Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Romeny would never have insttuted the stupid shit Obama has done. You simply cherry pick stats that make him look good. You conveniently leave out record deficits, record dependence, credit downgrtades and other shit.If a president Romney had only 5% unemployment and the most sustained job growth since the 90s - and he did this after inheriting the greatest fiscal crisis in our lifetime - than Romney would be heralded as the 2nd coming of Reagan. Republicans would tirelessly brag about the Romney economy.
But when the opposite happens...
When their president destroys the economy and a Democrat turns it around, then Republican Think Tanks go into overdrive highlighting any statistic that paints a different picture.
If a Republican wins the White House, we will see a return to the Bush years - with "Wild West" lending into every asset bubble imaginable. Financial regulators will be suppressed so that Wall Street - the engine of private sector wealth creation - can sell junk derivatives to unsuspecting morons.
There will be color coded fear games, with nonstop talk about terrorism. Every time someone lights a firecracker behind the Safeway, FOX News will be dispatched.
The only way for a narrow group of wealthy people to take over a nation is to lie. They have to lie about the Obama economy. What else do they have?
Romeny would never have insttuted the stupid shit Obama has done. You simply cherry pick stats that make him look good. You conveniently leave out record deficits, record dependence, credit downgrtades and other shit.If a president Romney had only 5% unemployment and the most sustained job growth since the 90s - and he did this after inheriting the greatest fiscal crisis in our lifetime - than Romney would be heralded as the 2nd coming of Reagan. Republicans would tirelessly brag about the Romney economy.
But when the opposite happens...
When their president destroys the economy and a Democrat turns it around, then Republican Think Tanks go into overdrive highlighting any statistic that paints a different picture.
If a Republican wins the White House, we will see a return to the Bush years - with "Wild West" lending into every asset bubble imaginable. Financial regulators will be suppressed so that Wall Street - the engine of private sector wealth creation - can sell junk derivatives to unsuspecting morons.
There will be color coded fear games, with nonstop talk about terrorism. Every time someone lights a firecracker behind the Safeway, FOX News will be dispatched.
The only way for a narrow group of wealthy people to take over a nation is to lie. They have to lie about the Obama economy. What else do they have?
Obama did not turn the economy around. The economy was better the day Bush left office than at any time in Obama's first term.
LOL!!!Romeny would never have insttuted the stupid shit Obama has done. You simply cherry pick stats that make him look good. You conveniently leave out record deficits, record dependence, credit downgrtades and other shit.If a president Romney had only 5% unemployment and the most sustained job growth since the 90s - and he did this after inheriting the greatest fiscal crisis in our lifetime - than Romney would be heralded as the 2nd coming of Reagan. Republicans would tirelessly brag about the Romney economy.
But when the opposite happens...
When their president destroys the economy and a Democrat turns it around, then Republican Think Tanks go into overdrive highlighting any statistic that paints a different picture.
If a Republican wins the White House, we will see a return to the Bush years - with "Wild West" lending into every asset bubble imaginable. Financial regulators will be suppressed so that Wall Street - the engine of private sector wealth creation - can sell junk derivatives to unsuspecting morons.
There will be color coded fear games, with nonstop talk about terrorism. Every time someone lights a firecracker behind the Safeway, FOX News will be dispatched.
The only way for a narrow group of wealthy people to take over a nation is to lie. They have to lie about the Obama economy. What else do they have?
Obama did not turn the economy around. The economy was better the day Bush left office than at any time in Obama's first term.
The economy was in complete free fall when Bush left office.
Obama started with gigantic deficits and brought them down faster than any pace seen before.
And let's not forget that Clinton signed the deregulation that caused the too big to fail fiasco and he signed it in December of his last year in officeIdiot.Bush assumed a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid off debt. Guess what the cowboy wannabe did? That's right sport's fans, cut tax rates for rich folks twice, started two wars, one totally unnecessary, never cut spending a dime and doubled the national debt from $5.7 to $11.9 trillion. What a leader!
Bush assumed an economy falling into recession as a result of CLinton's raising taxes and the bust of the dot com boom. Also he inherited Clinton's failed terrorism policy that caused 9/11.
Quit blaming Bush, dumbshit. Obama and the Dems own this economy and this foreign policy and everyone knows they have failed.
