Iran Says They'll Attack Israel

[Phoenall]

The war was instigated by islamonai terrorists from Syria, Egypt and Jordan who attacked Israel and then found them too hard a not to crack. It did see a victor as all 3 islamionazi nations have not instigated another attack on Israel since

Wrong.
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From your link


In the period leading up to June 1967, tensions became dangerously heightened. In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula,

Nasser induced Syria and Jordan to begin attacks on Israel by using the initially confused situation to claim that Egypt had defeated the Israeli air strike. Israeli counterattacks resulted in the seizure of East Jerusalem as well as the West Bank from the Jordanians, while Israel's retaliation against Syria resulted in its occupation of the Golan Heights.

Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered an act of war, or justification for war,[36][37] and Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on May 22–23.[38][39][40] On May 30, Jordan and Egypt signed a defense pact. The following day, at Jordan's invitation, the Iraqi army began deploying troops and armoured units in Jordan.[41] They were later reinforced by an Egyptian contingent. On June 1, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on June 4 the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six-Day War.



Even your own link calls you a LIAR

"The Egyptians were caught by surprise, and nearly the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed with few Israeli losses, giving the Israelis air superiority. Simultaneously, the Israelis launched a ground offensive into the Gaza Strip and the Sinai, which again caught the Egyptians by surprise. After some initial resistance, Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the evacuation of the Sinai. Israeli forces rushed westward in pursuit of the Egyptians, inflicted heavy losses, and conquered the Sinai."
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correct, but how does this alter the fact that Egypt struck the first blow by closing the straits, and then massing its troops on the border between Egypt and Israel. They mobilised nearly their full armed forces into the Sinai ready to attack. Israel being on their toes realised what was about to happen and struck first, destroying the airforce and then the army

Closing the straits was not a military act. The Egyptian government deployed only a fraction of the army there. Each time you open your mouth another lie appears.
Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You made the claim that Egypt had to garrison the straits to enforce the closure. Then it was they put their troops on the border with Israel in case of an attack ( didnt work did it ) Now it is that Egypt deployed only a fraction ( yep a very large fraction like 9/10ths) of it armed forces.

It is you that contstantly LIES when your posts are destroyed, mine have said the same thing in every single one of them, and no changes

 

[Phoenall]

what a surprise. irosie again has intimate inside knowledge.

polonium is a very deadly substance. but nobody is producing it, and iran certainly can't produce it now with the oversight in place.

israel on the other hand could produce polonium with ease. are you saying we should be concerned that israel will try to poison the milk supply?

Iran is a big place, just like Iraq was. so why cant they have set up a plant in the desert to enrich ore and produce polonium. Easy enough to do when you realise Russia did it for many years

Its beyond easy-----it is elementary------polonium can EASILY be made in any facility that makes isotopes for medical use---
therapy and testing. Every reasonably equipped
hospital has a RADIO ISOTOPES department and either makes them or buys them. No one need discern ---a nefarious purpose. --------in fact any country that has bleach---(as in laundry Clorox) can make chlorine bombs---
ASK BABY ASSAD. Surveillance for nuclear BOMBS has
nothing to do with getting up a batch of POLONIUM

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

right. protocols in place like nuclear reactor type security at dairy plants...

you know, it's pretty likely that yasser arafat died from polonium poisoning.

wonder what nation would do something like that?

Hamas would for starters. Israel had no need to as they could take him out other ways. But it was said treatment for aids with polonium was being tried in those days

 

[Phoenall]

Iran is a big place, just like Iraq was. so why cant they have set up a plant in the desert to enrich ore and produce polonium. Easy enough to do when you realise Russia did it for many years

Its beyond easy-----it is elementary------polonium can EASILY be made in any facility that makes isotopes for medical use---
therapy and testing. Every reasonably equipped
hospital has a RADIO ISOTOPES department and either makes them or buys them. No one need discern ---a nefarious purpose. --------in fact any country that has bleach---(as in laundry Clorox) can make chlorine bombs---
ASK BABY ASSAD. Surveillance for nuclear BOMBS has
nothing to do with getting up a batch of POLONIUM

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

 

[Phoenall]

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

not very cheap----but a lot less expensive and a lot easier than
making a nuclear bomb-----also a lot more CONVENIENT---
but it is not convenient for LARGE SCALE AND IMPRESSIVE
devastation--------it won't work to drop it from planes. The stuff has to be DROPPED directly into something that will get
into the population-------like a large milk vat.------some sort of
big food processing thing-----etc etc Once discovered ---there are ways of tracing the isotope-----even thought they are
relatively short lived

so at the end of this great big rabbit hole you admit that it isn't a likely attack vector.

why did you even bring it up? there is zero reason to believe iran is in any way interested in polonium

That unlikely that during the Russian assassination some years back the UK was on high alert and people were told to watch for suspicious behavior near drinking water reservoirs

 

[Mindful]

I see that Turkey's Air Force is pounding Isis targets now.

