Zone1 Is socialism dying abroad?....

What I stated was factually accurate
No it isn't
Public payer, private delivery works. If you go straight socialism everyone will slack off and see 10 patients a day.
What about those who have no money ? profit has no part to play in health care for anyone who wants to live in a civilized society because it's all about cutting back to maximise profit same with other public services that have been handed over to the private sector.
 
No it isn't

What about those who have no money ? profit has no part to play in health care for anyone who wants to live in a civilized society because it's all about cutting back to maximise profit same with other public services that have been handed over to the private sector.
Why would a Doctor who has devoted his life trained for years to caring for people slack off?
 
No it isn't

What about those who have no money ? profit has no part to play in health care for anyone who wants to live in a civilized society because it's all about cutting back to maximise profit same with other public services that have been handed over to the private sector.
Yes it is,

Slavery was around long before capitalism was invented and it was western capitalist nations which began to outlaw it,.

Those who have no money are responsible for themselves like anyone else.

Profit is the only way to have good health care, Socialism is health care at gun point which is idiotic

Enslaving the most educated members of society is just as bad and stupid as enslaving those with a strong back. Demanding the right to health care IS by definition enslaving the most educated ( doctors and nurses etc,) NO ONE has a right to their labor.
 
Yes it is,

Slavery was around long before capitalism was invented and it was western capitalist nations which began to outlaw it,.

Those who have no money are responsible for themselves like anyone else.

Profit is the only way to have good health care, Socialism is health care at gun point which is idiotic

Enslaving the most educated members of society is just as bad and stupid as enslaving those with a strong back. Demanding the right to health care IS by definition enslaving the most educated ( doctors and nurses etc,) NO ONE has a right to their labor.
You are a lost cause that's what comes from a lifetime of brainwahing, we know slavery has been around a long time, but European capitalists turned it into a global business, much of the wealth that built cities in the UK came from slave money such as liverpool.
 
You are a lost cause that's what comes from a lifetime of brainwahing, we know slavery has been around a long time, but European capitalists turned it into a global business, much of the wealth that built cities in the UK came from slave money such as liverpool.
lol I am correct hence your desperation in invoking the brainwashing dodge.

You have yet to even so much as challenge the facts which I have posted.

WE do not know anything and what you are describing is not some common accepted knowledge.

European capitalists certainly took advantage of slavery for a short time. But then those same nations and people led the way in ending it.

That is fact and ABSOLUTE fact and also one of the historic truths which makes western civilization superior.

Socialists seek to bring slavery back through fake causes such as universal health care which is nothing more than enslaving health care professionals.

You are actually projecting when you throw out brainwashing as an argument. You have actually stated your belief that forcing a doctor to work on you at the end of a government gun is better than paying him to profit off of his labor.

Your entire ideology is empty of anything resembling logic or consistent principles
 
SOCIALISM is when you fish in a public pond and keep the fish you catch ....
CAPITALISM is when you fish in a pond that belongs to the capitalist for some reason and you give more than half of the catch to the capitalist....
Like that, not all that fishing rod bullshit.
 
SOCIALISM is when you fish in a public pond and keep the fish you catch ....
CAPITALISM is when you fish in a pond that belongs to the capitalist for some reason and you give more than half of the catch to the capitalist....
Like that, not all that fishing rod bullshit.
The Socialist pond is funded by everyone, even by the utter vast majority that don't fish.

A Capitalist provides a better pond because he/she wants to reap better by sowing better, that's the incentive. Everyone has the choice if they want to foot the running costs of the pond by going fishing.

So Capitalism provides incentives and choice, Socialism shares the misery when it's idea inevitably collapses.

You can be a Socialist and live in a Capitalist society but you can't be a Capitalist and live in a Socialist society.

So you are more than welcome to go and risk all your money and assets and set up a large company where all the employees that suffer from no risk to share all your profits, and you can be on the same wage as them for your gallantry. Then when you go bust, go to your old Capitalist boss, get your old job back, head down, and be a good boy/girl.

If I want to risk my capital to run a business and you're my employee, don't except a slice of the profits for nothing. The agreed wage that you accepted is your reward/payment for your effort and time. Give me $500,000 capital, I'll give you some shares. Your capital is at risk, and the reward for that risk is dividends (a share of the profit). If you want no risk, then you get no profits, no reward. And it's as simple as that.

When you want a share of the profits with no risk, that's called, "Wanting your cake and eat it".

What you meant to say was, "I caught 10 fish in the Socialist pond but the government took 5 off me".
 
Last edited:
A Capitalist doesn't tell you how to lead your life, a meat eater doesn't tell you what to eat, they want you to have that choice.

A Socialist will tell you how to lead your life, a vegan tells you what you can't eat, they don't want you to have a choice.
 
The Socialist pond is funded by everyone, even by the utter vast majority that don't fish.

A Capitalist provides a better pond because he/she wants to reap better by sowing better, that's the incentive. Everyone has the choice if they want to foot the running costs of the pond by going fishing.

So Capitalism provides incentives and choice, Socialism shares the misery when it's idea inevitably collapses.

You can be a Socialist and live in a Capitalist society but you can't be a Capitalist and live in a Socialist society.

So you are more than welcome to go and risk all your money and assets and set up a large company where all the employees that suffer from no risk to share all your profits, and you can be on the same wage as them for your gallantry. Then when you go bust, go to your old Capitalist boss, get your old job back, head down, and be a good boy/girl.

If I want to risk my capital to run a business and you're my employee, don't except a slice of the profits for nothing. The agreed wage that you accepted is your reward/payment for your effort and time. Give me $500,000 capital, I'll give you some shares. Your capital is at risk, and the reward for that risk is dividends (a share of the profit). If you want no risk, then you get no profits, no reward. And it's as simple as that.

When you want a share of the profits with no risk, that's called, "Wanting your cake and eat it".

What you meant to say was, "I caught 10 fish in the Socialist pond but the government took 5 off me".


 

Forum List

Back
Top