It's The Beginning Of The End!!!

[The Original Tree]

The indictments are coming. Mueller had 2.5 years and $40m to spend investigating Trump. I believe that Barr and the DOJ will hand down indictments after their investigations are complete. Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are all investigating, it takes time to obtain all the evidence. If there are no indictments by Xmas then I'd agree with you that indictments are probably not coming.

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

 

[wamose]

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.[/QUOTE] Then sanctuary cities are nothing more than a renegade political attack

 

[SAYIT]

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency. When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

Then sanctuary cities are nothing more than a renegade political attack

Not satisfied to fill our media with their angry, bitter LYING, Kamala Harris demands Twitter silence Trump and Biden insists Trump's attorney must be banned from cable news.

I believe those Dems have heard of the 1st Amendment but clearly they either never read it or just didn't understand it.

There isn't a single Democrat who is worthy of any office higher than dog catcher. Not one.

 

[Crixus]

The beginning of everyone's end is the same ...

It's inevitable from this point forward.

A memento mori ('remember that you must die') is an artistic or symbolic reminder of the inevitability of death. The expression 'memento mori' developed with the growth of Christianity, which emphasized Heaven, Hell, and salvation of the soul in the afterlife.

 

[kyzr]

I think the implied comment is that the democrats have been saying "its the beginning of the end for Trump" since he announced his candidacy. They will probably be saying that until he leaves office in January 2025. Here is the MSM montage before Trump was elected, he had no path to 270 electoral votes:

I tend to think there is a war going on between Trump and the Deep State. I don’t see Donny winning the war. If he were winning, we would see indictments.

The American people for the most part, are clueless.


Where Are the Indictments of Those Implicated in the Coup Attempt Against Trump?
By Paul Craig Roberts

That the Demorcrats and their handlers have an ongoing coup against the President of the United States is undeniable. High treason is written all over it. The few educated and aware Americans who still exist can see it clearly. We are watching to see if the insouciant American people succumb to propaganda that is terminating the United States. Something will still be here, but it won’t be America. What remains will be a Tower of Babel, the disunity of which makes it easily controllable by the Deep State. Or, if insouciant white Americans ever realize that they are on the genocide list, civil war could erupt between ethnic Americans and the nonwhite immigrants flooded into the country by the Democrats hoping to use their votes to keep governmental power in Democrat hands.
Where Are the Indictments - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

The indictments are coming. Mueller had 2.5 years and $40m to spend investigating Trump. I believe that Barr and the DOJ will hand down indictments after their investigations are complete. Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are all investigating, it takes time to obtain all the evidence. If there are no indictments by Xmas then I'd agree with you that indictments are probably not coming.

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

 

[B. Kidd]

All I gotta say is that Biden is done, Bernie is 2 stents away from a massive coronary event; and I can only quote a great cultural icon, Alfred E. Neumann, "What? Me Worry?".

Trump in 2020....Keep America Great!!!

 

[dudmuck]

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency. When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

Then sanctuary cities are nothing more than a renegade political attack

Not satisfied to fill our media with their angry, bitter LYING, Kamala Harris demands Twitter silence Trump and Biden insists Trump's attorney must be banned from cable news.

I believe those Dems have heard of the 1st Amendment but clearly they either never read it or just didn't understand it.

There isn't a single Democrat who is worthy of any office higher than dog catcher. Not one.

Harris is asking Twitter CEO to suspend Trump's account, not demanding. Twitter has an anti-bullying policy, and Trump is coming close to violating it. The threshold is implicit bullying \vs explicit bullying.

For Biden's campaign demanding news outlets stop booking Giuliani, this is just reverse psychology. Hopefully this will cause Giuliani to appear more, because every time he Giuliani goes on the air, it becomes worse for Trump.

"Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself."

 

[okfine]

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

I bet you were waiting to see Trumps balls, eh wood?