Then there's a problem with the Kurds.

Too many players in this Syria game.

 

[irosie91]

Wrong.
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From your link


In the period leading up to June 1967, tensions became dangerously heightened. In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula,

Nasser induced Syria and Jordan to begin attacks on Israel by using the initially confused situation to claim that Egypt had defeated the Israeli air strike. Israeli counterattacks resulted in the seizure of East Jerusalem as well as the West Bank from the Jordanians, while Israel's retaliation against Syria resulted in its occupation of the Golan Heights.

Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered an act of war, or justification for war,[36][37] and Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on May 22–23.[38][39][40] On May 30, Jordan and Egypt signed a defense pact. The following day, at Jordan's invitation, the Iraqi army began deploying troops and armoured units in Jordan.[41] They were later reinforced by an Egyptian contingent. On June 1, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on June 4 the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six-Day War.



Even your own link calls you a LIAR

"The Egyptians were caught by surprise, and nearly the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed with few Israeli losses, giving the Israelis air superiority. Simultaneously, the Israelis launched a ground offensive into the Gaza Strip and the Sinai, which again caught the Egyptians by surprise. After some initial resistance, Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the evacuation of the Sinai. Israeli forces rushed westward in pursuit of the Egyptians, inflicted heavy losses, and conquered the Sinai."
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correct, but how does this alter the fact that Egypt struck the first blow by closing the straits, and then massing its troops on the border between Egypt and Israel. They mobilised nearly their full armed forces into the Sinai ready to attack. Israel being on their toes realised what was about to happen and struck first, destroying the airforce and then the army

Closing the straits was not a military act. The Egyptian government deployed only a fraction of the army there. Each time you open your mouth another lie appears.
Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You made the claim that Egypt had to garrison the straits to enforce the closure. Then it was they put their troops on the border with Israel in case of an attack ( didnt work did it ) Now it is that Egypt deployed only a fraction ( yep a very large fraction like 9/10ths) of it armed forces.

It is you that contstantly LIES when your posts are destroyed, mine have said the same thing in every single one of them, and no changes

Phoen-----try to cope------by now you should know who CAPT.
BLEI is

 

[Bleipriester]

Wrong.
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

From your link


In the period leading up to June 1967, tensions became dangerously heightened. In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula,

Nasser induced Syria and Jordan to begin attacks on Israel by using the initially confused situation to claim that Egypt had defeated the Israeli air strike. Israeli counterattacks resulted in the seizure of East Jerusalem as well as the West Bank from the Jordanians, while Israel's retaliation against Syria resulted in its occupation of the Golan Heights.

Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered an act of war, or justification for war,[36][37] and Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on May 22–23.[38][39][40] On May 30, Jordan and Egypt signed a defense pact. The following day, at Jordan's invitation, the Iraqi army began deploying troops and armoured units in Jordan.[41] They were later reinforced by an Egyptian contingent. On June 1, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on June 4 the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six-Day War.



Even your own link calls you a LIAR

"The Egyptians were caught by surprise, and nearly the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed with few Israeli losses, giving the Israelis air superiority. Simultaneously, the Israelis launched a ground offensive into the Gaza Strip and the Sinai, which again caught the Egyptians by surprise. After some initial resistance, Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the evacuation of the Sinai. Israeli forces rushed westward in pursuit of the Egyptians, inflicted heavy losses, and conquered the Sinai."
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correct, but how does this alter the fact that Egypt struck the first blow by closing the straits, and then massing its troops on the border between Egypt and Israel. They mobilised nearly their full armed forces into the Sinai ready to attack. Israel being on their toes realised what was about to happen and struck first, destroying the airforce and then the army

Closing the straits was not a military act. The Egyptian government deployed only a fraction of the army there. Each time you open your mouth another lie appears.
Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You made the claim that Egypt had to garrison the straits to enforce the closure. Then it was they put their troops on the border with Israel in case of an attack ( didnt work did it ) Now it is that Egypt deployed only a fraction ( yep a very large fraction like 9/10ths) of it armed forces.

It is you that contstantly LIES when your posts are destroyed, mine have said the same thing in every single one of them, and no changes

Every time I post a link you call it lies. Where is the proof for all your claims? You don´t have a single one. Egypt also didn´t close the Straits of Tiran but only for Israeli ships.