George W. Bush screwed things up. Bill Clinton left an unemployment rate of 4.3%, a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid up debt. The first thing Bush did was to cut taxes twice, 2001 and 2003. It's what Republicans do.....they've done it ever since Reagan screwed everything up:
The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:
These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:
......................................................Total U S Debt......................................................
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton raised tax rates)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
So Mr. Dumb Ass hole, why no mention of the mini rescission Clinton left Bush Jr and that's why he lowered taxes?
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
And let's not forget that Clinton signed the deregulation that caused the too big to fail fiasco and he signed it in December of his last year in officeIdiot.
Bush assumed an economy falling into recession as a result of CLinton's raising taxes and the bust of the dot com boom. Also he inherited Clinton's failed terrorism policy that caused 9/11.
Quit blaming Bush, dumbshit. Obama and the Dems own this economy and this foreign policy and everyone knows they have failed.
George W. Bush screwed things up. Bill Clinton left an unemployment rate of 4.3%, a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid up debt. The first thing Bush did was to cut taxes twice, 2001 and 2003. It's what Republicans do.....they've done it ever since Reagan screwed everything up:
The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:
These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:
......................................................Total U S Debt......................................................
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton raised tax rates)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
So Mr. Dumb Ass hole, why no mention of the mini rescission Clinton left Bush Jr and that's why he lowered taxes?
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
Like I said.....George W. Bush cut tax rates for the rich two times, 2001 and 2003. That's when the shit hit the fan.
And let's not forget that Clinton signed the deregulation that caused the too big to fail fiasco and he signed it in December of his last year in office
George W. Bush screwed things up. Bill Clinton left an unemployment rate of 4.3%, a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid up debt. The first thing Bush did was to cut taxes twice, 2001 and 2003. It's what Republicans do.....they've done it ever since Reagan screwed everything up:
The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:
These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:
......................................................Total U S Debt......................................................
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton raised tax rates)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
So Mr. Dumb Ass hole, why no mention of the mini rescission Clinton left Bush Jr and that's why he lowered taxes?
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
Like I said.....George W. Bush cut tax rates for the rich two times, 2001 and 2003. That's when the shit hit the fan.
He actually cut taxes for everyone
And the tax cuts weren't as big of a deal as you seem to think
As always it's the spending that's the problem
George W. Bush screwed things up. Bill Clinton left an unemployment rate of 4.3%, a balanced budget with surpluses projected all the way to a paid up debt. The first thing Bush did was to cut taxes twice, 2001 and 2003. It's what Republicans do.....they've done it ever since Reagan screwed everything up:
The Republicans never have seen a tax cut for corporations and the rich they didn't like but never have quit spending for their pet projects and war machine:
These figures came from the bureau of the debt....they're easily verified:
......................................................Total U S Debt......................................................
09/30/2009 $11,909,829,003,511.75(80% Of All Debt Across 232 Years Borrowed By Reagan And Bushes)
09/30/2008 $10,024,724,896,912.49(Times Square Debt Clock Modified To Accommodate Tens of Trillions)
09/30/2007 $9,007,653,372,262.48
09/30/2006 $8,506,973,899,215.23
09/30/2005 $7,932,709,661,723.50
09/30/2004 $7,379,052,696,330.32
09/30/2003 $6,783,231,062,743.62(Second Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2002 $6,228,235,965,597.16
09/30/2001 $5,807,463,412,200.06(First Bush Tax Cuts Enacted Using Reconciliation to block Democrat objection)
09/30/2000 $5,674,178,209,886.86(Administration And Congress Arguing About How To Use Surplus)
09/30/1999 $5,656,270,901,615.43(First Surplus Generated...On Track To Pay Off Debt By 2012)
09/30/1998 $5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997 $5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996 $5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995 $4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994 $4,692,749,910,013.32 (Bill Clinton raised tax rates)
09/30/1993 $4,411,488,883,139.38 ( Debt Quadrupled By Reagan/Bush41)
09/30/1992 $4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991 $3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990 $3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989 $2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988 $2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987 $2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986 $2,125,302,616,658.42
09/30/1985 $1,823,103,000,000.00
09/30/1984 $1,572,266,000,000.00
09/30/1983 $1,377,210,000,000.00
09/30/1982 $1,142,034,000,000.00(Total Debt Passes $1 Trillion)((Reagan Slashed Tax Rates To Pre Depression Levels)
09/30/1981 $997,855,000,000.00
So Mr. Dumb Ass hole, why no mention of the mini rescission Clinton left Bush Jr and that's why he lowered taxes?
