“I’m not going to vote on a half-ass bill” - Sen. Mazie Hirono...Senate Democrats threaten to block & filibuster the GOP/Tim Scott police bill

Horse shit. No such thing as negotiating with a Democrat! If they choose not to vote on a police reform bill that’s their choice!
They are voting on a police reform bill...in the House. Of course..as has been stated...the Republicans won't touch it. so that's THEIR choice, right?

I guess will have to see what's in it won't we.
If it contains a bunch of bullshit like most dem bills no it shouldnt be approved.

So..let's take a look, shall we?




A sweeping new police reform bill being drafted by House and Senate Democrats would ban chokeholds, limit “qualified immunity” for police officers, create a national misconduct registry, end the use of no-knock warrants in drug cases and make lynching a federal crime among other dramatic changes, according to an outline being circulated on Capitol Hill.
The Justice in Policing Act of 2020 is sponsored on the House side by Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) on the Senate side. Harris is among the frontrunners to become the Democratic vice presidential nominee this year.


More recently..as in today:


The bill would amend the requirement of intent in the federal criminal statute to prosecute police misconduct, by changing the standard of prosecution from "willfulness" to "recklessness." It would also reform qualified immunity, meaning that individuals would be able to recover damages when their constitutional rights are violated by law enforcement officers.
The bill aims to implement structural reforms at the Justice Department by granting the department's Civil Rights Division subpoena power. The bill would also incentivize state attorneys general to conduct pattern and practice investigations of local police departments, and provide grants for states to create structures for investigating police-involved deaths.
The legislation attempts to improve transparency by creating a National Police Misconduct Registry, and mandate state and local law enforcement turn over data on use of force broken out by race, gender, disability, religion and age.
The bill also aims to address cultural biases in police stations by mandating racial training. It would also change the standard for evaluating whether use of force was justified. Currently, officers only need to prove that use of force was reasonable. The bill would change the standard so that officers need to prove that use of force is necessary. The bill would also require that federal law enforcement officers wear body cameras, and limit transfer of military-grade equipment to state and local law enforcement.
It would ban no-knock warrants in drug cases, meaning that police officers could not barge into people's homes without knocking first. Protesters have called for ending the practice after police officers in Louisville, Kentucky, shot and killed Breonna Taylor in her bed after entering her home on the basis of a no-knock warrant. The bill would also ban police chokeholds. Floyd died after he was pinned down by a police officer with a knee to his neck for nearly nine minutes.
The bill includes a section that makes lynching a hate crime, after the Senate failed to pass an anti-lynching bill last week. It is unclear whether this package would receive support in the Republican-controlled Senate.

 
I would need to know what is in it. If it's good with the problem being not enough good. Vote for it. The rest can be addressed later.
 
GOP bill would incentivize police departments to ban chokeholds, but Trump said is was alright when there live was in danger. So you are going to bride them and hope that they stop. Okay

increase the use of body-worn cameras, now all they have to do is stop them from turning it off

improve training in de-escalation tactics - improve training in de-escalatiion tactics. okay so they just need to improve training whatever that means.

and take prior records into greater account when making hiring decisions. While do they not do that now and what does greater account mean.

It would also increase data collection on the use of force, weapon discharge and no-knock warrants- okay do they not collect data oh but they just need to increase it. this data now and

making lynching a federal crime, among other things. okay when was the last time there was a lynching? Okay lynching is bad and to make it a federal crime should help reduce the amount of lynching.
Look at your very first sentence. You suck. First. It is “their” not “there” secondly it is “life” not live. And thirdly “you are going to bride them.” What the actual fuck? Did ewe mean “bride them”? Or “bribe them”?
 
Born in Japan and a graduate of Georgetown Law School and the best legal description of a Bill the Hawaiian senator can come up with is "half assed". Makes you wonder about democrats.
 
Horse shit. No such thing as negotiating with a Democrat! If they choose not to vote on a police reform bill that’s their choice!
They are voting on a police reform bill...in the House. Of course..as has been stated...the Republicans won't touch it. so that's THEIR choice, right?