 

[SAYIT]

All I gotta say is that Biden is done, Bernie is 2 stents away from a massive coronary event; and I can only quote a great cultural icon, Alfred E. Neumann, "What? Me Worry?".

Trump in 2020....Keep America Great!!!

Democrat Socialist Party desperation is evident in their constant LYING and the "Hail Mary" passes they are already tossing fully 13 months before the election. They've painted themselves into a dark corner and have no other options.

Meanwhile DNC Chair Tom Perez just returned from 3 fundraisers in Mexico City - MEXICO CITY - because Americans won't support the gun-confiscating, abortion-loving, socialism-embracing, open border demanding, impeachment-in-lieu-of-election-victories BS of their candidates.

Did you see the MSM coverage on that? Yeah ... me neither, and we both know why. MEXICO CITY.

DNC Chief: ‘Our nominee won't stand a chance against Trump’

 

[Agit8r]

 

[dudmuck]

I tend to think there is a war going on between Trump and the Deep State. I don’t see Donny winning the war. If he were winning, we would see indictments.

The American people for the most part, are clueless.


Where Are the Indictments of Those Implicated in the Coup Attempt Against Trump?
By Paul Craig Roberts

That the Demorcrats and their handlers have an ongoing coup against the President of the United States is undeniable. High treason is written all over it. The few educated and aware Americans who still exist can see it clearly. We are watching to see if the insouciant American people succumb to propaganda that is terminating the United States. Something will still be here, but it won’t be America. What remains will be a Tower of Babel, the disunity of which makes it easily controllable by the Deep State. Or, if insouciant white Americans ever realize that they are on the genocide list, civil war could erupt between ethnic Americans and the nonwhite immigrants flooded into the country by the Democrats hoping to use their votes to keep governmental power in Democrat hands.
Where Are the Indictments - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

The indictments are coming. Mueller had 2.5 years and $40m to spend investigating Trump. I believe that Barr and the DOJ will hand down indictments after their investigations are complete. Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are all investigating, it takes time to obtain all the evidence. If there are no indictments by Xmas then I'd agree with you that indictments are probably not coming.

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

 

[SAYIT]

View attachment 282580

So high crimes and misdemeanors is whatever you say it is. Got it. Thanks.

 

[The Original Tree]

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

Why are you so worried about the Bidens? Slo-Joe's WH dream has been dying for months and why wouldn't we want those crimes uncovered?

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency.
When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

This is why Obama should have been impeached. Looking in to Obama's, Clinton's and Biden's Criminal Behavior after it was discovered in an official ongoing investigation is perfectly legal.

Looking in to Hillary Clinton's multiple felonies and insider trading and willful mishandling of classified information, and as to why James Comey was ordered by The White House to squash all investigations in to her, while at the same time, illegally spying on The Trump Campaign, and going balls to the wall pre-dawn military style raids on harmless people already cooperating, and then as if that weren't enough to show who they were, granting Clinton and entire campaign immunity is again, perfectly legal to look in to that kind of corruption.

What The Obama-Clinton Campaign did was Illegal. They Manufactured Evidence, Purchased Russian Propaganda, Laundered Money to do it, Engaged in False Circular Corroboration of it, knowing it was paid for by The DNC, Clinton and Obama, and then filed knowingly false affidavits in FISA committing fraud. Obama knew it was his Russian Propaganda that was used as a reason to abuse FISA and spy on American Citizens, and he was informed of everything that was going on, and he said nothing, because it was he that was giving the orders to engage in this criminal behavior.

And that is just scratching the surface. What they did with hiring foreign spies, laundering money to Russia, being engaged in Espionage, was just the tip of the iceberg of the criminal enterprise they were engaged in, and still are engaged in to this day.

Devin Nunes says Democrats tried to get nude pictures of Trump from Ukrainians

I bet you were waiting to see Trumps balls, eh wood?

Nah, no need to see that, when I can see Putin's Balls resting on your chin.

