Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

[Bobby1250]

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

If the Vienna deal is to mean anything, the whole of the Middle East must rid itself of weapons of mass destruction

We – Iran and its interlocutors in the group of nations known as the P5+1 – have finally achieved the shared objective of turning the Iranian nuclear programme from an unnecessary crisis into a platform for cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and beyond. The nuclear deal reached in Vienna this month is not a ceiling but a solid foundation on which we must build. The joint comprehensive plan of action, as the accord is officially known, cements Iran’s status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. Now it is high time that we expand that zone to encompass the entire Middle East.

Iran’s push for a ban on weapons of mass destruction in its regional neighbourhood has been consistent. The fact that it precedes Saddam Hussein’s systematic use of WMDs against Iran (never reciprocated in kind) is evidence of the depth of my country’s commitment to this noble cause. And while Iran has received the support of some of its Arab friends in this endeavour, Israel – home to the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons programme – has been the holdout. In the light of the historic nuclear deal, we must address this challenge head on.

One of the many ironies of history is that non-nuclear-weapon states, like Iran, have actually done far more for the cause of non-proliferation in practice than nuclear-weapon states have done on paper. Iran and other nuclear have-nots have genuinely “walked the walk” in seeking to consolidate the non-proliferation regime. Meanwhile, states actually possessing these destructive weapons have hardly even “talked the talk”, while completely brushing off their disarmament obligations under the non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and customary international law.

That is to say nothing of countries outside the NPT, or Israel, with an undeclared nuclear arsenal and a declared disdain towards non-proliferation, notwithstanding its absurd and alarmist campaign against the Iranian nuclear deal.

Today, in light of the Vienna deal, it is high time that the nuclear “haves” remedied the gap by adopting serious disarmament measures and reinforcing the non-proliferation regime.

It is time for the “haves” to finally come to terms with a crucial reality; we live in a globalised security environment. The cold war era asymmetry between states that possess nuclear weapons and those that don’t is no longer remotely tolerable.

For too long, it has been assumed that the insane concept of mutually assured destruction would sustain stability and non-proliferation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prevalence of this deterrence doctrine in international relations has been the primary driving force behind the temptation by some countries to acquire nuclear weapons, and by others to engage in expanding and beefing up the strength of their nuclear arsenals. All this in blatant violation of the disarmament objectives set by the international community.

It is imperative that we change this dangerous and erroneous security paradigm and move toward a better, safer and fairer arrangement. I sincerely believe that the nuclear agreement between my country – a non-nuclear-weapon state – and the P5+1 (which control almost all nuclear warheads on Earth) is symbolically significant enough to kickstart this paradigm shift and mark the beginning of a new era for the non-proliferation regime.

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

This could, in an initial phase, occasion the de-alerting of nuclear arsenals (removing warheads from delivery vehicles to reduce the risk of use) and subsequently engender the progressive disarmament by all countries possessing such WMDs. It is certainly a feasible goal to start this global project with a robust, universal and really genuine push to establish a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, if the relevant powers finally come to deem it not just a noble cause but a strategic imperative.

Such a new treaty would revive and complement the NPT for nuclear “haves”. It would codify disarmament obligations for nuclear-armed regimes that are not party to the NPT – but that are nonetheless bound – politically, by the international non-proliferation regime and, legally, by preemptory norms of customary international law to disarm.

Iran, in its national capacity and as current chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement, is prepared to work with the international community to achieve these goals, knowing full well that, along the way, it will probably run into many hurdles raised by the sceptics of peace and diplomacy. But we must endeavour to convince and persist, as we did in Vienna.

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal now it s Israel s turn Javad Zarif Comment is free The Guardian

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

If the Vienna deal is to mean anything, the whole of the Middle East must rid itself of weapons of mass destruction

We – Iran and its interlocutors in the group of nations known as the P5+1 – have finally achieved the shared objective of turning the Iranian nuclear programme from an unnecessary crisis into a platform for cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and beyond. The nuclear deal reached in Vienna this month is not a ceiling but a solid foundation on which we must build. The joint comprehensive plan of action, as the accord is officially known, cements Iran’s status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. Now it is high time that we expand that zone to encompass the entire Middle East.

Iran’s push for a ban on weapons of mass destruction in its regional neighbourhood has been consistent. The fact that it precedes Saddam Hussein’s systematic use of WMDs against Iran (never reciprocated in kind) is evidence of the depth of my country’s commitment to this noble cause. And while Iran has received the support of some of its Arab friends in this endeavour, Israel – home to the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons programme – has been the holdout. In the light of the historic nuclear deal, we must address this challenge head on.

