"Israel doesn't want the rocket to stop. They cause no real damage..."

But, but Israel went and 'murdered' 20,000 children in the 2014 Gaza war, didn't they? To have them tell it.
hundreds of children were killed by Israel, yes.

do you not have a problem with that?


Of course I have a problem with that. We ALL have a problem with that. We just properly assign the responsibility to where it belongs -- with Hamas. When Hamas decides to stop perpetrating belligerent acts of violence not a single child on either side will die or be injured. Not one.

I noticed you haven't yet answered my question about what steps need to be taken to end the conflict and prevent even one more child dying these tragic and horrible deaths.
Two years ago they were to negotiate a comprehensive, long term cease fire.

I haven't heard. Where are they on that?




Because the P.A. wanted to control the cease fire under islamic jurisprudence. This meant they wanted to be able to cancel it at any time without giving notice. Israel said NO we work along the lines of UN resolutions towards a full and final peace and negotiate mutual borders.
Link?




Islam's doctrines of deception
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
 
But, but Israel went and 'murdered' 20,000 children in the 2014 Gaza war, didn't they? To have them tell it.
20,000?! It was 2,000,000 according to Iranian PressTv, and they were all innocent children! Not one terrorist.
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef[/QUO








What Occupation as the land was always Jewish under international law.

The settlements are on Jewish owned land stolen by force in 1949 contrary to the UN charter

What theft and expropriation is this as the land in all Jewish


A pity that hamas leaders constantly refer to the charter when they want to rally the people, then it is understood and accepted by all arab muslims calling themselves palestinians.
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
Israel was judged as a terrorist organization by the British, long before they bombed the King david hotel
The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[9] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[10][11][12] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Zionist gang currently occupying Palestine need to hold on to power by controlling the perception that they are under viable attack from home made rockets with no Warhead

“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship…

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

– Hermann Goering"
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
chera foshe irani midi ?:biggrin:
rasti hamin jomle ke neveshtam be english chi mishe ? mani fosh be english too in jomle chie ?
 
It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy.

Bullcrap. There is no occupation, settlements, theft or expropriation in Gaza. They are in a perfect position to begin building a viable nation. They just choose not to.
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
chera foshe irani midi ?:biggrin:
rasti hamin jomle ke neveshtam be english chi mishe ? mani fosh be english too in jomle chie ?
Een heyvoun iraniyeh islamiyeh. Fanger likes to post propaganda from Iranian PRESSTV. LOL
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
Israel was judged as a terrorist organization by the British, long before they bombed the King david hotel
The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[9] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[10][11][12] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Zionist gang currently occupying Palestine need to hold on to power by controlling the perception that they are under viable attack from home made rockets with no Warhead

“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship…

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

– Hermann Goering"
Ha ha ha ha! Only to a Moooslem heyvoun. Israel is a secular, tolerant, vibrant nation of laws, unlike most of the Muslim shitholes around it.
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
chera foshe irani midi ?:biggrin:
rasti hamin jomle ke neveshtam be english chi mishe ? mani fosh be english too in jomle chie ?
Een heyvoun iraniyeh islamiyeh. Fanger likes to post propaganda from Iranian PRESSTV. LOL
fanger iraniye ?
 
But, but Israel went and 'murdered' 20,000 children in the 2014 Gaza war, didn't they? To have them tell it.

nice lie. but even if it weren't a lie, maybe Palestinian terrorists shouldn't use their children as human shields
The old, They made us do it Lie, 4 boys on a beach with a football as a human shield?






Playing next to a known terrorist outpost. Then the journalists show the rocket launchers installed right outside their windows adding insult to injury. Want to try and prove again that hamas dont use civilians, usually children, to act as human shields.

As for those four boys care to explain how they were bled dry before they reached the hospital and had been dead for at least 48 hours. All in the detailed autopsy report provided by the gazan hospital. Once again islamonazi kithman and taqiya to cover up the murder of children because their fathers are fatah members
 


It really doesn’t matter what political party you belong to in Palestine because every single one has first to deal with Israeli occupation, settlements, theft and expropriation before it can begin to campaign about public policy on jobs, healthcare and the economy. Despite this stark reality, the question I have faced most frequently since returning to Gaza in 2006 is this: does the Hamas charter, which contains passages deemed offensive to Jewish people, truly represent the movement’s vision and political goals? Diplomats, journalists, academics, parliamentarians and politicians from numerous nations have empathised with Palestinians; yet they all seem to struggle with this document.

The question is understandable given how frequently much of the foreign media refers to it. The reality, however, is that one would be hard pressed to find any member of Hamas who is fully versed in the content of the charter – a treatise that was actually never universally endorsed by the movement. Earnest students of Palestine should consider the context. This was a text written in the early days of the first intifada. Our youth rebelling against the Israeli occupiers needed a rallying cry – a written expression of their resolve. The charter was designed to be that inspirational document and it was never intended to be the governing instrument, the guiding principle or the political vision of the movement
Judge Hamas on the measures it takes for its people | Ahmed Yousef
Hamas has been judged as a terrorist organization by the US, Western Europe, and many other nations. Deal with it, bacheh koony.
Israel was judged as a terrorist organization by the British, long before they bombed the King david hotel
The King David Hotel bombing was a terrorist attack carried out on Monday July 22, 1946 by the militant Zionist underground organization Irgun on the British administrative headquarters for Palestine, which was housed in the southern wing[9] of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem.[10][11][12] 91 people of various nationalities were killed and 46 were injured
King David Hotel bombing - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Zionist gang currently occupying Palestine need to hold on to power by controlling the perception that they are under viable attack from home made rockets with no Warhead

“Why, of course, the people don’t want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece. Naturally, the common people don’t want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship…

Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”

– Hermann Goering"






And they also called the arab muslims terrorists long before the Jews started to defend against attacks. The attack on the King David hotel was is responce to the cold blooded mass murder of 250 Jews by the British. They gave warnings of the attack on the military portion and the British ignored them, making them responsible for the deaths.


If they have no warheads then why do they kill so many arab muslims when they land in gaza. And why have illegal chemical and biological materials been found in the warheads. Would you care to explain this ?
 
What's the Hamas Charter say about negotiating peace with Israel?
Do you mean the so called charter that was written in 1988 by one man and was not endorsed by any of the Hamas leadership?

Woo.
Our Declaration of Independence was written by 1 man (Jefferson). Our Constitution was written by 1 man (Madison) and millions of Americans have lived by it. None in Hamas have disavowed a word of their charter and all have lived by it.

You seem to have a singular and very unique understanding of Hamas and Gaza ... an understanding you yourself have manufactured.
:lmao:[/QUOTE][/QUOTE]
 

Forum List

Back
Top