I keep asking.

And now I see something I had not noticed in the last 8 years. It turns out that the DNA analysis of the fragmented remains of the passengers on the flight that crashed into the field in PA (together with those of the damned Islamoshitfuckers that committed that part of the atrocities) WERE identified.

Human remains from the Flight 93 crash site are moved to a temporary morgue that has been set up at the Pennsylvania National Guard Armory, several miles away in Friedens. High-tech mortuary equipment has been brought to the armory in a tractor-trailer. [Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency, 9/12/2001 ; WTAE-TV, 9/13/2001] 75 to 100 specialists, including pathologists and fingerprint experts, are involved in the attempt to identify the remains. Forensic anthropologist Dennis Dirkmaat says that because the remains have suffered “extreme fragmentation,” most will need to be identified using DNA analysis. [Washington Post, 9/14/2001] When remains cannot be identified at the temporary morgue, samples are sent on to the Armed Forces DNA Identification Laboratory in Rockville, Maryland, where samples from the Pentagon crash are also being analyzed (see September 11-November 16, 2001). [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 9/25/2001; Stars and Stripes, 10/8/2001; KCRA, 12/20/2001] By December 19, the remains of all 40 passengers and crew from Flight 93 have been identified, using fingerprints, dental records, and DNA. Investigators have, by a process of elimination, also been able to isolate genetic profiles of the four hijackers. [Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, 12/30/2001; DMORT National News, 1/2002; Associated Press, 2/26/2002; Stripe, 9/20/2002] Searchers recovered about 510 pounds of human remains at the crash scene, equaling about eight percent of the total bodyweight on the plane. According to Somerset County Coroner Wallace Miller, everything else was vaporized. [Washington Post, 5/12/2002; Age (Melbourne), 9/9/2002; Canadian Press, 3/28/2004]
Context of 'September 13-December 19, 2001: Investigators Work to Identify Flight 93 Victims'
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FCsqayKrSM[/ame]

Hey you fucking imbecile Troofer asswipe, Id-eots:

If the rest of the human remains of those killed in the crash of Flt. 93 were not vaporized, then you must have some really good (i.e., utterly unsupported and laughable) "theory" as to why only about 8% of the total body mass of the passengers and crew were able to be recovered in the days and weeks following the 9/11/2001 atrocities.

You remain a very pathetic joke and a scumbag of a human being, Id-eots.

FYI.
 
Last edited:
and your proof of this is ?

http://www.usmessageboard.com/1803385-post54.html and links therein.

Not that giving you any kind of evidence is a fruitful effort. You are such a fucking stain that your mind is already closed and rusted shut before you even pretend to contemplate actual evidence or its implications. You fucking asswipe Troofers are like that.
 
Last edited:
hey eots.... why dont you tell us again how its impossible for flight 77 to have been hijacked.... that was one of my favorites..... :cuckoo:
 
If the plane did not crash in Pennsylvania and the plane did not hit the Pentagon, where did the planes, crew and passengers go?


If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?

Gunny, I haven't seen many of your posts on this but by and large they are nothing but mockeries. Don't expect sincere responses when your displays of insincerity have overshadowed the issue.
 
If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?.

if you have evidence of where they went then please share. keep in mind that you have already set the standard as no negative evidence.
 
hey eots.... why dont you tell us again how its impossible for flight 77 to have been hijacked.... that was one of my favorites..... :cuckoo:

I seem to remember reading a post of his that clearly stated he did not make that claim and he didn't create the title of the article. Why troll here just to make false accusations? Don't you guys have a kiddie forum where your kind of childishness is appropriate?
 
If the plane did not crash in Pennsylvania and the plane did not hit the Pentagon, where did the planes, crew and passengers go?


If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?

Gunny, I haven't seen many of your posts on this but by and large they are nothing but mockeries. Don't expect sincere responses when your displays of insincerity have overshadowed the issue.

Absolute cop out. It is simple. IF the contention is that the pentagon was hit by a missile then WHAT HAPPENED to the flight that is missing? If the contention is that no plane crashed in Pennsylvania then where did that flight go?

Both flights existed , both had real people on them. One can not, as terrel and eots does, claim they never existed because we know the people on the flights were real. In fact the core of the 9/11 conspiracy claims are that those planes never hit where we are told they did.

