"It's my body, my choice" doesn't count if another life is invovled.

Funny thing...all those folks intent on telling a woman what she can or can not do with her own body, fall silent to the plight of children born into poverty....and in fact advocate cutting them off aid.
 
Jjj
Self begins at birth.
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
 
Funny thing...all those folks intent on telling a woman what she can or can not do with her own body, fall silent to the plight of children born into poverty....and in fact advocate cutting them off aid.
We see what you did there...
funny-pilot-ejecting-plane-jet-crash-accident.jpg
 
Jjj
"Self" ends at conception. After... It becomes "we". Two people, with two unique sets of DNA. And our law states that all are created equal. And as such all parties are afforded equal protection, and treatment under the law.
Self begins at birth.
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.
 
Jjj
Self begins at birth.
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
 
Jjj
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...
 
Doesn't it? Really? You see, we have a legal precedent in this country known as "bodily autonomy". Because of this precedent, you cannot force me to donate blood, even if it is necessary to save a life. Similarly, you cannot harvest the organs of a corpse without the prior consent of the person, before they died. Even a corpse is allowed bodily autonomy.

To insist that a person give up their bodily autonomy for nine months during an expensive, invasive, often life threatening procedure is immoral, unethical, and illegal. You are attempting to demand that women surrender the bodily autonomy that we afford to corpses. Really??????
Cancer, made up of human chromosomes living in your body, do you have a right to destroy that? It's you body, it's your choice. Yes indeed.
 
Jjj
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
Then that expense has to be proven unwillingly forfeited...
 
Jjj
Wrong. DNA evidence proves as much. And is backed up by courts double homicide rulings for the murder of pregnant women. And the constitution; " all men are created equal", people are created at conception. Try again baby killer...
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.

Murdering a human living inside you isn't a "right".
 
Jjj
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...

:lol:

Conception wasn't a recognized event. Birth was. Actually - to be accurate, an independent being was recognized at the drawing of the first breath.

Does a fetus have an SS#?
Can a fetus be claimed as a dependent?
Can a fetus sign contracts?
If a person is declared dead upon cessation of brainwaves...is a fetus dead prior to brainwaves?
Is a fetus be counted in a census?
Why do people always say they have two children and another on the way...why not three?



Can you have two sets of rights in ONE body? Who's takes precedence?
 
Jjj
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
Then that expense has to be proven unwillingly forfeited...

Nope. You do not forfeit rights to your own body. This is not slavery.
 
Jjj
Self begins at birth, nothing to do with DNA. Let’s see how childish you get....
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.

Murdering a human living inside you isn't a "right".

Removing an unwanted tenant is.
 
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...

:lol:

Conception wasn't a recognized event. Birth was. Actually - to be accurate, an independent being was recognized at the drawing of the first breath.

Does a fetus have an SS#?
Can a fetus be claimed as a dependent?
Can a fetus sign contracts?
If a person is declared dead upon cessation of brainwaves...is a fetus dead prior to brainwaves?
Is a fetus be counted in a census?
Why do people always say they have two children and another on the way...why not three?



Can you have two sets of rights in ONE body? Who's takes precedence?
None of your deflections are relevant to the point you thought you were making previously before I smacked you down... The constitution. Try harder...
 
Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...

:lol:

Conception wasn't a recognized event. Birth was. Actually - to be accurate, an independent being was recognized at the drawing of the first breath.

Does a fetus have an SS#?
Can a fetus be claimed as a dependent?
Can a fetus sign contracts?
If a person is declared dead upon cessation of brainwaves...is a fetus dead prior to brainwaves?
Is a fetus be counted in a census?
Why do people always say they have two children and another on the way...why not three?



Can you have two sets of rights in ONE body? Who's takes precedence?
None of your deflections are relevant to the point you thought you were making previously before I smacked you down... The constitution. Try harder...

The Constitution doesn't recognize life prior to birth. No cigar.
 
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
Then that expense has to be proven unwillingly forfeited...

Nope. You do not forfeit rights to your own body. This is not slavery.
So... Were you to be in the act of say... Holding my hand, or kissing me... I could shoot you in the moment I decided I no longer wanted you invading my body...?
 
No need to explain further... You have your own opinion to defend at the moment...


Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
Then that expense has to be proven unwillingly forfeited...

Nope. You do not forfeit rights to your own body. This is not slavery.
The human body inside the mother has rights. Scott Petersen was charged with murder and found guilty.
 
It says "created". At conception a unique, new DNA sequence of human is created. Its not rocket science. That's why your kidney, is your kidney. Its your DNA; your "self". And can be proven so. No so much for another person...

It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...

:lol:

Conception wasn't a recognized event. Birth was. Actually - to be accurate, an independent being was recognized at the drawing of the first breath.

Does a fetus have an SS#?
Can a fetus be claimed as a dependent?
Can a fetus sign contracts?
If a person is declared dead upon cessation of brainwaves...is a fetus dead prior to brainwaves?
Is a fetus be counted in a census?
Why do people always say they have two children and another on the way...why not three?



Can you have two sets of rights in ONE body? Who's takes precedence?
None of your deflections are relevant to the point you thought you were making previously before I smacked you down... The constitution. Try harder...

The Constitution doesn't recognize life prior to birth. No cigar.
The constitution makes no distinction beyond created. You've failed again.
 
Where does the Constitution reference people being created at conception or in fact any rights prior to birth?

The preborn are members of the human species from the moment of fertilization. The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution was written to protect every human being, especially the weakest and most marginalized.

Not at the expense of the rights of another.
Then that expense has to be proven unwillingly forfeited...

Nope. You do not forfeit rights to your own body. This is not slavery.
So... Were you to be in the act of say... Holding my hand, or kissing me... I could shoot you in the moment I decided I no longer wanted you invading my body...?

Nope.

I'm an independent life form living independent of your body.
 
It has no reference to rights before birth. Created does not refer to conception.
It never denies rights prior to birth. It only mentions "created". Which happens at conception. You've failed again...

:lol:

Conception wasn't a recognized event. Birth was. Actually - to be accurate, an independent being was recognized at the drawing of the first breath.

Does a fetus have an SS#?
Can a fetus be claimed as a dependent?
Can a fetus sign contracts?
If a person is declared dead upon cessation of brainwaves...is a fetus dead prior to brainwaves?
Is a fetus be counted in a census?
Why do people always say they have two children and another on the way...why not three?



Can you have two sets of rights in ONE body? Who's takes precedence?
None of your deflections are relevant to the point you thought you were making previously before I smacked you down... The constitution. Try harder...

The Constitution doesn't recognize life prior to birth. No cigar.
The constitution makes no distinction beyond created. You've failed again.

It makes no mention of conception. You going to keep doubling up on fail?
 

Forum List

Back
Top