BolshevikHunter
Rookie
- Banned
- #61
Nadar and Kucinich supporters are not his "base."
Kucinich isn't a liberal?
No, he is.
Obama's not a liberal.
100% correct! ~BH
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Nadar and Kucinich supporters are not his "base."
Kucinich isn't a liberal?
No, he is.
Obama's not a liberal.
Silliness. Do I support the actions taken? I haven't formed a strong opinion on that yet. But he has not overstepped any bounds.. And there are certainly no grounds for impeachment.
Silliness. Do I support the actions taken? I haven't formed a strong opinion on that yet. But he has not overstepped any bounds.. And there are certainly no grounds for impeachment.
Oh really? So he bypassed Constitutional law by not bringing the issue before congresss, yet you say that he has not "overstepped any bounds"?
Hell, he is bombing innocent civillians, while supposedly trying to save innocent civillians, from a guy that he and others before him have been arming and paying off in billions for the last 25 years or more? Wake up robot. No offense, but wake yourself up and pay attention to exactly what is going on with these liars on both sides. ~BH
Nadar and Kucinich supporters are not his "base."
Kucinich isn't a liberal?
No, he is.
Obama's not a liberal.
Who put obama in the white house?
Silliness. Do I support the actions taken? I haven't formed a strong opinion on that yet. But he has not overstepped any bounds.. And there are certainly no grounds for impeachment.
Oh really? So he bypassed Constitutional law by not bringing the issue before congresss, yet you say that he has not "overstepped any bounds"?
Hell, he is bombing innocent civillians, while supposedly trying to save innocent civillians, from a guy that he and others before him have been arming and paying off in billions for the last 25 years or more? Wake up robot. No offense, but wake yourself up and pay attention to exactly what is going on with these liars on both sides. ~BH
All he had to do was write a letter to Congress. That has been done. True story, whether you agree with the actions or not.
Well they are both "Liberals". Obama's a center left liberal..like Clinton. Kucinich is a far left liberal like Nader.
Political Spectrum Quiz - Your Political Label
A far-right social libertarian. He is also a foreign policy centrist and culturally liberal. Scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +8.35 right
Social issues: +9.05 libertarian
Foreign policy: +0.43 neo-con
Cultural identification: +5.08 liberal
Category: political quizzes
If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal. They would be criticizing Obama no matter what position he took.
You mean kind of like the vast Majority of Libs on this Board. Who screamed at us about Illegal Wars, and not using force unless there is an immediate threat to the US. Are now sitting by giving Obama a pass?
No, he is.
Obama's not a liberal.
Who put obama in the white house?
Around 69 million Americans.
If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal. They would be criticizing Obama no matter what position he took.
You mean kind of like the vast Majority of Libs on this Board. Who screamed at us about Illegal Wars, and not using force unless there is an immediate threat to the US. Are now sitting by giving Obama a pass?
The vast majority of Libs on this board are giving Obama a pass on Libya? You sure you want to stand by that?
Oh really? So he bypassed Constitutional law by not bringing the issue before congresss, yet you say that he has not "overstepped any bounds"?
Hell, he is bombing innocent civillians, while supposedly trying to save innocent civillians, from a guy that he and others before him have been arming and paying off in billions for the last 25 years or more? Wake up robot. No offense, but wake yourself up and pay attention to exactly what is going on with these liars on both sides. ~BH
All he had to do was write a letter to Congress. That has been done. True story, whether you agree with the actions or not.
According to the law as it is written, yes. The Constitutional argument is far from settled though. War Powers has never been challenged, yet. But it would almost certainly be deemed unconstitutional.
But no one wants to upset the status quo.
LIBYA vs. IRAQ
They spoke loud and clear with their protesting the they needed our help.
Iraqis did not ask for our help. Bush's mission in Iraq was not to stop Saddam from killing his people but about WMDs which he did not have. Otherwise he did not give a damn about the people of Iraq. Saddam had been killing his people for decades. What did Bush do about the genocide in Africa?
Our mission in Iraq changed with the tide. WMDs, genocide, connection with Al Qaeda, Take your pick.
Our mission in Iraq has mutated
By IVAN GOLDMAN
GUEST COLUMNIST
One of the oddest features of our strange, strange war in Iraq is that we're still trying to figure out the mission. Oil? Religious zealotry? Revenge? Glory? What?
Some critics say President Bush has failed to define just what it is we're trying to do there, but he and his handlers have defined it over and over. The trouble is, just about everyone understands by now that they've been lying all along. So media questioners twist themselves into pretzels trying to figure out some polite way of asking them to tell the truth, just once.
Whether he is in the US, Libya or Brazil, Obama can lead. His visit to Brazil was more important then Libya. He took care of Libya before he left for Brazil.
Our mission in Iraq has mutated
Obama can lead