

 

[fncceo]

Twitter has an anti-bullying policy, and Trump is coming close to violating it.