Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
1948all fake pics, Hollywood style.
The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
Whenever someone posts something you don't like, you claim it's fake or a lie. IT shows just how much you really hate the truth.
Here is the truth
New settlement in east Jerusalem ,as Bibi says he wants peace with the Pals, the last part was a lie.
Since when has it been illegal to build on your own property ?
View attachment 41218
Great response to a question you have ZERO answer to...
Well done roodboy
Childish response from a childish mind...
Congratulations...
You appear so mature...
View attachment 41219
The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
Whenever someone posts something you don't like, you claim it's fake or a lie. IT shows just how much you really hate the truth.
Here is the truth
New settlement in east Jerusalem ,as Bibi says he wants peace with the Pals, the last part was a lie.
Since when has it been illegal to build on your own property ?
Settlements are clearly NOT "own property" and you know that Phoney... Why do you lie and make yourself look like a prick?
1948The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
Whenever someone posts something you don't like, you claim it's fake or a lie. IT shows just how much you really hate the truth.
Here is the truth
New settlement in east Jerusalem ,as Bibi says he wants peace with the Pals, the last part was a lie.
Since when has it been illegal to build on your own property ?
We should all give our appreciation to Penelope for showing us that she uses hates sites to get fake Talmud quotes. I wonder if she uses the same sites that a Muslim woman from India always used to get her fake Talmud quote.
The asylum escapee wants these animals to be able to spread their message:
all fake pics, Hollywood style.
The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
There ya go, Muslim savagery verified by snopes, now take your meds:
Claim: Photographs show sign-bearing Muslim protesters at a "Religion of Peace' demonstration in London.
TRUE
"Below I have enclosed pictures of Moslems who marched throughout the streets of London during their recent Religion of Peace Demonstration.
These pictures have never been shown in any of our American newspapers or television news programs because we should never appear to offend anyone!
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest1.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest2.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest3.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest5.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest6.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest7.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest8.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest9.jpg
Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems?!
Origins: The series of photographs of sign-bearing Muslim protesters displayed above were taken during a 3 February 2006 protest staged in London by Muslims angry over the publication in Scandinavian periodicals of cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad (not as a demonstation of Islam as a "religion of peace"):
The trigger for the latest clash of cultures was the publication by the Danish newspaper Jyllends-Posten on September 30 [2005] of 12 cartoons of Muhammad. A biographer of the prophet had complained that no one would dare to illustrate his book, and the newspaper challenged cartoonists to draw pictures of the prophet in a self-declared battle for freedom of speech.
One submission showed Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban; in another he tells dead suicide bombers that he has run out of virgins with which to reward them. Any portrayal of Muhammad is blasphemous in Islam, lest it encourages idolatry.
In October [2005] ambassadors from ten Muslim countries complained to Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish Prime Minister, who refused to interfere with the press’s freedom.
But the issue began to boil [in January 2006] after the cartoons appeared in Magazinet, a Christian newspaper in Norway, and on the website of the Norwegian newspaper
image: http://choices.truste.com/get?name=admarker-icon-tl.png
Dagbladet. An estimated 500 to 700 demonstrators marched from Regent's Park Mosque to the Danish embassy in Knightsbridge during the protest. MP David Davis, the shadow home secretary, condemned messages displayed on some of the protesters' placards as an "incitement to murder":
Clearly, some of these placards are incitement to violence, and indeed incitement to murder — an extremely serious offence which the police must deal with and deal with quickly.
Whatever your view on these cartoons, we have a tradition of freedom of speech in this country which has to be protected. Certainly there can be no tolerance of incitement to murder.
MP David Winnick, a member of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, called for the prosecution and deportation of some of the demonstrators:
Mr Winnick said: "The cartoons were deeply offensive to hundreds of millions of Muslims. But it is totally unacceptable that, on British soil, there should be thugs demonstrating for people to be beheaded and actually glorifying the atrocities of July 7.
"It is to be hoped that prosecutions will follow very quickly indeed."
He said those responsible who were temporarily in Britain should be deported, even it meant stripping them of permission previously given to remain in the country.
The Walsall North MP added that the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Britain "have the same distaste as the rest of us about these thugs".
"I hope it will be the last time we ever see such a demonstration, totally unacceptable to the Muslim community," he said.
