LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
I'll told you there is no problem cutting money distributed by the government but I get to choose. The right will always take away the money from the weak , the sick, the old , the vets the needy, teachers, government workers(they hate them) and anyone who isn't pure white.The smart move is to cut out redundant programs and programs that haven't worked for decades and programs that work against the interests of the people but democrats can't seem to figure out that concept.
I have two coworkers; both who retired from the government with pensions at the age of 55. If I had that ability in the private sector, I would have retired three years ago. But because I didn't work for government, I have to work 12 more years to retire.
Asking that government workers get pay (and benefits) equal to the private sector is not hate, it's equity. And WTF does the federal government have to do with teachers pay? Most teachers are funded by city or county taxpayers.
The problem with the "weak, the sick, the old" is that Democrats look to create more government dependents. The more government dependents, the more likely Democrat voters. It's not a coincidence that Commie Care created over 20 million more new government dependents, and that paled in comparison to DumBama's food stamp expansion. Together, Democrats created over 40 million more new government dependents, and they are proud as hell of it.
Yet if Republicans see these unnecessary needs and want to cut a bit, it's taking from those who need it the most.
Hold up! Correct me if I'm wrong, but don't you own some lucrative income generating properties that have made it so you don't have to work if you don't want to?
Or was that some other guy from Cleveland who said that?