"Insurrectionist" Judge steps in it and commits Libel on the record!

The Democrat Panic Continues...

A Colorado judge just made an arbitrary statement without the force of law to uphold it. The Judge called Trump an 'insurrectionist' without a conviction for this charge. This is liable. The judge and the state of Colorado are now on the hook for what could be millions in damages.

No court or judge has the power to arbitrarily make this distinction. It must come from a jury after charges and trial.

This is left wing tripe being spouted hoping the general public will take the deception hook, line, and sinker.


These America-hating judges and lawyers are constantly trying to out-crazy each other to get media deals. This time it may cost her.
 

Preserve and support, are synonyms. She was also wrong that the president is not an officer of the united states.... imo. The President's Executive Office even has a seal, and the President is the Chief Executive officer at the center of it....???


1700524752141.png
 
The Democrat Panic Continues...

A Colorado judge just made an arbitrary statement without the force of law to uphold it. The Judge called Trump an 'insurrectionist' without a conviction for this charge. This is liable. The judge and the state of Colorado are now on the hook for what could be millions in damages.

No court or judge has the power to arbitrarily make this distinction. It must come from a jury after charges and trial.

This is left wing tripe being spouted hoping the general public will take the deception hook, line, and sinker.

Just another inept liberal judge.
 
Immunity does not protect slanderous and libel acts which violate the law. Especially when they are done under color of law (official acts).
in court, statements are privileged.

besides that, the wording of 14th amendment section 3 uses the word engaged . "engaged in insurrection".
Since Trump gave a speech prior to it, and sat around for hours during it... well there you go.
 
in court, statements are privileged.

besides that, the wording of 14th amendment section 3 uses the word engaged . "engaged in insurrection".
Since Trump gave a speech prior to it, and sat around for hours during it... well there you go.
Stretching it are you not... The wording of the 14th amendment requires a conviction not a presumption, which you do not have. Secondly, a Judge is not protected when he/she commits a criminal act outside of the law, which this was.
 
A nothing burger with cheese. Would I be in trouble, if I called you a loser, without you ever have been convicted of being a loser in a court of law?
 

Forum List

Back
Top