One of the many ironies of history is that non-nuclear-weapon states, like Iran, have actually done far more for the cause of non-proliferation in practice than nuclear-weapon states have done on paper. Iran and other nuclear have-nots have genuinely “walked the walk” in seeking to consolidate the non-proliferation regime. Meanwhile, states actually possessing these destructive weapons have hardly even “talked the talk”, while completely brushing off their disarmament obligations under the non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and customary international law.

That is to say nothing of countries outside the NPT, or Israel, with an undeclared nuclear arsenal and a declared disdain towards non-proliferation, notwithstanding its absurd and alarmist campaign against the Iranian nuclear deal.

Today, in light of the Vienna deal, it is high time that the nuclear “haves” remedied the gap by adopting serious disarmament measures and reinforcing the non-proliferation regime.

It is time for the “haves” to finally come to terms with a crucial reality; we live in a globalised security environment. The cold war era asymmetry between states that possess nuclear weapons and those that don’t is no longer remotely tolerable.

For too long, it has been assumed that the insane concept of mutually assured destruction would sustain stability and non-proliferation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prevalence of this deterrence doctrine in international relations has been the primary driving force behind the temptation by some countries to acquire nuclear weapons, and by others to engage in expanding and beefing up the strength of their nuclear arsenals. All this in blatant violation of the disarmament objectives set by the international community.

It is imperative that we change this dangerous and erroneous security paradigm and move toward a better, safer and fairer arrangement. I sincerely believe that the nuclear agreement between my country – a non-nuclear-weapon state – and the P5+1 (which control almost all nuclear warheads on Earth) is symbolically significant enough to kickstart this paradigm shift and mark the beginning of a new era for the non-proliferation regime.

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

This could, in an initial phase, occasion the de-alerting of nuclear arsenals (removing warheads from delivery vehicles to reduce the risk of use) and subsequently engender the progressive disarmament by all countries possessing such WMDs. It is certainly a feasible goal to start this global project with a robust, universal and really genuine push to establish a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, if the relevant powers finally come to deem it not just a noble cause but a strategic imperative.

Such a new treaty would revive and complement the NPT for nuclear “haves”. It would codify disarmament obligations for nuclear-armed regimes that are not party to the NPT – but that are nonetheless bound – politically, by the international non-proliferation regime and, legally, by preemptory norms of customary international law to disarm.

Iran, in its national capacity and as current chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement, is prepared to work with the international community to achieve these goals, knowing full well that, along the way, it will probably run into many hurdles raised by the sceptics of peace and diplomacy. But we must endeavour to convince and persist, as we did in Vienna.

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal now it s Israel s turn Javad Zarif Comment is free The Guardian

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

Obozo couldn't get a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism from Iran, how do you get one from anyone else in the region?

 

[Blackrook]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

 

[Bobby1250]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

 

[Blackrook]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Kerry is a member of the lawless Obama administration, who believe that the United States Constitution is a dead letter document that is not binding on their raw exercise of power.

You obviously approve of this fascist theory of government that one man has all the power and everyone else has none.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Arm yourself to the hilt Israel. There is a country close by that wants to wipe you off the map, and we are backing them 100%. Trust yourself and God only.

 

[Bobby1250]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Kerry is a member of the lawless Obama administration, who believe that the United States Constitution is a dead letter document that is not binding on their raw exercise of power.

You obviously approve of this fascist theory of government that one man has all the power and everyone else has none.

The fact you are engaging in off topic, argumentum ad hominems, (attack the messenger), further proves my point about you being a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Sanctions, boycotts and public pressure eventually saw the end of Apartheid South Africa. If the same principles were used against Israel it would eventually have to fall into line. It is a pariah state but unfortunately many countries and organisations just keep rewarding its bad behavior. It is time the spoilt little child of the Middle East was dished out some discipline.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

If the Vienna deal is to mean anything, the whole of the Middle East must rid itself of weapons of mass destruction

We – Iran and its interlocutors in the group of nations known as the P5+1 – have finally achieved the shared objective of turning the Iranian nuclear programme from an unnecessary crisis into a platform for cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and beyond. The nuclear deal reached in Vienna this month is not a ceiling but a solid foundation on which we must build. The joint comprehensive plan of action, as the accord is officially known, cements Iran’s status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. Now it is high time that we expand that zone to encompass the entire Middle East.

