Impeach obama

[shintao]

And no it's not coming from the Gop or the right. It's coming from the left this time

So what is holding you rightwinged cowards back? Afraid you will lose the election? Ya chicken shits!!!! LMAO!!!

President Barack Obama should be impeached for approving air strikes against Libya, Rep. Dennis Kucinich said in an interview Monday.

“President Obama moved forward without Congress approving,” the liberal Ohio Democrat told Raw Story. “He didn’t have congressional authorization, he has gone against the Constitution, and that’s got to be said.” Several other members of Congress have also chastised the Obama administration for not doing enough to sell the intervention to Congress, let alone to the American people.

Obama’s decision “would appear on its face to be an impeachable offense,” though he conceded in the interview that he’s unsure whether Congress would move ahead on a trial.

“Now, it doesn’t necessarily follow that simply because a president has committed an impeachable offense, that the process should start to impeach and remove him,” he said. “That’s a whole separate question. But we have to clearly understand what this Constitution is about.”



Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/51668.html#ixzz1HPQuauks

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Imagine a Conservative ever calling for a Republican Presidents impeachment?.. HA! Shows that Liberals don't take crap actions regardless of who they're from.

Bad deflection,
It's not a conservative talking about impeaching obama.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Lybian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

They'd be going on and on about Lockerbie. Which is what they SHOULD be doing no matter who is President.

Deflection
It's not a conservative or republican talking about impeaching obama.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And no it's not coming from the Gop or the right. It's coming from the left this time


Impeach President Obama over Libya? Some liberal critics, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, suggest it


Read more: Impeach President Obama over Libya? Some liberal critics, Ralph Nader, Dennis Kucinich, suggest it

The war is not an impeachable offense. As much as I'd like to think going to war w/o Congress say so is a crime. It is not.

The name of the law or amendment that came about in Nixons time escapes me now. (... powers act) limits the Pres, but it's not been evoked once.

I didn't say I agree wth it, just reporting it.

 

[shintao]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Lybian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

They'd be going on and on about Lockerbie. Which is what they SHOULD be doing no matter who is President.

Deflection
It's not a conservative or republican talking about impeaching obama.

WHY ISN'T IT???

 

[bigrebnc1775]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Libyian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

If a conservative was in the White House the handling of the events in the middle east would had been much different. No conservative would of got authorization from France, UK, Russia and China to take us to war instead of our own Congress.

The situation most analgous to Libya came at the end of the 1st Gulf War (1991). After encouraging Iraqi citizens to revolt against Saddam, GHW Bush stood back and watched his military massacre his own people in the south.

If a Democratic president ever did that, the conservatives would demand that he be impeached.

Deflection
It's not the conservatives or tea party or republicas talking about impeachment.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, shut government down then impeach Obama..

Sop when you have no ideas or governing skills.

Deflection
It's not the conservatives or tea party or republicas talking about impeachment.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

And no it's not coming from the Gop or the right. It's coming from the left this time

So what is holding you rightwinged cowards back? Afraid you will lose the election? Ya chicken shits!!!! LMAO!!!

President Barack Obama should be impeached for approving air strikes against Libya, Rep. Dennis Kucinich said in an interview Monday.

“President Obama moved forward without Congress approving,” the liberal Ohio Democrat told Raw Story. “He didn’t have congressional authorization, he has gone against the Constitution, and that’s got to be said.” Several other members of Congress have also chastised the Obama administration for not doing enough to sell the intervention to Congress, let alone to the American people.

Obama’s decision “would appear on its face to be an impeachable offense,” though he conceded in the interview that he’s unsure whether Congress would move ahead on a trial.

“Now, it doesn’t necessarily follow that simply because a president has committed an impeachable offense, that the process should start to impeach and remove him,” he said. “That’s a whole separate question. But we have to clearly understand what this Constitution is about.”



Read more: Kucinich: Libya action 'impeachable' - Jennifer Epstein - POLITICO.com

obama is losing his base 2012 looks real shakey right about now for the bamster.

 

[Sarah G]

Yes, shut government down then impeach Obama..

Sop when you have no ideas or governing skills.

Deflection
It's not the conservatives or tea party or republicas talking about impeachment.

Oh, Nader and Kucinich have the power to impeach.. I forgot.

 

[Article 15]

This should not come as a shock to people familiar with Nadar and Kucinich.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Yes, shut government down then impeach Obama..

Sop when you have no ideas or governing skills.

Deflection
It's not the conservatives or tea party or republicas talking about impeachment.

Oh, Nader and Kucinich have the power to impeach.. I forgot.

Deflection, talking about it and having the power to do it are two very differant subjects.
Point is obama is losing his base and 2012 looks very shakey.

 

[Article 15]

Nadar and Kucinich supporters are not his "base."

 

[midcan5]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Lybian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

Absolutely true, is there any wonder the republicans in power fail so badly when they position flip flop based only the party affiliation and not on principle, humanitarian concern, or morality. What a total and complete bunch of hypocrites. Considering their partisan blockage of most things, Obama would have been at fault if he had tried to work with republicans, anything he did would be wrong. They are a useless party today.

 

[hipeter924]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Lybian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

Absolutely true, is there any wonder the republicans in power fail so badly when they position flip flop based only the party affiliation and not on principle, humanitarian concern, or morality. What a total and complete bunch of hypocrites. Considering their partisan blockage of most things, Obama would have been at fault if he had tried to work with republicans, anything he did would be wrong. They are a useless party today.

