If you incorporate you automatically make the left's sh*t list.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The criteria is the same for businesses as individuals. If you cheat, lie, and steal to reach your goals, you qualify.
Then why does the left continually demonize businesses that don't do that, But merely for their size?
Wouldn't it be nice if Flopper applied his standard of evil to the Democratic Party?
how's that ''charity'' working out for the poorest? guess you all left some ''behind'' huh?
why do those charities need government money, our tax dollars then? why are charities taking gvt handouts for faith based initiatives, if the charities are accomplishing all that is needed all by their lonesome avatar?
do you think it is wrong for these charities to take money from the tax payers via the faith based initiatives?
one of my mentors, a boss of mine in my earlier career.... used to rattle this off quite often; "Ya know, for some reason, the harder I worked, the Luckier I got!"
of course there are those that accomplish what is asked of them and not more and there are those that do accomplish more.
some of those that accomplish what is asked of them are loyal employees Jarhead....they never call in sick, they do whatever you ask of them....but they CAN'T work more due to kids that need to be picked up from Daycare or an elderly parent that they need to take care of at home or their husband of wife works the /evening night shift and they need to be home for the kids so the spouse can go to work....
I have had employees such as these over the years fill the non critical positions within the corporation.... they still can be loyal employees....just not ones that want to or can, advance themselves, due to other circumstances....but then again, many of these corporations ended up adding daycare at work, so that these employees could manage and move on up the ladder as well...
Your business will be considered "evil" only if you make a profit.How successful would I have to make it until I'm one of those evil businesses?
one of my mentors, a boss of mine in my earlier career.... used to rattle this off quite often; "Ya know, for some reason, the harder I worked, the Luckier I got!"
of course there are those that accomplish what is asked of them and not more and there are those that do accomplish more.
some of those that accomplish what is asked of them are loyal employees Jarhead....they never call in sick, they do whatever you ask of them....but they CAN'T work more due to kids that need to be picked up from Daycare or an elderly parent that they need to take care of at home or their husband of wife works the /evening night shift and they need to be home for the kids so the spouse can go to work....
I have had employees such as these over the years fill the non critical positions within the corporation.... they still can be loyal employees....just not ones that want to or can, advance themselves, due to other circumstances....but then again, many of these corporations ended up adding daycare at work, so that these employees could manage and move on up the ladder as well...
one of my mentors, a boss of mine in my earlier career.... used to rattle this off quite often; "Ya know, for some reason, the harder I worked, the Luckier I got!"
of course there are those that accomplish what is asked of them and not more and there are those that do accomplish more.
some of those that accomplish what is asked of them are loyal employees Jarhead....they never call in sick, they do whatever you ask of them....but they CAN'T work more due to kids that need to be picked up from Daycare or an elderly parent that they need to take care of at home or their husband of wife works the /evening night shift and they need to be home for the kids so the spouse can go to work....
I have had employees such as these over the years fill the non critical positions within the corporation.... they still can be loyal employees....just not ones that want to or can, advance themselves, due to other circumstances....but then again, many of these corporations ended up adding daycare at work, so that these employees could manage and move on up the ladder as well...
But I hope they won't. At some point many of us have to make a decision about what is most important to us. Being a great parent to great kids, maintaining a great home as a refuge from a sometimes stressful world, or be a rising star destined to be influential, powerful, famous, and prosperous in the corporate world. Both choices can end in amazing success depending on how one defines success.
I hate to think of kids being squirreled away in day care longer than they absolutely have to be in order for Mommy and Daddy to make a living.
You're so full of shit!When you start looking at your first Bentley and a chauffer to drive it and you fire enough of your employees to cover the cost.
Typical left wing rhetoric.
Better said this way....
When you review your fianncials and you see that progress and technology allows you to cut back on operating expenses so you can maintain or increase your lifestyle...which is why you went into your own business to begin with.....then you become evil in the eyes of the jealous.
No business owner lays off people knowing it will kill the business just so they can buy a Bentley that they will no longer be able to afford becuase they laid off empoloyees and business died.
Tyical left wing talking points rhetoric.
Hey, I've seen it first hand. Except it wasn't a Bentley with a driver it was a Porsche 911.
