In just 72 hours : MSNBC: We Have to Break Through This Idea 'That Kids Belong to Their Parents'

[Syriusly]

As has been noted by this Board's more profound intellects, by this time next year we will be debating the finer points of "Protecting Children's Equal Rights Under The Law", part and parcel of which will; you can rest assured, be the Child's right to sexual consent...

Just three days after the SCOTUS divined a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT FOR DEGENERATES TO MARRY WITHIN A HOMO-GENDER CONSTRUCT, we find the Left priming up the separation of children from their 'rents.

"“We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children."

...

Stephan Kinsella argues that the primary social evil today is a lack of respect for the fundamental right of self-ownership. Obama and Harris-Perry represent the other side of this argument. They believe, as do all Marxists and socialists, that the state, what Harris-Perry calls the “community,” owns the individual.

Harris-Perry urges us to “break through” the “private idea” that individuals own themselves. Like Marx, she believes the individual is a “communal being” and all human worth is intractably linked to the community, the collective, and the state is the ultimate manifestation of the collective will. Read more via InfoWars..."

I say it here and it comes out ^ THERE ^.

So you think parents own their kids?

Do they get to buy and sell them as commodities?

 

[jknowgood]

Even ole Hillary said it takes a village to raise a child. Congratulations to liberals. It only took them about 50 years to destroy a once great nation.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Clearly, 72 hours is insufficient for the meltdown to run its course. As a matter of fact, I suspect it's just getting started.

Do you agree that people are property to of the state, to be disposed of as our rulers see fit?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

This Stephan Kinsella uses the term "slave owning parents"? Have you left loons lost your collective minds? I have a proposition for any daffy leftist that's buying into this BS children belong to society, come try and take ours or tell us how to raise them. It will get very ugly...very quickly. You retards need to back up, sit down and stop this nonsense

Stephan Kinsella is a libertarian that works with the Mises Institute. A body too right wing for the CATO institute, so it split away. It promotes anarcho-capitalism. It regularly gives awards to Ron Paul.

And this you call 'left loon'?

There's not much right of their position beyond straight up anarchy.

economic

Is there a link to the MSNBC remarks?
Not infowars

Sure...



Of course, that link requires that you believe your own eyes and ears...

Cool...

Now understand, the argument is that in the first 72 hours, the Ideological Left has already begun, to march their way to the rhetorical sea burning and pillaging everything it can burn and pillage in terms of recognition and respect for Natural Law... toward the goal of Legalizing Adult Sex with Children.

I told you on Day One... as most of you already knew, that the 'divining of the Fundamental Right to Marry' was not a Slippery Slope, but a leap from the Precipice... (That means 'we jumped off the cliff', Gilligan) that such would come first, through the ruse of providing Children with Equal Protection Under the Law, which requires that the natural responsibilities of the Parent be transferred to the state, thus providing the state the means to determine that children are 'Rightfully entitled to offer their Consent to sexual relations with Adult Homosexuals'.

Understand, that ROE has already gone along way toward destroying the notion of parental sanctity; wherein the Government Licensed Degeneracy at the first level... by 'granting the Right' to MURDER YOUR CHILDREN. So... where you can murder your children to avoid your responsibility to them, you've closed the gap necessary to rationalize that your parental responsibilities aren't 'real' anyway, so what's the big deal about giving Government the Responsibility for them... . Odds are that there's going to be some serious 'financial incentive coming, to help the lowest common denominator along.

So recognize that pattern, as it's the 900lb Democrat in the middle of the room.

SOOooo... in the first 72 hours after the Federal Government Licensed Degeneracy, we now have our first In-house Comrades Publicly Joining the Left's Ramp-up to Providing Children Equal Protection Under the Law.

We add to the list the following proponents:

Swim Expert
TheOldSchool
Skylar

Anyone else?

Interesting, I have all three of those dopes on ignore.

Good policy...

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Even ole Hillary said it takes a village to raise a child. Congratulations to liberals. It only took them about 50 years to destroy a once great nation.

Yes, Hillary Clinton is the nations leading proponent of providing Children with "Equal Protection under the law" and, in so doing providing Children the means to legally consent to sexual relations with sexual deviants; most notably homosexuals, who, due to the early childhood molestation, are inclined to desire sex with children... .

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you think parents own their kids?

All rational people do. This means you Communists do not.

Do they get to buy and sell them as commodities?

No, they protect and nurture them as members of their family. The bond of the family exceeds the bond of peasants to their rulers - which is why you wage war to destroy the family.

 

[Skylar]

Cool...

Now understand, the argument is that in the first 72 hours, the Ideological Left has already begun, to march their way to the rhetorical sea burning and pillaging everything it can burn and pillage in terms of recognition and respect for Natural Law... toward the goal of Legalizing Adult Sex with Children.

I told you on Day One... as most of you already knew, that the 'divining of the Fundamental Right to Marry' was not a Slippery Slope, but a leap from the Precipice... (That means we jumped off the cliff, Gilligan) that such would come first, through the ruse of providing Children with Equal Protection Under the Law, which requires that the responsibilities of the Parent be transferred to the state, thus providing the state the means to determine that children are 'Rightfully entitled to offer their Consent to sexual relations with Adult Homosexuals'.

SOOooo... in the first 72 hours after the Federal Government Licensed Degeneracy, we now have our first In-house Comrades Publicly Joining the Left's Ramp-up to Providing Children Equal Protection Under the Law.

We add to the list the following proponents:

Swim Expert
TheOldSchool

Anyone else?

Yo, the man above is telling me something? The "DEVIL" is trying to takeover the Country!!!
All HELL will break-loose!!!

"GTP"

Uh yeah... we're looking into the dead eyes of Old Testament Evil here. No question... .

