I'm so sick of the rightwing denial of man made climate change

[Mr. H.]

God damn Liberals. Fucking up a good thing. If it isn't broke, they always find a way to fuck shit up.

What about the God-made farmer?

You can't argue with Paul Harvey now, can you?

"God made a farmer".

The farmer is the single most raper of the environment. Is the farmer in "the news"?

No. He is not. Because you Liberals kiss the farmer's sphicter. You lap at the ass of the farmer.

The farmer plants 58 million acres of corn to make ethanol and you call it good.

"Lo- and the farmer made seed of 58 million mother fucking acres".

And the Liberals called it good.

You fuckers crack me up.

What are you even talking about?

Candidate

Agriculture is the number one polluter of the environment.

Is it in the news?

No.

That's what I'm talking about.

Bitch.

Do you really not understand that farming has nothing to do with climate change?

Next...

 

[Yarddog]

God damn Liberals. Fucking up a good thing. If it isn't broke, they always find a way to fuck shit up.

What about the God-made farmer?

You can't argue with Paul Harvey now, can you?

"God made a farmer".

The farmer is the single most raper of the environment. Is the farmer in "the news"?

No. He is not. Because you Liberals kiss the farmer's sphicter. You lap at the ass of the farmer.

The farmer plants 58 million acres of corn to make ethanol and you call it good.

"Lo- and the farmer made seed of 58 million mother fucking acres".

And the Liberals called it good.

You fuckers crack me up.

What are you even talking about?

Candidate

Agriculture is the number one polluter of the environment.

Is it in the news?

No.

That's what I'm talking about.

Bitch.

Do you really not understand that farming has nothing to do with climate change?

Maybe indirectly when deforestation takes place. Much of Northern Africa and middle east were much more green before bad farming practices changed the land for ever. It does to some extent effect the climate.

 

[Thunderbird]

What if the planet decides not to cooperate?

The big list of failed climate predictions Watts Up With That

 

[Wyatt earp]

The ONLY reason why the RW base has chosen not to believe in this phenomenon is because republicans told them not to. Al Gore just had to get involved so of course repubs through a tantrum over it to defend the interests of oil companies. Because the RW base are pawns, they buy into it.

RW clowns: Save your cherry picked "studies" that are NOT peer reviewed and are likely funded by big oil that argue against human caused climate change. Youre wasting your life over them. The vast majority of peer reviewed studies from AROUND THE WORLD confirm it to be real. The science is settled. I don't give a shit what democrats or Obama say about it. I listen to the actual experts.

Survey finds 97 climate science papers agree warming is man-made Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian

This entire thread seems like troll food for the right wingers who don't believe climate change is man made.
You think THIS time they'll believe science? Noooope.

Because we we're told so?

No Billy we all graduated from the second grade when they taught about the past ice ages and stuff.

Again Billy us old enough to remember has been hearing your fear mongering for the past 40 years , that's what were sick of.

 

[tinydancer]

97% was and always will be bullshit hype.

 

[The sheeple sea]

God damn Liberals. Fucking up a good thing. If it isn't broke, they always find a way to fuck shit up.

What about the God-made farmer?

You can't argue with Paul Harvey now, can you?

"God made a farmer".

The farmer is the single most raper of the environment. Is the farmer in "the news"?

No. He is not. Because you Liberals kiss the farmer's sphicter. You lap at the ass of the farmer.

The farmer plants 58 million acres of corn to make ethanol and you call it good.

"Lo- and the farmer made seed of 58 million mother fucking acres".

And the Liberals called it good.

You fuckers crack me up.

What are you even talking about?

Candidate

Agriculture is the number one polluter of the environment.

Is it in the news?

No.

That's what I'm talking about.

Bitch.

You COULD explain the ways that agriculture is a polluter of the environment in specifics and actually make a point instead of spewing this as mad man rhetoric.
The runoff from pollutants from poor farming practice has resulted in a dead zone in the gulf of Mexico the size of Rhode island.
The lack of sustainable farming techniques by corporate farms has resulted in the depletion of topsoil at dangerous levels that will more than likely lead to dust bowl 2.0.
These are reasonable points to bring up and I'm sure there are more about horrible corporate farming practices.
Instead of just saying liberals uh " lap at the ass of the farmer?" , maybe you could explain and find out?
And in the process help inform people about an issue that you yourself say doesn't get enough attention.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"I'm so sick of the rightwing denial of man made climate change"

Just sick of the rightwing in general.

 

[Yarddog]

The ONLY reason why the RW base has chosen not to believe in this phenomenon is because republicans told them not to. Al Gore just had to get involved so of course repubs through a tantrum over it to defend the interests of oil companies. Because the RW base are pawns, they buy into it.

RW clowns: Save your cherry picked "studies" that are NOT peer reviewed and are likely funded by big oil that argue against human caused climate change. Youre wasting your life over them. The vast majority of peer reviewed studies from AROUND THE WORLD confirm it to be real. The science is settled. I don't give a shit what democrats or Obama say about it. I listen to the actual experts.