You can find the article here.I couldn't find the article you referenced so I dont know what your definition of poor is. US Health and Human Service define poverty for a couple as a combined gross income of less than $15,000. Unless you are using some other measure of poverty, I find it difficult to believe that 43% of young married couples with a combined gross income of less than $15,000 own a 3-bedroom 1 ½ bath air-conditioned home and a car. The mortgage alone would run well over half their gross pay. You can buy a color TV at Goodwill for $10 and a new microwave $30, but the house and car, I dont think so.no, I don't know that Zander.... MOST THAT ARE POOR, are truly poor and are not gaming the system....where you get that 90% of the poor are not poor is beyond me. (the reciprocal of the 10 to 1 ratio of low lifes you speak of above)
90% of the 50% that you all bitch about ad nausea that do not pay any federal income taxes are not lazy ass scumbags.....
generalizations such as that, is where you lose me....
no different than condemning all corporations instead of the few that are gaming the system...
Forty-three percent of all poor households actually own their own homes; the average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Census Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage and a porch or patio.
Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning; by contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
Only 6 percent of poor households are overcrowded; two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, London, Vienna, Athens and other cities throughout Europe (these comparisons are to the average citizens in foreign countries, not to those classified as poor).
Also:
Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.
Material poverty can be measured relatively or absolutely. An absolute measure would consist of some minimum quantity of goods and services deemed adequate for a baseline level of survival. Achieving that level means that poverty has been eliminated. However, if poverty is defined as, say, the lowest one-fifth of the income distribution, it is impossible to eliminate poverty. Everyone's income could double, triple and quadruple, but there will always be the lowest one-fifth, explains Williams.
Source: Walter Williams, "Where Best To Be Poor," Jewish World Review, June 30, 2010.
2009 Federal Poverty Guidelines
Unlike years before unions, we now have laws that prevent child labor; we have minimum wage that prevents "slave wages"; we now have laws that orevent dangerous work environments.; We now have laws that prevent dsicrimination.
Now we can let the free market run again. You dont like the wage, dont take the job.
The worker will dictate the salary in the end....demand for a particular position is what will define the salary.
Unions have proven to be self serving for themselves and the memebers not taking into conideration how it affects the priices of the goods they produce and the success of the company overall.
Trust me...as a business planner and recruiter......salaries for no union positions are dictated by the demand for the psoition by qulified people...even in economic times like these.
You're so full of shit!Typical left wing rhetoric.
Better said this way....
When you review your fianncials and you see that progress and technology allows you to cut back on operating expenses so you can maintain or increase your lifestyle...which is why you went into your own business to begin with.....then you become evil in the eyes of the jealous.
No business owner lays off people knowing it will kill the business just so they can buy a Bentley that they will no longer be able to afford becuase they laid off empoloyees and business died.
Tyical left wing talking points rhetoric.
Hey, I've seen it first hand. Except it wasn't a Bentley with a driver it was a Porsche 911.
Unlike years before unions, we now have laws that prevent child labor; we have minimum wage that prevents "slave wages"; we now have laws that orevent dangerous work environments.; We now have laws that prevent dsicrimination.
Now we can let the free market run again. You dont like the wage, dont take the job.
The worker will dictate the salary in the end....demand for a particular position is what will define the salary.
Unions have proven to be self serving for themselves and the memebers not taking into conideration how it affects the priices of the goods they produce and the success of the company overall.
Trust me...as a business planner and recruiter......salaries for no union positions are dictated by the demand for the psoition by qulified people...even in economic times like these.
We have the labor laws we have BECAUSE of the efforts of Unions. Business and Government did wake up one day and go, "Gosh..it would be nice to treat labor like we want to be treated". And part of that was due to people like FDR realizing that people's misery would lead to populist movements like Fascism and Communism taking root.
And it's a constant struggle..as we see today. Business has been colluding to rollback these gains as well. I've seen it happen where I work. They eliminated the Union by giving the same benefits to non-union workers. Once the Union collapsed..the Benefits have begun to evaporate. Pensions went bye bye 3 years ago. And we now contribute much more to our healthcare.
I've been on both sides of the fence..business owner and labor. So I kinda see how the whole thing works..soup to nuts.
You're so full of shit!Hey, I've seen it first hand. Except it wasn't a Bentley with a driver it was a Porsche 911.
Well if the guy could pay for a car by firing some workers, it would seem those workers were a drain on corporate profits anyway, yes? Most of us hire people to make money for us. If they don't, there really isn't much reason to hire them in the first place.
You're so full of shit!
Well if the guy could pay for a car by firing some workers, it would seem those workers were a drain on corporate profits anyway, yes? Most of us hire people to make money for us. If they don't, there really isn't much reason to hire them in the first place.
