Insuring only legal votes are counted in presidential election is a federal question

[busybee01]

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President.


Our Constitution by its 14th Amendment provides a penalty for any abridgement of the right to vote making any abridgement federally protected.


By our Constitution’s 15th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, making this right federally protected.


By the 19th Amendment the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex making any abridgement federally protected.


By the 24th Amendment The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reasons of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.


And by the 26th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age.


So, what actually constitutes an abridgement of the right to vote which is federally protected as stated above?


If a State’s employees who count election results are free to count illegal ballots ___ ballots which do not meet the States voting requirements and restrictions ___ would that constitute an “abridgement” of the federally protected right to vote? The answer to this question is a resounding ‘Yes”, as each illegal ballot would in effect cancel out a Citizen’s legally presented ballot and thus be an infringement.


So, to protect against such infringements, should our federal courts require, when an appropriate request is made, that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot?


JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

We also have Trump trying to cripple the post office to make it more difficult to vote by mail. The Post Office defied a federal judge's order to find 300,000 missing ballots. That is 300,000 voters who were disenfranchised by Donald Trump.

 

[busybee01]

Democrats disdain legal voting. The rioting and looting in the streets over hoaxes was specifically designed as a run up to the election . Less laws because Dems can't obey them therefore laws are racist and result of white privledge. Big con job to get us to roll over and play dead as to election lawbreaking. Illegal aliens-doesn’t matter; illegal aliens voting-doesn’t matter. Any laws that reduce the flow of illegal Democrat actions must be ignored

Republicans disdain legal voting. They have done everything they can to prevent people from voting.

 

[busybee01]

When did Election Day become Election Week????

Oh, I know, when Dems drummed up the Covid hoax and told everyone that for their own well being ballots need to be mailed in

Election Day is when people vote. Election week is when votes are counted. If Trump had his own way even the military would be denied the right to vote.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

When there is nothing to hide, nobody minds.

God bless you and our homeland always!!!

Holly

 

[johnwk]

We also have Trump trying to cripple the post office to make it more difficult to vote by mail.

You forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK



The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

 

[DrLove]

We also have Trump trying to cripple the post office to make it more difficult to vote by mail.

You forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Dude, you need to catch the fuck up - ASAP!

 

[johnwk]

We also have Trump trying to cripple the post office to make it more difficult to vote by mail.

You forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Dude, you need to catch the fuck up - ASAP!

Once again, you forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

 

[DrLove]

We also have Trump trying to cripple the post office to make it more difficult to vote by mail.

You forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership, detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.

Dude, you need to catch the fuck up - ASAP!

Once again, you forgot to provide your evidence regarding Trump trying to cripple the post office.

JWK

Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

You know how to use the Google. SPARE the rest of us if not.

Let Me Google That

For all those people that find it more convenient to bother you with their question than to google it for themselves.

letmegooglethat.com

 

[Zorro!]

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President...

No. Our Constitution states that The State Legislature shall prescribe the manner of selecting Electors, and today they all use a State or Congressional District vote, but, it's the State Legislature that selects Electors. Where precincts illegally operated in secret, they may not be able to use their vote totals for the purposes of assigning Electors.

Now, if the Congress chooses to, they may publish rules for the State Legislatures to follow in Federal Elections, but, other than that, it's up to the State Legislatures. If Congress does publish rules they should require that the remaining 48 States assign electors per Congressional District, like ME and NE do so that all 50 states get to participate in elections rather than a few handfuls of "Swing States".

THE KING OF SELF-BECLOWNMENT: Paul Krugman Melts Down Over Dem Losses, Accidentally Admits He Doesn’t Have a Clue.

Democrat's teeth are being gnashed over the drubbing they took in House races as well as the defeats they suffered in local races and on some referendum votes.

There is much disagreement amongst Democrats as to what was responsible for their losses at the ballot box. Was it their push to defund the police? The riots? Was it Republicans tying vulnerable Democrats to socialism? Joe Biden’s flip flops on fracking? Their stonewalling on the COVID relief bill?

The answer is a combination of one or more of the above in concert with more and more Americans are becoming fed up with the left’s identity politics games and the shoehorning of various minority groups into neat little boxes as though individuals can’t (and shouldn’t) think for themselves.

