- Dec 28, 2011
- 59,694
- 53,023
- 3,600
No evidentiary hearings means you cannot prove shit in a courtroom. Trump never got one. Try the truth.Well, they did, 70 times and lost every one of them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
No evidentiary hearings means you cannot prove shit in a courtroom. Trump never got one. Try the truth.Well, they did, 70 times and lost every one of them.
What rules? Every swing state violated its own laws. That has been proven, especially in GA. and WI. Why is nothing be done about it?Are you going to try to change the rules after the election again?
Jacked up Joe really worries you4). Confusing Screaming *Joe to the point he just stares blankly into the abyss waiting for the moderator to save him.
If you have a problem with the rules, address it before people vote.What rules? Every swing state violated its own laws. That has been proven, especially in GA. and WI. Why is nothing be done about it?
A lie, of course.On the contrary, I want free and fair (secure) elections.
Remember when Rudy admitted they have lots of theories but they didn’t have any evidence.No evidentiary hearings means you cannot prove shit in a courtroom. Trump never got one. Try the truth.
Rusty Bowers said that Rudy said that, not Rudy. Try the truth.Remember when Rudy admitted they have lots of theories but they didn’t have any evidence.
There’s your champ Rudy.
This is my business. The problem is that democrats want to make voting as easy as possible so it's easier to cheat. Voting needs to be secure.We will vote by any legal means we want. Mind your own business.
You brainwashed POS. Quit while you think you are ahead.If you have a problem with the rules, address it before people vote.
Your side tried to change the rules after the election and take away our votes.
Are you going to try these abhorrent tactics again?
Bullshit. You're the ones not fooling anyone. You'd allow 16 year olds and non-citizens to vote if you could.A lie, of course.
You want lower turnout. And you are not fooling anyone.
They still don't understand the difference between (a) a theory on what they think "must" have happened, and (b) court-ready evidence of a crime.Remember when Rudy admitted they have lots of theories but they didn’t have any evidence.
There’s your champ Rudy.
The cultists are already gearing up for the attacks on the elections if he loses in November. How many people will they beat with poles flying the US flag this time when they help him attempt to overturn another election? I'm sure the usual 'patriotic' suspects here will be cheering it on.
Correct. The hillbilly insirrectionists are all Trumpers.Lol! And I'm sure the Leftards who want "Anyone But Trump" will just throw up their hands, and say "aw schucks", if Tump is allowed to win. Right?
Correct? Like last time when the fuckers burned down half the country? Yeah... Not likely...Correct. The hillbilly insirrectionists are all Trumpers.
That didnt happen, you delusinal freak. AM radio has turned your brains to diarrhea.Correct? Like last time when the fuckers burned down half the country? Yeah... Not likely...
Damn my lyin' eyes...That didnt happen, you delusinal freak. AM radio has turned your brains to diarrhea.
At least hillbillies can define what a woman is.Correct. The hillbilly insirrectionists are all Trumpers.
There was no insurrection.Correct. The hillbilly insirrectionists are all Trumpers.
So, Rudy said it, Rusty repeated what he heardRusty Bowers said that Rudy said that, not Rudy. Try the truth.
It makes it hearsay. Not accepted as evidence.So, Rudy said it, Rusty repeated what he heard
Doesn’t make it a lie