Mitt Romney is most certainly a career politician. He's just a failed one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Of course. Same as it ever was.
Well, except Hilary. Did she do an instant throw? As I recall, she was pretty damn pissed.
So...if we elect someone who does not have wealth...then you can't vote for Obama either.Ah, yes.....either/or!
How convenient.
How (typically) "conservative"!
How fuckin' LAZY!!!!
Mitt Romney is most certainly a career politician. He's just a failed one.
How is Obama a career politician? He didn't even finish his one Senate term!
Senator is the only job in the world that politicians do ?
What other political position did he hold. None. He wasn't a mayor, a governor, a congressman. Career politicians hold political positions for many, many years.
He ran for senator of Massachusetts in 1994 against Sen. Edward Kennedy, as a liberal.Mitt Romney is most certainly a career politician. He's just a failed one.
Please expound on that?
What did he do before being elected governor
never the less, half of our country will defend one and the other half will defend the other.
We're doomed.
No, we're not. I have full faith in the American people.
Fortunately, most of the American people are not partisan ideologues. The problem is that it's the partisan ideologues who are the loudest and end up influencing things. I dunno, all the zealots are screaming and none of them are listening.
.
He hit the nail on the head.
I'd have to agree with him if he admitted that he's a corrupt, ego driven, DC insider who's pissed that the better candidate beat his ass in the primaries.
As it is, Gingrich is just another sore loser.
I can't help but think when it come's to someone like Romney and even President Obama, with all the outstanding Americans out there, one's who have served this nation in time of need, and those of some note who have served in a noble manner, these are the choices we are left with. It does tend to show what money will end up with at least in my humble opinion. With Mitt Romeny I see a man who constantly changes his position based on what he feels will get him the most votes, so it is hard to know where he stands on anything. As for the President I see a man who took control of the White House with little experience in Govt. at a time when this nation needed someone to take the reins of power and kick it in the collective backside. Given these factors, I have yet to decide where my vote will go and will likely not decide until the moment I vote, because frankly a vote for Mitt Romeny I see as going back to the Bush Administration which got us here in the first place, and a vote for President Obama as nothing changing, so a very hard choice indeed.
I know how you feel. The lesser-of-two-evils syndrome has never been more prominent.I can't help but think when it come's to someone like Romney and even President Obama, with all the outstanding Americans out there, one's who have served this nation in time of need, and those of some note who have served in a noble manner, these are the choices we are left with. It does tend to show what money will end up with at least in my humble opinion. With Mitt Romeny I see a man who constantly changes his position based on what he feels will get him the most votes, so it is hard to know where he stands on anything. As for the President I see a man who took control of the White House with little experience in Govt. at a time when this nation needed someone to take the reins of power and kick it in the collective backside. Given these factors, I have yet to decide where my vote will go and will likely not decide until the moment I vote, because frankly a vote for Mitt Romeny I see as going back to the Bush Administration which got us here in the first place, and a vote for President Obama as nothing changing, so a very hard choice indeed.
He hit the nail on the head.
Bush already destroyed the country, and wingnuts cheered him on.I can't help but think when it come's to someone like Romney and even President Obama, with all the outstanding Americans out there, one's who have served this nation in time of need, and those of some note who have served in a noble manner, these are the choices we are left with. It does tend to show what money will end up with at least in my humble opinion. With Mitt Romeny I see a man who constantly changes his position based on what he feels will get him the most votes, so it is hard to know where he stands on anything. As for the President I see a man who took control of the White House with little experience in Govt. at a time when this nation needed someone to take the reins of power and kick it in the collective backside. Given these factors, I have yet to decide where my vote will go and will likely not decide until the moment I vote, because frankly a vote for Mitt Romeny I see as going back to the Bush Administration which got us here in the first place, and a vote for President Obama as nothing changing, so a very hard choice indeed.
I agree with you everywhere except for that part you said you might vote for Obama. Dude, Obama is an ass clown that is going to destroy this country if he is left unchecked.
No.Didn't Biden talk shit about Obama in terms of him not being experienced enough to run right before being asked to be VP?
No.Didn't Biden talk shit about Obama in terms of him not being experienced enough to run right before being asked to be VP?
I can't help but think when it come's to someone like Romney and even President Obama, with all the outstanding Americans out there, one's who have served this nation in time of need, and those of some note who have served in a noble manner, these are the choices we are left with. It does tend to show what money will end up with at least in my humble opinion. With Mitt Romeny I see a man who constantly changes his position based on what he feels will get him the most votes, so it is hard to know where he stands on anything. As for the President I see a man who took control of the White House with little experience in Govt. at a time when this nation needed someone to take the reins of power and kick it in the collective backside. Given these factors, I have yet to decide where my vote will go and will likely not decide until the moment I vote, because frankly a vote for Mitt Romeny I see as going back to the Bush Administration which got us here in the first place, and a vote for President Obama as nothing changing, so a very hard choice indeed.
If I believed - even for a nanosecond - that Romney is another Bush, I'd be slamming him as much as Obama. But he isn't. Bush was a career politician, Obama is a career politician - I loathe career politicians.
Bush already destroyed the country, and wingnuts cheered him on.I can't help but think when it come's to someone like Romney and even President Obama, with all the outstanding Americans out there, one's who have served this nation in time of need, and those of some note who have served in a noble manner, these are the choices we are left with. It does tend to show what money will end up with at least in my humble opinion. With Mitt Romeny I see a man who constantly changes his position based on what he feels will get him the most votes, so it is hard to know where he stands on anything. As for the President I see a man who took control of the White House with little experience in Govt. at a time when this nation needed someone to take the reins of power and kick it in the collective backside. Given these factors, I have yet to decide where my vote will go and will likely not decide until the moment I vote, because frankly a vote for Mitt Romeny I see as going back to the Bush Administration which got us here in the first place, and a vote for President Obama as nothing changing, so a very hard choice indeed.
I agree with you everywhere except for that part you said you might vote for Obama. Dude, Obama is an ass clown that is going to destroy this country if he is left unchecked.
I blame Bush for two things, hiding the cost of the Iraq and Afghan wars, and not raising taxes when revenues fell drastically. Unfortunately, the second one would have been difficult to do. The writing was on the wall that the economy was tanking. Raising taxes at that point would have just made things worse, but this goes to show that the rates were reduced too much to begin with.