Noted anti-Trump liberal conspiracy theorist and Fake News New York Times columnist Paul Krugman is one of the more high-profile leftists to be openly wondering what happened. In one of multiple Twitter threads he’s written recently, Kruggie lamented the fact that more black and Hispanic voters went for Trump this year than in 2016 – despite what he believes about racism allegedly being “Trump’s brand”:
Paul Krugman
@paulkrugman
The more I look at this election, the less I imagine I understand. Florida was a surprise Trump triumph — and also voted to increase the minimum wage to $15 1/
8:26 AM · Nov 4, 2020

CA is very liberal — and voted to let Uber and Lyft keep treating their employees as independent contractors, with no benefits 2/

They seem to have voted for Senate Republicans who want to drown government in the bathtub 4/

Racism is Trump's brand — but he outperformed the polls in large part with Hispanic and some black votes 5/

Maybe the summary point is that although elected officials fall very well on a left-right spectrum, many voters don't see it that way. Or something. And of course the majority did vote for a center-left candidate. No idea what the true lessons are. 6/

It simply does not compute with him that in California even leftists are waking up to the folly of AB5 or that in Florida Cuban Americans prefer a president who doesn’t cotton to socialistic dictatorships. And that elsewhere more black Americans are seeing that, unlike Democrats, Trump is listening to their concerns and not taking their support for granted.

The good news beyond Democrats bad night Tuesday night is that at least Krugman is willing to admit – possibly for the first time – that he doesn’t have a clue on how to understand voters, especially those from key Democrat voting blocs who don’t march in lockstep with the Democrat party. The bad news is that, like other leftists (and NeverTrumpers) in and outside of the media, Krugman has no interest in understanding them. Because treating them with utter disdain and contempt is so much easier.

... If a State’s employees who count election results are free to count illegal ballots...

They aren't.

... each illegal ballot would in effect cancel out a Citizen’s legally presented ballot and thus be an infringement.

So, to protect against such infringements, should our federal courts require, when an appropriate request is made, that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot?

Well, for now, I think we need to focus on holding these precincts that operated illegally to existing law. The Courts may intervene, or, they may simply leave it up to the State Legislature who need to determine how to select Electors. The State Legislators could make the determination where precincts became secretive illegal operations, that there simply isn't time to redo the election, and so remove the vote counts generated during the time the precincts were operating illegally and then follow the vote count from there.

 

[johnwk]

You know how to use the Google. SPARE the rest of us if not.

Translation: You are unable to provide evidence regarding your assertion about Trump trying to cripple the post office.



JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

 

[johnwk]

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President...

No. Our Constitution states that The State Legislature shall prescribe the manner of selecting Electors, and today they all use a State or Congressional District vote, but, it's the State Legislature that selects Electors. Where precincts illegally operated in secret, they may not be able to use their vote totals for the purposes of assigning Electors.

What I posted is absolutely correct.

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President.

SEE: How Are Electoral College Electors Chosen?


"The result of this struggle was the Electoral College, the system by which the American people vote not for president and vice president, but for a smaller group of people, known as electors. These electors then cast their votes directly for president and vice president, at a meeting held several weeks after the general election."

JWK

Our socialist domestic revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Trump should be bringing this to the S.C. This entire "count all the ballots" during the Mid-Terms should have been a HUGE red flag.

They are accepting mail in NV until Tuesday the 10th.

Yeah, that's right. Let's only count the votes for Orange Jesus.

Trump always ALWAYS whines that it's rigged when he loses.

So zero credibility outside his cult.

In person, valid ID and registered to vote

Problem with that? If not why?

Don't give me that shit about no ID, you can't function without one

So how would our service members who are serving overseas vote?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President.


Our Constitution by its 14th Amendment provides a penalty for any abridgement of the right to vote making any abridgement federally protected.


By our Constitution’s 15th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, making this right federally protected.


By the 19th Amendment the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex making any abridgement federally protected.


By the 24th Amendment The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reasons of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.


And by the 26th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age.


So, what actually constitutes an abridgement of the right to vote which is federally protected as stated above?


If a State’s employees who count election results are free to count illegal ballots ___ ballots which do not meet the States voting requirements and restrictions ___ would that constitute an “abridgement” of the federally protected right to vote? The answer to this question is a resounding ‘Yes”, as each illegal ballot would in effect cancel out a Citizen’s legally presented ballot and thus be an infringement.


So, to protect against such infringements, should our federal courts require, when an appropriate request is made, that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot?


JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

Show us where voting by mail is illegal.