 

[irosie91]

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

not very cheap----but a lot less expensive and a lot easier than
making a nuclear bomb-----also a lot more CONVENIENT---
but it is not convenient for LARGE SCALE AND IMPRESSIVE
devastation--------it won't work to drop it from planes. The stuff has to be DROPPED directly into something that will get
into the population-------like a large milk vat.------some sort of
big food processing thing-----etc etc Once discovered ---there are ways of tracing the isotope-----even thought they are
relatively short lived

so at the end of this great big rabbit hole you admit that it isn't a likely attack vector.

why did you even bring it up? there is zero reason to believe iran is in any way interested in polonium

That unlikely that during the Russian assassination some years back the UK was on high alert and people were told to watch for suspicious behavior near drinking water reservoirs

did I mention that USA homeland security guards water reservoirs ----at least in New York State---it is INTENSIVE

 

[ogibillm]

Its beyond easy-----it is elementary------polonium can EASILY be made in any facility that makes isotopes for medical use---
therapy and testing. Every reasonably equipped
hospital has a RADIO ISOTOPES department and either makes them or buys them. No one need discern ---a nefarious purpose. --------in fact any country that has bleach---(as in laundry Clorox) can make chlorine bombs---
ASK BABY ASSAD. Surveillance for nuclear BOMBS has
nothing to do with getting up a batch of POLONIUM

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

 

[ogibillm]

Iran is a big place, just like Iraq was. so why cant they have set up a plant in the desert to enrich ore and produce polonium. Easy enough to do when you realise Russia did it for many years

Its beyond easy-----it is elementary------polonium can EASILY be made in any facility that makes isotopes for medical use---
therapy and testing. Every reasonably equipped
hospital has a RADIO ISOTOPES department and either makes them or buys them. No one need discern ---a nefarious purpose. --------in fact any country that has bleach---(as in laundry Clorox) can make chlorine bombs---
ASK BABY ASSAD. Surveillance for nuclear BOMBS has
nothing to do with getting up a batch of POLONIUM

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

right. protocols in place like nuclear reactor type security at dairy plants...

you know, it's pretty likely that yasser arafat died from polonium poisoning.

wonder what nation would do something like that?

Hamas would for starters. Israel had no need to as they could take him out other ways. But it was said treatment for aids with polonium was being tried in those days

lol. sure.

 

[irosie91]

I see that Turkey's Air Force is pounding Isis targets now.

Then there's a problem with the Kurds.

Too many players in this Syria game.

so true------but even MORE significant----virtually all the major
players have HATE histories against each other. I laugh
every time I think about Syria and Turkey as "ALLIES" ---and now even more enemies are sitting at the same table
sharing a plate of choumous------or-----borscht

 

[irosie91]

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

fairly simple----unless you call a cyclotron a BIG DEAL polonium is found in nature but it is a bit rare----polonium
can by SYNTHESIZED by bombarding BISMUTH with
various subatomic particles-----easy stuff----it means neutrons and protons

 

[ogibillm]

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

fairly simple----unless you call a cyclotron a BIG DEAL polonium is found in nature but it is a bit rare----polonium
can by SYNTHESIZED by bombarding BISMUTH with
various subatomic particles-----easy stuff----it means neutrons and protons

lol. so easy the stuff only sells for $2 million a gram.

but anyone can do it. lol

 

[Phoenall]

From your link


In the period leading up to June 1967, tensions became dangerously heightened. In reaction to the mobilisation of Egyptian forces along the Israeli border in the Sinai Peninsula,

Nasser induced Syria and Jordan to begin attacks on Israel by using the initially confused situation to claim that Egypt had defeated the Israeli air strike. Israeli counterattacks resulted in the seizure of East Jerusalem as well as the West Bank from the Jordanians, while Israel's retaliation against Syria resulted in its occupation of the Golan Heights.

Israel reiterated declarations made in 1957 that any closure of the Straits would be considered an act of war, or justification for war,[36][37] and Nasser declared the Straits closed to Israeli shipping on May 22–23.[38][39][40] On May 30, Jordan and Egypt signed a defense pact. The following day, at Jordan's invitation, the Iraqi army began deploying troops and armoured units in Jordan.[41] They were later reinforced by an Egyptian contingent. On June 1, Israel formed a National Unity Government by widening its cabinet, and on June 4 the decision was made to go to war. The next morning, Israel launched Operation Focus, a large-scale surprise air strike that was the opening of the Six-Day War.



