Insuring only legal votes are counted in presidential election is a federal question

Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, why did you post all that stuff in post #48? What does it have to do with the fact that every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors?

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
 
Trump should be bringing this to the S.C. This entire "count all the ballots" during the Mid-Terms should have been a HUGE red flag.

They are accepting mail in NV until Tuesday the 10th.

Why did the poll workers cover the windows in Detroit? Was it so no one could observe their work?


View attachment 411708

JWK


Um
Yeah


Agreed!

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, why did you post all that stuff in post #48? What does it have to do with the fact that every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors?

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.


It is still by popular vote. So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:



Split Electoral Votes in Maine and Nebraska

"In all but two states, electoral votes are 'winner-take-all'. The candidate winning the popular vote normally receives* all of that state's votes. Maine and Nebraska have taken a different approach. Using the 'congressional district method', these states allocate two electoral votes to the state popular vote winner, and then one electoral vote to the popular vote winner in each Congressional district (2 in Maine, 3 in Nebraska). This creates multiple popular vote contests in these states, which could lead to a split electoral vote."

JWK
Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
 
Last edited:
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, why did you post all that stuff in post #48? What does it have to do with the fact that every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors?

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?

We were talking about how Electors are chosen. I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?

We were talking about how Electors are chosen. I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. The Legislature is not bound to assign electors based on illegal votes. Only legal votes legitimately count.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?

We were talking about how Electors are chosen. I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. The Legislature is not bound to assign electors based on illegal votes. Only legal votes legitimately count.

Which has nothing to do with how Electors are chosen, and is what we were talking about.

I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing to the fact that every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?

We were talking about how Electors are chosen. I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. The Legislature is not bound to assign electors based on illegal votes. Only legal votes legitimately count.

Which has nothing to do with how Electors are chosen, and is what we were talking about...
The Legislatures select the Electors.
... I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors...
Yes, but, they are not bound by illegal votes.

OH: Georgia Republican Poll Watcher Discovered Recount Error Off By More Than 9,000 Votes For Biden.

Weird how every "error" is to the benefit of Biden. He is just continually showered by beneficial anomalies.
 
Yes. They seem quite butthurt over that plain language of the Constitution.

What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?

JWK
Did you not point out the language in article II that the State Legislature selects the electors? I'm not clear on what is confusing you.
I asked you a question. "What does all that stuff that have to do with what I posted?"

We were talking about electors. I pointed out:

The Constitution, from its very beginning, guaranteed that each State appoint their own electors. During the first Presidential election, different states adopted different methods to appoint their electors. Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

:rolleyes:

JWK

The liberty to succeed or fail at one’s own hand is a socialist revolutionaries’ nightmare and not the American Dream
The point is, that it's a State Legislature's decision on how to use the vote totals. If it appears that certain precincts engaged in widespread cheating, the legislature, for purposes of electorate determination, may throw out the totals that were processed during periods that particular precincts were engaging in illegal activity.

PA, WI, MI, AZ all have GOP legislatures, constitutionally, they have the final say.


All of which has nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Sure it does. The State legislature determines how the Electors are selected, Silly.

Today, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's electors.

So, all the nonsense you posted had nothing to do with how a state's electors are determined, which is what we were talking about.:rolleyes:

JWK



Call these scoundrels what they are! They are not “progressive” or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. In NE and ME, rather than a statewide popular vote, they vote by Congressional District, as that is the method prescribed by the State Legislature.
... It is still by popular vote...
Fake News. The Legislature is not compelled to assign Electors based on a corrupted vote.

We weren't talking about a "corrupted vote". We were talking about how Electors are chosen.
The fact is, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.
:rolleyes:

JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.
Fake News. The title of the panel refers to ONLY COUNTING LEGAL VOTES. How the Legislature should respond to the presence of ILLEGAL votes is very much what is under discussion.

How come you don't want to talk about this?
What is it that you fear?

We were talking about how Electors are chosen. I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors. You assert this is "Fake News".

"What is it that you fear" ... agreeing every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors?

JWK

Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
Fake News. The Legislature is not bound to assign electors based on illegal votes. Only legal votes legitimately count.

Which has nothing to do with how Electors are chosen, and is what we were talking about...
The Legislatures select the Electors.
... I pointed out, every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors...
Yes, but,

There are no "buts" about it. Every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors.

Now that we agree that every state uses a popular vote of the people to appoint their State's Electors, I have a question:

How were poll workers prevented from counting a stack of ballots, favoring one of the candidates, twice?

JWK


Call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 
Returning to the subject of the thread . . .


Does our federal Constitution guarantee that the right to vote in federal elections, shall not be infringed upon? And if the answer is yes, is it not our Supreme Courts’ job to adjudicate allegations when the right to vote has been infringed upon, e.g., a state purposely adopting voting regulations and procedures which allow and invite an infringement upon the right to vote by illegal cast ballots canceling out legally cast ballots?

JWK

We need to call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 

Forum List

Back
Top