Hundreds of SICK, DEMENTED MURDERERS Rally in Indiana to Promote Killing Babies With Down Syndrome

[Vigilante]

Save the unborn and nuke the Muslims is a nice couple..

Why do hate Muslims so much that you want to nuke them?

It's fantasy of the Vag...

Well IF we did nuke the muslim's,95% of the world's troubles and discourse would be ended!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I could get behind aborting the gays if they can ever locate that elusive gay gene. What ya think Hairy Back? Yeah I smelled rotten carp so I knew you were lurking

 

[deltex1]

Have any of you raised a retarded kid? Maybe you shouldn't judge someone else's decision until you've walked a mile in their shoes.

They don't want to walk in uncomfortable shoes...so they throw them in the garbage. God forbid they carry a burden.

 

[JOSweetHeart]

Wow, the lady in country music who recently passed away from cervical cancer named Joey Martin Feek had a little girl with down syndrome and I believe that she and her husband Rory lived in Indiana because that is where Joey was from and Indiana is what they named her daughter! I believe that she will be three years old later this year. I wonder what Rory thinks of this news. To me, whoever is in favor of such an act should be locked up and never released.

God bless you and Rory and all three of his daughters always!!!

Holly

P.S. This is my favorite song from Joey and Rory.

 

[Moonglow]

I could get behind aborting the gays if they can ever locate that elusive gay gene. What ya think Hairy Back? Yeah I smelled rotten carp so I knew you were lurking

Pray to your Gawd, I am sure he/she will point you in the right direction..

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I could get behind aborting the gays if they can ever locate that elusive gay gene. What ya think Hairy Back? Yeah I smelled rotten carp so I knew you were lurking

Pray to your Gawd, I am sure he/she will point you in the right direction..

Beat it half pint, you're irrelevant

 

[CremeBrulee]

I think it's cruel to force a child to live out a short agonizing existence as their parents watch. But I guess that is okay to some people if it is predicted to live longer than three weeks after birth. Governor Pence is trying really hard to lose his re-election campaign with all of the high-handed laws being issued in Indianapolis.

 

[Picaro]

Absolutely the WORST of the WORST, scum of the world, promoting their MURDERING WAYS!

lifenews.com ^ | April 12, 2016 | Micaiah Bilger
Hundreds of abortion activists gathered at the Indiana state capital on Saturday to protest a law that protects unborn babies with disabilities like Down syndrome. The new law, signed by Gov. Mike Pence in March, is the second in the nation to ban abortions because of a genetic disability such as Down syndrome. It also bans abortions based solely on the unborn baby’s race or sex. The law includes several other abortion-related measures, such as a requirement that aborted or miscarried babies’ bodies be cremated or buried and another requirement that abortionists who have hospital admitting privileges renew them annually...

Yes, THESE small HUMANS deserve to be CUT APART and SOLD for body parts!

This is sooo yesterday, dude! You need to be more up to date. The new thing is to allow people to murder babies up to 2 years old, health issues or no. All the kewl kidz and 'progressives' are behind it, cuz itz 'Science'!!! n Stuff.

The original article is no longer available online any more, they either buried it because of the outcry or they hope to cash in on selling it, at least my link no longer brings it up, but the following links will point out all the 'highlights' for the Peanut Gallery, including Planned Parenthood's real 'beliefs' on baby killing; they try to portray themselves as just poor hapless Do-Gooders and victims, but of course they aren't anything of the sort, just amoral psychoes.

Ethicists Argue in Favor of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ as Newborns ‘Are Not Persons’

After-Birth Abortion: A Modest Proposal? - Truth and Charity Forum

The following is New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith's speech on the floor about not only the article these sick freaks published in an allegedly 'legitimate' scholarly journal but more:

Smith Comments on Controversial Planned Parenthood Testimony on “After-Birth’ Abortions

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Late last month, two bioethicists--Dr. Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva--published an outrageous paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics, justifying the deliberate, premeditated murder of new-born babies during the first days and even weeks after birth.

