What are you most "proud" of "veteran"?
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Without lies you wouldn't have much to bore us with, would you?avneri lives by stealing-----he has hardly worked a day in his life
What are you most "proud" of "veteran"?
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
Israel struck first in '67 days before it shot up the USS Liberty killing 34 Americans and nineteen years after one-third of the entire population of Mandate Palestine inflicted a Jewish State by force of arms upon the majority of all Palestinians.What are you most "proud" of "veteran"?
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
What " illegal invasions?" " Illegal l occuoations?" Where was " Palestine" before 1967? Who initiated the 1967 War? What about Hamas even now insisting Israel doesn't have the right to exist?
If the Arabs had won the 1967 War and Israel didn't exist somehow I don't think you would be whining about " Occupation" Maybe you can tell us why the 1967 Borders were Never recognized and still aren't?
Thanks for your stupidity; You moron
Georgie, as time goes by you will learn that if you try to match wits or tangle with PV you will be severely mauled. Just a friendly warning.Israel struck first in '67 days before it shot up the USS Liberty killing 34 Americans and nineteen years after one-third of the entire population of Mandate Palestine inflicted a Jewish State by force of arms upon the majority of all Palestinians.What are you most "proud" of "veteran"?
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
What " illegal invasions?" " Illegal l occuoations?" Where was " Palestine" before 1967? Who initiated the 1967 War? What about Hamas even now insisting Israel doesn't have the right to exist?
If the Arabs had won the 1967 War and Israel didn't exist somehow I don't think you would be whining about " Occupation" Maybe you can tell us why the 1967 Borders were Never recognized and still aren't?
Thanks for your stupidity; You moron
All three crimes were part of a deliberate Zionist policy of "creeping annexation" and "creeping transfer" best summed up by Moshe Dayan in 1970:
"...we must tell the Palestinian refugees in the territories that 'we have no solution, you shall continue to live like dogs, and whoever wishes may leave, and we will see where the process leads.'"
Chomsky, Failed States p.191
I'm afraid but you should be too. Irosie and PV went to the same school.Be afraid, Hossie...the End in Near!
Israel struck first in '67 days before it shot up the USS Liberty killing 34 Americans and nineteen years after one-third of the entire population of Mandate Palestine inflicted a Jewish State by force of arms upon the majority of all Palestinians.What are you most "proud" of "veteran"?
Taking part in illegal invasions or occupations?
Thanks for your stupidity, Slave.
What " illegal invasions?" " Illegal l occuoations?" Where was " Palestine" before 1967? Who initiated the 1967 War? What about Hamas even now insisting Israel doesn't have the right to exist?
If the Arabs had won the 1967 War and Israel didn't exist somehow I don't think you would be whining about " Occupation" Maybe you can tell us why the 1967 Borders were Never recognized and still aren't?
Thanks for your stupidity; You moron
All three crimes were part of a deliberate Zionist policy of "creeping annexation" and "creeping transfer" best summed up by Moshe Dayan in 1970:
"...we must tell the Palestinian refugees in the territories that 'we have no solution, you shall continue to live like dogs, and whoever wishes may leave, and we will see where the process leads.'"
Chomsky, Failed States p.191
There's nothing to "negotiate" because the US and Israel have rejected every Arab peace proposal since 1976:
"The basic terms of the international consensus on the Arab-Israel conflict were expressed in a resolution brought to the Security Council in January 1976, calling for a settlement on the pre-June 1967 borders (the Green Line) with 'appropriate arrangements...to guarantee...the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all states in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries,' including Israel and a new Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
"The resolution was backed by Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and the PLO -- in fact 'prepared' by the PLO according to Israel's UN Ambassador Haim Herzog, now President. It was strenuously opposed by Israel and vetoed by the United States, once again in 1980.
"These events are -- automatically -- out of history, along with other facts unacceptable to US power, including repeated PLO initiatives through the 1980s calling for negotiations with Israel leading to mutual recognition... "
There is nothing to " negotiate" because it calls for Israel to make ALL the concessions. When two or more parties " negotiate" it means that BOTH ( or more ) parties have to be willing to compromise sonewhere along the way. Exactly what are the Palestinians willing to do? Oh.. I forgot. The answer is NOTHING.
