Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?there was no reason to say todler except to incite a reactiondo you not know what a "todler" is?
Go back and read the posts again.
thats what shitgun does
do you not know what a "todler" is?The IDF stated that 309 "innocent civilians" had been killed. Is 300 not a close enough estimate for you?
Go back and read the posts again.
ERUSALEM (JTA) -- Some 1,434 Palestinians were killed, including 960 civilians, during Israel's military offensive in Gaza, a Palestinian human rights group said.
The dead included 288 children and 121 women, the Palestinian Center for Human Rights said on Thursday.
The non-civilians killed included 239 police officers and 235 "fighters," according to the group.
Palestinian rights group releases Cast Lead stats | JTA - Jewish & Israel News
And I used the GENEROUS figures from the fucking jpost, you goofy ****. Can you fucking count to 300, fuckstick? go ahead and use your zionist target practice decoy if you need to.
are all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?there was no reason to say todler except to incite a reaction
Go back and read the posts again.
thats what shitgun does
are all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?there was no reason to say todler except to incite a reaction
thats what shitgun does
NO
as they should beare all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?
NO
Any fatality that was 16 years or younger was put on the list of children who were killed.
are all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?
NO
Any fatality that was 16 years or younger was put on the list of children who were killed.
Semantics?are all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?there was no reason to say todler except to incite a reaction
thats what shitgun does
NO
ah, thanks for the puntSemantics?are all children todlers?There's no reason to point out the large number of children killed by the IDF in their latest human rights disaster?
NO
No thank you.
Oh, i forgot, Kalam is a muslim, which means he hates jews by default. The opinions of muslims dont matter, because they are obviously heavily biased.
when in doubt, scream ANTISEMITE!
sad.. very pathetic, actually.
Oh, God no. You're all about the Jew love.
"jew love" doesn't amount to "jew blank check favoratism" in my book. You've never seen me calling for the mass extermination of a single jewish population like you HAVE seen DavidS "joke" about. By all means, if you can find a quote of mine then post it. Remember, IM the one whose position is based on pluralism and democratic equality despite race...
now, go put your pussy back in your pants before someone else makes it bleed all over the carpet again.
Oh, i forgot,
LOL.Kalam is a muslim, which means he hates jews by default.
My opinions are based on my own observations. Almost everybody around me (online as well as IRL) is an ardent supporter of Israel. I don't attend a mosque or worship with any congregation, so my opinions aren't based on the ravings of any anti-Semitic imam. The specific school of thought that I follow is based heavily on logical arguments and rationality, so the type of religious prejudice that you subscribe to would not be compatible with my beliefs.The opinions of muslims dont matter, because they are obviously heavily biased.
"jew love" doesn't amount to "jew blank check favoratism" in my book.
Obviously in your book that blank check is reserved only for the the Palesitinians.
quote me where i've suggested pali rockets are a godsend and have defended their use as wholly necessary.
or, just sit there with your thumbs up your ass waiting to cry antisemite.. it's not as if you people really change tactics.
except the difference between a todler and children is semantics to youOh, i forgot,
You forgot? Did the giant Arabic avatar and name clue you in, dipshit?
LOL.Kalam is a muslim, which means he hates jews by default.
Of my closest friends, 3 are Jewish... at least one has a number of family members who served in the IDF, and even he agrees that Cast Lead was completely retarded.
My opinions are based on my own observations. Almost everybody around me (online as well as IRL) is an ardent supporter of Israel. I don't attend a mosque or worship with any congregation, so my opinions aren't based on the ravings of any anti-Semitic imam. The specific school of thought that I follow is based heavily on logical arguments and rationality, so the type of religious prejudice that you subscribe to would not be compatible with my beliefs.The opinions of muslims dont matter, because they are obviously heavily biased.
Hamas soldiers jump into the nearest phone booth and change clothes à la Superman whenever the IDF shows up? Somehow I doubt that.Well those green head bands come off AWFULLY quick... as do the face masks... which are designed to hide their identity... this because THEY ARE CIVILIANS, LIVING IN AND AMONG OTHER REST OF THE CIVILIANS...
Not that it matters how they're dressed when Israel indiscriminately drops bombs, uses white phosphorous, and uses cluster munitions in densely populated urban areas...
Way to cite an event from over 20 years ago. What does that have to do with anything today? What the hell does a PLF hijacking have to do with Hamas or the IDF? The answer to both questions is nothing.The guy in a wheel chair is an American whose name was Leon Klinghoffer... The Palestinian murdered him while he was on a Mediterian Cruise with his wife...
Inaccurate/sweeping generalizations. Go ahead and rationalize Israel's massacre of Palestinian civilians. Hopefully, it'll make you feel better while you try to pretend that they were all "terrorist supporters" or "human shields."Yeah these are a peaceful, innocent people... who train their children to hate Jews and whose only purpose is to murder innocent people.
Clearly, I'm far more deserving of censure than someone who makes blanket generalizations about Muslims being anti-Semitic and having worthless opinions.except the difference between a todler and children is semantics to you
Hamas soldiers jump into the nearest phone booth and change clothes à la Superman whenever the IDF shows up? Somehow I doubt that.Well those green head bands come off AWFULLY quick... as do the face masks... which are designed to hide their identity... this because THEY ARE CIVILIANS, LIVING IN AND AMONG OTHER REST OF THE CIVILIANS...
Not that it matters how they're dressed when Israel indiscriminately drops bombs, uses white phosphorous, and uses cluster munitions in densely populated urban areas...
Way to cite an event from over 20 years ago. What does that have to do with anything today? What the hell does a PLF hijacking have to do with Hamas or the IDF? The answer to both questions is nothing.
Inaccurate/sweeping generalizations. Go ahead and rationalize Israel's massacre of Palestinian civilians. Hopefully, it'll make you feel better while you try to pretend that they were all "terrorist supporters" or "human shields."Yeah these are a peaceful, innocent people... who train their children to hate Jews and whose only purpose is to murder innocent people.
kinda makes ya wish ya handn't blown up that cafe eh......
you must have me confused with someone elseClearly, I'm far more deserving of censure than someone who makes blanket generalizations about Muslims being anti-Semitic and having worthless opinions.except the difference between a todler and children is semantics to you
you must have me confused with someone elseClearly, I'm far more deserving of censure than someone who makes blanket generalizations about Muslims being anti-Semitic and having worthless opinions.except the difference between a todler and children is semantics to you
well, YOU were the one saying that fuck head shitgun was correct when he clearly wasntyou must have me confused with someone elseClearly, I'm far more deserving of censure than someone who makes blanket generalizations about Muslims being anti-Semitic and having worthless opinions.
Why complain about my refusal to discuss semantics and not about GB's anti-Islamic prejudice? After all, isn't the assertion that Palestinians supporters are prejudiced a trademark argument of the pro-Israel side of the debate? It can't look good to have prejudice on your own side... or does it only count as prejudice when it's directed towards Jews?