As we suspected The Democrat Party is a Crime Syndicate, built to enrich it's members at the expense of the voters.

Joe Biden is a crook.

 

[kyzr]

The indictments are coming. Mueller had 2.5 years and $40m to spend investigating Trump. I believe that Barr and the DOJ will hand down indictments after their investigations are complete. Huber, Durham, and Horowitz are all investigating, it takes time to obtain all the evidence. If there are no indictments by Xmas then I'd agree with you that indictments are probably not coming.

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

 

[dudmuck]

Proving guilt, especially conspiracy, is a tough nut to crack but if there is a leak or two watch for the dam to break and a flood of guilty scumbags scrambling to make a deal.

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is fram Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intellegence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

 

[kyzr]

I'm not sure how to break this to you democrats so that it registers, but it doesn't fucking matter WTF the democrat House puts in the articles of impeachment. The democrats have been trying to impeach Trump since he won. There are no crimes worthy of impeachment, there are no crimes period. Leaks are not worth much since the House clown car would need to investigate, and we know they never find anything. So keep dreaming that the intel agency deep staters would be able to take Trump down. The US Senate won't allow that to happen, 67 votes is 20 bridges too far.

Lets say that Obama had reached out to Iran for help in finding dirt on Trump in an effort to discredit him during the 2016 election and give Hillary the edge.

Wouldnt that be impeachable?

NO. Why would it be? Maybe you need to talk with Alan Dershowitz to see what's a crime and what's impeachable.

Hillary hired Russians to find dirt on Trump, created the Steele Dossier, and the FBI said that was fine.

Hillary never used the dossier during the campaign. Dossier was only known after Trump assumed office. Purchasing opposition research is legal, shady but legal.
This is different than permitting (or asking) a foreign government from interfering in our election.

Hillary did use the Steele Dossier. It was shopped all over the place but the MSM didn't use it because it was unverified, and Trump would have sued their ass off.
Then again, the FBI used it to obtain illegal FISA warrants to spy on the Trump campaign.
Then we have the Obama admin mis-using the intel agencies and foreign assets to setup the Trump campaign.
Trump did not ask the Ukraine to interfere in the US election, Joe Biden's confession on video doesn't need an explanation.
Rudy has an affidavit from the fired prosecutor that explains the firing.
Bernie is gone, Joe is gone, looks like Pocahontas has the ball.
Watch how the MSM protects her and keeps attacking Trump. Just like 2016.

By the third quarter of 2016 many news organizations knew about the existence of the dossier, which had been described as an "open secret" among journalists, but chose not to publish information that could not be confirmed.
The news of dossier was washed out by Comey's re-opening of hillary email issue a week before voting for president.

FBI chief: No evidence of illegal spying on Trump campaign
This is from Wray, a Trump appointee.
It was an intelligence investigation, protecting ourselves from a foreign attack.

Trump asked Zelensky to help him win.
Why? because there's no evidence of Biden's wrongdoing.

Viktor Shokin wasnt fired just because of Biden, it was also our ally countries that wanted him out. So our ally countries are just as "guilty".

Vitaliy Kasko, who had been Shokin’s deputy overseeing international cooperation, told Bloomberg that the investigation (of Burisma) was dormant.

Good discussion so far, keeping the facts rolling along:
1. I'm always mystified by Comey's actions in 2016, why give Hillary a pass on her obvious crimes for lack of "intent", just to fuck that up with the announcement that they may have found "classified" emails on Uma Abedin's laptop?! WTF?? (of which there were none, supposedly)

2. Wray may have been told by the deep staters still in the FBI that there was no illegal spying on the Trump campaign, but we all know that McCabe said under oath that without the Steele Dossier the FBI would not have applied for a FISA warrant. Barr, Durham, Huber, and Horowitz will get to the bottom of any wrongdoing by the FBI and DOJ. Stay tuned, indictments coming for the coup plotters.