Iran’s push for a ban on weapons of mass destruction in its regional neighbourhood has been consistent. The fact that it precedes Saddam Hussein’s systematic use of WMDs against Iran (never reciprocated in kind) is evidence of the depth of my country’s commitment to this noble cause. And while Iran has received the support of some of its Arab friends in this endeavour, Israel – home to the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons programme – has been the holdout. In the light of the historic nuclear deal, we must address this challenge head on.

One of the many ironies of history is that non-nuclear-weapon states, like Iran, have actually done far more for the cause of non-proliferation in practice than nuclear-weapon states have done on paper. Iran and other nuclear have-nots have genuinely “walked the walk” in seeking to consolidate the non-proliferation regime. Meanwhile, states actually possessing these destructive weapons have hardly even “talked the talk”, while completely brushing off their disarmament obligations under the non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and customary international law.

That is to say nothing of countries outside the NPT, or Israel, with an undeclared nuclear arsenal and a declared disdain towards non-proliferation, notwithstanding its absurd and alarmist campaign against the Iranian nuclear deal.

Today, in light of the Vienna deal, it is high time that the nuclear “haves” remedied the gap by adopting serious disarmament measures and reinforcing the non-proliferation regime.

It is time for the “haves” to finally come to terms with a crucial reality; we live in a globalised security environment. The cold war era asymmetry between states that possess nuclear weapons and those that don’t is no longer remotely tolerable.

For too long, it has been assumed that the insane concept of mutually assured destruction would sustain stability and non-proliferation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prevalence of this deterrence doctrine in international relations has been the primary driving force behind the temptation by some countries to acquire nuclear weapons, and by others to engage in expanding and beefing up the strength of their nuclear arsenals. All this in blatant violation of the disarmament objectives set by the international community.

It is imperative that we change this dangerous and erroneous security paradigm and move toward a better, safer and fairer arrangement. I sincerely believe that the nuclear agreement between my country – a non-nuclear-weapon state – and the P5+1 (which control almost all nuclear warheads on Earth) is symbolically significant enough to kickstart this paradigm shift and mark the beginning of a new era for the non-proliferation regime.

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

This could, in an initial phase, occasion the de-alerting of nuclear arsenals (removing warheads from delivery vehicles to reduce the risk of use) and subsequently engender the progressive disarmament by all countries possessing such WMDs. It is certainly a feasible goal to start this global project with a robust, universal and really genuine push to establish a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, if the relevant powers finally come to deem it not just a noble cause but a strategic imperative.

Such a new treaty would revive and complement the NPT for nuclear “haves”. It would codify disarmament obligations for nuclear-armed regimes that are not party to the NPT – but that are nonetheless bound – politically, by the international non-proliferation regime and, legally, by preemptory norms of customary international law to disarm.

Iran, in its national capacity and as current chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement, is prepared to work with the international community to achieve these goals, knowing full well that, along the way, it will probably run into many hurdles raised by the sceptics of peace and diplomacy. But we must endeavour to convince and persist, as we did in Vienna.

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal now it s Israel s turn Javad Zarif Comment is free The Guardian

I would strongly discourage Israel from doing so.

 

[Bobby1250]

Arm yourself to the hilt Israel. There is a country close by that wants to wipe you off the map, and we are backing them 100%. Trust yourself and God only.

ORLY?

What country is that?

wipe you off the map

That was debunked, you know. Looks like you're behind the loop by a decade or more.

 

[Bobby1250]

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

If the Vienna deal is to mean anything, the whole of the Middle East must rid itself of weapons of mass destruction

We – Iran and its interlocutors in the group of nations known as the P5+1 – have finally achieved the shared objective of turning the Iranian nuclear programme from an unnecessary crisis into a platform for cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and beyond. The nuclear deal reached in Vienna this month is not a ceiling but a solid foundation on which we must build. The joint comprehensive plan of action, as the accord is officially known, cements Iran’s status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. Now it is high time that we expand that zone to encompass the entire Middle East.

Iran’s push for a ban on weapons of mass destruction in its regional neighbourhood has been consistent. The fact that it precedes Saddam Hussein’s systematic use of WMDs against Iran (never reciprocated in kind) is evidence of the depth of my country’s commitment to this noble cause. And while Iran has received the support of some of its Arab friends in this endeavour, Israel – home to the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons programme – has been the holdout. In the light of the historic nuclear deal, we must address this challenge head on.

