Is The Aim To Destroy America????

[Toronado3800]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Reuters



What is the Democrat policy vis-a-vis these 'caravans of wanna-be illegal immigrants????

Hey, did we convince some ruler of a country with a crud economy to build a wall!

Go 'merica!

 

[PoliticalChic]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Reuters



What is the Democrat policy vis-a-vis these 'caravans of wanna-be illegal immigrants????

Hey, did we convince some ruler of a country with a crud economy to build a wall!

Go 'merica!

Good news!


You won the contest....'Dumbest Post.'


The prize is a ticket to the Saudi Consulate in Turkey.



See ya'.....

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. In a cunning attempt to shield the guilty, this is sort of attempt that one finds: the claims that it was conservatives who were the slavers.



“ The Democratic party was what we would call “conservative” while the new Republican party was more liberal by our definition. This can be most easily seen in the way people voted for them. The North was Republican, the South was Democratic. The North was the home of abolitionism while the South was for slavery, “states rights”, secession and the Confederacy.

Many conservatives in America don’t want to believe that their political positions coincide with the awful elements of the past. Conservatives in the South routinely deny the South was involved in Slavery or Jim Crow, that the South ever was conservative. Conservatives in Modern America deny they were against women voting, against immigrants, against civil rights.”
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-th...n-two-parties-switching-their-main-ideologies

Totally false, with an obvious motive.



The Republican Party was created to combat the slavers, the Democrats. And ‘conservative’ means to conserve the founding principles of America:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


At some point, ever the dumbest of government school grads must recognize that they’ve been lied to.




7. Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

 

[captkaos]

Going back many generations, that could be. There will always be those who disagree no matter what the subject is. Today the underlying cuases of their behavior may have shifted.

Most liberals I know have two particular characteristics of note....

1). They despise capitalism
2). They are not Christians

So in my opinion, much of their work involves the "destruction" of these two important facets of USA culture and society.

However, what we are largely seeing today (again in my opinion) is an added influence of Marxist influence hoping to "capitalize" on the internal dischord via heavy influencers such as George Soros and company.

So while they claim they are not out to destroy America per se, they do want to destroy many of those things that made it America for the last few hundred years or more. Encouraged by ignorance and peer pressure, with assurances that all who oppose are bigots and racists, many eagerly jump on the band wagon with very little idea of what they are doing and the damage they are causing themselves and their country.

In summary, radical Democrats today largely hold that either the nation MUST change to become what they envision....or it's destruction is justified in the process of trying. All the while being taught that compromise is not an option.

The whole concept of Changing America is to change it from the inside out. Take Control of the Govt, The Courts and the Media , Spread as much fear and hate and discord as possible then step up propaganda through the Media and bombard the Populace with as many half truths and lies as they will believe and promote the Socialist agenda as the Cure to all social ills which were actually the result of their own actions and Policies . Any Questions ???

 

[captkaos]

6. In a cunning attempt to shield the guilty, this is sort of attempt that one finds: the claims that it was conservatives who were the slavers.



“ The Democratic party was what we would call “conservative” while the new Republican party was more liberal by our definition. This can be most easily seen in the way people voted for them. The North was Republican, the South was Democratic. The North was the home of abolitionism while the South was for slavery, “states rights”, secession and the Confederacy.

Many conservatives in America don’t want to believe that their political positions coincide with the awful elements of the past. Conservatives in the South routinely deny the South was involved in Slavery or Jim Crow, that the South ever was conservative. Conservatives in Modern America deny they were against women voting, against immigrants, against civil rights.”
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-th...n-two-parties-switching-their-main-ideologies

Totally false, with an obvious motive.



The Republican Party was created to combat the slavers, the Democrats. And ‘conservative’ means to conserve the founding principles of America:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


At some point, ever the dumbest of government school grads must recognize that they’ve been lied to.




7. Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Stephen Douglas Lost ! So did Slavery! so will the Democratic party in this Country's upcoming election cycle

 

[PoliticalChic]

Going back many generations, that could be. There will always be those who disagree no matter what the subject is. Today the underlying cuases of their behavior may have shifted.