Giubilini and Minerva wrote: ``When circumstances occur after birth that would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.''

Madam Speaker, they've just coined a brand-new phrase, ``after-birth abortion,'' which is the killing of newborns, the killing of little children--boys and girls--immediately after their births and up to weeks later. These bioethicists argue that if a newly born child poses an economic burden on a family or is disabled or is unwanted that that child can be murdered in cold blood because the baby lacks intrinsic value, and according to Giubilini and Minerva, it is simply not a person.

Giubilini and Minerva write: ``Actual people's well-being--'' and you and I, Madam Speaker, are actual people; adults are actual people according to them ``--could be threatened by a

new-born, even if healthy child, requiring energy, money and care which the family might happen to be in short supply of.''

As any parents--especially moms--will tell you, children in general, and newborns in particular, require an enormous amount of energy, money, and boatloads of love. If any of those things, however, are lacking or pose what Giubilini and Minerva call a ``threat,'' does that justify a death sentence? Are the lives of new-born children and new-born babies so cheap? So expendable?

The murder of newly born children is further justified by Giubilini and Minerva in this renowned journal's article--why they carried it is certainly suspect--because new-born infants, like their slightly younger sisters and brothers in the womb, ``cannot have formed any aim that she is prevented from accomplishing.'' In other words, no dreams, no plans for the future, no ``aims'' that can be discerned, recognized or understood by adults equal no life at all.

This preposterous, arbitrary, and evil prerequisite for the attainment of legal personhood is not only bizarre; it is inhumane in the extreme. Stripped of its pseudo-intellectual underpinnings, the Giubilini and Minerva rationale for murdering newborns in the nursery is indistinguishable from any other child predator wielding a knife or a gun.

Giubilini and Minerva say the devaluation of new-born babies is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children. Let me say that again. The devaluation of new-born babies, even into weeks of their lives outside their mothers' wombs, is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children and is, indeed, the logical extension of the abortion culture. They also write this: that they ``propose to call the practice after-birth abortion rather than infanticide in order to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed--'' that is to say the baby ``--is comparable to that of a fetus ..... Whether she will exist is exactly what our choice is about.''

So let's again get this right because the unborn child has been deemed to be a nonperson and can be killed at will. For the new-born child, who is very, very similar in almost every aspect except dependency and its not being a little bit more mature, the choice is, if it is unwanted, that the parents can order the killing, the execution, of that child.

Madam Speaker, these anti-child, pro-murder rationalizations remind me of other equally disturbing rants from highly credentialed individuals over the years. Princeton's Peter Singer suggested a couple of years ago--and I quote him in pertinent part:

There are various things you can say that are sufficient to give moral status to a child after a few months, maybe 6 months or something like that, and you get perhaps a full moral status, really, only after 2 years.

Break that down. Only after 2 years, Madam Speaker, should we really confer a sense of personhood to a child who is no longer a baby anymore because of this particular intellectual's perspective.

... and more on the psychotics now pretending to be 'pro-choice'.

Hey, it's like, science n stuff, Doods!!!!

 

[Picaro]

Over 90% of Down's pregnancies are aborted after detection.

That means most of the pro-lifers are doing it too.

So get stuffed, lying pro-life hypocrites. Everyone on all sides is repulsed by you, because you're such a pack of deviant dishonest pervos. Stop fantasizing about baby parts. It's just creepy, and makes you look like kiddie snuff-porn freaks.

And they turn around and kick back taxpayer dollars to politicians and their campaigns.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Have any of you raised a retarded kid? Maybe you shouldn't judge someone else's decision until you've walked a mile in their shoes.

