Is socialism a violent socioeconomic system? Yes, indeed it is.

If you could form an argument I could take you seriously. If I am honest I am impressed that you can nearly form sentences.

If you were honest, you wouldn't be a leftist and you wouldn't have posted demagoguery that was debunked over a decade ago when you vile scum first floated it.

But, you are not honest. You are a member of the demagogue - sociopath party, where party is the ONLY thing you care about.
 
If you could form an argument I could take you seriously. If I am honest I am impressed that you can nearly form sentences.

If you were honest, you wouldn't be a leftist and you wouldn't have posted demagoguery that was debunked over a decade ago when you vile scum first floated it.

But, you are not honest. You are a member of the demagogue - sociopath party, where party is the ONLY thing you care about.
You have no idea who I vote for. you are just frothing away because I have questioned things that are important to you. You will agree with me one day.
 
You have no idea who I vote for.

Oh yes I do.

You are a hate filled leftist spewing long debunked bullshit that you got from the Soros hate sites.

Mindless fools like you vote for whoever the party orders you to vote for,

you are just frothing away because I have questioned things that are important to you. You will agree with me one day.

You haven't questioned anything. You simply posted a link to a bit of slander that popped up over a decade back that even left wing Snopes ranks as bullshit.

You haven't the intellect to "question" anything. You are but a drone flinging slander and libel on behalf of your filthy party.

Another leftist troll flinging shit like a feral baboon. Go back to KOS or ThinkProgress, you lack the wits to engage in actual debate.
 
Conservatism Linked to Lack of Education
Conservatism Linked to Lack of Education
I send you to college and now you support queers!
Published on February 17, 2010

Oh right wing media, how I love thee for amusement. So it is a bad thing that liberals are more educated?

A recently released study showed that people at the end of college are more liberal than people starting college. And it also showed that students at the end were not necessarily more knowledgable about government and civics issues.

According to a wide range of right wing media, this is a sign that college makes people liberal. This is a bad thing because, according to them, liberal professors are pushing their beliefs onto students, but, get this, they aren't necessarily learning more.

(Sigh before I go on). First, it is outlandish to suggest that, overall, students aren't learning more in college because they don't know more about government and history. What about all the other subjects? And clearly, from your perspective, they are learning liberal views right? Isn't that of some civic value?

Secondly, since when was education a bad thing? I am so tired of people telling me that I "think too much" and am just some brainwashed left winger in academics. I am sorry I know a lot about something and this shapes my views on life, including social issues. It is sad that people have to apologize for knowing stuff, as if this is some horrible thing. But for conservatives, it is often it viewed this way.

(No wonder Fox News reporters play down their credentials. For instance, one reporter was Valedvictorian and graduated from Stanford, but asks on air what words like "czar" mean, as if she doesn't know).

Why isn't this study being viewed by people as a negative thing for conservativism? Why are the headlines "liberals brainwash your kids at college" instead of "If you are conservative, you are probably less educated?"

Sadly, it seems I do not have much media company in my interpretation of the results.
 
I have a Masters in World History, you have a masters in RW propaganda/gobbledygook. Socialism is not a command economy. Command translates into totalitarianism- RW fascism and LW communism.

Two possibilities;

You've had a stroke that eradicated any knowledge you once had;

Or you got your masters from a Cracker Jacks box.

{
Full Definition of socialism
  1. 1 : any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods}
You ignorant and uneducated baboon.
That's only one of the 3 stupid DICTIONARY definitions- the one that RW nutjobs trot out every time, functional MORON.
 
Any regulation of the economy is fascism? Really?

If that's your argument, you're raising ignorance to an art form.

I assume you think that Fascism was created by Barry Goldwater or the hated Ronald Reagan, right?

In reality there was a man named Benito Mussolini who lived in Italy. He was raised by a father who was a Communist party member and raised Benito on Marxist rhetoric. Benito rose in the ranks of the Communist party and was made the editor of the official Communist party newspaper. He was dispatched to Switzerland by Vladimir Lenin to lead a general strike. The strike failed and Benito was thrown in prison. He expected to be sprung by Lenin, but Lenin let him rot in a Swiss jail for 6 months. Finally Lenin sent an operative to negotiate and Mussolini was released and deported.

Two factors here, Mussolini was bitter over the abandonment by his boss, and Mussolini was a megalomaniac in his own right. Socialism doesn't work, it is not economically sound. Mussolini set out to "fix" socialism. The primary flaw is that socialism provides no incentive to get men to produce. The lack of a profit motive ensures that socialism will always fail. Mussolini loved totalitarianism as much as Obama did, he simply recognized the failure of socialist economics. So he created a totalitarian state that would rival Bernie Sanders wet dreams. He also had a command economy where the state determined what would be produced and in what quantity. HOWEVER, he added in the profit motive by allowing private property and private profits. Mussolini had a socialist system where the state controlled the means of production, without directly owning them.

