It's official: Majority of Amercian's voted Barack Obama, Best President Ever!

[rightwinger]

Bitch, please

Indicting Russian nationals
and an Internet Research Agency, for meddling....

attempting to sow political discord
making derogatory statements online
favoring Trump but, not poor Hillary
buying political advertisement on social media
attempting to influence public opinion

There was already discord moron
All candidates make derogatory statements,
about the other candidates
Who wasn't using social media to sway voters
All candidates attempt to influence public opinion

Why was the 'meddling' not brought to light, early on?

As far as Hillary goes, her poll numbers went down immediately following Comey going public (regarding the FBI's investigation of her).

As far as Hillary goes,
the 'polls' still showed Trump, eating her dust

Just like the bullshit claims, that the majority of Americans
chose Obama as the best president, in a recent poll.

44%, of 2,002 people, who were allowed multiple responses,
and didn't include the % of those who answered 'don't know',
and the % totals, are greater than 100%....

Are inaccurate, misleading and hogwash!

The 4 people convicted and 1 to be indicted, were all part of Trump's campaign and inner circle.

More to come once they squeal

Can’t wait to hear Cohens inside information on Crooked Donnie

 

[toobfreak]

Not only is that total BULLSHIT, but if anyone DIDN'T have acceptable ID, THAT IS THEIR FAULT! Obviously they choose not to have it. Only eligible legal citizens and preferably landowners and taxpayers should have any say in our elections. I wouldn't be against a test as well. We don't want the vote of idiots who have no idea what they're voting for!

What about the handicapped, or the poor, who don't have the resources to go get your bullshit ID?

Again, show me where there are no many absolutely destitute, sick, elderly impoverished people that can't get ANY KIND of valid ID whatsoever, that:
A). Their number is so great as to CHANGE an election.
B). Voting for someone is even in the top 100 of their concerns and problems they are dealing with.
C). That they even have the means to own a TV, internet, newspaper, anything for them to even know who the candidates are, when the election is, the issues, or these people's positions upon which to base a vote in the first place?

STOP THE DAMNED LYING
INSTITUTE VOTER ID LAWS NOW

You have yet to show where 99 percent of the population has an acceptable ID

Your opinion has no weight.......Where is your study?

You have yet to EVER respond to showing where even 1% DON'T have ID. THAT IS THE TOPIC, stick to it.
You never have any opinion, you have no weight, you have no credibility, you have no study.
All you ever do is post stupid shit to get your post count up and waste people's time.

Where are all the no-ID people whom would CHANGE ANY ELECTION if missed?
Where are the droves of people who have TRIED to vote but were BLOCKED because they COULD NOT GET any form of legal ID?

How can we consider an election so sacred we spend millions worrying that some country on the other side of the planet might have slightly influenced one with Facebook ads to 0.00001% yet we care nothing to even ensure that those here voting are actually legally valid voters?

Read post 182

Now you provide credible proof that 99 percent HAVE ID

Sure! Soon as you tell me how anyone cannot, CANNOT get at least one form of legal ID in this country in their entire life that WANTS to vote AND that there are so many of such people that it could even come close to changing the outcome of an election? Why do you keep avoiding THESE QUESTIONS, Numbnuts?

Seems to me this is a far bigger threat than Russia! Get on it!

 

[rightwinger]

What about the handicapped, or the poor, who don't have the resources to go get your bullshit ID?

Again, show me where there are no many absolutely destitute, sick, elderly impoverished people that can't get ANY KIND of valid ID whatsoever, that:
A). Their number is so great as to CHANGE an election.
B). Voting for someone is even in the top 100 of their concerns and problems they are dealing with.
C). That they even have the means to own a TV, internet, newspaper, anything for them to even know who the candidates are, when the election is, the issues, or these people's positions upon which to base a vote in the first place?

STOP THE DAMNED LYING
INSTITUTE VOTER ID LAWS NOW

You have yet to show where 99 percent of the population has an acceptable ID

Your opinion has no weight.......Where is your study?

You have yet to EVER respond to showing where even 1% DON'T have ID. THAT IS THE TOPIC, stick to it.
You never have any opinion, you have no weight, you have no credibility, you have no study.
All you ever do is post stupid shit to get your post count up and waste people's time.