Or he could just make those who are left pick up the slack.
I've seen it happen. It was a small, family owned business of about 100 people.
one of my mentors, a boss of mine in my earlier career.... used to rattle this off quite often; "Ya know, for some reason, the harder I worked, the Luckier I got!"
of course there are those that accomplish what is asked of them and not more and there are those that do accomplish more.
some of those that accomplish what is asked of them are loyal employees Jarhead....they never call in sick, they do whatever you ask of them....but they CAN'T work more due to kids that need to be picked up from Daycare or an elderly parent that they need to take care of at home or their husband of wife works the /evening night shift and they need to be home for the kids so the spouse can go to work....
I have had employees such as these over the years fill the non critical positions within the corporation.... they still can be loyal employees....just not ones that want to or can, advance themselves, due to other circumstances....but then again, many of these corporations ended up adding daycare at work, so that these employees could manage and move on up the ladder as well...
Yes, I understand and respect that.
But those employees, for good or for bad, had priorities that were more important than their careers...and I do not hold that against them.
However, they must understand that when push comes to shove, they are deemed as dispensible if there need to be cuts.
Afterall, should I cut the person who CAN and DOES stay late?
You see....there are many of us that are not willing to sacrifice personal respoinsibilities for a job and many of us that are. Me? I missed many of my sons football games....my neighbor didnt miss them. He lost his company during the recession...I didnt. He has regrets...so do I....but at least I still have my company and my employees have jobs. His? I Hired one of them but couldnt hire all of them.
Seems to me that Unions destroy every industry that they glom on to. Why else would their ranks be declining year after year after year?In 2010, 7.6 million public sector employees belonged to a union, compared with 7.1 million union workers in the private sector. The union membership rate for public sector workers (36.2 percent) was substantially higher than the rate for private sector workers (6.9 percent)
one of my mentors, a boss of mine in my earlier career.... used to rattle this off quite often; "Ya know, for some reason, the harder I worked, the Luckier I got!"
of course there are those that accomplish what is asked of them and not more and there are those that do accomplish more.
some of those that accomplish what is asked of them are loyal employees Jarhead....they never call in sick, they do whatever you ask of them....but they CAN'T work more due to kids that need to be picked up from Daycare or an elderly parent that they need to take care of at home or their husband of wife works the /evening night shift and they need to be home for the kids so the spouse can go to work....
I have had employees such as these over the years fill the non critical positions within the corporation.... they still can be loyal employees....just not ones that want to or can, advance themselves, due to other circumstances....but then again, many of these corporations ended up adding daycare at work, so that these employees could manage and move on up the ladder as well...
Yes, I understand and respect that.
But those employees, for good or for bad, had priorities that were more important than their careers...and I do not hold that against them.
However, they must understand that when push comes to shove, they are deemed as dispensible if there need to be cuts.
Afterall, should I cut the person who CAN and DOES stay late?
You see....there are many of us that are not willing to sacrifice personal respoinsibilities for a job and many of us that are. Me? I missed many of my sons football games....my neighbor didnt miss them. He lost his company during the recession...I didnt. He has regrets...so do I....but at least I still have my company and my employees have jobs. His? I Hired one of them but couldnt hire all of them.
my husband and I have no children...we have been childless....so my career got everything from me, I was a work- a- holic of sorts....I gave it my all...every ounce of me... some to numb my pain or even shame of being barren perhaps....at least this is what some that know me have speculated....but truly, I just loved every job challenge that I have ever had, and always have wanted to do the company good....not just good, but better than they ever expected from me.
Yes, I was eventually compensated for the loyalty.
Well if the guy could pay for a car by firing some workers, it would seem those workers were a drain on corporate profits anyway, yes? Most of us hire people to make money for us. If they don't, there really isn't much reason to hire them in the first place.
Or he could just make those who are left pick up the slack.
I've seen it happen. It was a small, family owned business of about 100 people.
And if those that are left agree to pick up the slack and dont quit and get a better job?
Then I would say it was a great decision made by the business owner.
You're so full of shit!
Well if the guy could pay for a car by firing some workers, it would seem those workers were a drain on corporate profits anyway, yes? Most of us hire people to make money for us. If they don't, there really isn't much reason to hire them in the first place.
Or he could just make those who are left pick up the slack.
I've seen it happen. It was a small, family owned business of about 100 people.