Is socialism a violent socioeconomic system? Yes, indeed it is.

Doesnt the history of your country tell you that a free market economy doesnt actually work ?

Certainly not for people.


WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY DOESN'T ACTUALLY WORK?

>
Well an unfettered free market needs a government to protect the people from the excesses that are a natural result.

If capital was "Good" there would be no need for government. But it isnt and people need protecting.

can you point to one single "unfettered free market" in the USA today?


I on the other hand can point to numerous instances of unfettered controlled markets by the fascist/socialist axis.


.
 
Yes, that's the difference, after Americas Revolution, almost everyone was free, after a Progressive Revolution everyone except for party leaderships are enslaved
Almost everyone? Free from what, the rules of white male elites? Women and children were property, as were indentured servants. Not much freedom around then actually.



NO ONE IS SUPPORTING THAT


JUST REMIND THE BERNERS THAT AMERICANS ARE ARMED TO THEIR TEETH

THAT IF PUSH COMES TO SHOVE THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO
The Constitution you purport to support so staunchly would be the very tool to suppress the insurrection and rebellion you now conditionally threaten. That conflict flies in the face of reason and logic, hypocrite! You can now switch your thumbs between your ass and mouth, fool!


THE CONSTITUTION PROTECTS THE BERNERS IN THEIR ATTEMPT TO ENSLAVE US TO MAJORITY RULE?

.
Hey, you're the one that wrote this:
JUST REMIND THE BERNERS THAT AMERICANS ARE ARMED TO THEIR TEETH

THAT IF PUSH COMES TO SHOVE THEY WILL DO WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO
Don't try to change the narrative YOU DIRECTED implying armed insurrection if your faction saw fit. Change those thumbs again instead!
 
LIKE WHAT....... excesses that are a natural result.? HUH?

IF COMPANY "A" STEALS FROM YOU THEN FILE A COMPLAINT ---WHY DO YOU NEED COMRADE SANDERS?

The beloved free market banks stole a few $trillion, when people complained they had to give them a $trillion more so the poor banksters could get their bonu$$es.

Comrade Bernie is needed to correct natuaral excesses like that

:banana:
 
Doesnt the history of your country tell you that a free market economy doesnt actually work ?

Certainly not for people.


WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY DOESN'T ACTUALLY WORK?

>
Well an unfettered free market needs a government to protect the people from the excesses that are a natural result.

If capital was "Good" there would be no need for government. But it isnt and people need protecting.


LIKE WHAT....... excesses that are a natural result.? HUH?

IF COMPANY "A" STEALS FROM YOU THEN FILE A COMPLAINT ---WHY DO YOU NEED COMRADE SANDERS?
I am trying to think of an excess that is a result of the free market. Give me a minute.
 
The beloved free market banks stole a few $trillion, when people complained they had to give them a $trillion more so the poor banksters could get their bonu$$es.

Comrade Bernie is needed to correct natuaral excesses like that

:banana:

Communists have zero grasp of economics.

Comrade, if the government is interfering, by definition it is NOT a free market.

Corrupt government and corrupt banks colluded to rip off the public.

Your solution is more government.

Well, you're not a Communist because you're particularly bright, now are you?
 
Doesnt the history of your country tell you that a free market economy doesnt actually work ?

Certainly not for people.


WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY DOESN'T ACTUALLY WORK?

>
Well an unfettered free market needs a government to protect the people from the excesses that are a natural result.

If capital was "Good" there would be no need for government. But it isnt and people need protecting.

 
OP- That's STILL communism, cold war dinosaur dupe...socialism is always democratic, since 1935-45.


Communism is a stateless society where all assets are owned in common, you ignorant troll.

Communism has never been achieved franco hater bot dupe. The USSR, Khmer Rouge, PRC, Cuba, Nicaragua, Ho's Vietnam, Angola, all socialist - all practicing what you evil fucks are instituting here in America.
 
Calling me a fucktard doesn't help your case.

But it IS extremely accurate. :thup:
“When the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.”

Slander would indicate that assertion was false. :dunno:
I rest my case.

As well you should, it was a loser.
Yeah, definitely, when you know you can't argue a false point, you call your opponent a fucktard. 10/10
 
hillary and barry.jpg


Sorry Hillary, the Socialists have used you up and spit you out like the trash you are.

They won't even give you as so much as a thanks for promoting their power base over the years.
 
Yeah, definitely, when you know you can't argue a false point, you call your opponent a fucktard. 10/10

He said that progressives are out of the closet and openly Socialist.

That's hardly "false."
It's false. They are not "socialist" as you are trying to define them. If anything, some of them are "democratic socialists." Look up what the means in todays context.
 
Yeah, definitely, when you know you can't argue a false point, you call your opponent a fucktard. 10/10

He said that progressives are out of the closet and openly Socialist.

That's hardly "false."
It's false. They are not "socialist" as you are trying to define them. If anything, some of them are "democratic socialists." Look up what the means in todays context.


I DID


THEY ARE VIOLENT SOCIALISTS AS AM TRYING TO DEFINE THEM
 

Forum List

Back
Top