One of the many ironies of history is that non-nuclear-weapon states, like Iran, have actually done far more for the cause of non-proliferation in practice than nuclear-weapon states have done on paper. Iran and other nuclear have-nots have genuinely “walked the walk” in seeking to consolidate the non-proliferation regime. Meanwhile, states actually possessing these destructive weapons have hardly even “talked the talk”, while completely brushing off their disarmament obligations under the non-proliferation treaty (NPT) and customary international law.

That is to say nothing of countries outside the NPT, or Israel, with an undeclared nuclear arsenal and a declared disdain towards non-proliferation, notwithstanding its absurd and alarmist campaign against the Iranian nuclear deal.

Today, in light of the Vienna deal, it is high time that the nuclear “haves” remedied the gap by adopting serious disarmament measures and reinforcing the non-proliferation regime.

It is time for the “haves” to finally come to terms with a crucial reality; we live in a globalised security environment. The cold war era asymmetry between states that possess nuclear weapons and those that don’t is no longer remotely tolerable.

For too long, it has been assumed that the insane concept of mutually assured destruction would sustain stability and non-proliferation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prevalence of this deterrence doctrine in international relations has been the primary driving force behind the temptation by some countries to acquire nuclear weapons, and by others to engage in expanding and beefing up the strength of their nuclear arsenals. All this in blatant violation of the disarmament objectives set by the international community.

It is imperative that we change this dangerous and erroneous security paradigm and move toward a better, safer and fairer arrangement. I sincerely believe that the nuclear agreement between my country – a non-nuclear-weapon state – and the P5+1 (which control almost all nuclear warheads on Earth) is symbolically significant enough to kickstart this paradigm shift and mark the beginning of a new era for the non-proliferation regime.

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

This could, in an initial phase, occasion the de-alerting of nuclear arsenals (removing warheads from delivery vehicles to reduce the risk of use) and subsequently engender the progressive disarmament by all countries possessing such WMDs. It is certainly a feasible goal to start this global project with a robust, universal and really genuine push to establish a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, if the relevant powers finally come to deem it not just a noble cause but a strategic imperative.

Such a new treaty would revive and complement the NPT for nuclear “haves”. It would codify disarmament obligations for nuclear-armed regimes that are not party to the NPT – but that are nonetheless bound – politically, by the international non-proliferation regime and, legally, by preemptory norms of customary international law to disarm.

Iran, in its national capacity and as current chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement, is prepared to work with the international community to achieve these goals, knowing full well that, along the way, it will probably run into many hurdles raised by the sceptics of peace and diplomacy. But we must endeavour to convince and persist, as we did in Vienna.

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal now it s Israel s turn Javad Zarif Comment is free The Guardian

I would strongly discourage Israel from doing so.

Why? Isn't Israel always bragging they have the 4th largest military in the world and the best air force in the world?

According to them they don't even need nukes.

 

[Blackrook]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Kerry is a member of the lawless Obama administration, who believe that the United States Constitution is a dead letter document that is not binding on their raw exercise of power.

You obviously approve of this fascist theory of government that one man has all the power and everyone else has none.

The fact you are engaging in off topic, argumentum ad hominems, (attack the messenger), further proves my point about you being a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Sanctions, boycotts and public pressure eventually saw the end of Apartheid South Africa. If the same principles were used against Israel it would eventually have to fall into line. It is a pariah state but unfortunately many countries and organisations just keep rewarding its bad behavior. It is time the spoilt little child of the Middle East was dished out some discipline.

Perhaps you have ideas on how to "discipline" the Jews of Israel?

 

[Bobby1250]

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Bobby, I have bifocals, so you don't need to post in super-large text. Your post has no extra credibility because it is in super-large font. I can tell from the beginning that it is complete bullshit.

By the way, the treaty has not been approved by the Senate, so it is premature to even talk about it.

That's an interesting opinion, you can tell it's complete BS, but you're not willing to tell anyone WHY you can tell it is complete BS.

I can tell you are a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Kerry: Congress Has No Role in Approving Iran Nuclear Deal

Aren't you interested in seeing a nuclear weapons free Middle East?

Kerry is a member of the lawless Obama administration, who believe that the United States Constitution is a dead letter document that is not binding on their raw exercise of power.

You obviously approve of this fascist theory of government that one man has all the power and everyone else has none.