3. Trump did not ask Zelensky "to help him win". Trump asked for Zelensky to look into what the Ukraine did in the 2016 election to help Hillary Clinton and hurt Trump's candidacy. He also asked Z to look into the Biden request to fire the prosecutor investigating Burisma, where Hunter Biden was getting $50,000 a month. Was that a legitimate request? Giuliani has a sworn affidavit from that prosecutor saying that the firing was illegal. It remains to be seen how that will play out, but Biden's video confession is damning. I can't find proof that Joe was acting honorably at the behest of the EU or WTO or Obama, etc.

There is a lot of old 2016 stuff to look into, as well as new 2020 stuff. The House may even vote on impeachment?! Should be an interesting year or two.

 

[B. Kidd]

You assume Trump was asking for dirt on a political opponent and not just performing his oath to uphold the law which way too many seem to have broken.

The president's job is to set policy and delegate tasks to the appropriate agency. When a politician takes law enforcement into his own hands on a political opponent, then it just becomes a political attack.

Then sanctuary cities are nothing more than a renegade political attack

Not satisfied to fill our media with their angry, bitter LYING, Kamala Harris demands Twitter silence Trump and Biden insists Trump's attorney must be banned from cable news.

I believe those Dems have heard of the 1st Amendment but clearly they either never read it or just didn't understand it.

There isn't a single Democrat who is worthy of any office higher than dog catcher. Not one.

Harris is asking Twitter CEO to suspend Trump's account, not demanding. Twitter has an anti-bullying policy, and Trump is coming close to violating it. The threshold is implicit bullying \vs explicit bullying.

For Biden's campaign demanding news outlets stop booking Giuliani, this is just reverse psychology. Hopefully this will cause Giuliani to appear more, because every time he Giuliani goes on the air, it becomes worse for Trump.

"Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself."

What a deep thought.
You're such a deep thinker.....

 

[wamose]

It's the beginning of the end. How many times have I heard that referring to Trump or any of his appointments? The Democrat party is a joke without an ounce of credibility. I really thought Pelosi was smarter. So going forward, how can anyone believe anything the Dems. say? 95% of the people already know what they're going to say before they open their mouths. In other words, their lies are predictable.

 

[georgephillip]

Not one of these leftist talking heads has admitted they were, are, and will always be FOS but while their hysterical silliness contains no information, it does have comedic value.

"Trump warrants impeachment on many counts from violations of the emoluments clause to obstruction of justice, and it's highly likely money laundering will be added to the case after his financial documents are examined.

"Ukraine is merely the latest and simplest of examples proving beyond all reasonable doubt he is too fucking stupid to be POTUS:

House Investigators Question Kurt Volker, First Impeachment Witness

"WASHINGTON — House investigators on Thursday privately questioned Kurt D. Volker, the State Department’s former special envoy for Ukraine, interviewing the first witness in their growing impeachment inquiry into whether President Trump tried to bend American policy for his own political benefit...."

"Investigators for the House Intelligence Committee want to know what Mr. Volker knew, and when, about Mr. Giuliani’s work in Ukraine, the president’s decision to withhold $391 million in security assistance from the country at the same time he was pressing for the investigations of Democrats, and the Trump administration's decision to recall Marie L. Yovanovitch, the former United States ambassador to Ukraine who was targeted by the president and Mr. Giuliani for ostensibly being insufficiently loyal."

 

[SAYIT]

Not one of these leftist talking heads has admitted they were, are, and will always be FOS but while their hysterical silliness contains no information, it does have comedic value.

"Trump warrants impeachment on many counts from violations of the emoluments clause to obstruction of justice, and it's highly likely money laundering will be added to the case after his financial documents are examined...

And as the video shows we've heard that from impotent lefties for 3 solid years. How has it worked out so far?

Pelosi has both a House majority and the authority to impeach but evidently lacks the case to get 'er done. Perhaps you should share your "knowledge" with her.