Most who kill a retarded baby have not raised one either, your "logic" fails.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Absolutely the WORST of the WORST, scum of the world, promoting their MURDERING WAYS!

lifenews.com ^ | April 12, 2016 | Micaiah Bilger
Hundreds of abortion activists gathered at the Indiana state capital on Saturday to protest a law that protects unborn babies with disabilities like Down syndrome. The new law, signed by Gov. Mike Pence in March, is the second in the nation to ban abortions because of a genetic disability such as Down syndrome. It also bans abortions based solely on the unborn baby’s race or sex. The law includes several other abortion-related measures, such as a requirement that aborted or miscarried babies’ bodies be cremated or buried and another requirement that abortionists who have hospital admitting privileges renew them annually...

Yes, THESE small HUMANS deserve to be CUT APART and SOLD for body parts!

This is sooo yesterday, dude! You need to be more up to date. The new thing is to allow people to murder babies up to 2 years old, health issues or no. All the kewl kidz and 'progressives' are behind it, cuz itz 'Science'!!! n Stuff.

The original article is no longer available online any more, they either buried it because of the outcry or they hope to cash in on selling it, at least my link no longer brings it up, but the following links will point out all the 'highlights' for the Peanut Gallery, including Planned Parenthood's real 'beliefs' on baby killing; they try to portray themselves as just poor hapless Do-Gooders and victims, but of course they aren't anything of the sort, just amoral psychoes.

Ethicists Argue in Favor of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ as Newborns ‘Are Not Persons’

After-Birth Abortion: A Modest Proposal? - Truth and Charity Forum

The following is New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith's speech on the floor about not only the article these sick freaks published in an allegedly 'legitimate' scholarly journal but more:

Smith Comments on Controversial Planned Parenthood Testimony on “After-Birth’ Abortions

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Late last month, two bioethicists--Dr. Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva--published an outrageous paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics, justifying the deliberate, premeditated murder of new-born babies during the first days and even weeks after birth.

Giubilini and Minerva wrote: ``When circumstances occur after birth that would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.''

Madam Speaker, they've just coined a brand-new phrase, ``after-birth abortion,'' which is the killing of newborns, the killing of little children--boys and girls--immediately after their births and up to weeks later. These bioethicists argue that if a newly born child poses an economic burden on a family or is disabled or is unwanted that that child can be murdered in cold blood because the baby lacks intrinsic value, and according to Giubilini and Minerva, it is simply not a person.

Giubilini and Minerva write: ``Actual people's well-being--'' and you and I, Madam Speaker, are actual people; adults are actual people according to them ``--could be threatened by a

new-born, even if healthy child, requiring energy, money and care which the family might happen to be in short supply of.''

As any parents--especially moms--will tell you, children in general, and newborns in particular, require an enormous amount of energy, money, and boatloads of love. If any of those things, however, are lacking or pose what Giubilini and Minerva call a ``threat,'' does that justify a death sentence? Are the lives of new-born children and new-born babies so cheap? So expendable?

The murder of newly born children is further justified by Giubilini and Minerva in this renowned journal's article--why they carried it is certainly suspect--because new-born infants, like their slightly younger sisters and brothers in the womb, ``cannot have formed any aim that she is prevented from accomplishing.'' In other words, no dreams, no plans for the future, no ``aims'' that can be discerned, recognized or understood by adults equal no life at all.

This preposterous, arbitrary, and evil prerequisite for the attainment of legal personhood is not only bizarre; it is inhumane in the extreme. Stripped of its pseudo-intellectual underpinnings, the Giubilini and Minerva rationale for murdering newborns in the nursery is indistinguishable from any other child predator wielding a knife or a gun.

Giubilini and Minerva say the devaluation of new-born babies is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children. Let me say that again. The devaluation of new-born babies, even into weeks of their lives outside their mothers' wombs, is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children and is, indeed, the logical extension of the abortion culture. They also write this: that they ``propose to call the practice after-birth abortion rather than infanticide in order to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed--'' that is to say the baby ``--is comparable to that of a fetus ..... Whether she will exist is exactly what our choice is about.''

So let's again get this right because the unborn child has been deemed to be a nonperson and can be killed at will. For the new-born child, who is very, very similar in almost every aspect except dependency and its not being a little bit more mature, the choice is, if it is unwanted, that the parents can order the killing, the execution, of that child.

