Bobby1250
VIP Member
- Jul 22, 2015
- 1,440
- 98
- 65
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #61
I read that article ^^^, and I don't agree that the images show irrefutable evidence of a nuclear detonation. But, even is it's true, and all the major media have not reported it, why wouldn't Syria say something? Seriously, if someone just nuked your country you're not going to scream bloody murder? One would think Assad--and Iranian leadership--would be telling this to everyone every chance they get. Why would Iran agree to any limitations for its development of nuclear weapons if they knew Israel has already nuked its neighbor?
Oh, of course you don't agree with it. Heck, I don't expect any of the Israel firsters that have posted in this thread expressing their undying support of the rogue nuclear terrorist state in the ME to agree with it. Syria did scream bloody murder about it...but as I pointed out before, your GOD....ABCNNBCBSFOXNYTAP covered it all up. That is why schitzreals crime against humanity has been reported on alternative media....but, not the former MSM ( only 13% of America still trusts MSM...people like you).
The following captures give you a clear reference for what is happening in the frames above. Put your finger on one of the flames in the frame above to see where it is in the picture while the light of the nuke is still overwhelming the camera so badly it cannot see that flame. How bright is the sun? Would that camera be able to see a fire at high noon? Obviously yes, and this proves that even after significantly fading, the nuke is STILL brighter than the sun.
There is only ONE THING WE KNOW OF, THAT CAN LIGHT THINGS BRIGHTER THAN THE SUN. THIS ALONE IS PROOF ISRAEL NUKED SYRIA.
Strawman argument, much? Please stick to the topic...hard as that is for you to do.
Back on topic.
Israel had a serious launch dilemma
Israel is in a unique predicament. It's small land mass and hostile neighborhood have made developing a space program and ballistic missile defense system all but impossible.
Geography matters. Most nations are privileged to have vast tracts of land suitible for space launches, or friendly neighbors who will permit the use of their airspace during a space launch. Israel is not one of them.
If a rocket is to be put to its most practical use, it must launch toward the rising sun to make use of earth's rotational velocity and add it to the speed of the rocket. If a rocket is launched towards the setting sun, it must first accelerate to the speed of the earth's rotation, and then an additional 1,000 mph just to get to where zero would have been with an eastward launch. Though it can be done, it wastes fuel and after launch another problem then presents itself - your payload will be traveling opposite to all the many thousands of other satellites and space debris in orbit and an eventual catastrophic collision is virtually assured. This has made westward launches both taboo and difficult. Westward launches are considered unacceptable, though Israel has done it.
Israel has been stifled in space of because of these difficulties. The prime Eastward launch direction will violate both Jordani and Saudi airspace, because a rocket has to reach an altitude of 60 miles to be formally above, and not trespassing on a nation. Though a straight up launch which then turns East after an acceptable altitude is reached is possible, it will waste so much fuel and require such a large rocket that it will be too impractical to be considered an option. This has spelled doom for a land based ballistic missile defense system in Israel because only a small east to west launch corridor is available over the mediterannean. So while the Israelis have launched satellites into orbit through this window, a ballistic defense system which needs a full 360 degree launch direction to be fully effective is not possible. Israel was forced to both explore and implement other methods of delivering an effective nuclear deterrent.
Sadly, their only affordable option allowed them to screw the world
What if Israel came up with a way to smuggle nuclear weapons into the most sensitive areas of all the developed nations - areas where if anything big goes BOOM all is lost? Could there be a clandestine reason for the supposed shortage of Helium 3, which is needed in the type of radiation detectors required to detect a nuclear weapon? You can block protons, but neutrons are difficult to shield entirely, and you can forget about neutrinos - you can't hide a nuke from the right detector, one which uses helium 3 in it's detector element. Why did America and all other nations somehow run out of Helium 3 a few years ago, which simultaneously left their borders open to nuclear weapons smuggling? Coincidence? I think not. The picture to the left appears to be a legitimate camera in a body that could also hold a nuke. It does not appear to actually be a nuke. HOWEVER...
Strawman argument, much?
Showing a conventional alternative to your nuclear nutbaggery is a strawman argument? LOL!
And it was a pretty lame strawman argument too. lol