are you really this stupid or are you trying to be funny? i said for 8 minutes the flight wasnt tracked. the FAA said the same thing (which is where i got the info from). you say the same thing.
so what is your point again?
Rotfl! I anticipated you would ignore the facts. You are so fucking lame you bold PART of a sentence and ignore everything else. I even said "it's not endemic to the 8 minutes."
Look at the part you are ignoring:
"Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56"
"Radar reconstructions performed after 9/11 reveal that FAA radar equipment tracked the flight from the moment its transponder was turned off at 8:56"
Do you get what that means? If the RECONSTRUCTION was done AFTER 9/11 then there was not a live primary radar. Which reminds me, didn't I already suggest you pay close attention to the first sentence?
Your inability to comprehend simple things is so fucking predictable I can guess what you will ignore before you even do it. I still can't get over how you actually fucking edited a sentence midstream to defend your claim. It just shows you have little to no desire to even attempt being honest.
re·con·struct (rkn-strkt)
tr.v. re·con·struct·ed, re·con·struct·ing, re·con·structs
1. To construct again; rebuild.
2. To assemble or build again mentally; re-create: reconstructed the sequence of events from the evidence.
3. To cause to adopt a new attitude or outlook: a diehard traditionalist who could not be reconstructed.
recon·structi·ble adj.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company. Updated in 2009. Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
reconstruct [ˌriːkənˈstrʌkt]
vb (tr)
1. to construct or form again; rebuild to reconstruct a Greek vase from fragments
2. to form a picture of (a crime, past event, etc.) by piecing together evidence or acting out a version of what might have taken place
Can we understand from this that to reconstruct something it must have previously existed? Cannot REconstruct something that never was there.
If you insist on using actual valid logic on these guys, you will
(a) confuse the living snot out of them
(b) frustrate them and
(c) nevertheless fail to persuade them, since they are impervious to truth, accuracy, reason and logic.