Immigration - More or Less?

[Bonzi]

Immigration only by rules and laws currently in place.
Not complicated.

 

[danielpalos]

Immigration only by rules and laws currently in place.
Not complicated.

We really only needed, Ten simple Commandments from any God.

 

[Bonzi]

Immigration only by rules and laws currently in place.
Not complicated.

We really only needed, Ten simple Commandments from any God.

Not true. Those are impossible to follow.
Self restraint is needed personally.
Law implementation is needed for a society. When exceptions are made, the system breaks down

 

[danielpalos]

Socialism requires social morals for free to achieve a secular and temporal, Heaven on Earth.

Is it any coincidence that some on the left may believe, that simply needing the Expense of Government, only happens in Nexus 6, with Zardoz and the incorrigibles.

 

[longknife]

I question rich white people, they own the company I work for, besides rich white people employ illegal aliens or owned slaves for that matter.They create paradigms and they create dogmas. Illegals are the neo slaves for these wanker doodles. Question authority.

I sure hope the white people who own your company write better English than you do.

 

[danielpalos]

We should be solving this problem on a permanent basis via our Commerce Clause; everyone who comes to the US is a tourist, until they formally apply for naturalization.

 

[LuckyDuck]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

I look at it from this standpoint.
The left wants to let in "millions" of people from all over......yet......they complain about our environmental footprint. When you let in millions, you are creating more urban sprawl, more highway/street congestion, more farmland loss to accommodate for the urban sprawl, more strain on the farm resources, more deforestation for the same urban sprawl and more wildlife habitat loss. If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

 

[Unkotare]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

... If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

Better to be pro - human.

 

[longknife]

 

[longknife]

 

[KissMy]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

I look at it from this standpoint.
The left wants to let in "millions" of people from all over......yet......they complain about our environmental footprint. When you let in millions, you are creating more urban sprawl, more highway/street congestion, more farmland loss to accommodate for the urban sprawl, more strain on the farm resources, more deforestation for the same urban sprawl and more wildlife habitat loss. If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

The Republicans are the ones inviting in the cheap labor, then cry when they drop anchor babies US citizens. Repubtards cry more than anchor-babies.

 

[MaryL]

I have a HUGE problem with illegal undocumented immigrant aliens. Whether or not immigration laws are perfect. They aren't. Illegal aliens chose to ignore laws or borders despite the consequences. But what about people that immigrate legally? The fact is, if we tolerate or excuse illegal aliens, dosen't that belittle or cheapen people that work hard and LEGALLY immigrate here? Isn't THAT the biggest crime of all, belittling legitimate immigrants? I won't accept that...

 

[danielpalos]

Fallacy of false cause; like usual for the right wing.

He is waving his flag to prove he would be a tourist who can work here, wait for a good exchange rate, and go home and start some enterprise, over there.

Only the right wing, never gets it. And, prefer their socialism on a national basis to applied capitalism, every chance they get.

 

[Unkotare]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

I look at it from this standpoint.
The left wants to let in "millions" of people from all over......yet......they complain about our environmental footprint. When you let in millions, you are creating more urban sprawl, more highway/street congestion, more farmland loss to accommodate for the urban sprawl, more strain on the farm resources, more deforestation for the same urban sprawl and more wildlife habitat loss. If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

The Republicans are the ones inviting in the cheap labor, then cry when they drop anchor babies US citizens. Repubtards cry more than anchor-babies.

You mean "US citizens."

 

[MaryL]

I despise the liberals or conservatives that use illegal aliens as pawns. They are human beings. Illegals have little to no excuse, but it's the people that use them that disgusts me...as cheap labor, or use them as leverage politically as a human rights issue. Immigrate legally. No excuses. We all dream, my great grandparents legally immigrated here and didn't use their children as human shields against immigration laws. I too am a dreamer.

 

[Unkotare]

One day years ago I went into a local INS office to complain about a bunion. They told me to get lost because they had enough with screwy lunatics popping in and bothering them. I was pretty upset, so I went home and played really loud music.

 

[LuckyDuck]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

... If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

Better to be pro - human.

Translation: Self-destructive.

 

[Unkotare]

I was watching Bill Maher today and he and Richard Dawkins were taking the left to task for their stance on immigration. When someone like Bill Maher is agreeing with Republicans on immigration, I think something has changed.

What should America's immigration policy be going forward?

... If one is pro-environment, one should stand for "no" immigration and tax incentives to keep the families small.

Better to be pro - human.

Translation: Self-destructive.

Exactly the opposite.

 

[badger2]

No, morphologies in an underground economy trump the fear of hiring. They can live thus for years. Trump's Nielsen has just brought that up in the media.

 

[badger2]

#52: That depends on whether you are an Indigene or an American immigrant from the Mayflower.