Further there is the claim that the twin towers were brought down by explosives. This claim includes the supposition that the aircraft never hit the buildings or that they were carefully aimed at certain spots because that was were the explosives were laid. Neither supposition makes sense. ANd yet none of the conspiracy people can make a simple answer to how they supposedly happened.

And here you are deflecting for them.
 
If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?.

if you have evidence of where they went then please share. keep in mind that you have already set the standard as no negative evidence.


Never said I had evidence. Got anything else to troll about?
 
If the plane did not crash in Pennsylvania and the plane did not hit the Pentagon, where did the planes, crew and passengers go?


If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?

Gunny, I haven't seen many of your posts on this but by and large they are nothing but mockeries. Don't expect sincere responses when your displays of insincerity have overshadowed the issue.

Absolute cop out. It is simple. IF the contention is that the pentagon was hit by a missile then WHAT HAPPENED to the flight that is missing? If the contention is that no plane crashed in Pennsylvania then where did that flight go?

Both flights existed , both had real people on them. One can not, as terrel and eots does, claim they never existed because we know the people on the flights were real. In fact the core of the 9/11 conspiracy claims are that those planes never hit where we are told they did.

Further there is the claim that the twin towers were brought down by explosives. This claim includes the supposition that the aircraft never hit the buildings or that they were carefully aimed at certain spots because that was were the explosives were laid. Neither supposition makes sense. ANd yet none of the conspiracy people can make a simple answer to how they supposedly happened.

And here you are deflecting for them.


I don't speak for anyone but me. I'm telling you why I think your op is nothing but bait to ridicule those you disagree with. In a different thread I answered one of your posts and response was nothing but bullshit name calling. This op is also the same false dilemma OCTAs thrive about. No matter what gets posted in this thread I know two invariable things will happen: OCTAs
will call people names and claim the OCT is true by the stale false dilemma.
 
If the plane did not crash in Pennsylvania and the plane did not hit the Pentagon, where did the planes, crew and passengers go?


If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?

Gunny, I haven't seen many of your posts on this but by and large they are nothing but mockeries. Don't expect sincere responses when your displays of insincerity have overshadowed the issue.

Nonsense.

You say that you are merely asking questions, but you seem not to be particularly interested in the plausibility of 100 people disappearing within half an hour and their body parts and mementos showing up within the Pentagon. Instead, you write about the duration of flight data recorders and pilot doors. Those are minor questions compared to "What happened to the people and the planes?" because you simply can be wrong about your information about the flight data recorder and the doors. 100 people disappearing into thin air and their body parts showing up elsewhere is a much more difficult question. Planes and people don't just disappear, with strong evidence of them being somewhere when you claim they might be elsewhere. But you deride those who ask the question.
 
Last edited:
lol @ thinking that this government we live in has the intelligence and ability to carry off such a conspiracy.

9/11 if it was a conspiracy is not something that 5 people in a room could have done...that is unless they are terrorists and plan to kill themselves as well.

At least with things like JFK and what not that can be done with a small group.

9/11 would have invovled thousands of people.

From demolition teams to put in explosives in the towers....execution squads to kidnap and kill the people who died in PA...someone firing rockets into the pentagon....intelligence groups knowing when the attack was going to happen.

how fucking stupid can you be to think it was a conspiracy and thousands of people would have been invovled from the federal to local governments and no one would have said anything by now.

you people are really out of your mind


This is no less silly than the no plane theory. A false flag op is not an all or nothing situation but if it makes you feel better to label everyone who disagrees with you as crazy, well, you will find some very loyal friends in the OCTA camp.
 
lol @ thinking that this government we live in has the intelligence and ability to carry off such a conspiracy.

9/11 if it was a conspiracy is not something that 5 people in a room could have done...that is unless they are terrorists and plan to kill themselves as well.

At least with things like JFK and what not that can be done with a small group.

9/11 would have invovled thousands of people.

From demolition teams to put in explosives in the towers....execution squads to kidnap and kill the people who died in PA...someone firing rockets into the pentagon....intelligence groups knowing when the attack was going to happen.

how fucking stupid can you be to think it was a conspiracy and thousands of people would have been invovled from the federal to local governments and no one would have said anything by now.

you people are really out of your mind


This is no less silly than the no plane theory. A false flag op is not an all or nothing situation but if it makes you feel better to label everyone who disagrees with you as crazy, well, you will find some very loyal friends in the OCTA camp.