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
Like I said.....George W. Bush cut tax rates for the rich two times, 2001 and 2003. That's when the shit hit the fan.
He actually cut taxes for everyone
And the tax cuts weren't as big of a deal as you seem to think
As always it's the spending that's the problem
He and GHW borrowed three trillion in eight years. That's how big they were! It's amazing that in the twenty years from 1982 to 2002 the Republicans had two chances to completely settle the national debt. Guess what??? Both times they gave rich people big tax cuts. The most flagrant was in 2001 when slow walkin' George took over. All he needed to do was leave things alone and by 2012 the debt would have been settled. Guess What??? He cut taxes two times...2001 and 2003. Oil buddies need tax cuts too!
So Mr. Dumb Ass hole, why no mention of the mini rescission Clinton left Bush Jr and that's why he lowered taxes?
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
Like I said.....George W. Bush cut tax rates for the rich two times, 2001 and 2003. That's when the shit hit the fan.
He actually cut taxes for everyone
And the tax cuts weren't as big of a deal as you seem to think
As always it's the spending that's the problem
He and GHW borrowed three trillion in eight years. That's how big they were! It's amazing that in the twenty years from 1982 to 2002 the Republicans had two chances to completely settle the national debt. Guess what??? Both times they gave rich people big tax cuts. The most flagrant was in 2001 when slow walkin' George took over. All he needed to do was leave things alone and by 2012 the debt would have been settled. Guess What??? He cut taxes two times...2001 and 2003. Oil buddies need tax cuts too!
We did not see 3 trillion less in revenue because of the tax cuts
Government spending is always the major cause of deficits and debt
...job growth is anything but a "bad economy ".
I mean okay, the labor participation rate is pretty low and that does matter, but for republicans to pretend that means the economy is shit is just disingenuous bullshit. I mean, Christ the Great Recession began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's presidency. Most of that can be directly attributed to Obama's stimulus package. According to the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs. Since then, we have had NON STOP Jon growth. That is unheard of.
And sure, wages are low under Obama. However, like the labor participation rate, they began to decline BEFORE obama's presidency. Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.
Face it repubs. Your party is a joke.
Yeah they like to ignore the fact that Clinton surfed the tech bubble out of office
Like I said.....George W. Bush cut tax rates for the rich two times, 2001 and 2003. That's when the shit hit the fan.
He actually cut taxes for everyone
And the tax cuts weren't as big of a deal as you seem to think
As always it's the spending that's the problem
He and GHW borrowed three trillion in eight years. That's how big they were! It's amazing that in the twenty years from 1982 to 2002 the Republicans had two chances to completely settle the national debt. Guess what??? Both times they gave rich people big tax cuts. The most flagrant was in 2001 when slow walkin' George took over. All he needed to do was leave things alone and by 2012 the debt would have been settled. Guess What??? He cut taxes two times...2001 and 2003. Oil buddies need tax cuts too!
We did not see 3 trillion less in revenue because of the tax cuts
Government spending is always the major cause of deficits and debt
I hate to tell you how wrong you are but it's bad. If you cut your income and continue to spend you go in debt...DUUUUHH!
The tax cuts did not necessitate the 3 trillion in borrowing because the tax cuts did not result in 3 trillion less in revenue not even close
Romeny would never have insttuted the stupid shit Obama has done. You simply cherry pick stats that make him look good. You conveniently leave out record deficits, record dependence, credit downgrtades and other shit.If a president Romney had only 5% unemployment and the most sustained job growth since the 90s - and he did this after inheriting the greatest fiscal crisis in our lifetime - than Romney would be heralded as the 2nd coming of Reagan. Republicans would tirelessly brag about the Romney economy.
But when the opposite happens...
When their president destroys the economy and a Democrat turns it around, then Republican Think Tanks go into overdrive highlighting any statistic that paints a different picture.
