Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Don't act like there is no logical evidence that it isn't. He's got very good reasons for that position, in contrast, people with opposing views don't have the evidence to argue against it, they just act like they do.Would it really matter to someone who believes that "911 was an inside job" and pretty much every other conspiracy theory that exists in the modern (and not so modern) world?
The Patriots did not beat the Seahawks. They won on a bad call by the offensive coordinator of Seattle. If they had given the ball to Marshawn Lynch, there would've been no Patriot victory.The Patriots beat the Seahawks and big mouth Richard Sherman too.
One of the Seahawks all pro players was beaten out in the end zone by one of the Patriots rookies that year! Remember that game?
Malcolm Butler! Woo hoo and bwa-ha-ha-ha!
The Patriots did not beat the Seahawks. They won on a bad call by the offensive coordinator of Seattle. If they had given the ball to Marshawn Lynch, there would've been no Patriot victory.The Patriots beat the Seahawks and big mouth Richard Sherman too.
Don't cherry-pick what I said! In that game, the Seahawks came back on them, not the other way around. If the Pats were down 28 - 3 on that team, they would've lost 45 - 10, just like they did to the Bears.
The only reason men like Brady, is because he has a hot wife.Montana started on the Bench
Johnny U was cut by the Steelers
Brett Favre was traded by Atlanta
It's not where you start...but where you end up with your career
And if they had given it to Lynch, the Pats would've NOT won the game.That end zone interception won the game. So sowwy.
And if they had given it to Lynch, the Pats would've NOT won the game.That end zone interception won the game. So sowwy.
That's right. But you're not addressing my original point, that the Pats would not have came back from 28 - 3 against that team.But they didn't, and the Pats won. That's football! Lol!
I never said they weren't. And you never addressed my point.Football is just as much about the decisions made and the coaching staff as it is about the "play makers." The Pats won. Period. End of story. You can sob about the Patriots all day long but it makes no difference in the end. The Patriots are winners.
I never said they weren't. And you never addressed my point.Football is just as much about the decisions made and the coaching staff as it is about the "play makers." The Pats won. Period. End of story. You can sob about the Patriots all day long but it makes no difference in the end. The Patriots are winners.
If that's what you feel you have to tell yourself, I'm okay with that.You didn't make one.
If that's what you feel you have to tell yourself, I'm okay with that.You didn't make one.
You talk as though Brady won the Super Bowl by himself. He was lucky he was playing Atlanta. If he was playing Seattle, Carolina or Green Bay and was down 28 - 3 in the 3rd quarter, he would've been the losing quarterback. He got lucky playing a bunch of Super Bowl rookies who got psyched out in the 2nd half.Ah...could someone explain to Fart Boy that the Patriots WON the Super Bowl? Duh...
That has nothing to do with the point I made.I don't have to tell myself anything because MY team is a winner.
That has nothing to do with the point I made.I don't have to tell myself anything because MY team is a winner.
My point was the Pats would not have came back against a more Super Bowl experienced team.Did you see what Atlanta did to Seattle and Green Bay?
That's because you don't want to!I don't know what your point is.
That's because you don't want to!I don't know what your point is.