Where are all the no-ID people whom would CHANGE ANY ELECTION if missed?
Where are the droves of people who have TRIED to vote but were BLOCKED because they COULD NOT GET any form of legal ID?

How can we consider an election so sacred we spend millions worrying that some country on the other side of the planet might have slightly influenced one with Facebook ads to 0.00001% yet we care nothing to even ensure that those here voting are actually legally valid voters?

Read post 182

Now you provide credible proof that 99 percent HAVE ID

Sure! Soon as you tell me how anyone cannot, CANNOT get at least one form of legal ID in this country in their entire life that WANTS to vote AND that there are so many of such people that it could even come close to changing the outcome of an election? Why do you keep avoiding THESE QUESTIONS, Numbnuts?

Seems to me this is a far bigger threat than Russia! Get on it!

Don’t drive, don’t have a passport, have some inconsistencies in their birth certificate, doesn’t have a concealed carry permit

You still haven’t provided any data showing that 99 percent of people have acceptable ID

 

[Auld Phart]

less then half of 2200 equals over 200 million people.

(must be the new math my grandkids are talking about)

less then half of 2200 equals over 200 million people.

What?

Isn't that what you said?

'

44% of 2,000 adults, represents over 200 million people

I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

 

[Auld Phart]

Voter fraud doesn't exist but, yous blame Russia
for Hillary losing...she blames them, plus
everyone and everything else

Exactly, no matter how many times you blame Russia,
there is no evidence to back that up

Are you on crack? After 20 indictments, 4 convictions and we're not even finished with this investigation, you say there is no evidence? You are WHACK!

As far as Hillary goes, her poll numbers went down immediately following Comey going public (regarding the FBI's investigation of her). And at that time, he conveniently did not mention the ongoing FBI investigation of Trump campaign officials.

The one thing we can take from all of this, is you and that republican banana court yesterday, are mentally incapable of being anywhere near a public office.

The one thing we can take from all of this, is you and that republican banana court yesterday, are mentally incapable of being anywhere near a public office.

considering the actions of the bananas on the Left side of the court yesterday, they had no clue why they were there.

 

[jillian]

Presidents in my lifetime

1. Ike
2. The Great Obama
3. Reagan
4. JFK
5. LBJ
6. Clinton
7. Bush 41
8. Carter
9. Ford
10. Nixon
11 Trump
12 Bush 43

If Nixon hadn’t been paranoid, and criminal, he would have gone down as the greatest president in my lifetime. Today he couldn’t get through a republican primary

Nixon was highly qualified to be president and did a great job in foreign policy and even performed as good as could be expected on Vietnam

But his internal demons were his undoing
Much like Trump

Nixon also started the EPA. And ultimately ended Vietnam.
He did have horrible demons. But he was also very smart.

Unlike Donald, who is not only unstable, he's an ignorant moron.

 

[jillian]

What?

Isn't that what you said?

'

44% of 2,000 adults, represents over 200 million people

I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

nice delusional thinking there.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gerrymandering only impacts House seats, it doesn't do shit to the other 533 EC votes.

It affects 435 seats.

How many EC votes do you think there are?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You just provided a link which shows gerrymandering benefited the House. You did not provide one which shows gerrymandering increased Trump's electoral votes.

I don't think you understand how the electoral college process works.

The number of a States districts = the number of a State's electoral votes.

You left out the EC votes for each state's 2 senate seats.

If you win the districts' popular vote, you win that districts' electoral vote.

The only 2 states that decide any EC votes by district are Maine(2) and Nebraska(3).

In some States, if you win the majority of districts, you get all the States' electoral votes.

No, no, no. Wrong. No state adds up the "won districts" to see who won the state.
They add up all the votes statewide to see who gets the EC votes.
It's possible to win 52 of California's 53 districts and still lose the state by hundreds of thousands of votes.

So Trump wins these electoral votes in States, with a minority of the popular vote.

Nope. In every state Trump won he had more votes than Hillary.

I already admitted I was mistaken on this issue, yet you carry on like I didn't. Get ADD much?

I already admitted I was mistaken on this issue, yet you carry on like I didn't

The post where I was correcting your stupidity was earlier than the post where you admitted your stupidity.

