Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not mythical, real. You are the insane one.Good for Indiana. And what woul you two nitwits know what Jesus would do? Answer is nothing.Childless two-income households have a lot of disposable income to spend elsewhere. Maybe Jesus will replace all the lost revenue?
How insane is that to base decisions on a mythical character
To protect normal people.what is the purpose of it ......The RFRA does not discriminate against gays in any shape or form.
from what ??To protect normal people.what is the purpose of it ......The RFRA does not discriminate against gays in any shape or form.
There is nothing in the 1st amendment that says they can't either.Obviously not. The baker in Oregon was harassed,attacked and forced out of business for following her first amendment rights.What someone who bakes cakes for a living believes in is getting paid, on time, for said cake.Its agreeing to make a cake for something you don't believe in which is a homosexual "marriage".Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.
I'm not quite sure how baking a cake "caters" to anyone's lifestyle. Its just a cake.
There's nothing in the 1st amendment that gives anyone the right to deny public accommodation based on sexual orientation.
Protecting from sickness of humankind like this crap
-Geaux
Protecting from sickness of humankind like this crap
-Geaux
I consider you to be an inferior subnormal...
No I don't mind to me you are an entitled white male full of itselfProtecting from sickness of humankind like this crap
-Geaux
I consider you to be an inferior subnormal...
Thanks. You wont mind if I consider the source do you? lol
-Geaux
Religion is a choice, in most cases, and that's protected so, relax little friend, we are just expanding the protected "choices".This is a civil rights battle and all the usual suspects are lined up on the losing side.
Lifestyle choice is not a civil right.
Religion is protected by the Constitution. Faggotry is not.
Homophobes like you are mostly closeted homosexuals.
Come out of the closet. Know real freedom.
When are you going to post videos of your "ok to be gay" tour in Yemen?
No I don't mind to me you are an entitled white male full of itselfProtecting from sickness of humankind like this crap
-Geaux
I consider you to be an inferior subnormal...
Thanks. You wont mind if I consider the source do you? lol
-Geaux
here you are
Welcome to Indiana your sexual orientation please
Race is not a lifestyle choice.Faggots should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and faggots will get over it.
Let's rephrase that, shall we?
"Blacks should stop suing people who refuse to cater to their "lifestyle" and laws like this wouldn't even be needed but of course the people in the right are blamed as usual. Indiana will survive and blacks will get over it".
See how that looks?
Yep, those who died in the camps, like sheep, were. The ones who survived might have been even worse, they were Nazi cocksuckers.Not that I will bother with any of your nonsense, but, the Christians were pussies then, which they're supposed to be. At least the Jews and the Muslims can kill their enemies, with God's blessing and help no less.Maybe you should learn Islam, where an insult of a thousand years ago was fucking yesterday. Oh that's right, you have no clue about Islam because you never studied it, like the rest of the dumbshits here.Oh, again you bring up ANCIENT history and try to compare that to today's day and age. Lol. Silly boy.
And somehow, by magic I guess, a religion of warriors is supposed to be better than a religion of peacemakers, who spent five hundred years chopping off the heads of Muslims, Jews, and other unbelievers, when that is they weren't slaughtering each other. History matters, learn to apply it.
Muslims slaughtered Jews by the thousands. Muhammad himself wiped out several towns full of Jews. Muslims waged war on Christians for 500 years before the started to defend themselves.
Talk about someone who knows nothing of history.
Oh, and yesterday, the Jews were pussies.
That's right, wear that bigotry on your sleeve like a good chap.
It's not bigotry. It's well deserved contempt.
Definitely bigotry.
What isn't bigotry? Why isn't contempt towards a Christian deemed bigotry? Hmm?
A bigot is "a person who strongly and unfairly dislikes other people, ideas, etc. : a bigoted person; especially : a person who hates or refuses to accept the members of a particular group (such as a racial or religious group)."
Whether or not contempt is involved is irrelevant. I can have contempt of court because of a specific idea that I abhore, but that doesn't mean that I dislike the judge. I can have contempt for a religion or a religious view, but that doesn't mean that I dislike the religious PERSON. One can disagree with the religion and like the religious. My family is a classic example. I'm an atheist. Most of the rest of my family is devout Catholic. I intensely dislike Catholicism, but love my family. You can intensely dislike homosexuality for whatever reason. You can even dislike the homosexual. But you have no right to discriminate against them because they are homosexuals. The hatred needs to stop. They aren't hurting anyone by being gay any more than heterosexuals are hurting anyone by being heterosexual. Their sexual preference is no one else's business but their own.
So if you feel contempt for all Nazis, does that make you a bigot?
look....if that's what Indiana wants ....who are we to say no?
I do respect their decision.
Because it violates the constitution.
The 14th amendment clearly says that everyone is to be treated equally under the law.
The government of Indiana has written and passed a law that makes it legal to not treat everyone equally under the law.
The federal Constitution trumps state laws. If a state law violates the constitution that law isn't implemented.
I'm sure that people are right now taking steps to challenge that law in court. No court in the nation is going to allow a state to violate the Constitution.
I just want to know how a gay person is going to be able to eat food if the only store in their small town won't sell food to them because they're gay?
Or how is a gay person going to get the proper medical treatment if the only doctor in their small town refuses to treat them because they're gay?
Well, you make a good point, especially with the doctor. I don't like it though. The government telling you that you don't have the choice when it is your own business? Besides, gay is not a religion, nor is it a race or gender.
His point is bullshit. If I'm a Jewish doctor and you're a Nazi and I don't want to treat you for a mortal injury, then you are going to die. Tough shit for you.