The fact you are engaging in off topic, argumentum ad hominems, (attack the messenger), further proves my point about you being a complete BSer and are completely BSing in this thread.

Sanctions, boycotts and public pressure eventually saw the end of Apartheid South Africa. If the same principles were used against Israel it would eventually have to fall into line. It is a pariah state but unfortunately many countries and organisations just keep rewarding its bad behavior. It is time the spoilt little child of the Middle East was dished out some discipline.

Perhaps you have ideas on how to "discipline" the Jews of Israel?

See again, post #7.

And please refrain from using buzzwords like the Jews (which are intended to provoke an emotive response). Stick to "Israel".

Didn't I tell you I can tell you are a BSer using BS. lol

 

[Penelope]

The best deal made, and Israel wont even let the IAEA enter their country. The senate has no jurisdiction in this, the P5 & 1 and the IAEA has made this deal. Everyone needs to get rid of their nukes. Watch the Bomb on PBS.

If Israel and the GOP keep making their uneducated comments based on being popular with the Zionist and War mongers, who could really blame Iran for making a nuclear weapon. Israel needs to shut the hell up and mind their own business, they have no business in any of it and nor does Saudi Arabia.

 

[The Irish Ram]

Debunked my ass. Iran wouldn't even discuss removing the threat during the "agreement" they made with Kerry. And Hamas is their new bff's.
You wouldn't expect the USA to get rid of our defenses, especially in light of the terrorists declaring "Death to America" and "Thanks for the bombs."

To insist Israel become defenseless in light of countries calling for their annihilation, is just stupid and deadly. They have been responsible with their capabilities to wipe people out. They haven't. Iran will. We have backed the wrong country. It is the cost of being stupid enough to elect a Muslim for president.

 

[Penelope]

Arm yourself to the hilt Israel. There is a country close by that wants to wipe you off the map, and we are backing them 100%. Trust yourself and God only.

Can you please tell us who said those words and when? Also speak for yourself, as I and many US citizen and other European people are not backing Israehell.

 

[theHawk]

Why should Israel get rid of its nukes? Has it used them yet?

 

[Penelope]

Debunked my ass. Iran wouldn't even discuss removing the threat during the "agreement" they made with Kerry. And Hamas is their new bff's.
You wouldn't expect the USA to get rid of our defenses, especially in light of the terrorists declaring "Death to America" and "Thanks for the bombs."

To insist Israel become defenseless in light of countries calling for their annihilation, is just stupid and deadly. They have been responsible with their capabilities to wipe people out. They haven't. Iran will. We have backed the wrong country. It is the cost of being stupid enough to elect a Muslim for president.

Perhaps since some top Zionist have said the same those very things about Iran, tell me why Iran should not have nukes? I truly believe you want a war, it sure sounds like it, and you must be very young to want another war. Israel is far from defenseless, and Iran has never attacked Israel.

 

[Penelope]

Why should Israel get rid of its nukes? Has it used them yet?

Not yet, but they are unstable. The only country that talks about the Sampson option, and I believe they are crazy enough to do it.

 

[007]

Arm yourself to the hilt Israel. There is a country close by that wants to wipe you off the map, and we are backing them 100%. Trust yourself and God only.

ORLY?

What country is that?

wipe you off the map

That was debunked, you know. Looks like you're behind the loop by a decade or more.

Who's the bull shitter now... ahem...

 

[Bobby1250]

Debunked my ass. Iran wouldn't even discuss removing the threat during the "agreement" they made with Kerry. And Hamas is their new bff's.
You wouldn't expect the USA to get rid of our defenses, especially in light of the terrorists declaring "Death to America" and "Thanks for the bombs."

To insist Israel become defenseless in light of countries calling for their annihilation, is just stupid and deadly. They have been responsible with their capabilities to wipe people out. They haven't. Iran will. We have backed the wrong country. It is the cost of being stupid enough to elect a Muslim for president.

Yes, it was debunked and that's not all either. Just accounting for the BS you are claiming.

1. the terrorists declaring "Death to America"...debunked.
2.the terrorists declaring "Thanks for the bombs"......debunked,
3. in light of countries calling for their annihilation .... debunked.
4. We have backed the wrong country....(kinda debunked...since schitzreal is the country we have been backing).
5. elect a Muslim for president....WAYYY debunked.

Barry the "Muslim" ? Huh what?


My advice? Look up the MOSSAD disinformation groups MEMRI and CAMERA online.