Other Muslims maintained the protesters were extremists not representative of mainstream British Muslims:
Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, said the demonstration in London should have been stopped by police because the group had been advocating violence.
He said the protesters "did not represent British Muslims".
Mr Bukhari told the BBC News website: "The placards and chants were disgraceful and disgusting, Muslims do not feel that way.
"I condemn them without reservation, these people are less representative of Muslims than the BNP are of the British people."
He said that Muslims were angry over satirical cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad published in European papers but it was "outrageous" for anyone to advocate extreme action or violence.
"We believe it [the protest] should have been banned and the march stopped.
"It's irrelevant whether it's Muslims causing hatred or anyone else — freedom of speech has to be responsible."
No arrests were made at the time, according to police, due to the danger posed by the size and nature of the crowd:
As the clamour for action grew, police sources said there were no arrests because of fears of a riot. A senior Scotland Yard officer said: "We have to take the overall nature of the protesters into account. If they are overheated and emotional we don't go in.
"It's like a risk assessment; you have to look at the crowd you are dealing with. If we went in to arrest one person with a banner the crowd would turn on us and people would get hurt."
Although it has been circulated with the set of images displayed above, the following photograph likely comes from a completely different protest held in Luton a couple of years earlier:
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest4.jpg
Read more at snopes.com Muslim Religion of Peace Demonstration
It's not if, the pictures are true. And snopes verified it. Except you're too much a crazy bigot to handle it.The asylum escapee wants these animals to be able to spread their message:
all fake pics, Hollywood style.
The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
There ya go, Muslim savagery verified by snopes, now take your meds:
Claim: Photographs show sign-bearing Muslim protesters at a "Religion of Peace' demonstration in London.
TRUE
"Below I have enclosed pictures of Moslems who marched throughout the streets of London during their recent Religion of Peace Demonstration.
These pictures have never been shown in any of our American newspapers or television news programs because we should never appear to offend anyone!
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest1.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest2.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest3.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest5.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest6.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest7.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest8.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest9.jpg
Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems?!
Origins: The series of photographs of sign-bearing Muslim protesters displayed above were taken during a 3 February 2006 protest staged in London by Muslims angry over the publication in Scandinavian periodicals of cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad (not as a demonstation of Islam as a "religion of peace"):
The trigger for the latest clash of cultures was the publication by the Danish newspaper Jyllends-Posten on September 30 [2005] of 12 cartoons of Muhammad. A biographer of the prophet had complained that no one would dare to illustrate his book, and the newspaper challenged cartoonists to draw pictures of the prophet in a self-declared battle for freedom of speech.
One submission showed Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban; in another he tells dead suicide bombers that he has run out of virgins with which to reward them. Any portrayal of Muhammad is blasphemous in Islam, lest it encourages idolatry.
In October [2005] ambassadors from ten Muslim countries complained to Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish Prime Minister, who refused to interfere with the press’s freedom.
But the issue began to boil [in January 2006] after the cartoons appeared in Magazinet, a Christian newspaper in Norway, and on the website of the Norwegian newspaper
image: http://choices.truste.com/get?name=admarker-icon-tl.png
Dagbladet. An estimated 500 to 700 demonstrators marched from Regent's Park Mosque to the Danish embassy in Knightsbridge during the protest. MP David Davis, the shadow home secretary, condemned messages displayed on some of the protesters' placards as an "incitement to murder":
Clearly, some of these placards are incitement to violence, and indeed incitement to murder — an extremely serious offence which the police must deal with and deal with quickly.
Whatever your view on these cartoons, we have a tradition of freedom of speech in this country which has to be protected. Certainly there can be no tolerance of incitement to murder.
MP David Winnick, a member of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, called for the prosecution and deportation of some of the demonstrators:
Mr Winnick said: "The cartoons were deeply offensive to hundreds of millions of Muslims. But it is totally unacceptable that, on British soil, there should be thugs demonstrating for people to be beheaded and actually glorifying the atrocities of July 7.
"It is to be hoped that prosecutions will follow very quickly indeed."
He said those responsible who were temporarily in Britain should be deported, even it meant stripping them of permission previously given to remain in the country.
The Walsall North MP added that the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Britain "have the same distaste as the rest of us about these thugs".