Madam Speaker, these anti-child, pro-murder rationalizations remind me of other equally disturbing rants from highly credentialed individuals over the years. Princeton's Peter Singer suggested a couple of years ago--and I quote him in pertinent part:

There are various things you can say that are sufficient to give moral status to a child after a few months, maybe 6 months or something like that, and you get perhaps a full moral status, really, only after 2 years.

Break that down. Only after 2 years, Madam Speaker, should we really confer a sense of personhood to a child who is no longer a baby anymore because of this particular intellectual's perspective.

... and more on the psychotics now pretending to be 'pro-choice'.

Hey, it's like, science n stuff, Doods!!!!

Obama supports killing babies after birth.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well IF we did nuke the muslim's,95% of the world's troubles and discourse would be ended!

We don't need to nuke Muslims, just nuke their Idol.

 

[turzovka]

Over 90% of Down's pregnancies are aborted after detection.

That means most of the pro-lifers are doing it too.

So get stuffed, lying pro-life hypocrites. Everyone on all sides is repulsed by you, because you're such a pack of deviant dishonest pervos. Stop fantasizing about baby parts. It's just creepy, and makes you look like kiddie snuff-porn freaks.

What repulses you means nothing to me.

I feel sorry for you, though.

 

[Katzndogz]

Absolutely the WORST of the WORST, scum of the world, promoting their MURDERING WAYS!

lifenews.com ^ | April 12, 2016 | Micaiah Bilger
Hundreds of abortion activists gathered at the Indiana state capital on Saturday to protest a law that protects unborn babies with disabilities like Down syndrome. The new law, signed by Gov. Mike Pence in March, is the second in the nation to ban abortions because of a genetic disability such as Down syndrome. It also bans abortions based solely on the unborn baby’s race or sex. The law includes several other abortion-related measures, such as a requirement that aborted or miscarried babies’ bodies be cremated or buried and another requirement that abortionists who have hospital admitting privileges renew them annually...

Yes, THESE small HUMANS deserve to be CUT APART and SOLD for body parts!

This is sooo yesterday, dude! You need to be more up to date. The new thing is to allow people to murder babies up to 2 years old, health issues or no. All the kewl kidz and 'progressives' are behind it, cuz itz 'Science'!!! n Stuff.

The original article is no longer available online any more, they either buried it because of the outcry or they hope to cash in on selling it, at least my link no longer brings it up, but the following links will point out all the 'highlights' for the Peanut Gallery, including Planned Parenthood's real 'beliefs' on baby killing; they try to portray themselves as just poor hapless Do-Gooders and victims, but of course they aren't anything of the sort, just amoral psychoes.

Ethicists Argue in Favor of ‘After-Birth Abortions’ as Newborns ‘Are Not Persons’

After-Birth Abortion: A Modest Proposal? - Truth and Charity Forum

The following is New Jersey Congressman Chris Smith's speech on the floor about not only the article these sick freaks published in an allegedly 'legitimate' scholarly journal but more:

Smith Comments on Controversial Planned Parenthood Testimony on “After-Birth’ Abortions

Mr. SMITH of New Jersey. Thank you very much, Madam Speaker.

Late last month, two bioethicists--Dr. Alberto Giubilini and Francesca Minerva--published an outrageous paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics, justifying the deliberate, premeditated murder of new-born babies during the first days and even weeks after birth.

Giubilini and Minerva wrote: ``When circumstances occur after birth that would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible.''

Madam Speaker, they've just coined a brand-new phrase, ``after-birth abortion,'' which is the killing of newborns, the killing of little children--boys and girls--immediately after their births and up to weeks later. These bioethicists argue that if a newly born child poses an economic burden on a family or is disabled or is unwanted that that child can be murdered in cold blood because the baby lacks intrinsic value, and according to Giubilini and Minerva, it is simply not a person.