I guess will have to see what's in it won't we.
If it contains a bunch of bullshit like most dem bills no it shouldnt be approved.

So..let's take a look, shall we?




A sweeping new police reform bill being drafted by House and Senate Democrats would ban chokeholds, limit “qualified immunity” for police officers, create a national misconduct registry, end the use of no-knock warrants in drug cases and make lynching a federal crime among other dramatic changes, according to an outline being circulated on Capitol Hill.
The Justice in Policing Act of 2020 is sponsored on the House side by Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) on the Senate side. Harris is among the frontrunners to become the Democratic vice presidential nominee this year.


More recently..as in today:


The bill would amend the requirement of intent in the federal criminal statute to prosecute police misconduct, by changing the standard of prosecution from "willfulness" to "recklessness." It would also reform qualified immunity, meaning that individuals would be able to recover damages when their constitutional rights are violated by law enforcement officers.
The bill aims to implement structural reforms at the Justice Department by granting the department's Civil Rights Division subpoena power. The bill would also incentivize state attorneys general to conduct pattern and practice investigations of local police departments, and provide grants for states to create structures for investigating police-involved deaths.
The legislation attempts to improve transparency by creating a National Police Misconduct Registry, and mandate state and local law enforcement turn over data on use of force broken out by race, gender, disability, religion and age.
The bill also aims to address cultural biases in police stations by mandating racial training. It would also change the standard for evaluating whether use of force was justified. Currently, officers only need to prove that use of force was reasonable. The bill would change the standard so that officers need to prove that use of force is necessary. The bill would also require that federal law enforcement officers wear body cameras, and limit transfer of military-grade equipment to state and local law enforcement.
It would ban no-knock warrants in drug cases, meaning that police officers could not barge into people's homes without knocking first. Protesters have called for ending the practice after police officers in Louisville, Kentucky, shot and killed Breonna Taylor in her bed after entering her home on the basis of a no-knock warrant. The bill would also ban police chokeholds. Floyd died after he was pinned down by a police officer with a knee to his neck for nearly nine minutes.
The bill includes a section that makes lynching a hate crime, after the Senate failed to pass an anti-lynching bill last week. It is unclear whether this package would receive support in the Republican-controlled Senate.

LOL.....lynching is currently legal!!!! Who Knew???
I really dont have a problem with a national registry of cops who are bad actors. They certainly need to be removed.
The whole choke hold thing is rather ambiguous. Control the head and you control the body,for smaller and female officers removing that option is damn near a death sentence in certain cases.
And then they say: Among other dramatic changes.
Sorry that dont cut it.
 
Horse shit. No such thing as negotiating with a Democrat! If they choose not to vote on a police reform bill that’s their choice!
They are voting on a police reform bill...in the House. Of course..as has been stated...the Republicans won't touch it. so that's THEIR choice, right?

I guess will have to see what's in it won't we.
If it contains a bunch of bullshit like most dem bills no it shouldnt be approved.

So..let's take a look, shall we?




A sweeping new police reform bill being drafted by House and Senate Democrats would ban chokeholds, limit “qualified immunity” for police officers, create a national misconduct registry, end the use of no-knock warrants in drug cases and make lynching a federal crime among other dramatic changes, according to an outline being circulated on Capitol Hill.
The Justice in Policing Act of 2020 is sponsored on the House side by Rep. Karen Bass (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Congressional Black Caucus, and Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Sens. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) and Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) on the Senate side. Harris is among the frontrunners to become the Democratic vice presidential nominee this year.