Since when have Presidents had morality? Lincoln was a rarity, not the norm, there have been none with moral principles (not stolen from or encouraged by others) in recent history.

 

[Sarah G]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal on the Lybian crisis.

We all know by now that they would be denouncing Obama irrespective of what position he took.

Absolutely true, is there any wonder the republicans in power fail so badly when they position flip flop based only the party affiliation and not on principle, humanitarian concern, or morality. What a total and complete bunch of hypocrites. Considering their partisan blockage of most things, Obama would have been at fault if he had tried to work with republicans, anything he did would be wrong. They are a useless party today.

Since when have Presidents had morality? Lincoln was a rarity, not the norm, there have been none with moral principles (not stolen from or encouraged by others) in recent history.

Lincoln is thought to have been gay so he's not that rare.

 

[editec]

There is no "THE LEFT" folks.

Posing the issues as though there was a single entity called "THE LEFT" leads one to conclusions that make no sense.

Of course the narrative most of you have bought into is that Obama is a leftie.

So naturally some of you are surprised to discover what some of us have been telling you all along.

Obama is no more a lefty that Bush II was. Most of the left leaning people in this nation are fully aware that Obama is nothning more than the GOOD COP in the good cop/bad cop game/

There are NO lefties in power.

Well...maybe Bernie from Vermont, but he's IT, and let's face it, he has NO power.

 

[Dr.Drock]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal. They would be criticizing Obama no matter what position he took.

You mean kind of like the vast Majority of Libs on this Board. Who screamed at us about Illegal Wars, and not using force unless there is an immediate threat to the US. Are now sitting by giving Obama a pass?

Yes that's exactly how. The problem is you're both right. Republicans love any version of warmongering by a republican gov't, then pretend to be against Obama doing it based on their principles, then you hear Democrats cry foul whenever a republican warmongers and they cheer on their bureacrats when they do the exact same thing.

 

[Charles_Main]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal. They would be criticizing Obama no matter what position he took.

You mean kind of like the vast Majority of Libs on this Board. Who screamed at us about Illegal Wars, and not using force unless there is an immediate threat to the US. Are now sitting by giving Obama a pass?

Each crisis should be assessed on its own merits - but conservative political strategy desperately wants to group Iraq and Lybia together.

The difference is demonstrated by the fact that 7 allies (Belgium, Canada, France, Greece, Norway, Qatar, Sweden), who refused to "buy in" to the US invasion of Iraq, are willing to provide military aid in the Lybian crisis.

Coalition of the Willing
**********************************************************************************
Afghanistan, Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Colombia, the Czech Republic, Denmark, El Salvador, Eritrea, Estonia, Ethiopia, Georgia, Hungary, Italy, Japan, South Korea, Latvia, Lithuania, Macedonia, the Netherlands, Nicaragua, the Philippines, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, Uzbekistan.

Lybian Coalition
**********************************************************************************
Belgium, Canada, Denmark, France, Greece, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Qatar, Romania, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Your premise is flawed.

First there were more Nations in the coalition for Iraq than there is in Libya.

Second Bush actually went to the US congress and got approval to attack Iraq.

Democrats screamed for Years that it was an illegal war, and claimed the US congress Resolution that Bush claimed gave him the right to attack Iraq did not.

Now we have a president who did not even attempt to get a Resolution from Congress and all you Lefties are for the most part silent on the constitutional Issue.

And Partisan Hacks like yourself are trying to tell us how this time is different? Why? Because the UN says it is ok? Are you really saying the US is Subject to the will of the UN?

Iraq had compelling humanitarian Reasons to remove Saddam, yet you lefties would hear none of that. You basically said the only legitimate reason for the US to use force is if there is an immediate Dire threat to the US. Now Obama who has told us we can not dictate to other nations. Is saying he can authorize the use of force when ever innocent people are at risk. Even when it has almost no US national Interests in it, and when there clearly is no DIRE threat to the US.

You go ahead and keep trying to contort yourself to support this action. The Rest of us know the truth. You are raging Hippocrates and liars.

 

[Charles_Main]

If there was a Republican president in the White House, you can be assured that our conservative friends would do a complete reversal. They would be criticizing Obama no matter what position he took.

You mean kind of like the vast Majority of Libs on this Board. Who screamed at us about Illegal Wars, and not using force unless there is an immediate threat to the US. Are now sitting by giving Obama a pass?

Yes that's exactly how. The problem is you're both right. Republicans love any version of warmongering by a republican gov't, then pretend to be against Obama doing it based on their principles, then you hear Democrats cry foul whenever a republican warmongers and they cheer on their bureacrats when they do the exact same thing.

First off, I do not love any kind of warmongering by any president. I voted for Bush, yet questioned why we were attacking Iraq before Afghan was finished.

Second I support what Obama is doing (though I am a little worried about a lack of a clear end game) I am simply pointing out how the lines about illegal wars, and the US only using force when there is a threat to us, we heard from Democrats were pure Horse shit.

This action and Democrats relative silence on it expose one thing Clearly. In most Democrats and liberals minds the most important thing is having the UN sign of on what you do. They could care less about informed consent from Congress. Basically they give up our sovereignty to the UN, and think we must have UN approval to ever act in our own interests.

That is the basic difference, other than a Democrat is behind it, Between this war and Iraq. the UN signed off on this, and it appears that is most important to most Lefties around here.

 

[PillyMan]

Why?