Giubilini and Minerva write: ``Actual people's well-being--'' and you and I, Madam Speaker, are actual people; adults are actual people according to them ``--could be threatened by a

new-born, even if healthy child, requiring energy, money and care which the family might happen to be in short supply of.''

As any parents--especially moms--will tell you, children in general, and newborns in particular, require an enormous amount of energy, money, and boatloads of love. If any of those things, however, are lacking or pose what Giubilini and Minerva call a ``threat,'' does that justify a death sentence? Are the lives of new-born children and new-born babies so cheap? So expendable?

The murder of newly born children is further justified by Giubilini and Minerva in this renowned journal's article--why they carried it is certainly suspect--because new-born infants, like their slightly younger sisters and brothers in the womb, ``cannot have formed any aim that she is prevented from accomplishing.'' In other words, no dreams, no plans for the future, no ``aims'' that can be discerned, recognized or understood by adults equal no life at all.

This preposterous, arbitrary, and evil prerequisite for the attainment of legal personhood is not only bizarre; it is inhumane in the extreme. Stripped of its pseudo-intellectual underpinnings, the Giubilini and Minerva rationale for murdering newborns in the nursery is indistinguishable from any other child predator wielding a knife or a gun.

Giubilini and Minerva say the devaluation of new-born babies is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children. Let me say that again. The devaluation of new-born babies, even into weeks of their lives outside their mothers' wombs, is inextricably linked to the devaluation of unborn children and is, indeed, the logical extension of the abortion culture. They also write this: that they ``propose to call the practice after-birth abortion rather than infanticide in order to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed--'' that is to say the baby ``--is comparable to that of a fetus ..... Whether she will exist is exactly what our choice is about.''

So let's again get this right because the unborn child has been deemed to be a nonperson and can be killed at will. For the new-born child, who is very, very similar in almost every aspect except dependency and its not being a little bit more mature, the choice is, if it is unwanted, that the parents can order the killing, the execution, of that child.

Madam Speaker, these anti-child, pro-murder rationalizations remind me of other equally disturbing rants from highly credentialed individuals over the years. Princeton's Peter Singer suggested a couple of years ago--and I quote him in pertinent part:

There are various things you can say that are sufficient to give moral status to a child after a few months, maybe 6 months or something like that, and you get perhaps a full moral status, really, only after 2 years.

Break that down. Only after 2 years, Madam Speaker, should we really confer a sense of personhood to a child who is no longer a baby anymore because of this particular intellectual's perspective.

... and more on the psychotics now pretending to be 'pro-choice'.

Hey, it's like, science n stuff, Doods!!!!

Obama supports killing babies after birth.

That is true.

 

[Vigilante]

Well IF we did nuke the muslim's,95% of the world's troubles and discourse would be ended!

We don't need to nuke Muslims, just nuke their Idol.

Unfortunately, you do have to nuke them, it's the only thing they understand...much like the Japanese before the 2 big bombs!

 

[Uncensored2008]

Well IF we did nuke the muslim's,95% of the world's troubles and discourse would be ended!

We don't need to nuke Muslims, just nuke their Idol.

Unfortunately, you do have to nuke them, it's the only thing they understand...much like the Japanese before the 2 big bombs!

Nope.

Without the Idol, Islam is dead.

They all bow to the Idol 5 times each day. Melt Allah to slag and they have nothing to worship, and the cult fades away.

 

[Vigilante]

Well IF we did nuke the muslim's,95% of the world's troubles and discourse would be ended!

We don't need to nuke Muslims, just nuke their Idol.

Unfortunately, you do have to nuke them, it's the only thing they understand...much like the Japanese before the 2 big bombs!

Nope.

Without the Idol, Islam is dead.

They all bow to the Idol 5 times each day. Melt Allah to slag and they have nothing to worship, and the cult fades away.

OK, we'll try it your way.....

 

[aaronleland]

I wish Vigilante's parents would have held the same belief.