Most liberals I know have two particular characteristics of note....

1). They despise capitalism
2). They are not Christians

So in my opinion, much of their work involves the "destruction" of these two important facets of USA culture and society.

However, what we are largely seeing today (again in my opinion) is an added influence of Marxist influence hoping to "capitalize" on the internal dischord via heavy influencers such as George Soros and company.

So while they claim they are not out to destroy America per se, they do want to destroy many of those things that made it America for the last few hundred years or more. Encouraged by ignorance and peer pressure, with assurances that all who oppose are bigots and racists, many eagerly jump on the band wagon with very little idea of what they are doing and the damage they are causing themselves and their country.

In summary, radical Democrats today largely hold that either the nation MUST change to become what they envision....or it's destruction is justified in the process of trying. All the while being taught that compromise is not an option.

The whole concept of Changing America is to change it from the inside out. Take Control of the Govt, The Courts and the Media , Spread as much fear and hate and discord as possible then step up propaganda through the Media and bombard the Populace with as many half truths and lies as they will believe and promote the Socialist agenda as the Cure to all social ills which were actually the result of their own actions and Policies . Any Questions ???

Your post could be the 'Ted Talk' given by the DNC to Democrat recruits.....

 

[dudmuck]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Re

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads on to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."

Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"

Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Reuters



What is the Democrat policy vis-a-vis these 'caravans of wanna-be illegal immigrants????

The horde of illegal immigrants is an invasion. Unless the United States starts fighting back, and leaving the dead bodies at the border of Mexico, then the invasion will continue, when the wall of dead bodies gets high enough, the invasion will cease. If the liberals want to side with the enemy and they have they can join the horde at the border.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...ant-caravan-after-trump-threats-idUSKCN1MQ1UX
?


so
let's see if I understand you....

you want liberals to join the immigrants at the border so you can "leave the dead bodies at the border of Mexico"

dead bodies.....?

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

 

[PoliticalChic]

6. In a cunning attempt to shield the guilty, this is sort of attempt that one finds: the claims that it was conservatives who were the slavers.



“ The Democratic party was what we would call “conservative” while the new Republican party was more liberal by our definition. This can be most easily seen in the way people voted for them. The North was Republican, the South was Democratic. The North was the home of abolitionism while the South was for slavery, “states rights”, secession and the Confederacy.

Many conservatives in America don’t want to believe that their political positions coincide with the awful elements of the past. Conservatives in the South routinely deny the South was involved in Slavery or Jim Crow, that the South ever was conservative. Conservatives in Modern America deny they were against women voting, against immigrants, against civil rights.”
https://www.quora.com/Is-it-true-th...n-two-parties-switching-their-main-ideologies

Totally false, with an obvious motive.



The Republican Party was created to combat the slavers, the Democrats. And ‘conservative’ means to conserve the founding principles of America:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


At some point, ever the dumbest of government school grads must recognize that they’ve been lied to.




7. Was Slavery North vs South?
No….Democrats vs Republicans

Over the issue of slavery. Northern Democrat Stephen Douglas presidential candidate made his feelings clear:
“Now, I do not believe that the Almighty ever intended the negro to be the equal of the white man. …. He belongs to an inferior race, and must always occupy an inferior position.

I believe this government was made on the white basis. I believe it was made by white men for the benefit of white men and their posterity for ever; and I am in favor of confining citizenship to white men, ….”
In the First Debate with Lincoln
In the First Debate with Lincoln by Stephen Arnold Douglas. America: II. (1818-1865). Vol. IX. Bryan, William Jennings, ed. 1906. The World's Famous Orations




That was Stephen Douglas, Northern Democrat, stating his party’s position.

It remains true to this very day.....even black Democrats follow that doctrine:

Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

Stephen Douglas Lost ! So did Slavery! so will the Democratic party in this Country's upcoming election cycle

From your post to God's in-box....