"I hope it will be the last time we ever see such a demonstration, totally unacceptable to the Muslim community," he said.
Other Muslims maintained the protesters were extremists not representative of mainstream British Muslims:
Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, said the demonstration in London should have been stopped by police because the group had been advocating violence.
He said the protesters "did not represent British Muslims".
Mr Bukhari told the BBC News website: "The placards and chants were disgraceful and disgusting, Muslims do not feel that way.
"I condemn them without reservation, these people are less representative of Muslims than the BNP are of the British people."
He said that Muslims were angry over satirical cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad published in European papers but it was "outrageous" for anyone to advocate extreme action or violence.
"We believe it [the protest] should have been banned and the march stopped.
"It's irrelevant whether it's Muslims causing hatred or anyone else — freedom of speech has to be responsible."
No arrests were made at the time, according to police, due to the danger posed by the size and nature of the crowd:
As the clamour for action grew, police sources said there were no arrests because of fears of a riot. A senior Scotland Yard officer said: "We have to take the overall nature of the protesters into account. If they are overheated and emotional we don't go in.
"It's like a risk assessment; you have to look at the crowd you are dealing with. If we went in to arrest one person with a banner the crowd would turn on us and people would get hurt."
Although it has been circulated with the set of images displayed above, the following photograph likely comes from a completely different protest held in Luton a couple of years earlier:
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest4.jpg
Read more at snopes.com Muslim Religion of Peace Demonstration
If true, all you showed was a few protestors, fundamental ones. So what?
I Prefer not to put my trust in the U.N. - not after the controversial U.N.R.W.A issues but since you do I believe you also know that "MOST" essential supplies refers to metallic marbles and pipes, concrete, fuel and that smuggled powder(I can't remember the name of it) which all serves for creating weapons such as rockets, you probably never heard of rockets but we do, so Israel decided to inspect the goods before delivering them to the hands of Hamas right away, any evidence of Israel blocking humanitarian aid? (entirely?)Israel never blocked an humanitarian aid, except for weapons and weapons material.Israel sent aid to Haiti but blocked the aid from Gaza.Israel is (and was) in a fragile situation of which any action bare consequence, so it is a common sense not to dance on thin ice.
Criticism Follows Israeli Aid to Nepal - Bloomberg View
So, does Israel send aid because it cares or is it just a PR stunt?
Really?
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/11/world/middleeast/11nations.html?_r=0
So back to the paradox I assume, Israel is practicing apartheid in the 'West Bank' which are not a part of the state of Israel..makes sense? very.The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
Whenever someone posts something you don't like, you claim it's fake or a lie. IT shows just how much you really hate the truth.
Here is the truth
New settlement in east Jerusalem ,as Bibi says he wants peace with the Pals, the last part was a lie.
Since when has it been illegal to build on your own property ?
Settlements are clearly NOT "own property" and you know that Phoney... Why do you lie and make yourself look like a prick?
Claimed by whom?It is claimed by some that Israel is dependent on God. Someone ought to ask.
It is claimed by some that Israel is dependent on God. Someone ought to ask.
So the War for Independence was a scam, (doo-bee-doo-bee-doophus)?
The asylum escapee wants these animals to be able to spread their message:
all fake pics, Hollywood style.
The pictures are true. There's thousands of pics like these available by valid news organizations.
Yes ok if you say so.
There ya go, Muslim savagery verified by snopes, now take your meds:
Claim: Photographs show sign-bearing Muslim protesters at a "Religion of Peace' demonstration in London.
TRUE
"Below I have enclosed pictures of Moslems who marched throughout the streets of London during their recent Religion of Peace Demonstration.
These pictures have never been shown in any of our American newspapers or television news programs because we should never appear to offend anyone!
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest1.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest2.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest3.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest5.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest6.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest7.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest8.jpg
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest9.jpg
Why would anyone think that we should be at war with such nice, peaceful Moslems?!
Origins: The series of photographs of sign-bearing Muslim protesters displayed above were taken during a 3 February 2006 protest staged in London by Muslims angry over the publication in Scandinavian periodicals of cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad (not as a demonstation of Islam as a "religion of peace"):
The trigger for the latest clash of cultures was the publication by the Danish newspaper Jyllends-Posten on September 30 [2005] of 12 cartoons of Muhammad. A biographer of the prophet had complained that no one would dare to illustrate his book, and the newspaper challenged cartoonists to draw pictures of the prophet in a self-declared battle for freedom of speech.