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Demand Verification Of Voter Identity "

* Circular Argument Of Cannot Be Disproved Because There Is No Proof *

Has any taken a sample or even one of the mail in ballots and contacted the individuals directly to verify the identity of the voter ?

In some states that care about the integrity of consequence upon other citizens not in their state , procedures are in place by which to vet voters because it is well known that voter fraud occurs - Voter Verification Without ID Documents .

If a state wishes to have lackadaisical standards of voting for its state officials , federal elections should require much more rigor .

 

[johnwk]

Our federal Constitution commands that the people of each state vote for their electors and their electors vote for the President.


Our Constitution by its 14th Amendment provides a penalty for any abridgement of the right to vote making any abridgement federally protected.


By our Constitution’s 15th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude, making this right federally protected.


By the 19th Amendment the right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex making any abridgement federally protected.


By the 24th Amendment The right of citizens of the United States to vote in any primary or other election for President or Vice President, for electors for President or Vice President, or for Senator or Representative in Congress, shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or any State by reasons of failure to pay any poll tax or other tax.


And by the 26th Amendment, the right of citizens of the United States, who are 18 years of age or older, to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any state on account of age.


So, what actually constitutes an abridgement of the right to vote which is federally protected as stated above?


If a State’s employees who count election results are free to count illegal ballots ___ ballots which do not meet the States voting requirements and restrictions ___ would that constitute an “abridgement” of the federally protected right to vote? The answer to this question is a resounding ‘Yes”, as each illegal ballot would in effect cancel out a Citizen’s legally presented ballot and thus be an infringement.


So, to protect against such infringements, should our federal courts require, when an appropriate request is made, that all ballots be inspected by representatives of each political party to insure each ballot is a legally counted ballot?


JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

Show us where voting by mail is illegal.

Why are you asking me that question?

JWK

“Until you realize how easy it is for your mind to be manipulated, you remain the puppet of someone else’s game.” ― Evita Ochel

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Verify The Voter Identity In Person And Ensure The Integrity Confidentiality And Non Repudiation Of The Vote "

* Common Practices Of A Digital Age *

So how would our service members who are serving overseas vote?

Apply the basic standards of verifying the voter and maintaining the confidentiality , integrity and non repudiation of the vote .

 

[Godboy]

Trump should be bringing this to the S.C. This entire "count all the ballots" during the Mid-Terms should have been a HUGE red flag.

They are accepting mail in NV until Tuesday the 10th.

Yeah, that's right. Let's only count the votes for Orange Jesus.

Trump always ALWAYS whines that it's rigged when he loses.

So zero credibility outside his cult.

Your cult doesnt find him credible? Im shocked by this news!

 

[Superbadbrutha]

" Verify The Voter Identity In Person And Ensure The Integrity Confidentiality And Non Repudiation Of The Vote "

* Common Practices Of A Digital Age *

So how would our service members who are serving overseas vote?

Apply the basic standards of verifying the voter and maintaining the confidentiality , integrity and non repudiation of the vote .

So how do you verify service members who vote using mail in ballots from overseas?

 

[Monk-Eye]

" Coercion Without Confidentiality "

* Proof Of Identity Requirement And Competence *

So how do you verify service members who vote using mail in ballots from overseas?

When the service members who vote using mail in ballots from overseas , do they go to a location and verify their identity as the ballot is submitted for mailing ?

Disparate mail in ballots do not verify the voter identity and only an in person verification can do that .

It remains a mystery how confidentiality and integrity are maintained through mail in ballots , whereby intimidation or coercion are factors .

How many votes are submitted by the indigent who are mentally incapable of submitting a ballot on their own and had others complete them on their behalf ?

A valid reason needs to be provided by an individual to not go to an electronic voting station that is not simply the convenience of avoiding a wait in a line .

 

[DrLove]

You know how to use the Google. SPARE the rest of us if not.

Translation: You are unable to provide evidence regarding your assertion about Trump trying to cripple the post office.



JWK


Today’s Fifth Column media ___ MSNBC, NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, WASHINGTON POST, ATLANTIC MAGAZINE, New York Daily News, Time, ETC., and their countless Yellow Journalists who are socialist domestic revolutionaries ___ make Russia’s old Pravda, [an organ of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union] look like propaganda amateurs.

Dumpster Don and his unqualified $700,000 donor stooge Louie DeMisery have lost multiple lawsuits for slow rolling the mail. You should have heard something about it by now. Slow learners.