The Democrats lost in 1860 because they had two candidates.
There were two distinct factions of Democrats, and this made Lincoln’s electoral victory possible:
there was Stephen Douglas, the Northern Democrat presidential candidate,
and John C. Breckinridge, the Southern Democrat presidential candidate.

Both, of course, were pro-slavery.

The split gave Lincoln his election victory.

 

[PoliticalChic]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Re

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads on to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."

Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"

Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Reuters



What is the Democrat policy vis-a-vis these 'caravans of wanna-be illegal immigrants????

The horde of illegal immigrants is an invasion. Unless the United States starts fighting back, and leaving the dead bodies at the border of Mexico, then the invasion will continue, when the wall of dead bodies gets high enough, the invasion will cease. If the liberals want to side with the enemy and they have they can join the horde at the border.

?


so
let's see if I understand you....

you want liberals to join the immigrants at the border so you can "leave the dead bodies at the border of Mexico"

dead bodies.....?

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

 

[dudmuck]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Re

The horde of illegal immigrants is an invasion. Unless the United States starts fighting back, and leaving the dead bodies at the border of Mexico, then the invasion will continue, when the wall of dead bodies gets high enough, the invasion will cease. If the liberals want to side with the enemy and they have they can join the horde at the border.

?


so
let's see if I understand you....

you want liberals to join the immigrants at the border so you can "leave the dead bodies at the border of Mexico"

dead bodies.....?

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Re
?


so
let's see if I understand you....

you want liberals to join the immigrants at the border so you can "leave the dead bodies at the border of Mexico"

dead bodies.....?

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Only a dumbfuck like you cant get Nazi (Far Right Socialist) confused with "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness(Classical Liberal/Conservative)".. Yep, you are another success story of public education system by indoctrination......

 

[PoliticalChic]

A review of many of the actions of the Democrat Party throughout the history of this nation leads one to conclude that Progressives/Democrats seem to have ‘buyers remorse’ at having ratified the Constitution.



1.The founding documents of America include these two profound phrases:

All men are created equal

And

Consent of the governed


2.Yet, after signing on to documents that created a sovereign and unique nation, based on the two phrases above, the major political party, the Democrat, has worked tirelessly to maintain slavery, and, now, endorses open border policies that would destroy America as a free and autonomous nation.


3. Even though ‘all men’ is prominent above, neither the Southern Democrat Party and the Norther Democrat Party had any desire to abolish slavery nor to take any steps to limit it in the South. The party, in fact, worked to block efforts by the Republicans to do so.

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Re
?


so
let's see if I understand you....

you want liberals to join the immigrants at the border so you can "leave the dead bodies at the border of Mexico"

dead bodies.....?

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. If the Democrat Party is dedicated to the Founder’s principles, how to explain this sort of dedication?

“New York [Democrat] Gov. Andrew Cuomo has found himself in hot water over remarks he made on Wednesday, saying, “We’re not going to make America great again. It was never that great.”

Cuomo riffed on President Donald Trump’s slogan at a New York City bill-signing event” Andrew Cuomo claimed America "was never that great"




This is the same Democrat official who voiced this fascist motto about any who disagree:

“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said that “extreme” conservatives who oppose abortion and support gun rights have no place in his state.” Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives ‘have no place’ in New York



These are the values that Democrats have substituted for those that once made America great.

 

[dudmuck]

8. If the Democrat Party is dedicated to the Founder’s principles, how to explain this sort of dedication?

“New York [Democrat] Gov. Andrew Cuomo has found himself in hot water over remarks he made on Wednesday, saying, “We’re not going to make America great again. It was never that great.”

Cuomo riffed on President Donald Trump’s slogan at a New York City bill-signing event” Andrew Cuomo claimed America "was never that great"




This is the same Democrat official who voiced this fascist motto about any who disagree:

“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said that “extreme” conservatives who oppose abortion and support gun rights have no place in his state.” Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives ‘have no place’ in New York



These are the values that Democrats have substituted for those that once made America great.