If a Republican wins the White House, we will see a return to the Bush years - with "Wild West" lending into every asset bubble imaginable. Financial regulators will be suppressed so that Wall Street - the engine of private sector wealth creation - can sell junk derivatives to unsuspecting morons.
There will be color coded fear games, with nonstop talk about terrorism. Every time someone lights a firecracker behind the Safeway, FOX News will be dispatched.
The only way for a narrow group of wealthy people to take over a nation is to lie. They have to lie about the Obama economy. What else do they have?
Obama did not turn the economy around. The economy was better the day Bush left office than at any time in Obama's first term.
The economy was in complete free fall when Bush left office.
Obama started with gigantic deficits and brought them down faster than any pace seen before.
The U.S. economy has recovered the 8.7 million jobs lost during the Great Recession and its unemployment rate is now the lowest it's been in almost six years. But David Cay Johnston, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, author and visiting lecturer at Syracuse University's law school and business school, says the economy would be a lot stronger if not for the Bush tax cuts.
Americans have lost $6.6 trillion from 2001, when the tax cuts first took effect, through 2012, according to Johnston. That's more than one-third of the country's annual GDP.
The tax cuts did not necessitate the 3 trillion in borrowing because the tax cuts did not result in 3 trillion less in revenue not even close
Hey look at this. You are correct for once.
Tax cuts under bush and carrying on under obama didn't cost three trillion. It was over six trillion.
It is the 73 months rather than the job growth which is unprecedented, idiot. Job growth has been sluggish at best and has not kept up with the increase in population....job growth is anything but a "bad economy ".
I mean okay, the labor participation rate is pretty low and that does matter, but for republicans to pretend that means the economy is shit is just disingenuous bullshit. I mean, Christ the Great Recession began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's presidency. Most of that can be directly attributed to Obama's stimulus package. According to the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs. Since then, we have had NON STOP Jon growth. That is unheard of.
And sure, wages are low under Obama. However, like the labor participation rate, they began to decline BEFORE obama's presidency. Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.
Face it repubs. Your party is a joke.
It is the 73 months rather than the job growth which is unprecedented, idiot. Job growth has been sluggish at best and has not kept up with the increase in population....job growth is anything but a "bad economy ".
I mean okay, the labor participation rate is pretty low and that does matter, but for republicans to pretend that means the economy is shit is just disingenuous bullshit. I mean, Christ the Great Recession began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's presidency. Most of that can be directly attributed to Obama's stimulus package. According to the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs. Since then, we have had NON STOP Jon growth. That is unheard of.
And sure, wages are low under Obama. However, like the labor participation rate, they began to decline BEFORE obama's presidency. Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.
Face it repubs. Your party is a joke.
Call me when Obama gets to half of Reagans one million jobs gained in a month....job growth is anything but a "bad economy ".
I mean okay, the labor participation rate is pretty low and that does matter, but for republicans to pretend that means the economy is shit is just disingenuous bullshit. I mean, Christ the Great Recession began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's presidency. Most of that can be directly attributed to Obama's stimulus package. According to the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs. Since then, we have had NON STOP Jon growth. That is unheard of.
And sure, wages are low under Obama. However, like the labor participation rate, they began to decline BEFORE obama's presidency. Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.
Face it repubs. Your party is a joke.
The economy was better the day Bush left office than at any time in Obama's first term.
Call me when Obama gets to half of Reagans one million jobs gained in a month.
Hilarious. Pfizer and Ford just this week announced offshore plans.Call me when Obama gets to half of Reagans one million jobs gained in a month.
LMAO. Call me when you figure out how many manufacturing jobs left the country during Bush's.presidency.
...job growth is anything but a "bad economy ".
I mean okay, the labor participation rate is pretty low and that does matter, but for republicans to pretend that means the economy is shit is just disingenuous bullshit. I mean, Christ the Great Recession began under Bush and ended 6 months into Obama's presidency. Most of that can be directly attributed to Obama's stimulus package. According to the CBO, the stimulus created 3 million private jobs. Since then, we have had NON STOP Jon growth. That is unheard of.
And sure, wages are low under Obama. However, like the labor participation rate, they began to decline BEFORE obama's presidency. Obama tried to fix this by raising the minimum wage to a very reasonable 10.10 per hour.
Face it repubs. Your party is a joke.