There was no false flag Operation on 9-11-01. And there is absolutely no prove that there was.
 
a most valid question...if the plane did not crash...then what became of the people...did the government kill them all..and how and where...that would be hard secret to keep...ya kill the plane people then you have to kill the people that killed them...it would just snowball....

so where are these people...did the government convince a bunch of people to go away for the "good fo the us" well they would see by now that that was just a bad excuse...and would touch base with their families...

i just dont see a valid answer to this question.....but would geniuely be interested in one....

All ya have to do is eliminate the air national gaurdsman that shot down the plane over the ocean. Not that hard. When The Dick Cheney got the AF to fly some nukes to Mississippi mysteriously all of the airmen died in a series of freak car accidents ETC...
 
If the plane did not crash in Pennsylvania and the plane did not hit the Pentagon, where did the planes, crew and passengers go?


If it were possible to brainstorm down the halls of sincerity I'd be happy to offer some plausible scenarios but unfortunately, this op is nothing but bait to continue the moronic name calling (which I am guilty of too) and an excuse to further demonize anyone who questions the OCT. Are there any OCTAs on this board that can discuss the issue without falling into the name calling trap when presented with uncomfortable info?

Gunny, I haven't seen many of your posts on this but by and large they are nothing but mockeries. Don't expect sincere responses when your displays of insincerity have overshadowed the issue.

Nonsense.

You say that you are merely asking questions, but you seem not to be particularly interested in the plausibility of 100 people disappearing within half an hour and their body parts and mementos showing up within the Pentagon. Instead, you write about the duration of flight data recorders and pilot doors. Those are minor questions compared to "What happened to the people and the planes?" because you simply can be wrong about your information about the flight data recorder and the doors. 100 people disappearing into thin air and their body parts showing up elsewhere is a much more difficult question. Planes and people don't just disappear, with strong evidence of them being somewhere when you claim they might be elsewhere. But you deride those who ask the question.

I'll play along because I already know how it will unfold.
I don't write only about a fdr and pilot door sensors so what's up with the dishonesty? I can list several reasons why the OCT on flight 77 doesn't make sense but no matter how much evidence is presented you will just wave it off. What mementos were found in the Pentagon? A 757 disinegrates but mementos survived?
Unlike many OCTAs
I'm not an aviation expert, forensics specialist, engineer, or even somewhat intelligent so I have read and listen to what the experts have to say and there are way too many experts offering their insights and giving solid explanations why 77 doesn't make sense. Hell, even if 77 did hit the pentagon that still fails to explain how it got there. Or are we to believe Allah magically transformed Hanjour into an expert pilot overnight?

It's not that I deride those who ask the question. It's that it is not a sincere question. All of us here know the purpose for asking is to have an excuse to call people names. There are several plausible explanations for what happened if 77 didn't hit the Pentagon but OCTAs
don't have any respect for any idea that doesn't support the Bush admin. We have several people pointing out the 9E Commission was not an investigation......it was a pr scam to try and appease victims families and first responders. They are the core group responsible for the Truth movement.
 
lol @ thinking that this government we live in has the intelligence and ability to carry off such a conspiracy.

9/11 if it was a conspiracy is not something that 5 people in a room could have done...that is unless they are terrorists and plan to kill themselves as well.

At least with things like JFK and what not that can be done with a small group.

9/11 would have invovled thousands of people.

From demolition teams to put in explosives in the towers....execution squads to kidnap and kill the people who died in PA...someone firing rockets into the pentagon....intelligence groups knowing when the attack was going to happen.

how fucking stupid can you be to think it was a conspiracy and thousands of people would have been invovled from the federal to local governments and no one would have said anything by now.

you people are really out of your mind


This is no less silly than the no plane theory. A false flag op is not an all or nothing situation but if it makes you feel better to label everyone who disagrees with you as crazy, well, you will find some very loyal friends in the OCTA camp.


There was no false flag Operation on 9-11-01. And there is absolutely no prove that there was.


Okay, well that cleared it all up. I don't dare try to argue against overwhelming evidence.
 

Forum List

Back
Top