Then leave it to the angels instead of offering us thuggish threats of violence against gays.

And history tells us that No Nation or culture has ever survived the Licensing of Degeneracy.

History tells no such thing. Remember, you don't understand how causation works. Cultures collapse regardless of whether or not they've embraced homosexuality. You simply ignore any cultural collapse where homosexuality wasn't accepted.

And then laughably assume that because you ignored all instances that contradict you, none exist.

That's called the cherry picking fallacy. And it doesn't establish causation. But a piss poor argument.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

Yo, reason why we need to vote out both leaders in the Republican Party, and replace with Conservative Leaders!!!

"GTP"

what about pets? do pets belong to someone other than thier owners?

 

[Skylar]

Even ole Hillary said it takes a village to raise a child. Congratulations to liberals. It only took them about 50 years to destroy a once great nation.

Yes, Hillary Clinton is the nations leading proponent of providing Chidren with Equal Protection under the law and in so doing providing them the means of children to legally consent to sexual relations with sexual deviants, most notably homosexuals, who, due to the early childhood molestation necessary to deviating the normal human sexuality toward homosexuality, are inclined to desire sex with children... .

Hillary has never advocated sexual relations with children. Again, you're having a meltdown

 

[Uncensored2008]

All hell has broke loose...they just don't realize it yet. People are angry, damn angry

The left yearn for a civil war - they believe it is the path to end the Republic once and for all. They lost last time, but they think they will win this time around.

 

[Skylar]

Is there a link to the MSNBC remarks?
Not infowars

Sure...



Of course, that link requires that you believe your own eyes and ears...

And where does she say anything about sexual relations with children? Because I'm pretty sure you made that up.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

All hell has broke loose...they just don't realize it yet. People are angry, damn angry

The left yearn for a civil war - they believe it is the path to end the Republic once and for all. They lost last time, but they think they will win this time around.

Hard to win a war when you're afraid of guns.

 

[Uncensored2008]

what about pets? do pets belong to someone other than thier owners?

If the owners are property of the state, as the democrats content, then by extension the pets also belong to the state.

 

[hipeter924]

Children don't ' belong ' to anyone, they are individuals and human beings, certainly not the property of the state, communities, or their parents.

Others are only guardians, till children reach an age that they are capable of decision making and caring for themselves - this legally begins at 16, then gradually by 21 they are viewed responsible enough to drink alcohol.

Though I don't watch MSNBC, it doesn't seem like this is worse than what you get on Fox News, and is just from a different perspective.

 

[Skylar]

All hell has broke loose...they just don't realize it yet. People are angry, damn angry

The left yearn for a civil war - they believe it is the path to end the Republic once and for all. They lost last time, but they think they will win this time around.

The only folks that keep calling for a civil war are fringe right wingers. This is your fantasy. Take responsibility for your own batshit. And recognize that its not happening.

As the folks that are fighting age...support gay marriage. Millennial aren't killing anyone because you have an Armageddon fetish or don't like gay people. And you're certainly not willing to do the fighting yourself.

Leaving your 'civil war' with two words: Jack. And Shit.

As it should be.

 

[Rexx Taylor]

what about the private parts of males? god i hope no one owns my private parts.

 

[jknowgood]

Even ole Hillary said it takes a village to raise a child. Congratulations to liberals. It only took them about 50 years to destroy a once great nation.

Yes, Hillary Clinton is the nations leading proponent of providing Chidren with Equal Protection under the law and in so doing providing them the means of children to legally consent to sexual relations with sexual deviants, most notably homosexuals, who, due to the early childhood molestation necessary to deviating the normal human sexuality toward homosexuality, are inclined to desire sex with children... .

Hillary has never advocated sexual relations with children. Again, you're having a meltdown

If she still supports Bill, she has. He went to the island with under age sex slaves.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Children don't ' belong ' to anyone, they are individuals and human beings, certainly not the property of the state, communities, or their parents.

Others are only guardians, till children reach an age that they are capable of decision making and caring for themselves - this legally begins at 16, then gradually by 21 they are viewed responsible enough to drink alcohol.

Though I don't watch MSNBC, it doesn't seem like this is worse than what you get on Fox News, and is just from a different perspective.

Utter nonsense. Children are the property and responsibility of their parents until they reach the age of majority (18, not 16) or are emancipated - or parental rights are otherwise severed.

 

[Skylar]

Even ole Hillary said it takes a village to raise a child. Congratulations to liberals. It only took them about 50 years to destroy a once great nation.

Yes, Hillary Clinton is the nations leading proponent of providing Chidren with Equal Protection under the law and in so doing providing them the means of children to legally consent to sexual relations with sexual deviants, most notably homosexuals, who, due to the early childhood molestation necessary to deviating the normal human sexuality toward homosexuality, are inclined to desire sex with children... .

Hillary has never advocated sexual relations with children. Again, you're having a meltdown

If she still supports Bill, she has. He went to the island with under age sex slaves.

And which 'sex slave' on the island has accused Bill of anything?

And as an aside, do you ever get tired of not knowing what the fuck you're talking about?

 

[Skylar]

Children don't ' belong ' to anyone, they are individuals and human beings, certainly not the property of the state, communities, or their parents.

Others are only guardians, till children reach an age that they are capable of decision making and caring for themselves - this legally begins at 16, then gradually by 21 they are viewed responsible enough to drink alcohol.

Though I don't watch MSNBC, it doesn't seem like this is worse than what you get on Fox News, and is just from a different perspective.

Utter nonsense. Children are the property and responsibility of their parents until they reach the age of majority (18, not 16) or are emancipated - or parental rights are otherwise severed.

The responsibility, sure. But 'property'? Nope. No one owns anyone else.