Survey finds 97 climate science papers agree warming is man-made Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian

People don't need to rob banks anymore, they can go into politics instead. When there are billions at stake in regulations and contracts, rest assured there is money to be paid on the back end. Its always ok to question your government and they have made science political. cant believe its pure science anymore

 

[Hossfly]

The ONLY reason why the RW base has chosen not to believe in this phenomenon is because republicans told them not to. Al Gore just had to get involved so of course repubs through a tantrum over it to defend the interests of oil companies. Because the RW base are pawns, they buy into it.

RW clowns: Save your cherry picked "studies" that are NOT peer reviewed and are likely funded by big oil that argue against human caused climate change. Youre wasting your life over them. The vast majority of peer reviewed studies from AROUND THE WORLD confirm it to be real. The science is settled. I don't give a shit what democrats or Obama say about it. I listen to the actual experts.

Survey finds 97 climate science papers agree warming is man-made Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian

Don't you think the sun might have something to do with global warming? You know, that bright little yellow ball in the sky.

 

[tinydancer]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

 

[Billy000]

The ONLY reason why the RW base has chosen not to believe in this phenomenon is because republicans told them not to. Al Gore just had to get involved so of course repubs through a tantrum over it to defend the interests of oil companies. Because the RW base are pawns, they buy into it.

RW clowns: Save your cherry picked "studies" that are NOT peer reviewed and are likely funded by big oil that argue against human caused climate change. Youre wasting your life over them. The vast majority of peer reviewed studies from AROUND THE WORLD confirm it to be real. The science is settled. I don't give a shit what democrats or Obama say about it. I listen to the actual experts.

Survey finds 97 climate science papers agree warming is man-made Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian

This entire thread seems like troll food for the right wingers who don't believe climate change is man made.
You think THIS time they'll believe science? Noooope.

Because we we're told so?

No Billy we all graduated from the second grade when they taught about the past ice ages and stuff.

Again Billy us old enough to remember has been hearing your fear mongering for the past 40 years , that's what were sick of.

Just because you aren't smart enough to understand climate science, it doesn't mean your childish rationale for being skeptical means a damn.

 

[Billy000]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

It really wouldn't change the fact that the vast majority of peer reviewed studies from around the world all come to same conclusion now would it?

 

[Yarddog]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

Exactly! surveys and stats are made to be manipulated. and why do they have to be manipulated?

 

[Billy000]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

Your link has nothing to do with my link. Mine was a percentage of peer reviewed papers. Yours is on a survey of scientists themselves.

 

[The sheeple sea]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

And I'm sure if 97% of 79 out of 3146 agreed climate change was happening and caused by man the other 3077 would have said "what no? Liberal bullshit" but please call them up and find out. Never mind that many of those not surveyed ALSO wrote papers on how climate change is real and man made.

 

[tinydancer]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

It really wouldn't change the fact that the vast majority of peer reviewed studies from around the world all come to same conclusion now would it?

Peer reviewed had become such a joke that the rules have to be changed.

For a great length of time scientists were allowed to choose who would be able to *cough* peer review their work and their findings.

And as if that wasn't bad enough, many scientists were actually able to *cough* peer review their own papers.

Publishing The peer-review scam Nature News Comment

 

[Wyatt earp]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

It really wouldn't change the fact that the vast majority of peer reviewed studies from around the world all come to same conclusion now would it?

yea Billy and you believe a ship in 1870 the Great Britain challenger accurately measured ocean temperature to a 10th of a degree at a depth of 900 meters?

Bet you believe in the tooth fairy also(;.;'

 

[Billy000]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

It really wouldn't change the fact that the vast majority of peer reviewed studies from around the world all come to same conclusion now would it?

Peer reviewed had become such a joke that the rules have to be changed.

For a great length of time scientists were allowed to choose who would be able to *cough* peer review their work and their findings.

And as if that wasn't bad enough, many scientists were actually able to *cough* peer review their own papers.

Publishing The peer-review scam Nature News Comment

Lol did you even read this article? It cites 110 articles of authors fraudulently passing off their work as peer reviewed. It has nothing to do with the peer review process being inherently flawed.

 

[Billy000]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

It really wouldn't change the fact that the vast majority of peer reviewed studies from around the world all come to same conclusion now would it?

yea Billy and you believe a ship in 1870 the Great Britain challenger accurately measured ocean temperature to a 10th of a degree at a depth of 900 meters?

Bet you believe in the tooth fairy also(;.;'

Huh?

 

[tinydancer]

To the 97% lie we go....

"The "97 percent" figure in the Zimmerman/Doran survey represents the views of only 79 respondents who listed climate science as an area of expertise and said they published more than half of their recent peer-reviewed papers on climate change.

Seventy-nine scientists—of the 3,146 who responded to the survey—does not a consensus make."

More debunking of lies and bullshit at link.

Joseph Bast and Roy Spencer The Myth of the Climate Change 97 - WSJ

And I'm sure if 97% of 79 out of 3146 agreed climate change was happening and caused by man the other 3077 would have said "what no? Liberal bullshit" but please call them up and find out. Never mind that many of those not surveyed ALSO wrote papers on how climate change is real and man made.

You are spewing garbage. Refute the findings in the article or shut the fuck up.