Is sex ed working? Risky gay sex increasing as well as HIV infections

Some of the comments are classic, way to avoid responsibility:


The question should be: Is cutting funding for AIDS research, the high cost of medications for HIV, and homophobia on the rise in the US?
Reply Fave Share 28 Feb 1:22 PM Flag
 

One of the comments had stated that reductions in HIV funding and homphobia has caused men to stop using condoms. So apparently they aren't at fault, but others are.

They can't go too a convenience store and pay 75 cents for a pack of rubber?

That's irresponsible. So are liberals going too hold queers to the same standards they want too hold all gun owners?
 
So with the acceptance of the gay lifestyle comes the rise in HIV and aids?

One of the comments had stated that reductions in HIV funding and homphobia has caused men to stop using condoms. So apparently they aren't at fault, but others are.

They can't go too a convenience store and pay 75 cents for a pack of rubber?

That's irresponsible. So are liberals going too hold queers to thew same standards they want too hold all gun owner?

If they proposed persecuting gays even 1/10th as much as liberals persecute smokers because libs don't approve of smoking, then liberals would be crying about bigotry.

One kid gets drunk off 4 loko and liberals ban it. But thousands of gays can't be bothered to use condoms and we just have to accept it? Liberals ban things they don't approve of much much sooner and after far less harm occurs. Gee, could libs be having a double standard? Notice should be NATIONAL and international headlines, but gets buried in the gay section, like only gays should know about it. And of course you won't find the national media discussing this. Wouldn't be politically correct.
 
It's a simple precaution using a condom. Funny how liberals can ban you from drinking a 20 oz coke, or mandate you use reuseable bags, but can't force gays to use condoms.
 
One of the comments had stated that reductions in HIV funding and homphobia has caused men to stop using condoms. So apparently they aren't at fault, but others are.

They can't go too a convenience store and pay 75 cents for a pack of rubber?

That's irresponsible. So are liberals going too hold queers to thew same standards they want too hold all gun owner?

If they proposed persecuting gays even 1/10th as much as liberals persecute smokers because libs don't approve of smoking, then liberals would be crying about bigotry.

One kid gets drunk off 4 loko and liberals ban it. But thousands of gays can't be bothered to use condoms and we just have to accept it? Liberals ban things they don't approve of much much sooner and after far less harm occurs. Gee, could libs be having a double standard? Notice should be NATIONAL and international headlines, but gets buried in the gay section, like only gays should know about it. And of course you won't find the national media discussing this. Wouldn't be politically correct.

Yeah, well the next time someone is lynched for smoking a cigarette, come back and let me know.
 
It's a simple precaution using a condom. Funny how liberals can ban you from drinking a 20 oz coke, or mandate you use reuseable bags, but can't force gays to use condoms.

So no liberals want to hold queers too the same standards of responsibility as they do with gun owners?

Here's a question for them too think about.
How many Aids infected gays have killed people versus someone with a gun?
 
If you're stupid and you die, you deserve it.

If you don't use a condom and you get HIV/AIDS, you deserve it.

If people want to play "Russian Roulette" with their lives and they have unprotected sex, they deserve everything coming to them. If a guy with some disease rapes another person, that guy should suffer unimaginable pain until he's dead. Once he dies, doctors try to bring him back to life so he can continue on with his pain and suffering.

We should try and help those though who contract this terrible disease through no fault of their own.
 
Can't force anyone to use condoms.

You can't prevent murders by banning guns for cosmetic reasons nor by limiting magazine capacity.

I love guns. Have 2. Just don't hate gay people.

How is wanting to reduce HIV infectoins "hating" gay people? LIberals mandate everything they approve of, and ban everything they don't approve of. So why not do something here since what they are doing obviously isn't working?

Or is sticking your head in the sand going to f ix things? How much more money to do we need to waste on treating a very expensive illness that almost entirely preventable if people are just bothered to be responsible?
 

Forum List

Back
Top