More recently..as in today:


The bill would amend the requirement of intent in the federal criminal statute to prosecute police misconduct, by changing the standard of prosecution from "willfulness" to "recklessness." It would also reform qualified immunity, meaning that individuals would be able to recover damages when their constitutional rights are violated by law enforcement officers.
The bill aims to implement structural reforms at the Justice Department by granting the department's Civil Rights Division subpoena power. The bill would also incentivize state attorneys general to conduct pattern and practice investigations of local police departments, and provide grants for states to create structures for investigating police-involved deaths.
The legislation attempts to improve transparency by creating a National Police Misconduct Registry, and mandate state and local law enforcement turn over data on use of force broken out by race, gender, disability, religion and age.
The bill also aims to address cultural biases in police stations by mandating racial training. It would also change the standard for evaluating whether use of force was justified. Currently, officers only need to prove that use of force was reasonable. The bill would change the standard so that officers need to prove that use of force is necessary. The bill would also require that federal law enforcement officers wear body cameras, and limit transfer of military-grade equipment to state and local law enforcement.
It would ban no-knock warrants in drug cases, meaning that police officers could not barge into people's homes without knocking first. Protesters have called for ending the practice after police officers in Louisville, Kentucky, shot and killed Breonna Taylor in her bed after entering her home on the basis of a no-knock warrant. The bill would also ban police chokeholds. Floyd died after he was pinned down by a police officer with a knee to his neck for nearly nine minutes.
The bill includes a section that makes lynching a hate crime, after the Senate failed to pass an anti-lynching bill last week. It is unclear whether this package would receive support in the Republican-controlled Senate.

LOL.....lynching is currently legal!!!! Who Knew???
I really dont have a problem with a national registry of cops who are bad actors. They certainly need to be removed.
The whole choke hold thing is rather ambiguous. Control the head and you control the body,for smaller and female officers removing that option is damn near a death sentence in certain cases.
And then they say: Among other dramatic changes.
Sorry that dont cut it.
By far the most radical change would be if the standard for qualified immunity were to change..that would change the whole game. Real consequences.
 
You know what would be the absolute greatest thing that Trump could do? It's actually something he can't do... but I think it would be awesome if it happened.

You vote on a bill... That's it... you can't put anything in it that doesn't directly involve what the bill is about. Can't buy votes by earmarking crap into it. Post the bill online, and everyone can see who voted for/against it.
Get rid of Earmarks and Riders? Sure I'm for it...tough sell though--they all talk against them..they all use them...and i doubt that they're going to get rid of them. It's power, right?

As for the other...well a Bill..every Bill..is published in full in the Congressional Record. All votes are a matter of public record.
Yeah.. But without the extra bullshit... We would know EXACTLY what they voted no on... No earmarks and riders.
 
Maybe the Republicans should have done some negotiating with the Democrats first, YOU KNOW, THE WAY IT'S SUPPOSED TO BE DONE?????
Like behind closed doors the way the Demoncraps did with the Unaffordable Care act? How easy you brainless idiots forget the past. I hope it doesnt pass, then it is on the Demoncraps for NOT wanting police change. Demoncraps, keeps on killing....

You cant talk sense to these fucking morons
It's not possible.
 
GOP bill would incentivize police departments to ban chokeholds, but Trump said is was alright when there live was in danger. So you are going to bride them and hope that they stop. Okay

increase the use of body-worn cameras, now all they have to do is stop them from turning it off

improve training in de-escalation tactics - improve training in de-escalatiion tactics. okay so they just need to improve training whatever that means.

and take prior records into greater account when making hiring decisions. While do they not do that now and what does greater account mean.

It would also increase data collection on the use of force, weapon discharge and no-knock warrants- okay do they not collect data oh but they just need to increase it. this data now and

making lynching a federal crime, among other things. okay when was the last time there was a lynching? Okay lynching is bad and to make it a federal crime should help reduce the amount of lynching.
Look at your very first sentence. You suck. First. It is “their” not “there” secondly it is “life” not live. And thirdly “you are going to bride them.” What the actual fuck? Did ewe mean “bride them”? Or “bribe them”?

Who made you the sentence Nazi? Well then again if I only used less than 10 words in a post then I could be just like you but without the suck and the fuck references.
 

Forum List

Back
Top