It's official: Majority of Amercian's voted Barack Obama, Best President Ever!

Sure! Soon as you tell me how anyone cannot, CANNOT get at least one form of legal ID in this country in their entire life that WANTS to vote AND that there are so many of such people that it could even come close to changing the outcome of an election? Why do you keep avoiding THESE QUESTIONS, Numbnuts?

Seems to me this is a far bigger threat than Russia! Get on it!
Why are you so wound up on something that rarely ever happens?


Because the issue isn't the 5 or 10 or even the hundred oddballs so far out of it that in living 80 years, they haven't any ID WHATSOEVER to vote in a district that REQUIRES ID, it is the hundreds of thousands or millions of illegals that DO have voter registration from people like Jerry Brown given freely to vote in districts that DON'T require citizen ID! There. Schooled. Really. You can't feign you don't understand the issue anymore, just continue to lie about it.
 
considering the actions of the bananas on the Left side of the court yesterday, they had no clue why they were there.
After yesterday, there is no one talking about the left. Those republicans were just "out there"! If I were you, I'd make it a point to let people know, those republicans don't represent me!

If I were you, I'd make it a point to let people know, those republicans don't represent me!

If I were you, I'd make it a point to let people know, those democrats don't represent me!
 
In a recent Pew Research Poll, Barack Obama is No.1 in the Best President category.

Obama Leaves Trump in the Dust in Public's Ranking of the Best Presidents

"When asked which president has done the best job in their lifetimes, more Americans name Barack Obama than any other president."

Despite President Donald Trump's fervent support among his base, a recently released Pew Research Center poll found that he is trailing President Barack Obama, President Bill Clinton, and President Ronald Reagan in a survey of public opinion.
Well, I think I'll just leave it at that.


Must be the same pollster that predicted hiLIARy would win.
 
I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
It is fair if that is a representation of the population you are sampling

Nobody doin* a poll says....I need 500 Democrats and 500 Republicans.
 
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
It is fair if that is a representation of the population you are sampling

Nobody doin* a poll says....I need 500 Democrats and 500 Republicans.


bud, I don't trust polls

either the questions are slanted, or the 'representation' is slanted.


You want to believe them, have at.

i don't
 
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
It is fair if that is a representation of the population you are sampling

Nobody doin* a poll says....I need 500 Democrats and 500 Republicans.


bud, I don't trust polls

either the questions are slanted, or the 'representation' is slanted.


You want to believe them, have at.

i don't
Until the poll supports your position
 
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
It is fair if that is a representation of the population you are sampling

Nobody doin* a poll says....I need 500 Democrats and 500 Republicans.


bud, I don't trust polls

either the questions are slanted, or the 'representation' is slanted.


You want to believe them, have at.

i don't
Until the poll supports your position


Doubt you've noticed, but I rarely quote polls.
 
Because the issue isn't the 5 or 10 or even the hundred oddballs so far out of it that in living 80 years, they haven't any ID WHATSOEVER to vote in a district that REQUIRES ID, it is the hundreds of thousands or millions of illegals that DO have voter registration from people like Jerry Brown given freely to vote in districts that DON'T require citizen ID! There. Schooled. Really. You can't feign you don't understand the issue anymore, just continue to lie about it.
I know what the issue is, you're a lunatic who believes in bullshit.
 
Because the issue isn't the 5 or 10 or even the hundred oddballs so far out of it that in living 80 years, they haven't any ID WHATSOEVER to vote in a district that REQUIRES ID, it is the hundreds of thousands or millions of illegals that DO have voter registration from people like Jerry Brown given freely to vote in districts that DON'T require citizen ID! There. Schooled. Really. You can't feign you don't understand the issue anymore, just continue to lie about it.
I know what the issue is, you're a lunatic who believes in bullshit.


Really? You know what the issue is and that is it? You know, I'm always IMPRESSED when you post, Billo, not in anything you say, but the fact that you even manage to post anything at all.
 
I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
your posts prove otherwise.
ROFLMAO...is that so

Since it's acceptable for you to be an idiot,
it's acceptable for me to point it out
you're not getting the point.
No darling, I reject your illogical argument

You don't have, nor make, a reasonable point,
when it's supported by an illogical argument
44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Post #83 ^
if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
So, let me get this straight...

if the 3 main political parties are equally represented,
by the 2,002 people, responding to the poll,
the poll is fair and reflects the majority of millions

Otherwise, the % only is reflective of the 2,002 respondents

2,002 people COULD NEVER conclude the likelihood of millions!

How you reason, a fair cross section, of 2,002 people,
across the country, would achieve this, is mind boggling!

The poll itself, isn't even accurately reflecting the results

It's official, the overwhelming majority of Americans
DID NOT take part in a poll and select Obama, as the best POTUS

Everyone has a right to be stupid,
but, you're just abusing that privilege!
 
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.
Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy
your posts prove otherwise.
ROFLMAO...is that so

Since it's acceptable for you to be an idiot,
it's acceptable for me to point it out
you're not getting the point.
No darling, I reject your illogical argument

You don't have, nor make, a reasonable point,
when it's supported by an illogical argument
44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.
Post #83 ^
if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?
So, let me get this straight...

if the 3 main political parties are equally represented,
by the 2,002 people, responding to the poll,
the poll is fair and reflects the majority of millions

Otherwise, the % only is reflective of the 2,002 respondents

2,002 people COULD NEVER conclude the likelihood of millions!

How you reason, a fair cross section, of 2,002 people,
across the country, would achieve this, is mind boggling!

The poll itself, isn't even accurately reflecting the results

It's official, the overwhelming majority of Americans
DID NOT take part in a poll and select Obama, as the best POTUS

Everyone has a right to be stupid,
but, you're just abusing that privilege!
Statistical sampling theory
You can tell a lot about a population of 300 million with a random sample of 2000 and a margin of error
 
that's funny.......hahahahahhahahahahah
a lot of people liked hitler also
and Pol Pot
Jim Jones
Stalin
etc
 

Forum List

Back
Top