Fascism then is a form of socialism where the state controls the means of production without direct ownership. Generally corporation staffed with stooges loyal to the regime (Think GE and Jeffery Immelt) are the owners of heavy industry.
You assume more stupidity than anyone I've seen...Fascism is totalitarianism WITH corporations, communism without.
 
If you could form an argument I could take you seriously. If I am honest I am impressed that you can nearly form sentences.

If you were honest, you wouldn't be a leftist and you wouldn't have posted demagoguery that was debunked over a decade ago when you vile scum first floated it.

But, you are not honest. You are a member of the demagogue - sociopath party, where party is the ONLY thing you care about.
You have no idea who I vote for. you are just frothing away because I have questioned things that are important to you. You will agree with me one day.
There is no fool like an old fool.
 
You assume more stupidity than anyone I've seen...Fascism is totalitarianism WITH corporations, communism without.

Stalin allowed many corporations in the USSR. Armand Hammer was a major player in Soviet economics.

{
The industrialist Armand Hammer, the "red millionaire", as he was known in the West, started his controversial work with Vladimir Lenin and completed it in the years of Gorbachev's perestroika. - See more at: The Soviet Union that Hammer built

It's a bummer you never had even an introduction to world history...
 
That's only one of the 3 stupid DICTIONARY definitions- the one that RW nutjobs trot out every time, functional MORON.

Even for malware you have an abysmal education.
Tell me about Sanders or the EU, Oz, NZ trying any of that.

There were no Russian corporations under Stalin, numbskull. You're talking about who they traded with DUH. Socialism for 70-80 years has always been democratic in the real world, so your definition is bogus. Wonder how much pressure the GOP puts on that stupid dictionary to keep that THIRD, stupid definition. It's like the one proof of GW hoax Rush repeats endlessly, or the 2 irrelevant "lies" that make Hillary a "liar". Brainwashed RW idiocy.
 
Instead of Violence

Communism and socialism, Read contends, are not ideologies that exist somewhere out there among foreigners and shady agents of conspiracy. In America, the ideas of communism and socialism are alive and well among the supporters of public schooling, social security, the post office, and other tools of the state. In the end, whoever contends that the use of force is the proper method to attain “social performance” is spreading the ideas of socialism and communism.


_ _______________

Do we then have a right to violently stand our ground against socialists, berners, fascists?

Indeed we do.

rightwinger and his ilk will claim that the berners have a right to impose a tax and the Taxpayers and producers have no option other than to meekly pay it.

I say BULLSHIT.


What country ever existed a century and a half without a rebellion?
And what country can preserve it's liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. It is it's natural manure.
Thomas Jefferson

The keyboard commandos are declaring cyberwar again. I think that this might be the first time today. Bring your women and children indoors, and turn off your computer. The cyber medics are rolling cyber bandages and cyber bullets will soon be streaming!
 
Tell me about Sanders or the EU, Oz, NZ trying any of that.

You are executing flawed code again, virus.

There were no Russian corporations under Stalin, numbskull. You're talking about who they traded with DUH. Socialism for 70-80 years has always been democratic in the real world, so your definition is bogus. Wonder how much pressure the GOP puts on that stupid dictionary to keep that THIRD, stupid definition. It's like the one proof of GW hoax Rush repeats endlessly, or the 2 irrelevant "lies" that make Hillary a "liar". Brainwashed RW idiocy.

So, it isn't just that you are poorly educated, you are actually stupid. :thup:

Armand Hammer Dies at 92; Executive Forged Soviet Ties
 
Tell me about Sanders or the EU, Oz, NZ trying any of that.

You are executing flawed code again, virus.

There were no Russian corporations under Stalin, numbskull. You're talking about who they traded with DUH. Socialism for 70-80 years has always been democratic in the real world, so your definition is bogus. Wonder how much pressure the GOP puts on that stupid dictionary to keep that THIRD, stupid definition. It's like the one proof of GW hoax Rush repeats endlessly, or the 2 irrelevant "lies" that make Hillary a "liar". Brainwashed RW idiocy.

So, it isn't just that you are poorly educated, you are actually stupid. :thup:

Armand Hammer Dies at 92; Executive Forged Soviet Ties
So Hammer and his corporation were RUSSIAN? IDIOT.
 
So Hammer and his corporation were RUSSIAN? IDIOT.

Of course not, retard.

Look up what the NEP was and why it came about.

You are simply ignorant of world history.
I know all about it, and your argument that Stalin allowed Russian corporations is idiocy. Lenin did, not Stalin. He wiped out any capitalism in Russia, and ended the confusion between socialism and communism, except in WJ GOP...
 

Forum List

Back
Top