 

[rightwinger]

Gerrymandering only impacts House seats, it doesn't do shit to the other 533 EC votes.

It affects 435 seats.

How many EC votes do you think there are?

100 more

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It is a total waste of time expending any energy to prevent something that hardly ever happens.

Waste of time? How much time does it take to pull your ID out of your wallet while waiting in line?

Too much time.

Should we make it a law that you must carry toilet paper while jogging, in the event you have to take a shit while running at full speed?

DERP!

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Gerrymandering only impacts House seats, it doesn't do shit to the other 533 EC votes.

It affects 435 seats.

How many EC votes do you think there are?

100 more

Darn it, I was waiting for Billo to make a bigger fool of himself.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Again, show me where there are no many absolutely destitute, sick, elderly impoverished people that can't get ANY KIND of valid ID whatsoever, that:
A). Their number is so great as to CHANGE an election.
B). Voting for someone is even in the top 100 of their concerns and problems they are dealing with.
C). That they even have the means to own a TV, internet, newspaper, anything for them to even know who the candidates are, when the election is, the issues, or these people's positions upon which to base a vote in the first place?

STOP THE DAMNED LYING
INSTITUTE VOTER ID LAWS NOW

You mean institute voter suppression? Let's call it for what it is.

Suppressing the shit of out the dead and illegal alien voters!!

 

[keepitreal]

What?

Isn't that what you said?

'

44% of 2,000 adults, represents over 200 million people

I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

 

[Auld Phart]

Isn't that what you said?

'

I was being sarcastic, thats why I added....

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

If my world were little, I'd believe your post.


but....

44% of 2200 doesn't represent over 200 million people, if the participants don't represent an equal cross section of the country.

it only represents 44% of those 2200 people.

Omg girl..maybe your grandkids
could help you out with reading comprehension!

I replied to the crap cowboyted posted

He's creaming over a pew research poll.

2,002 people were polled
If anyone bothered to read the fine print,
they would have learned, don't know answers, weren't included
and that the numbers add to more than 100%
because of multiple responses

I listed these facts and added....

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

Do you enjoy living in your own little world?

Which, he must...because that's the only place,
where 44% of 2,002 respondents, can make him cream....
His own little world

There are over 200 million people,
2,002 people do not speak for the majority

Don't worry about my math skills,
my math skills are fine....
Worry about your comprehension skills...
they suck!

44% of 2,000 people, represent over 200 million people

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

only if that 44% is a fair cross section of the country.

Seems to be something wrong with your comprehension, not mine.

Omg....wtf are you talking about?

44%, of 2,002 people, isn't a fair representation of people...
44%, of 2,002 people, is less than 20 people per state
And your talking about, as long as it's a fair cross section

There is definitely something wrong with your
comprehension, math and critical thinking skills....not mine

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

Sorry, I'm not fluent in idiocy

your posts prove otherwise.

you're not getting the point.

if 1500 of those polled are democrats, 500 republicans, and 2 independents....

is it a fair poll?

 

[Billo_Really]

More to come once they squeal

Can’t wait to hear Cohens inside information on Crooked Donnie

12 more people indicted just before I logged in today.

No evidence my ass!

 

[Billo_Really]

Sure! Soon as you tell me how anyone cannot, CANNOT get at least one form of legal ID in this country in their entire life that WANTS to vote AND that there are so many of such people that it could even come close to changing the outcome of an election? Why do you keep avoiding THESE QUESTIONS, Numbnuts?

Seems to me this is a far bigger threat than Russia! Get on it!

Why are you so wound up on something that rarely ever happens?

 

[Billo_Really]

considering the actions of the bananas on the Left side of the court yesterday, they had no clue why they were there.

After yesterday, there is no one talking about the left. Those republicans were just "out there"! If I were you, I'd make it a point to let people know, those republicans don't represent me!

 

[Billo_Really]

How many EC votes do you think there are?

Irrelevant.

 

[Billo_Really]

I already admitted I was mistaken on this issue, yet you carry on like I didn't

The post where I was correcting your stupidity was earlier than the post where you admitted your stupidity.

And the post I was commenting on, came after my admittance.