Even your own link calls you a LIAR

"The Egyptians were caught by surprise, and nearly the entire Egyptian air force was destroyed with few Israeli losses, giving the Israelis air superiority. Simultaneously, the Israelis launched a ground offensive into the Gaza Strip and the Sinai, which again caught the Egyptians by surprise. After some initial resistance, Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser ordered the evacuation of the Sinai. Israeli forces rushed westward in pursuit of the Egyptians, inflicted heavy losses, and conquered the Sinai."
Six-Day War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Correct, but how does this alter the fact that Egypt struck the first blow by closing the straits, and then massing its troops on the border between Egypt and Israel. They mobilised nearly their full armed forces into the Sinai ready to attack. Israel being on their toes realised what was about to happen and struck first, destroying the airforce and then the army

Closing the straits was not a military act. The Egyptian government deployed only a fraction of the army there. Each time you open your mouth another lie appears.
Battle of Abu-Ageila (1967) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You made the claim that Egypt had to garrison the straits to enforce the closure. Then it was they put their troops on the border with Israel in case of an attack ( didnt work did it ) Now it is that Egypt deployed only a fraction ( yep a very large fraction like 9/10ths) of it armed forces.

It is you that contstantly LIES when your posts are destroyed, mine have said the same thing in every single one of them, and no changes

Every time I post a link you call it lies. Where is the proof for all your claims? You don´t have a single one. Egypt also didn´t close the Straits of Tiran but only for Israeli ships.

Which they were told years preciously was an act of war, so making that the fist shot fired in effect. You cant keep claiming that Egypt did nothing when the evidence shows they did. Same with Syria and Jordan who both attacked Israel after being asked to stay out of the war.


I call your posts LIES when they are proven to be lies, which is just about every one

 

[Phoenall]

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

Who mentioned real estate I said cost, which is the raw materials and wages. The centrifuge is no bigger than a washing machine

 

[ogibillm]

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

Who mentioned real estate I said cost, which is the raw materials and wages. The centrifuge is no bigger than a washing machine

goood god. just stop, you are out of your element.

 

[Phoenall]

Its beyond easy-----it is elementary------polonium can EASILY be made in any facility that makes isotopes for medical use---
therapy and testing. Every reasonably equipped
hospital has a RADIO ISOTOPES department and either makes them or buys them. No one need discern ---a nefarious purpose. --------in fact any country that has bleach---(as in laundry Clorox) can make chlorine bombs---
ASK BABY ASSAD. Surveillance for nuclear BOMBS has
nothing to do with getting up a batch of POLONIUM

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

right. protocols in place like nuclear reactor type security at dairy plants...

you know, it's pretty likely that yasser arafat died from polonium poisoning.

wonder what nation would do something like that?

Hamas would for starters. Israel had no need to as they could take him out other ways. But it was said treatment for aids with polonium was being tried in those days

lol. sure.

Why dont you take a look. In parts of Africa they believed that raping a baby would cure aids

 

[ogibillm]

super.

so wtf does that have to do with anything?

It relates to the issue of stuff available to HEZBOLLAH
TERRORISTS ------very available----so available that the USA has protocols in place as responses to the filth you so support

right. protocols in place like nuclear reactor type security at dairy plants...

you know, it's pretty likely that yasser arafat died from polonium poisoning.

wonder what nation would do something like that?

Hamas would for starters. Israel had no need to as they could take him out other ways. But it was said treatment for aids with polonium was being tried in those days

lol. sure.

Why dont you take a look. In parts of Africa they believed that raping a baby would cure aids

Doesn't matter what anyone else believed, nobody was using polonium to treat aids, and even if they were arafat did not have aids

 

[Phoenall]

what is so funny OGGIE? The USA is spending billions on
HOMELAND SECURITY------which is a euphemism for
"what to do when the muzzies attack" btw----in case of an occasion of terrorism via polonium-----be careful to do exactly
what you are told to do-----the directions will come to you by radio and bull horn

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

Who mentioned real estate I said cost, which is the raw materials and wages. The centrifuge is no bigger than a washing machine

goood god. just stop, you are out of your element.

Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon to receive radioisotopes from home instead of Hamilton, Ont.



Cost $25million because it is medical, iran already have them so what will it cost to put them over to polonium production using the existing materials.


You are the one out of your depth as I saw the one in my local hospital producing radioactive Iodine for imaging

 

[ogibillm]

if polonium is as easy to make and use as you claim why hasn't a large scale attack happened?

(hint: it's not cheap or easy to produce)

Cost is relative as the differences in the US show. Even the UK has different costs depending on where you are. For example a standard home in London would cost £1 million, while in the provinces as low as £90,000 and that is for identical houses.
So what would cost $10 million a dram to make in the US would cost $100 in iran

no. don't say stupid things. polonium and the equipment and expertise to produce it are not analogous to real estate.

Who mentioned real estate I said cost, which is the raw materials and wages. The centrifuge is no bigger than a washing machine

goood god. just stop, you are out of your element.

Royal University Hospital in Saskatoon to receive radioisotopes from home instead of Hamilton, Ont.



Cost $25million because it is medical, iran already have them so what will it cost to put them over to polonium production using the existing materials.


You are the one out of your depth as I saw the one in my local hospital producing radioactive Iodine for imaging

not the same thing