When Cuomo said america was never that great, he was referring to society.
America built great things and did great things, but a great society doesnt have slavery. Or politiical parties based on corruption. Or rampant unnecessary poverty. Great societies dont belittle/mock science.

And about pro-gun conservatives have no place in new york? Misleading, he was referring to extreme conservatives.

 

[PoliticalChic]

8. If the Democrat Party is dedicated to the Founder’s principles, how to explain this sort of dedication?

“New York [Democrat] Gov. Andrew Cuomo has found himself in hot water over remarks he made on Wednesday, saying, “We’re not going to make America great again. It was never that great.”

Cuomo riffed on President Donald Trump’s slogan at a New York City bill-signing event” Andrew Cuomo claimed America "was never that great"




This is the same Democrat official who voiced this fascist motto about any who disagree:

“New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo said that “extreme” conservatives who oppose abortion and support gun rights have no place in his state.” Gov. Cuomo: Pro-life, pro-gun conservatives ‘have no place’ in New York



These are the values that Democrats have substituted for those that once made America great.

When Cuomo said america was never that great, he was referring to society.
America built great things and did great things, but a great society doesnt have slavery. Or politiical parties based on corruption. Or rampant unnecessary poverty. Great societies dont belittle/mock science.

And about pro-gun conservatives have no place in new york? Misleading, he was referring to extreme conservatives.

You will always be dumber than a soup sandwich.

I asked you nicely to get lost.

 

[Dragonlady]

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

Where to start:

Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote.

Conservatives do not believe that health care is a right. This makes the USA the only first world country in the world where health care is NOT considered a right of every citizen.

Conservatives believe abortion is murder, which is a very radical, and religious stance and which is at odds with the 60% of Americans who believe that abortion should be legal.

There's the radical stance on prison reform - for profit prisons are now becoming slave farms, yet Trump just signed a multi-million dollar contract for for-profit detention camps on the southern border.

The problem with these for-profit prisons is their "minimum capacity requirements" which require the government to pay a minimum amount to the contractor just to keep the facility open. This has lead to funnelling prisoners to the private prisons to meet quotas, while government run-facilities are nowhere near capacity, and worse, the bribing of judges by prison owners to sentence as many defendants to jail time as possible.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

Where to start:

Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote.

Conservatives do not believe that health care is a right. This makes the USA the only first world country in the world where health care is NOT considered a right of every citizen.

Conservatives believe abortion is murder, which is a very radical, and religious stance and which is at odds with the 60% of Americans who believe that abortion should be legal.

There's the radical stance on prison reform - for profit prisons are now becoming slave farms, yet Trump just signed a multi-million dollar contract for for-profit detention camps on the southern border.

The problem with these for-profit prisons is their "minimum capacity requirements" which require the government to pay a minimum amount to the contractor just to keep the facility open. This has lead to funnelling prisoners to the private prisons to meet quotas, while government run-facilities are nowhere near capacity, and worse, the bribing of judges by prison owners to sentence as many defendants to jail time as possible.

"Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote."

Link or lie.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

Where to start:

Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote.

Conservatives do not believe that health care is a right. This makes the USA the only first world country in the world where health care is NOT considered a right of every citizen.

Conservatives believe abortion is murder, which is a very radical, and religious stance and which is at odds with the 60% of Americans who believe that abortion should be legal.

There's the radical stance on prison reform - for profit prisons are now becoming slave farms, yet Trump just signed a multi-million dollar contract for for-profit detention camps on the southern border.

The problem with these for-profit prisons is their "minimum capacity requirements" which require the government to pay a minimum amount to the contractor just to keep the facility open. This has lead to funnelling prisoners to the private prisons to meet quotas, while government run-facilities are nowhere near capacity, and worse, the bribing of judges by prison owners to sentence as many defendants to jail time as possible.

:Where to start:"

How about you start with the OP...

