Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
No. All laws can be repealed.
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
I pray that Clarence Thomas gets to write the majority opinion
I pray that Clarence Thomas gets to write the majority opinion
I'd check it for pubic hairs.
Might the justices rule that the ACA should stand, mandate and all, because dismantling it would be too complicated?
It would add a heck of alot to the deficit..and be another fine example of a radical right wing case decision..
Not as radical as citizen's united of course..which conflated the original case, ignored 100 years of precedent, previous cases and congressional legislation.
But close..
I pray that Clarence Thomas gets to write the majority opinion
I pray that Clarence Thomas gets to write the majority opinion
There's no way Roberts is not going to write the majority if it gets voted down. Too historic for it not to be written by the chief justice.
I've even heard speculation that he may be the fifth to uphold ACA. And again, he'd write it.
I can't remember where I heard it - whether it was a commentator or a clip from one of the justices - but someone suggested that the justices might not want to upend it because it was just too big. They might think it was already affecting too many people for it to be practical to undo it.
So they might swallow the constitutional question and more or less reward the law's authors for making it so huge and complicated.
I pray that Clarence Thomas gets to write the majority opinion
There's no way Roberts is not going to write the majority if it gets voted down. Too historic for it not to be written by the chief justice.
I've even heard speculation that he may be the fifth to uphold ACA. And again, he'd write it.
I share your 'concern'. I think either he or Kennedy could have been simply grandstanding this week - making it look like they put up a good fight. We'll see I guess.