One submission showed Muhammad wearing a bomb-shaped turban; in another he tells dead suicide bombers that he has run out of virgins with which to reward them. Any portrayal of Muhammad is blasphemous in Islam, lest it encourages idolatry.
In October [2005] ambassadors from ten Muslim countries complained to Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the Danish Prime Minister, who refused to interfere with the press’s freedom.
But the issue began to boil [in January 2006] after the cartoons appeared in Magazinet, a Christian newspaper in Norway, and on the website of the Norwegian newspaper
image: http://choices.truste.com/get?name=admarker-icon-tl.png
Dagbladet. An estimated 500 to 700 demonstrators marched from Regent's Park Mosque to the Danish embassy in Knightsbridge during the protest. MP David Davis, the shadow home secretary, condemned messages displayed on some of the protesters' placards as an "incitement to murder":
Clearly, some of these placards are incitement to violence, and indeed incitement to murder — an extremely serious offence which the police must deal with and deal with quickly.
Whatever your view on these cartoons, we have a tradition of freedom of speech in this country which has to be protected. Certainly there can be no tolerance of incitement to murder.
MP David Winnick, a member of the House of Commons Home Affairs Committee, called for the prosecution and deportation of some of the demonstrators:
Mr Winnick said: "The cartoons were deeply offensive to hundreds of millions of Muslims. But it is totally unacceptable that, on British soil, there should be thugs demonstrating for people to be beheaded and actually glorifying the atrocities of July 7.
"It is to be hoped that prosecutions will follow very quickly indeed."
He said those responsible who were temporarily in Britain should be deported, even it meant stripping them of permission previously given to remain in the country.
The Walsall North MP added that the overwhelming majority of Muslims in Britain "have the same distaste as the rest of us about these thugs".
"I hope it will be the last time we ever see such a demonstration, totally unacceptable to the Muslim community," he said.
Other Muslims maintained the protesters were extremists not representative of mainstream British Muslims:
Asghar Bukhari, chairman of the Muslim Public Affairs Committee, said the demonstration in London should have been stopped by police because the group had been advocating violence.
He said the protesters "did not represent British Muslims".
Mr Bukhari told the BBC News website: "The placards and chants were disgraceful and disgusting, Muslims do not feel that way.
"I condemn them without reservation, these people are less representative of Muslims than the BNP are of the British people."
He said that Muslims were angry over satirical cartoons of the Prophet Muhammad published in European papers but it was "outrageous" for anyone to advocate extreme action or violence.
"We believe it [the protest] should have been banned and the march stopped.
"It's irrelevant whether it's Muslims causing hatred or anyone else — freedom of speech has to be responsible."
No arrests were made at the time, according to police, due to the danger posed by the size and nature of the crowd:
As the clamour for action grew, police sources said there were no arrests because of fears of a riot. A senior Scotland Yard officer said: "We have to take the overall nature of the protesters into account. If they are overheated and emotional we don't go in.
"It's like a risk assessment; you have to look at the crowd you are dealing with. If we went in to arrest one person with a banner the crowd would turn on us and people would get hurt."
Although it has been circulated with the set of images displayed above, the following photograph likely comes from a completely different protest held in Luton a couple of years earlier:
image: http://www.snopes.com/photos/politics/graphics/protest4.jpg
Read more at snopes.com Muslim Religion of Peace Demonstration
If true, all you showed was a few protestors, fundamental ones. So what?
The US War for Independence. Israel did not have a war for that.So the War for Independence was a scam, (doo-bee-doo-bee-doophus)?
NOPE it was needed to put the arab muslims firmly in their place, it also showed the world that Israel was ready for free determination and able to stand on its own.
The US War for Independence. Israel did not have a war for that.So the War for Independence was a scam, (doo-bee-doo-bee-doophus)?
NOPE it was needed to put the arab muslims firmly in their place, it also showed the world that Israel was ready for free determination and able to stand on its own.
That was not a war for independence. Independence was granted through treaties and the UN.
It was a war of self defense, perhaps.