Republican President Lincoln:
“ There is no program offered by any wing of the Democratic party but that must result in the permanent destruction of the Union."
Abraham Lincoln: Interview with John T. Mills



And, years later, when Hussein Obama told illegal aliens to go and vote in the election, it was exactly in that vein, the destruction of our nation.




4. Democrats then and now:

a. Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425

b. The current Democrat iteration of the KKK, Antifa, expressing their feelings about the future of America:

Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '


Antifa 'No Trump, No Wall, No USA at all '





"Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats"
Honduras, Guatemala move to stop migrant caravan after Trump threats | Reuters



What is the Democrat policy vis-a-vis these 'caravans of wanna-be illegal immigrants????

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

Where to start:

Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote.

Conservatives do not believe that health care is a right. This makes the USA the only first world country in the world where health care is NOT considered a right of every citizen.

Conservatives believe abortion is murder, which is a very radical, and religious stance and which is at odds with the 60% of Americans who believe that abortion should be legal.

There's the radical stance on prison reform - for profit prisons are now becoming slave farms, yet Trump just signed a multi-million dollar contract for for-profit detention camps on the southern border.

The problem with these for-profit prisons is their "minimum capacity requirements" which require the government to pay a minimum amount to the contractor just to keep the facility open. This has lead to funnelling prisoners to the private prisons to meet quotas, while government run-facilities are nowhere near capacity, and worse, the bribing of judges by prison owners to sentence as many defendants to jail time as possible.

If you imagine that there is a Far Right in this country.....here's your chance.


1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Waiting.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Are you back, after taking 24 hours to lick your wounds, to try again to dig your way out of claiming that there is a Far Right in this country???
No????

Gave up???


Well, I did pulverize you yesterday when you claimed that, didn't I.

Still pretending the proud boys doesnt exist? Republicans are joining in.
The gateway pundit awarded Flynn in a far-right extravaganza.

'Proud Boys'?????

There are certainly nuts in the country....look at you.

But, there is no Far Right.

You'd like a chance to have yet another custard pie in the kisser????


Sure....it will improve your looks.


Take a chance:

1. There is no "far right" in this country. So... how to explain the constant reference to this meme by Leftists?

One fact of life is that hearing a phrase often enough, one tends to accept it without spending the effort of examining same. The term "Far Right," used in a cavalier yet effective manner by the Left, is one of those terms.

Yet...upon examination....it proves to be imaginary, very much like the benefits of communism....or ObamaCare.



2. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.
The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.

To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."

"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)




3. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.

Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY

How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




4. So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.




Waiting.

1, 2) you have a full wikipedia page dedicated to far-right in USA. better yet: nazis are winning here.

3) "Conservative Family Values" ALWAYS meant "White Christian Culture". Full stop. Evidenced by unwavering support of "grab'em by the pussy" Don.
This started when they right got pissed when the government stripped their tax exempt status when their schools openly practiced racial discrimination.

Remember this part, you dunce????

5.Here's where I use your ignorance to ram the truth down your throat:
If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Now....get lost.

Where to start:

Ann Coulter believes that women should not have the right to vote.

Conservatives do not believe that health care is a right. This makes the USA the only first world country in the world where health care is NOT considered a right of every citizen.

Conservatives believe abortion is murder, which is a very radical, and religious stance and which is at odds with the 60% of Americans who believe that abortion should be legal.

There's the radical stance on prison reform - for profit prisons are now becoming slave farms, yet Trump just signed a multi-million dollar contract for for-profit detention camps on the southern border.

The problem with these for-profit prisons is their "minimum capacity requirements" which require the government to pay a minimum amount to the contractor just to keep the facility open. This has lead to funnelling prisoners to the private prisons to meet quotas, while government run-facilities are nowhere near capacity, and worse, the bribing of judges by prison owners to sentence as many defendants to jail time as possible.

"Conservatives believe abortion is murder..."


Is there any argument for the "right" of a woman to authorize the killing of her unborn baby that would not apply to her authorizing the similar slaughter of a year old that she was breastfeeding?


'cause....if there isn't, and one is murder, so, then, is the other.

That's called logic.