In addition to insisting that Israel return to boundries that they NEVER recognized in the first place the " Saudi Peace Plan" and Abbas are demanding " Right of Return". Just more proof that the 1967 Boundries never meant anything before 1967 and don't mean anything now.
You are nothing but a Stupid Pro- Palestinian with a demented I.Q ( doubt you even have one) Keep drinking the Kool- Aid
There's nothing to "negotiate" because the US and Israel have rejected every Arab peace proposal since 1976:
"The basic terms of the international consensus on the Arab-Israel conflict were expressed in a resolution brought to the Security Council in January 1976, calling for a settlement on the pre-June 1967 borders (the Green Line) with 'appropriate arrangements...to guarantee...the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all states in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries,' including Israel and a new Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
"The resolution was backed by Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and the PLO -- in fact 'prepared' by the PLO according to Israel's UN Ambassador Haim Herzog, now President. It was strenuously opposed by Israel and vetoed by the United States, once again in 1980.
"These events are -- automatically -- out of history, along with other facts unacceptable to US power, including repeated PLO initiatives through the 1980s calling for negotiations with Israel leading to mutual recognition... "
There is nothing to " negotiate" because it calls for Israel to make ALL the concessions. When two or more parties " negotiate" it means that BOTH ( or more ) parties have to be willing to compromise sonewhere along the way. Exactly what are the Palestinians willing to do? Oh.. I forgot. The answer is NOTHING.
In addition to insisting that Israel return to boundries that they NEVER recognized in the first place the " Saudi Peace Plan" and Abbas are demanding " Right of Return". Just more proof that the 1967 Boundries never meant anything before 1967 and don't mean anything now.
You are nothing but a Stupid Pro- Palestinian with a demented I.Q ( doubt you even have one) Keep drinking the Kool- Aid
In all fairness to Abbas, he recently said that Israel belongs to the Israelis (sounds like recognition) and that, in his mind, the right of return is negotiable. Of course, the duly elected gov't of the "Palestinians" disagrees and slammed Abbas for having the temerity to offer some hope for a peaceful solution:
Stung by mounting criticism including a rally in Gaza where protesters set fire to his portrait the Palestinian President, Mahmoud Abbas, back-pedalled yesterday on his historic compromise over the "right of return" for Palestinian refugees a major sticking-point in Middle East peace-making.
In a TV interview last week, Mr Abbas said he no longer had an automatic right to return to live in Safed, in northern Galilee where he was born in 1935, now part of Israel.
"It's my right to see it, but not to live there ..."
Following the criticism, Mr Abbas told Egyptian television he had been expressing his personal views, not official policy. "What I said about Safed is my personal stance."
http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...sYC4AQ&usg=AFQjCNGOBzRWpw0bznmAEcQHKdPiIjOJJg
There's nothing to "negotiate" because the US and Israel have rejected every Arab peace proposal since 1976:
"The basic terms of the international consensus on the Arab-Israel conflict were expressed in a resolution brought to the Security Council in January 1976, calling for a settlement on the pre-June 1967 borders (the Green Line) with 'appropriate arrangements...to guarantee...the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of all states in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries,' including Israel and a new Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza Strip.
"The resolution was backed by Egypt, Syria, Jordan, and the PLO -- in fact 'prepared' by the PLO according to Israel's UN Ambassador Haim Herzog, now President. It was strenuously opposed by Israel and vetoed by the United States, once again in 1980.
"These events are -- automatically -- out of history, along with other facts unacceptable to US power, including repeated PLO initiatives through the 1980s calling for negotiations with Israel leading to mutual recognition... "
Middle East Diplomacy: Continuities and Changes, by Noam Chomsky
Has the sovereign, yet UNETHICAL, state of Israel decided on its Eastern border, yet?try again georgie---- sovereign nations have the right to determine their own demographics which is why partitions between parties in conflict have been so popular and effective historically Your dream of allowing majorties to commit genocide upon minorities-----is frowned upon by-------ETHICISTS. The ethical considerations are a bone in the throat of the ummah----(maybe that is why its members SLIT THROATS)
1948 Mandate Palestine.
650,000 Jews inflict a Jewish State on 1.2 million Arabs.
Read up on popular sovereignty:
"Popular sovereignty or the sovereignty of the people is the principle that the legitimacy of the state is created and sustained by the will or consent of its people, who are the source of all political power."
That would be ALL the people who are the source of ALL political power, Imbecile.