IndependntLogic
Senior Member
- Jul 14, 2011
- 2,997
- 399
- 48
- Thread starter
- #241
I won't return your petty insults.
So if I decide to bury highly enriched uranium on my own private property, is that okay then?
How about Bernie Madoff? All he did was exaggerate a tad about the value of some investments! Yet that darn SEC went in there and said their stupid "regulations" were violated.
So surely you don't think the guys at ENRON should have been told to stop having their fun?
The BP Gulf spill? What BUSINESS is it of the government's how they build and maintain their rigs!
You may now continue calling others confused if you like.
You don't have the ability to obtain ANY uranium, let alone highly enriched uranium. If you had just said 'Toxic Waste', I would reply that it's a matter for the courts.
The rest of your 'examples' deal with businesses perpetrating fraud, or in BP's case, an ACCIDENT.
I'm pretty sure he was talking about individual rights, and asking what kind of limitations you meant to THOSE rights.
But keep it up, you're pretty entertaining...
Well Ron Paul and MANY Libertarians have stated they would eliminate the EPA, SEC etc... Do you disagree with them?
As far as personal rights, I'd like to have a nuke! The 2nd amendment guarantees me the right to "arms" or armament. In the FF's day, they did not have nukes but they did not have even semi-automatic weapons either. However they did have guns AND bombs AND rockets! (I hear some had red glare). So unless you're one of those "The Constitution is a Living Document" types who concedes it must be interpreted I should be able to own a nuke! But alas, common sense prevails... I'm glad.
Oh and the toxic waste a matter for the courts? Um yeah. That's how thousands of Americans have been killed. Because they didn't have a team of $800 / hour lawyers working for them.